Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
COUNCIL MINUTES<br />
TUESDAY 28 AUGUST 2012<br />
Overall in view <strong>of</strong> the above comments, it is considered that the proposed setback <strong>of</strong> the<br />
development from the Railway Parade boundary is acceptable and satisfies the performance<br />
criteria for the following reasons:-<br />
• does not have a significant detrimental impact on the streetscape,<br />
• conforms with the existing and desired character <strong>of</strong> the streetscape.<br />
Buildings on boundary<br />
Setback <strong>of</strong> store, kitchen and<br />
living room wall to<br />
right/eastern boundary<br />
Performance criteria:<br />
Proposed<br />
Nil setback with a<br />
boundary wall<br />
Acceptable development<br />
provision<br />
1.0 metre setback<br />
Buildings built up to boundaries other than the street boundary where it is desirable to do so<br />
in order to:<br />
• make effective use <strong>of</strong> space; or<br />
• enhance privacy; or<br />
• otherwise enhance the amenity <strong>of</strong> the development;<br />
• not have any significant adverse effect on the amenity <strong>of</strong> the adjoining property; and<br />
• ensure that direct sun to major openings to habitable rooms and outdoor living areas <strong>of</strong><br />
adjoining properties is not restricted.<br />
The location <strong>of</strong> the boundary wall on the eastern boundary allows adjoining properties to<br />
maintain access to the northern sun and also prevents an impact on adjoining neighbours'<br />
access to the morning sun. The wall will have some impact on access to direct sun during<br />
the afternoon to the adjacent lot to the east, however, meets the acceptable development<br />
requirements regarding overshadowing. The wall is relatively low at a maximum <strong>of</strong> 2.5<br />
metres in height, and is a length <strong>of</strong> 8.7 metres, so the building bulk is minimised.<br />
The wall will abut the rear boundary <strong>of</strong> the adjacent lot to the east with a narrow outdoor<br />
passageway to the laundry, utilised by the residents, and window to the kitchen. It will not<br />
adjoin the major outdoor living area located to the south-east <strong>of</strong> the neighbouring site.<br />
Given the zoning <strong>of</strong> the lot at R30 and the location within a relatively built up area <strong>of</strong> West<br />
Leederville, the proposal <strong>of</strong> such a boundary wall is not considered insurgent to the current<br />
and future development within the immediate locality.<br />
Overall in view <strong>of</strong> the above comments, it is considered that the proposed store, kitchen and<br />
living room wall on the right/eastern side boundary is acceptable and satisfies the<br />
performance criteria for the following reason:-<br />
• does not have a significant adverse impact on the amenity <strong>of</strong> adjoining properties.<br />
H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\12 MINUTES\AUGUST 2012\B DV.DOCX 23