Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COUNCIL MINUTES<br />
TUESDAY 28 AUGUST 2012<br />
Neighbour submission<br />
The <strong>Town</strong> notified the owner <strong>of</strong> the property adjoining the subject site, being No. 23 The<br />
Grove to the north-eastern side. A submission was received from this owner objecting to the<br />
nil setback <strong>of</strong> the proposed double carport.<br />
Performance criteria assessment<br />
Buildings on boundary<br />
Proposed<br />
Acceptable development provision<br />
Carport side setback Nil 1 metres<br />
Performance criteria:<br />
Buildings built up to boundaries other than the street boundary where it is desirable to do so in order to:<br />
• make effective use <strong>of</strong> space; or<br />
• enhance privacy; or<br />
• otherwise enhance the amenity <strong>of</strong> the development;<br />
• not have any significant adverse effect on the amenity <strong>of</strong> the adjoining property; and<br />
• ensure that direct sun to major openings to habitable rooms and outdoor living areas <strong>of</strong><br />
adjoining properties is not restricted.<br />
The proposed carport is set back nil to the north-eastern boundary in lieu <strong>of</strong> the required 1<br />
metre. The structure is to replace an existing single carport structure that is also positioned<br />
on the boundary.<br />
The existing solid boundary wall will ensure that no issues arise in relation to privacy, and<br />
the open-style carport will not prevent sun access to habitable rooms. It is noted that the<br />
pitched ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the proposed carport, as well as its materials <strong>of</strong> construction, are to match<br />
those <strong>of</strong> the existing dwelling on the subject site. This ensures that the amenity <strong>of</strong> adjoining<br />
neighbours will not be adversely impacted by the new carport structure.<br />
Overall, in view <strong>of</strong> the above comments, it is considered that the reduced side boundary<br />
setback is acceptable and satisfies the performance criteria for the following reasons:-<br />
• the carport will not have any significant adverse impact on the amenity <strong>of</strong> the adjoining<br />
property.<br />
POLICY/STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS:<br />
There are no policy or statutory implications related to this report. The proposal was<br />
assessed against the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Residential Design Codes (R Codes), <strong>Town</strong> Planning<br />
Scheme No.1, and the <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme Policy Manual.<br />
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:<br />
There are no financial implications related to this report.<br />
H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\12 MINUTES\AUGUST 2012\B DV.DOCX 57