04.01.2015 Views

Actions in Response to the National Single Audit Sampling Project ...

Actions in Response to the National Single Audit Sampling Project ...

Actions in Response to the National Single Audit Sampling Project ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Audit</strong> Objectives (10)<br />

• Obta<strong>in</strong> sufficient appropriate evidence<br />

• Form op<strong>in</strong>ion at level required by GAR<br />

• Identify audit report<strong>in</strong>g requirements<br />

specified <strong>in</strong> GAR that are supplementary<br />

<strong>to</strong> GAGAS.<br />

<strong>Audit</strong> Procedures<br />

• Risk assessment procedures, tests of controls,<br />

and analytical procedures alone are not<br />

sufficient <strong>to</strong> address a risk of material noncompliance<br />

(19)<br />

• The use of analytical procedures <strong>to</strong> ga<strong>the</strong>r<br />

substantive evidence is generally less effective<br />

<strong>in</strong> a compliance audit than a f<strong>in</strong>ancial statement<br />

audit (A23)<br />

• References A-133 requirement <strong>to</strong> test I/C even if<br />

such test<strong>in</strong>g would be <strong>in</strong>efficient (A25)<br />

Documentation<br />

• Risk assessment procedures (39 & A38)<br />

• Procedures performed <strong>to</strong> test I/C &<br />

compliance (40)<br />

• Materiality levels and how determ<strong>in</strong>ed (41)<br />

• How complied with GAR (42)<br />

Management Representations (23)<br />

• Required by standard<br />

• Elements specifically enumerated<br />

Material Noncompliance<br />

• Failure <strong>to</strong> follow or violation of compliance<br />

requirements that results <strong>in</strong> noncompliance<br />

that is:<br />

– Quantitatively or qualitatively material<br />

– Ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dividually or when aggregated with<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r non-compliance<br />

<strong>Audit</strong> F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

• Materiality evaluation (29)<br />

– Known questioned costs<br />

– Likely questioned costs<br />

– O<strong>the</strong>r material noncompliance that by its<br />

nature may not result <strong>in</strong> questioned costs<br />

• Likely QC def<strong>in</strong>ed (11)<br />

– Developed by extrapolat<strong>in</strong>g from audit<br />

evidence, e.g., project<strong>in</strong>g known QC <strong>to</strong><br />

population.<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!