High performance capillary electrophoresis - T.E.A.M.
High performance capillary electrophoresis - T.E.A.M. High performance capillary electrophoresis - T.E.A.M.
Modes Amplitude 2 a) with a migration time reproducibility of 0.8 % RSD and a peak area reproducibility of 2.2 % RSD. 1 3, 4 3.3 6.6 9.9 13.2 2 1 3 4 9.9 13.2 16.5 19.8 Time [min] Figure 38 Separation of closely related peptides using non-ionic surfactants 18 Peaks: 1 = bradykinin, 2 = luteinizing hormone releasing hormone, 3 = [val 2 ]-angiotensin III, 4 = angiotensin III, 5 = angiotensin II Conditions: 250 mM phosphate, pH 7, 80 mM octyl glucoside (only in B), E = 250 V/cm, i = 33 mA, l = 70cm, id = 17 mm, l = 210 nm, aryl pentafluoro coated capillaries Figure 39 MEKC forensic drug screen 19 Conditions: 8.5 mM borate, 8.5 mM phosphate, 85 mM SDS, 15 % acetonitrile, pH 8.5, V = 20 kV, l = 25 cm, L = 47 cm, id = 50 mm, l = 210 nm 5 b) 5 The use of non-ionic surfactants to enhance selectivity is illustrated in figure 38. Peaks 3 and 4 are angiotensin III neuropeptides which differ by a single methyl substitution. As shown, no resolution of peaks 3 and 4 was obtained by CZE (figure 38a). Upon addition of 80 mM octyl glucoside the pair was resolved. Non-ionic (and zwitterionic) surfactants are advantageous in that they do not dramatically change the EOF, do not increase the conductivity of the buffer, and can have little impact on protein structure or activity. An example of the use of MEKC for the analysis of illicit drugs for forensic purposes is shown in figure 39. Here, a phosphate-borate buffer containing SDS and acetonitrile was employed. This analysis shows that MEKC is applicable to a large variety of forensic samples. It was especially useful for those samples that were difficult to analyze by GC, including phenethylamines, benzodiazapines, ergot alkalids, psilcybin, and PCP. For LSD and LAMPA, MEKC was thought to be superior to HPLC, which was usually employed. Volts 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0 b c d e f a h g i j a Psilocybin b Morphine c Phenobarbital d Psilocin e Codeine f Methaqualone g LSD h Heroin i Amphetamine m n k l o 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 38 40 44 Time [min] p j k l m n o p q r Librium Cocaine Methamphetamine Lorazepam Diazapam Fentanyl PCP Cannabidiol D 9 - THC q r 68
Modes The versatility of MEKC is further exemplified by the determination of organic gunshot and explosive constituents. A separation of gunshot and explosive standards is shown in figure 40. Here, qualitative characterization of six reloading powders is made. Differences can be seen in each manufacturer’s product reflecting the amounts of propellants, stabilizers, and plasticizers. Ageing of powders also gives rise to compositional changes. Overall, MEKC was considered to be a superior technique for such analyses due to excellent mass detection limits, low cost, rapid analysis time, superior resolution, and extremely small sample requirements. Further advantages included limited consumption of expensive and hazardous reagents. Figure 40 MEKC of extracts from different reloading powders 20 Peaks: 1 = EtOH, 2 = nitroglycerin, 3 = 2,4-DNT, 4 = 2,6-DNT, 5 = diphenylamine, 6 = N-nitrosodiphenylamine, 7 = 2-nitrodiphenylamine, 8 = ethylcentralite, 9 = dibutylphthalate Conditions: 2.5 mM borate, 25 mM SDS, pH 8.9, V = 20 kV, l = 50 cm, L = 67 cm, id = 100 mm, l = 200 nm 2 7 8 9 6 1 5 3 4 0 2 4 6 8 10 Time [min] 3.3 Capillary gel electrophoresis Gel electrophoresis has principally been employed in the biological sciences for the size-based separation of macromolecules such as proteins and nucleic acids. The size separation is obtained by electrophoresis of the solutes through a suitable polymer which acts as a “molecular sieve”. This form of zonal electrophoresis is illustrated in figure 41. As charged solutes migrate through the polymer network they become hindered, with larger solutes 69
- Page 18 and 19: Principles that ion. The mobility i
- Page 20 and 21: Principles the exact pI of fused si
- Page 22 and 23: Principles µ EOF × 10 -4 (cm 2 /
- Page 24 and 25: Principles For the analysis of smal
- Page 26 and 27: Principles µ EOF ( × 10 -4 cm 2 /
- Page 28 and 29: Principles Total length Effective l
- Page 30 and 31: Principles Note that equation (15)
- Page 32 and 33: Principles determined by the capill
- Page 34 and 35: Principles Current (uA) 300 250 200
- Page 36 and 37: Principles The contribution of inje
- Page 38 and 39: Principles k' H N H, µm 0.001 0.58
- Page 40 and 41: Principles Figure 19 Electrodispers
- Page 42 and 43: Principles rapidly eluting ions, th
- Page 44 and 45: Principles 44
- Page 46 and 47: Modes Mode Capillary zone electroph
- Page 48 and 49: Modes 3.1.1 Selectivity and the use
- Page 50 and 51: Modes Name pK a Phosphate 2.12 (pK
- Page 52 and 53: Modes EOF No flow Figure 22 Elimina
- Page 54 and 55: Modes Absorbance 214 nm 0.05 0.04 0
- Page 56 and 57: Modes Type Comment Silylation coupl
- Page 58 and 59: Modes Type Result Comment Extremes
- Page 60 and 61: Modes Figure 29 CZE of reversed pha
- Page 62 and 63: Modes Figure 33 Ion analysis of fer
- Page 64 and 65: Modes The separation mechanism of n
- Page 66 and 67: Modes the stationary phase in LC. S
- Page 70 and 71: Modes CGE t = 0 t > 0 Polymer matri
- Page 72 and 73: Modes Crosslinked polyacrylamide, a
- Page 74 and 75: Modes a) ds 500 base pairs This sam
- Page 76 and 77: Modes and resolution with respect t
- Page 78 and 79: Modes 3.5 Capillary isotachophoresi
- Page 80 and 81: Modes 80
- Page 82 and 83: Instrumentation/Operation Diode-arr
- Page 84 and 85: Instrumentation/Operation Pressure
- Page 86 and 87: Instrumentation/Operation If sensit
- Page 88 and 89: Instrumentation/Operation Despite q
- Page 90 and 91: Instrumentation/Operation T, ˚C 10
- Page 92 and 93: Instrumentation/Operation 4.2.1.1 C
- Page 94 and 95: Instrumentation/Operation However,
- Page 96 and 97: Instrumentation/Operation Calculati
- Page 98 and 99: Instrumentation/Operation Method Ma
- Page 100 and 101: Instrumentation/Operation 4.3.3 Lin
- Page 102 and 103: Instrumentation/Operation Area (arb
- Page 104 and 105: Instrumentation/Operation 4.3.6 Ext
- Page 106 and 107: Instrumentation/Operation light int
- Page 108 and 109: Instrumentation/Operation 4.3.7.2 Q
- Page 110 and 111: Instrumentation/Operation the capab
- Page 112 and 113: Instrumentation/Operation mAU 140 1
- Page 114 and 115: Abbreviations Abbreviation Full Nam
- Page 116 and 117: Abbreviations Abbreviation Full Nam
Modes<br />
Amplitude<br />
2<br />
a)<br />
with a migration time reproducibility of 0.8 % RSD and a peak<br />
area reproducibility of 2.2 % RSD.<br />
1<br />
3, 4<br />
3.3 6.6 9.9 13.2<br />
2<br />
1<br />
3<br />
4<br />
9.9 13.2 16.5 19.8<br />
Time [min]<br />
Figure 38<br />
Separation of closely related peptides<br />
using non-ionic surfactants 18<br />
Peaks: 1 = bradykinin, 2 = luteinizing hormone<br />
releasing hormone, 3 = [val 2 ]-angiotensin III,<br />
4 = angiotensin III, 5 = angiotensin II<br />
Conditions: 250 mM phosphate, pH 7, 80 mM<br />
octyl glucoside (only in B),<br />
E = 250 V/cm, i = 33 mA, l = 70cm,<br />
id = 17 mm, l = 210 nm, aryl<br />
pentafluoro coated capillaries<br />
Figure 39<br />
MEKC forensic drug screen 19<br />
Conditions: 8.5 mM borate, 8.5 mM phosphate,<br />
85 mM SDS, 15 % acetonitrile,<br />
pH 8.5, V = 20 kV, l = 25 cm,<br />
L = 47 cm, id = 50 mm, l = 210 nm<br />
5<br />
b)<br />
5<br />
The use of non-ionic surfactants to enhance selectivity is<br />
illustrated in figure 38. Peaks 3 and 4 are angiotensin III<br />
neuropeptides which differ by a single methyl substitution.<br />
As shown, no resolution of peaks 3 and 4 was obtained by<br />
CZE (figure 38a). Upon addition of 80 mM octyl glucoside the<br />
pair was resolved. Non-ionic (and zwitterionic) surfactants<br />
are advantageous in that they do not dramatically change<br />
the EOF, do not increase the conductivity of the buffer, and<br />
can have little impact on protein structure or activity.<br />
An example of the use of MEKC for the analysis of illicit<br />
drugs for forensic purposes is shown in figure 39. Here, a<br />
phosphate-borate buffer containing SDS and acetonitrile was<br />
employed. This analysis shows that MEKC is applicable to a<br />
large variety of forensic samples. It was especially useful for<br />
those samples that were difficult to analyze by GC, including<br />
phenethylamines, benzodiazapines, ergot alkalids, psilcybin,<br />
and PCP. For LSD and LAMPA, MEKC was thought to be<br />
superior to HPLC, which was usually employed.<br />
Volts<br />
0.40<br />
0.35<br />
0.30<br />
0.25<br />
0.20<br />
0.15<br />
0.10<br />
0.05<br />
0<br />
b c d e<br />
f<br />
a<br />
h<br />
g<br />
i<br />
j<br />
a Psilocybin<br />
b Morphine<br />
c Phenobarbital<br />
d Psilocin<br />
e Codeine<br />
f Methaqualone<br />
g LSD<br />
h Heroin<br />
i Amphetamine<br />
m n<br />
k l<br />
o<br />
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 38 40 44<br />
Time [min]<br />
p<br />
j<br />
k<br />
l<br />
m<br />
n<br />
o<br />
p<br />
q<br />
r<br />
Librium<br />
Cocaine<br />
Methamphetamine<br />
Lorazepam<br />
Diazapam<br />
Fentanyl<br />
PCP<br />
Cannabidiol<br />
D<br />
9<br />
- THC<br />
q<br />
r<br />
68