editorial articles reviews news & views - Institute of Sikh Studies
editorial articles reviews news & views - Institute of Sikh Studies
editorial articles reviews news & views - Institute of Sikh Studies
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
60<br />
ABSTRACTS OF SIKH STUDIES : APRIL-JUNE 2005 / 537 NS<br />
‘FREE SPEECH AND THE SARDARJI JOKE’<br />
– A REJOINDER –<br />
KHARAK SINGH *<br />
The Hindustan Times, Chandigarh, dated 27th February,<br />
2005 carried an article by Shri Vir Sanghvi under the above<br />
title. The author asserted his right to ridicule a whole<br />
community under freedom <strong>of</strong> speech. He tells, ‘any <strong>Sikh</strong><br />
who finds Sardar ji jokes <strong>of</strong>fensive not to go to see the film.<br />
For, just because some <strong>Sikh</strong> is <strong>of</strong>fended by a Sardarji joke, it<br />
does not follow that the rest <strong>of</strong> us lose the right to enjoy the<br />
jokes’. With equal bluntness the Christians are asked ‘to stay<br />
at home, avoid seeing the film and cling to their naivete.<br />
They have no right to deny me the opportunity to see the<br />
film’. Readers should please note that the esteemed paper<br />
appears to endorse this policy. For, it did not agree to publish<br />
the Rejoinder reproduced below.<br />
– Editor<br />
In his article under the above title, Mr Sanghvi has raised the<br />
issue <strong>of</strong> Free Speech, which, he appears to believe, is not subject to<br />
any limitation. If <strong>Sikh</strong>s protest against a Sardarji joke in a movie, or<br />
Christians object to Jesus not being shown in good light, it irritates<br />
him, since it violates his fundamental right to ‘freedom <strong>of</strong> speech’. If<br />
the Board <strong>of</strong> film Censor refuses to certify such a film, it is an act <strong>of</strong><br />
‘eternal shame’. Likewise, it is argued that the Minorities Commission,<br />
referred to as ‘ludicrous avatar’, has lost its right to interfere, since it<br />
failed to utter ‘one word <strong>of</strong> condemnation against Narendra Modi<br />
when Muslims were being massacred in the streets <strong>of</strong> Gurjarat.’<br />
* Editor, Abstracts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sikh</strong> <strong>Studies</strong>, Chandigarh