04.01.2015 Views

editorial articles reviews news & views - Institute of Sikh Studies

editorial articles reviews news & views - Institute of Sikh Studies

editorial articles reviews news & views - Institute of Sikh Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58<br />

ABSTRACTS OF SIKH STUDIES : APRIL-JUNE 2005 / 537 NS<br />

duty-bound to discharge their bonafide duties for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the<br />

people <strong>of</strong> the state; if they waste any state property or give it away to<br />

anyone without consideration, for their vested interests, even to retain<br />

political power or to get monetary gains or for any other reason<br />

whatsoever, it would be null and void. The construction <strong>of</strong> SYL<br />

canal was also a part <strong>of</strong> this so-called agreement. It does not confer<br />

any benefit on the state or its people. Can it ever be in the interest <strong>of</strong><br />

state and its people to waste thousands and thousands <strong>of</strong> acres <strong>of</strong><br />

land belonging to thousands <strong>of</strong> land owners to construct a canal to<br />

take Punjab river waters to Haryana without any consideration and<br />

make the remaining Punjab land semi-desert and unfit for agriculture<br />

No land for such a purpose could even be acquired under the Land<br />

Acquisition Act, being not for public purpose, rather anti-public<br />

purpose.<br />

Punjab state and its people were not allowed to get the judicial<br />

verdict in these unlawful and unjust distributions <strong>of</strong> Punjab river waters.<br />

The case filed in the Supreme Court by Punjab state was got withdrawn<br />

by Indira Gandhi by putting undue pressure on the Congress Chief<br />

Minister Darbara Singh. The cases filed in Punjab High Court against<br />

1981 distribution were fixed for hearing by Chief Justice S S<br />

Sandhawalia for Nov 15, 1983, by the Bench to be presided over by<br />

him, but he was transferred a day earlier to Patna High Court. Those<br />

cases were transferred to Supreme Court on Nov 18, 1983 on the oral<br />

request <strong>of</strong> the Attorney General, and have not been fixed for hearing<br />

as yet in the last over two decades. Supreme Court rather, on the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> Haryana state directed the Govt <strong>of</strong> India on June 4,<br />

2004 to get the SYL canal constructed through its agency, as Punjab<br />

Govt had not constructed it as per the agreement. Govt <strong>of</strong> India<br />

authorized Central Public Works Department to construct the canal.<br />

Punjab Legislature, in a special session in July 12, 2004 enacted<br />

the Punjab Termination <strong>of</strong> Agreements Act 2004, terminating 1981<br />

Agreement and all other agreements relating to Punjab river waters<br />

unanimously. It exhibited unity in the matter <strong>of</strong> Punjab river waters<br />

that these waters must be exclusively for Punjab, as it can no longer<br />

afford to give it to any other state. Punjab legislature has the<br />

jurisdiction to enact such law, the river waters being under its exclusive<br />

powers being the subject <strong>of</strong> state list. It is perfectly legal and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!