04.01.2015 Views

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

198 EPISTLES OF S. IGNATIUS.<br />

Brit. Mils. Add. 12 154 a volume of miscellaneous contents, which Wright<br />

(Catal. p. 976) ascribes to the end of the 8th or beginning of the 9th century.<br />

The first treatise, which contains the Ignatian quotation (fol. 13 a), is a<br />

Plerophoria in defence of Monophysite doctrine. The quotation does not agree<br />

exactly with the passage as quoted anywhere else. See Cureton C. I. pp. 220,<br />

250, 359-<br />

(4) Catena Patrwn [Anon. Syr.^].<br />

Of the holy Ignatius, archbishop and martyr, from the Epistle to<br />

those at Tarsus.<br />

/ have learned that some, ministers of Satan, have desired to trouble<br />

you ; there being some of them who say that Jesus was born in imagination,<br />

and 7Cias crucified in imagination ; but others, that He is not the Son<br />

of the Creator ; aid others, that He is God the Father who is over all;<br />

a7id others, that He is a mere man ; and others, that this flesh will not<br />

rise again {Tars. 2),<br />

Brit. Mus. Add. 17 191, fol. 58 a; see Cureton C. I. p. 363 sq, Wright's<br />

Catalogue p. 1012. This MS is a palimpsest ;<br />

and the later hand, which contains<br />

a collection from the fathers, is ascribed by Wright (p. 1008) to the 9th or<br />

loth century (see also Cureton p. 363). The same fragment<br />

is contained also in Brit.<br />

Mus. Add. 1<br />

72 14, fol. 74 a (see Wright p. 917), where the opening words of the<br />

epistle, § I 'Atto Supi'as yue'xpt PwM'^s drjpi.op.axQ, also are quoted. This MS is ascribed<br />

by Wright to the 7th century, and must be the same which Cureton (p. 364 sq)<br />

mentions, without however giving the number, and assigns to the 6th century; see<br />

also my notes on Clem. Rom. ii. § i. This same fragment from the Epistle to the<br />

Tarsians is given also in Brit. Mus. Add. 14538, fol. 148 a (see Wright p. 1007), but<br />

in a different form and somewhat mutilated owing to the condition of the MS.<br />

The above is printed from Add. 17 191. The only variations of Add. 17214 are<br />

that it reads 0\^L»r^ for the first word and inserts ^Sa<br />

before r

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!