04.01.2015 Views

editorial articles reviews news & views - Institute of Sikh Studies

editorial articles reviews news & views - Institute of Sikh Studies

editorial articles reviews news & views - Institute of Sikh Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

70<br />

ABSTRACTS OF SIKH STUDIES : APRIL-JUNE 2005 / 537 NS<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Sikh</strong> scripture is beyond any doubt” (Contesting Interpretations p.<br />

305) The point is that there was absolutely no need for him to raise<br />

this point at all.<br />

McLeod’s basic mischief in denying the originality for Guru<br />

Nanak’s thought and starting a nirmal panth, a sovereign entity, by its<br />

own right, stands apart. He denies the very import <strong>of</strong> Guru Nanak’s<br />

revelation as one would deny Lord Buddha’s revelation or that <strong>of</strong><br />

Christ. To begin with, I repeat here what I stated in The <strong>Sikh</strong>s In History<br />

(New Delhi 1999) pp14-19:<br />

“Guru Nanak during the process <strong>of</strong> revelation gained new vistas<br />

<strong>of</strong> cosmic consciousness that divine light permeates the entire<br />

universe and it’s the only source <strong>of</strong> light in all human beings.<br />

Universal brotherhood <strong>of</strong> humankind and common heritage shorn<br />

<strong>of</strong> any limiting angularities, formed an essential part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

revelation. The issues that agitated the minds <strong>of</strong> the people were<br />

naturally the divisions within Hinduism and Islam, and relevance<br />

<strong>of</strong> God as a factor in social interaction as between various sectors<br />

<strong>of</strong> society.<br />

“Basically, the issues impinged on social responsibility. These<br />

were beyond the pale <strong>of</strong> any school <strong>of</strong> the Hindu thought. Neither<br />

the Vedas, the Shastras, and Smritis, nor the various religious<br />

teachers and law-givers – none <strong>of</strong> them – laid down social<br />

responsibility on anyone, much less a section <strong>of</strong> the society, to<br />

ameliorate the socio-political condition <strong>of</strong> the people. Rather by<br />

laying emphasis on asceticism and world-withdrawing doctrines<br />

that caused withdrawal from productive work and dependence<br />

on alms for sustenance, the Hindu socio-religious orders had<br />

become parasitic and irresponsible. Even the Bhaktas who were<br />

critical <strong>of</strong> the caste system and repudiated essentials <strong>of</strong><br />

Vaishnavism, advocated individual moksha, deliverance. They<br />

were not for acceptance <strong>of</strong> social responsibility. None <strong>of</strong> them,<br />

in consonance with Hindu thought, raised his voice against the<br />

prevalent political oppression, despite some <strong>of</strong> them including<br />

Kabir and Namdev facing personal persecution at the hands <strong>of</strong><br />

the rulers...<br />

“It was reserved for Guru Nanak to charter a new order by an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!