04.01.2015 Views

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COUNCIL MINUTES<br />

TUESDAY 28 AUGUST 2012<br />

Neighbour submission<br />

The <strong>Town</strong> notified the owner <strong>of</strong> the property adjoining the subject site, being No. 23 The<br />

Grove to the north-eastern side. A submission was received from this owner objecting to the<br />

nil setback <strong>of</strong> the proposed double carport.<br />

Performance criteria assessment<br />

Buildings on boundary<br />

Proposed<br />

Acceptable development provision<br />

Carport side setback Nil 1 metres<br />

Performance criteria:<br />

Buildings built up to boundaries other than the street boundary where it is desirable to do so in order to:<br />

• make effective use <strong>of</strong> space; or<br />

• enhance privacy; or<br />

• otherwise enhance the amenity <strong>of</strong> the development;<br />

• not have any significant adverse effect on the amenity <strong>of</strong> the adjoining property; and<br />

• ensure that direct sun to major openings to habitable rooms and outdoor living areas <strong>of</strong><br />

adjoining properties is not restricted.<br />

The proposed carport is set back nil to the north-eastern boundary in lieu <strong>of</strong> the required 1<br />

metre. The structure is to replace an existing single carport structure that is also positioned<br />

on the boundary.<br />

The existing solid boundary wall will ensure that no issues arise in relation to privacy, and<br />

the open-style carport will not prevent sun access to habitable rooms. It is noted that the<br />

pitched ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the proposed carport, as well as its materials <strong>of</strong> construction, are to match<br />

those <strong>of</strong> the existing dwelling on the subject site. This ensures that the amenity <strong>of</strong> adjoining<br />

neighbours will not be adversely impacted by the new carport structure.<br />

Overall, in view <strong>of</strong> the above comments, it is considered that the reduced side boundary<br />

setback is acceptable and satisfies the performance criteria for the following reasons:-<br />

• the carport will not have any significant adverse impact on the amenity <strong>of</strong> the adjoining<br />

property.<br />

POLICY/STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS:<br />

There are no policy or statutory implications related to this report. The proposal was<br />

assessed against the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Residential Design Codes (R Codes), <strong>Town</strong> Planning<br />

Scheme No.1, and the <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme Policy Manual.<br />

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:<br />

There are no financial implications related to this report.<br />

H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\12 MINUTES\AUGUST 2012\B DV.DOCX 57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!