04.01.2015 Views

editorial articles reviews news & views - Institute of Sikh Studies

editorial articles reviews news & views - Institute of Sikh Studies

editorial articles reviews news & views - Institute of Sikh Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

96<br />

ABSTRACTS OF SIKH STUDIES : APRIL-JUNE 2005 / 537 NS<br />

detail, they shift the focus <strong>of</strong> their talk to a popular theme to win their<br />

point. No one in this world will deny the significance <strong>of</strong> character.<br />

Both character and appearance have their own separate roles to play<br />

in the life <strong>of</strong> an individual. Emphasis on one does not necessarily<br />

mean abandoning the other.<br />

The learned editor now comes to his point. He starts with a<br />

reference to the WSC held in Sydney in September 2004. I had the<br />

opportunity to attend this conference on its opening day. There were<br />

about 50-60 people present on that day including the organizers,<br />

government <strong>of</strong>ficials and invitees from other religions. I would like to<br />

mention one thing about this conference, before we go further into<br />

the discussion about the <strong>editorial</strong>. S Hardev Singh Shergill said in his<br />

answer to one <strong>of</strong> the questions that in <strong>Sikh</strong>ism there is no place for<br />

priests. But before the start <strong>of</strong> the proceedings for the day, a priest<br />

from a local gurdwara was specially called to perform ardaas or prayer.<br />

And he left immediately after the prayer. The non-<strong>Sikh</strong> attendees<br />

must have gone with the impression that in <strong>Sikh</strong>ism they need a priest<br />

to say their prayer. It would have been better if S Hardev Singh or any<br />

one from the attendees would have come forward to say the prayer. In<br />

short, we are sending conflicting signals to the world. This is the crux<br />

<strong>of</strong> the problem. This is also one <strong>of</strong> the main reasons behind this<br />

confusion about the five ks. We are giving conflicting gestures to our<br />

kids and to the world at large. This <strong>editorial</strong> is doing exactly the same<br />

thing. In <strong>Sikh</strong>ism there is no place for priests, because every <strong>Sikh</strong> is<br />

supposed to be a priest. How many <strong>of</strong> us are ready to perform the<br />

duties <strong>of</strong> a priest, if need be<br />

Coming back to the topic, S Hardev Singh Shergill refers to the<br />

questions about the definition <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Sikh</strong> put to him by some attendees<br />

during this conference. He refers to the definition given in the <strong>Sikh</strong><br />

Rehat Maryada. Astonishingly, he interprets this definition as being<br />

silent about the uncut hair. The definition, as quoted by him, reads<br />

like this: “Any human being who faithfully believes in one immortal<br />

being; the ten Gurus, form Guru Nanak to Guru Gobind Singh; the<br />

Guru Granth Sahib; the utterances and teachings <strong>of</strong> the ten Gurus<br />

and the baptism bequeathed by the tenth Guru, and who does not<br />

owe allegiance to any other religion is a <strong>Sikh</strong>”. What S Hardev Singh<br />

is saying here is that teachings <strong>of</strong> our all the Gurus and the amrit

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!