04.01.2015 Views

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COUNCIL MINUTES<br />

TUESDAY 28 AUGUST 2012<br />

Overall in view <strong>of</strong> the above comments, it is considered that the proposed setback <strong>of</strong> the<br />

development from the Railway Parade boundary is acceptable and satisfies the performance<br />

criteria for the following reasons:-<br />

• does not have a significant detrimental impact on the streetscape,<br />

• conforms with the existing and desired character <strong>of</strong> the streetscape.<br />

Buildings on boundary<br />

Setback <strong>of</strong> store, kitchen and<br />

living room wall to<br />

right/eastern boundary<br />

Performance criteria:<br />

Proposed<br />

Nil setback with a<br />

boundary wall<br />

Acceptable development<br />

provision<br />

1.0 metre setback<br />

Buildings built up to boundaries other than the street boundary where it is desirable to do so<br />

in order to:<br />

• make effective use <strong>of</strong> space; or<br />

• enhance privacy; or<br />

• otherwise enhance the amenity <strong>of</strong> the development;<br />

• not have any significant adverse effect on the amenity <strong>of</strong> the adjoining property; and<br />

• ensure that direct sun to major openings to habitable rooms and outdoor living areas <strong>of</strong><br />

adjoining properties is not restricted.<br />

The location <strong>of</strong> the boundary wall on the eastern boundary allows adjoining properties to<br />

maintain access to the northern sun and also prevents an impact on adjoining neighbours'<br />

access to the morning sun. The wall will have some impact on access to direct sun during<br />

the afternoon to the adjacent lot to the east, however, meets the acceptable development<br />

requirements regarding overshadowing. The wall is relatively low at a maximum <strong>of</strong> 2.5<br />

metres in height, and is a length <strong>of</strong> 8.7 metres, so the building bulk is minimised.<br />

The wall will abut the rear boundary <strong>of</strong> the adjacent lot to the east with a narrow outdoor<br />

passageway to the laundry, utilised by the residents, and window to the kitchen. It will not<br />

adjoin the major outdoor living area located to the south-east <strong>of</strong> the neighbouring site.<br />

Given the zoning <strong>of</strong> the lot at R30 and the location within a relatively built up area <strong>of</strong> West<br />

Leederville, the proposal <strong>of</strong> such a boundary wall is not considered insurgent to the current<br />

and future development within the immediate locality.<br />

Overall in view <strong>of</strong> the above comments, it is considered that the proposed store, kitchen and<br />

living room wall on the right/eastern side boundary is acceptable and satisfies the<br />

performance criteria for the following reason:-<br />

• does not have a significant adverse impact on the amenity <strong>of</strong> adjoining properties.<br />

H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\12 MINUTES\AUGUST 2012\B DV.DOCX 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!