04.01.2015 Views

editorial articles reviews news & views - Institute of Sikh Studies

editorial articles reviews news & views - Institute of Sikh Studies

editorial articles reviews news & views - Institute of Sikh Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

60<br />

ABSTRACTS OF SIKH STUDIES : APRIL-JUNE 2005 / 537 NS<br />

‘FREE SPEECH AND THE SARDARJI JOKE’<br />

– A REJOINDER –<br />

KHARAK SINGH *<br />

The Hindustan Times, Chandigarh, dated 27th February,<br />

2005 carried an article by Shri Vir Sanghvi under the above<br />

title. The author asserted his right to ridicule a whole<br />

community under freedom <strong>of</strong> speech. He tells, ‘any <strong>Sikh</strong><br />

who finds Sardar ji jokes <strong>of</strong>fensive not to go to see the film.<br />

For, just because some <strong>Sikh</strong> is <strong>of</strong>fended by a Sardarji joke, it<br />

does not follow that the rest <strong>of</strong> us lose the right to enjoy the<br />

jokes’. With equal bluntness the Christians are asked ‘to stay<br />

at home, avoid seeing the film and cling to their naivete.<br />

They have no right to deny me the opportunity to see the<br />

film’. Readers should please note that the esteemed paper<br />

appears to endorse this policy. For, it did not agree to publish<br />

the Rejoinder reproduced below.<br />

– Editor<br />

In his article under the above title, Mr Sanghvi has raised the<br />

issue <strong>of</strong> Free Speech, which, he appears to believe, is not subject to<br />

any limitation. If <strong>Sikh</strong>s protest against a Sardarji joke in a movie, or<br />

Christians object to Jesus not being shown in good light, it irritates<br />

him, since it violates his fundamental right to ‘freedom <strong>of</strong> speech’. If<br />

the Board <strong>of</strong> film Censor refuses to certify such a film, it is an act <strong>of</strong><br />

‘eternal shame’. Likewise, it is argued that the Minorities Commission,<br />

referred to as ‘ludicrous avatar’, has lost its right to interfere, since it<br />

failed to utter ‘one word <strong>of</strong> condemnation against Narendra Modi<br />

when Muslims were being massacred in the streets <strong>of</strong> Gurjarat.’<br />

* Editor, Abstracts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sikh</strong> <strong>Studies</strong>, Chandigarh

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!