Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COUNCIL MINUTES<br />
TUESDAY 28 AUGUST 2012<br />
The proposed addition <strong>of</strong> the upper ro<strong>of</strong> deck is clearly over the wall height acceptable<br />
development requirement, protruding out <strong>of</strong> the ro<strong>of</strong> space. The ro<strong>of</strong> deck will add bulk to<br />
the dwelling, particularly on the Tumut Road and northern elevations. The proposed<br />
additional height and bulk would be out <strong>of</strong> keeping with the existing streetscape and may set<br />
an undesirable precedent for surrounding properties that would like to increase their height<br />
to reclaim ocean views that may be lost by this addition.<br />
It is acknowledged that obtaining and keeping views is a significant issue affecting<br />
development in City Beach. Dispensing with the height requirements (performance criteria)<br />
to allow the applicant to get better views is not considered appropriate. The performance<br />
criteria are intended to facilitate alternative design solutions which result in comparable or<br />
better outcomes than what the acceptable development provisions provide. In this particular<br />
case, the proposed upper ro<strong>of</strong> deck is not likely to provide similar or better outcomes for the<br />
streetscape and the neighbouring properties than the acceptable development provisions. It<br />
is considered the proposed upper ro<strong>of</strong> deck does not satisfy the above performance criteria<br />
and is therefore not supported.<br />
Overall, in view <strong>of</strong> the above comments, it is considered that the proposed wall height shown<br />
on the plans does not satisfy the performance criteria on the following grounds:-<br />
• the increased height and bulk <strong>of</strong> the dwelling will result in negative impacts on the<br />
streetscape and the amenity <strong>of</strong> the neighbouring properties, particularly access to<br />
views <strong>of</strong> significance.<br />
Buildings setback from the boundary<br />
Proposed Acceptable development<br />
provision<br />
Rear setback (north) 2.0 metres for upper ro<strong>of</strong> Min 6.0 metres<br />
deck<br />
Nil for shed<br />
Min 1.0 metre<br />
Side setback (east) Nil for shed Min 1.0 metre<br />
Performance criteria (for buildings setback from the boundary):-<br />
Buildings setback from boundaries other than street boundaries so as to:-<br />
provide adequate direct sun and ventilation to the building;<br />
ensure adequate direct sun and ventilation being available to adjoining properties;<br />
provide adequate direct sun to the building and appurtenant open spaces;<br />
assist with protection <strong>of</strong> access to direct sun for adjoining properties;<br />
assist in ameliorating the impacts <strong>of</strong> building bulk on adjoining properties; and<br />
assist in protecting privacy between adjoining properties.<br />
Performance criteria (for buildings on the boundary):<br />
Buildings built up to boundaries other than the street boundary where it is desirable to do so<br />
in order to:-<br />
make effective use <strong>of</strong> space; or<br />
enhance privacy; or<br />
otherwise enhance the amenity <strong>of</strong> the development;<br />
not have any significant adverse effect on the amenity <strong>of</strong> the adjoining property; and<br />
ensure that direct sun to major openings to habitable rooms and outdoor living areas <strong>of</strong><br />
adjoining properties is not restricted.<br />
H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\12 MINUTES\AUGUST 2012\B DV.DOCX 51