apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

102 EPISTLES OF S. IGNATIUS.
In Fhilad. lo, besides the usual Syriasms, A translates the sentence
6ts TO Trp€(r(3ev(Tat
Iku 0eou Trpecr^etav ets to uvy^aprjvai auTots ' qui possit
fieri praecursor (nuncius) Dei, ut proficiscatur illuc et simul gaudeat'
after S, ;
it inserts tou KvpLov after to ovo/xa Avith Sj
;
and it reads
'
sanctae ecclesiae ' for al
88).
'iyyiara iKKX-qa-iai with S, (see above p.
Lastly in ; Smyrn. 8, 9, the Armenian rendering of '
dyd-n-qv a lovefeast'
by 'quietem' is explained (as Petermann had conjectured without
seeing Si) by the intermediate word in Sj r^hvai^jJi 'refreshments',
of which word an allied form is used also as the rendering of dydirriv in
Jude 12.
The coincidences are equally striking here. In the short passage
manum
liom. 4 A reproduces two characteristic Syriasms from S^, per
'
(manus) earum ' (8t' wr), and ' provocando provocate ' {/xdWov KoXa-
Kcuo-aTe). In /iom. 5, 6, the phenomena are conclusive, and exhibit
clearly the corrupt state of the Syriac text, when the Armenian version
'
was made. A translates ri p.01 avfxtfiepet quod mandatum est mihi '
'
after S2, where the reading 1 «"