Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
COUNCIL MINUTES<br />
TUESDAY 28 AUGUST 2012<br />
5. Detail design modification needed for staging<br />
The concept design developed was on the basis <strong>of</strong> a continual section <strong>of</strong> single lane in<br />
each direction from Northwood St to Southport St as this was the original intent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
project. During development <strong>of</strong> the 2012/2103 Budget, it was determined that the first<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the works, from Northwood Street to Holyrood / Kerr Streets would be<br />
undertaken and a decision made at a later date to undertake further works from<br />
Holyrood / Kerr Streets to Southport Street.<br />
This will necessitate during detail design <strong>of</strong> the necessary tapers and kerb treatments<br />
where two lanes in each direction revert to one lane in each direction near the Holyrood<br />
/ Kerr Streets intersection.<br />
6. Bus Stop Details<br />
The concept design identified two bus stop locations, the first generally at the West<br />
Leederville Shopping Centre and the second generally aligned with Leederville <strong>Town</strong><br />
Hall. This is consistent with existing arrangements. During design discussions with PTA,<br />
the Leederville <strong>Town</strong> Hall bus stops were to be used by PTA as 'timed' stops where the<br />
buses may be standing for some time to catch up to their timetable. This led to the<br />
design <strong>of</strong> indented bus stops for this area to better manage traffic flow.<br />
The West Leederville Shopping Centre bus stops, on the other hand, were not proposed<br />
to be indented but rather on road.<br />
Some comments received were concerned as to the impacts on traffic flow when buses<br />
are standing at these bus stops for passenger alighting/disembarking. Whilst the<br />
average frequency over a full day <strong>of</strong> bus movements hardly warrants this concern (less<br />
than 1.5 bus movements per hour); it is relevant that in peak hour there are as many as<br />
four buses in a 15 minute period and as time progresses it is certain that bus<br />
frequencies would increase.<br />
On the City Bound lane, installation <strong>of</strong> an indented bay would require removal <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong><br />
the footpath and verge. Alternatively, <strong>Cambridge</strong> Street could be realigned further south<br />
to allow an indented bus bay to be built, albeit with a very narrow footpath. This would<br />
have a knock on effect <strong>of</strong> reducing the southern verge as well as requiring further<br />
removal <strong>of</strong> car bays on the west bound side <strong>of</strong> the road.<br />
On the west bound lane, an indented bay could be built at the cost <strong>of</strong> the removal <strong>of</strong> four<br />
on street parking bays.<br />
As an option, the bus stops near the West Leederville Shopping Centre could be<br />
relocated immediately west <strong>of</strong> Northwood Street, where <strong>Cambridge</strong> Street remains two<br />
lanes in each direction. This extends the walking distance from bus stop to shopping<br />
centre by 80 metres.<br />
The PTA has been canvassed on this matter. Their view is that bus movements are<br />
more efficient if 'on lane' standing is utilised for bus stops, as buses do not have to enter<br />
a traffic lane if indented bays were used. They also believe that the bus stops opposite<br />
the shopping centre are located to serve a demand for that location, and relocation<br />
further away appears counter intuitive. Finally, it is their view that the improvements<br />
made in use <strong>of</strong> boarding technology (Smartrider) reduce standing times at bus stops. It<br />
is their view that relocation would be a poor outcome.<br />
H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\12 MINUTES\AUGUST 2012\C CR.DOCX 149