Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

More documents

Recommendations

Info

COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY 28 AUGUST 2012 Overall in view of the above comments, it is considered that the proposed setback of the development from the Railway Parade boundary is acceptable and satisfies the performance criteria for the following reasons:- • does not have a significant detrimental impact on the streetscape, • conforms with the existing and desired character of the streetscape. Buildings on boundary Setback of store, kitchen and living room wall to right/eastern boundary Performance criteria: Proposed Nil setback with a boundary wall Acceptable development provision 1.0 metre setback Buildings built up to boundaries other than the street boundary where it is desirable to do so in order to: • make effective use of space; or • enhance privacy; or • otherwise enhance the amenity of the development; • not have any significant adverse effect on the amenity of the adjoining property; and • ensure that direct sun to major openings to habitable rooms and outdoor living areas of adjoining properties is not restricted. The location of the boundary wall on the eastern boundary allows adjoining properties to maintain access to the northern sun and also prevents an impact on adjoining neighbours' access to the morning sun. The wall will have some impact on access to direct sun during the afternoon to the adjacent lot to the east, however, meets the acceptable development requirements regarding overshadowing. The wall is relatively low at a maximum of 2.5 metres in height, and is a length of 8.7 metres, so the building bulk is minimised. The wall will abut the rear boundary of the adjacent lot to the east with a narrow outdoor passageway to the laundry, utilised by the residents, and window to the kitchen. It will not adjoin the major outdoor living area located to the south-east of the neighbouring site. Given the zoning of the lot at R30 and the location within a relatively built up area of West Leederville, the proposal of such a boundary wall is not considered insurgent to the current and future development within the immediate locality. Overall in view of the above comments, it is considered that the proposed store, kitchen and living room wall on the right/eastern side boundary is acceptable and satisfies the performance criteria for the following reason:- • does not have a significant adverse impact on the amenity of adjoining properties. H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\12 MINUTES\AUGUST 2012\B DV.DOCX 23
COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY 28 AUGUST 2012 POLICY/STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS: There are no policy or statutory implications related to this report. The proposal was assessed against the provisions of the Residential Design Codes (R Codes), Town Planning Scheme No.1, and the Town Planning Scheme Policy Manual. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: There are no financial implications related to this report. STRATEGIC DIRECTION: Consideration of this application is consistent with the Town's Strategic Plan 2009-2020 for the priority area 'Planning for our Community'. COMMUNITY CONSULTATION: This matter has been assessed under the Community Consultation Policy. The requirements for consultation have been satisfied under the statutory provisions of the Town Planning Scheme. ATTACHMENTS: Nil. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: That, in accordance with Part 4 of the Town of Cambridge Town Planning Scheme No. 1, Council APPROVES the application for two grouped dwellings submitted by Urban and Rural Perspectives at Lot 496 (No. 326) Railway Parade, West Leederville, as shown on the plans dated 11 May 2012, subject to the following conditions:- (i) (ii) the surface finish of boundary walls facing the adjoining property to the east to being rendered, painted or face brickwork to the satisfaction of the Town; the visual privacy screens for the balcony being designed to restrict views to the neighbouring properties to the east and west in accordance with the acceptable development provisions of part 6.8.1 ‘Visual Privacy’ of the Residential Design Codes of Western Australia and to be installed prior to the occupation of the dwelling. H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\12 MINUTES\AUGUST 2012\B DV.DOCX 24
Page 1 and 2: Council Minutes 28 AUGUST 2012
Page 3 and 4: COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY 28 AUGUST 2
Page 25: COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY 28 AUGUST 2
Page 77 and 78:
COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY 28 AUGUST 2
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
COUNCIL MINUTES 28 AUGUST 2012 10.
Page 213 and 214:
COUNCIL MINUTES 28 AUGUST 2012 •
Page 215 and 216:
COUNCIL MINUTES 28 AUGUST 2012 COMM
Page 217 and 218:
COUNCIL MINUTES 28 AUGUST 2012 (ii)
Page 219 and 220:
COUNCIL MINUTES 28 AUGUST 2012 COUN
show all

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?