03.01.2015 Views

Council Agenda 2003/09 - Kangaroo Island Council - SA.Gov.au

Council Agenda 2003/09 - Kangaroo Island Council - SA.Gov.au

Council Agenda 2003/09 - Kangaroo Island Council - SA.Gov.au

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

KANGAROO ISLAND COUNCIL<br />

NOTICE is given that an Ordinary Meeting of <strong>Council</strong> is to be held at the<br />

Penneshaw Hall, Middle Terrace, Penneshaw on Wednesday 10 th September<br />

<strong>2003</strong> at 1.00pm.<br />

..................................<br />

R Rattray<br />

Chief Executive Officer<br />

AGENDA<br />

1.0 OPENING BY HIS WORSHIP THE MAYOR<br />

2.0 APOLOGIES<br />

3.0 DEPUTATION<br />

3.1 Dean Brown MP, Member for Finniss to address <strong>Council</strong><br />

4.0 MINUTES OF MEETING HELD 6.8.03 (yellow pages)<br />

Moved Cr<br />

Seconded Cr<br />

That the Minutes of the Meeting held on 6.8.03 be confirmed.<br />

CARRIED.<br />

5.0 BUSINESS ARISING FROM MINUTES OF 6.8.03<br />

6.0 MAYOR'S REPORT<br />

Moved Cr<br />

That the Mayor’s Report be received.<br />

CARRIED.<br />

Seconded Cr<br />

MAYOR’S REPORT<br />

12/8/03 TOMM Committee. This Committee has new drive and<br />

I have asked Jackie Kelly to chair it. Jackie has a<br />

passion and knowledge of TOMM which will assist in<br />

driving it along. It is my intention to continue as a<br />

member, however make it more active and get<br />

considerable community inertia if possible<br />

21/8/03 Our workshop day was a great success and gives us all<br />

the time and opportunity to talk through matters without<br />

the pressures of a <strong>Council</strong> meeting.


22/8/03 Southern & Hills Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association<br />

Annual General Meeting. Mayor Kym McHugh is chair<br />

for the next 12 months, the February meeting will be on<br />

<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>. We had a presentation on the proposed<br />

changes to the planning system, however we will be<br />

relatively immune to “regionalisation” if we continue to<br />

have a DAP structured as we do.<br />

23/8/03 I had the pleasure of opening the Western Districts<br />

Sports Club’s new playground. Cr Davis was enlisted by<br />

me to assist. The WD community deserves a letter of<br />

congratulations for their efforts and I believe a motion<br />

in that direction should be forthcoming from <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

25/8/03 A meeting of the Minister’s Committee to look at the<br />

islands administrative arrangements was held. The<br />

Minister’s office is going to get an overview from a<br />

consultant [paid for by the Minister] to be completed by<br />

late September so we can progress from broad<br />

discussions to maybe an overview of what could be<br />

possibilities. I would stress that these discussions are at<br />

the Minister’s direction and not a secret method of<br />

taking over everything. At their conclusion a report will<br />

go to Minister McEwen. Tony Jarvis and myself are the<br />

<strong>Council</strong> representatives. In the afternoon I was asked to<br />

attend a meeting of the KI Development Board.<br />

28/8/03 The AGM of Tourism KI at Penneshaw was a success,<br />

Chris Schumann was returned as chair.<br />

29/8/03 CEO, Bob Rattray and I met with airline principles in<br />

Adelaide.<br />

30/8/03 I attended a function at American River with Qantas<br />

travel staff from interstate.<br />

1/9/03 Public meeting re. community land at Penneshaw.<br />

Details to be provided at the meeting.<br />

3/9/03 KI Information Services Committee meeting at the<br />

chambers.<br />

7.0 QUESTIONS FROM THE GALLERY<br />

8.0 PETITION - Nil.<br />

2


3<br />

9.0 QUESTIONS<br />

9.1 Questions on Notice - Nil.<br />

9.2 Questions without Notice<br />

10.0 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES<br />

10.1 Community Passenger Network Committee<br />

Moved Cr<br />

Seconded Cr<br />

That the notes of the Community Passenger Network Committee<br />

meeting held on 6.8.03 be received and the minutes of the<br />

Community Passenger Network Committee meeting held on<br />

27.8.03 be received and the recommendations therein be adopted.<br />

CARRIED.<br />

NOTES OF COMMUNITY PASSENGER NETWORK COMMITTEE<br />

MEETING HELD ON IN THE COUNCIL MEETING ROOM,<br />

6 th AUGUST, <strong>2003</strong><br />

1. ATTENDANCE<br />

Present;<br />

Peter Richards, Pilippa Kneebone, Rafferty Fynn<br />

Apologies:<br />

Toni Duka, Bec Davis, Chari Pahl, Vi Vincent, Kerrie Kromer<br />

2. COMFIRMATION OF PREVIOUS MINUTES<br />

The previous minutes were accepted.<br />

3. BUSINESS ARISING FROM PREVIOUS MINUTES<br />

3.1 Statistics<br />

Rafferty Fynn felt that the statistical information regarding the Transport<br />

Disadvantaged is a little scant. Philippa Kneebone said she would ask<br />

Mary Elliot to see if she were able to further break down the HACC<br />

clients in to Transport Disadvantaged and others.<br />

3.2 Report for the passenger Transport Board.<br />

As above it was agreed to get more information on the transport<br />

disadvantaged for inclusion in the report.<br />

For the information of the CPN, Peter Richards reported that since REX<br />

has ceased to fly to the <strong>Island</strong> on a regular basis there is no way for<br />

wheel chair bound people to fly off the <strong>Island</strong>, and the ferry confines<br />

them to their vehicle, without access to toilets as there is no wheel chair<br />

access to the lounges on either ferry.<br />

3.3 Results from <strong>Island</strong> wide mail drop.<br />

Discussed and reported on in the monthly report.


4<br />

3.4 Requests for assistance with transport<br />

Discussed and reported on in the monthly report<br />

4. ANY OTHER BUSINESS<br />

4.1 Visit to KI by Manager of Integrated Regional Services, Phil<br />

S<strong>au</strong>nders.<br />

Peter Richards will chase up any Cook Centre staff who may be<br />

interested in attending the meeting with Phil S<strong>au</strong>ders, including Lyndel<br />

Santibanez and Kerrie Kroner’s replacement. It was agreed that we<br />

should meet at 2 o’clock, with a view to finishing by 4. Rafferty Fynn<br />

will let Bob Rattray and Tony Jarvis know about this meeting should<br />

they wish to participate.<br />

5. NEXT MEETING<br />

At 2 pm on the 20 th August <strong>2003</strong> in the <strong>Council</strong> Chambers.<br />

6. MEETING CLOSED<br />

1.45pm.<br />

MINUTES FOR THE KANGAROO ISLAND COMMUNITY<br />

PASSENGER NETWORK COMMITTEE ON THE 27 th OF AUGUST IN<br />

THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, AT 2 PM.<br />

1. PRESENT<br />

Pete Richards, Toni Duka, Kate Bishop, Madeleine McQueen, Beck<br />

Davis, Rafferty Fynn<br />

APOLOGIES<br />

Philippa Kneebone, Chari Pahl, Vi Vincent<br />

2. CONFIRMATION OF PREVIOUS MINUTES<br />

Moved Peter Richards Seconded Rafferty Fynn<br />

3. BUSINESS ARISING FROM PREVIOUS MINUTES.<br />

3.1 Rafferty Fynn told the committee that an interim report has been<br />

complied form figures given to the CPN by various organizations on the<br />

island.<br />

4. ANY OTHER BUSINESS.<br />

Preamble. The meeting (held on the 20/8/02) to which Mr Phil<br />

S<strong>au</strong>nders and Ms Belinda White (both from Integrated Regional<br />

Services of the PTB) were invited, was basically regarded by all as<br />

‘disappointing’ regarding the lack of commitment made by the PTB to<br />

establishing any form of transport system on the <strong>Island</strong> before the next<br />

financial year. Mr. Phil S<strong>au</strong>nders told the meeting that the CPN


Coordinator’s role before that time was to prepare a detailed report that<br />

would culminate in finding enough work to keep a 22 seater bus<br />

employed for 40 hours per week. It is important to note that part of this<br />

concept is to sell bus time to other <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Departments such as the<br />

Health Services and the Education Department. To this end Belinda<br />

White agreed to send to R. Fynn the results of the surveys conducted in<br />

the Riverlands in recent months as a guide.<br />

4.1 It was agreed by the committee that Rafferty Fynn should make a<br />

special trip to the Yorke Peninsula CPN to get ideas and to find out how<br />

they operate. This CPN operates within the new guide lines of the PTB,<br />

in that it does not provide a transport service as its core business, which<br />

is to coordinate existing transport.<br />

Moved Toni Duka Second Beck Davis<br />

4.2 It was agreed that R. Fynn will make an appointment with the new<br />

hospital CEO regarding matters concerning the KICPN<br />

4.3 <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Community Forum is willing to support any initiatives<br />

of the KICPN. This support will be in the form of a letter of<br />

endorsement from the Forum members.<br />

4.4 It was suggested by Toni Duka that it was possible to perhaps obtain<br />

funding from one of the many Grants organizations to purchase a<br />

suitable vehicle for the carriage of the transport disadvantaged. This<br />

suggestion was made bec<strong>au</strong>se of the lack of commitment by the PTB to<br />

have any funds available for the KICPN before the next financial year<br />

and the fact that the ‘Hospital Bus’ is on its last legs. Toni Duka agreed<br />

that she would speak to Lyndel Santibanez, Manager, Community<br />

Health, regarding this matter with the view to forming a partnership . (A<br />

receiver of Grant money needs to be an incorporated body )<br />

4.5 R. Fynn to conduct a survey of transport needs in the following centers;-<br />

- Vivonne Bay<br />

- Parndana<br />

- Kingscote<br />

- American River<br />

- Penneshaw<br />

This will result in a report that duplicates the reporting format that the<br />

PTB has adopted for other areas of South Australia that have had similar<br />

surveys done.<br />

5. NEXT MEETING.<br />

Wednesday 24 September <strong>2003</strong> at 3pm at the <strong>Council</strong> Meeting Room<br />

6. MEETING CLOSED<br />

3pm<br />

5


10.2 Information Services Committee<br />

Moved Cr<br />

Seconded Cr<br />

That the minutes of the Information Services Committee meeting<br />

held on 3.9.03 be received and the recommendations therein be<br />

adopted.<br />

CARRIED.<br />

MINUTES OF THE INFORMATION SERVICES COMMITTEE<br />

MEETING HELD IN THE MEETING ROOM, COUNCIL OFFICES<br />

0N WEDNESDAY 3 rd SEPTEMBER <strong>2003</strong><br />

COMMENCING AT 9.30am<br />

1.0 Present<br />

Cr. Rebecca Davis (Chair), Mayor Michael Pengilly, Cr. Scott McDonald,<br />

Jean Woolley (Community Representative), Tony Jarvis (Corporate &<br />

Community Services Manager), Sharon Gullickson (Chief Librarian)<br />

2.0 Apologies<br />

Jackie Kelly (Community Representative), Shirley Simcock (Community<br />

Representative)<br />

6<br />

In the absence of the Chairman, the Mayor M. Pengilly declared the<br />

meeting open and welcomed those present.<br />

3.0 Minutes of the Meeting held on 25-6-03<br />

Moved J Woolley<br />

Seconded S McDonald<br />

That the Minutes of the Meeting held on the 25-6-03 be confirmed<br />

subject to Minute 1.0 being altered to include Jackie Kelly being present.<br />

CARRIED<br />

4.0 Business arising from the Minutes of 2-4-<strong>2003</strong><br />

Nil<br />

5.0 Correspondence<br />

Moved S McDonald<br />

That the Correspondence be received.<br />

Seconded J Woolley<br />

CARRIED<br />

Incoming<br />

Public Library and Community Information Services grants – PLAIN<br />

Central Services<br />

PLAIN Telecommunications and Internet Upgrade Project - PLAIN<br />

Central<br />

Services<br />

Invitation to Stakeholders Meeting – TAFE <strong>SA</strong><br />

6.0 Community Information Centre Report<br />

Moved J Woolley<br />

Seconded S McDonald<br />

That the Community Information Centre Report be received<br />

CARRIED


7<br />

6.1 The librarian stated that the Community Information Centre had largely<br />

being absorbed into the daily operation of the Library. The creation of<br />

the reading room has been well received and all community information<br />

enquiries were being managed from the main counter.<br />

7.0 Librarian’s Report<br />

Moved J Woolley<br />

That the Librarian’s Report is received.<br />

Seconded S McDonald<br />

CARRIED<br />

Cr R Davis joined the meeting and resumed the Chair<br />

7.1 The librarian outlined the need to extend the opening hours of the library.<br />

The Committee suggested that further investigations on the impact to the<br />

library budget and staffing be conducted prior to any alterations to the<br />

library hours.<br />

8.0 School Community Library<br />

The Committee discussed the concept of a joint-use library being<br />

established within the Kingscote Area School. Long term solution to the<br />

library facility needs to be determined and a joint-use library may be an<br />

option.<br />

Alternative long term solutions such as moving to the old J&B site were<br />

discussed.<br />

In the interim, short term cost effective solutions for address immediate<br />

concerns within the current library building also need to be investigated.<br />

Moved M Pengilly<br />

Seconded S McDonald<br />

CARRIED<br />

That Tony Jarvis and Sharon Gullickson to investigate options for the<br />

future of the library services including approaching the Kingscote Area<br />

School regarding the concept of a joint-use library facility.<br />

9.0 General Business<br />

9.1 J Woolley informed the committee that after a very tentative start at the<br />

beginning of February 03, the Friends have grown substantially and are<br />

a very and enthusiast group with positive ideas for the library.<br />

10.0 Next Meeting<br />

Moved S McDonald<br />

Seconded J Woolley<br />

CARRIED<br />

That a special meeting be held on November 5 th <strong>2003</strong> to further discuss the<br />

long and short term solutions for the library.<br />

11.0 Closure<br />

Cr R. Davis declared the meeting closed at 10.10am


8<br />

10.3 Roadside Vegetation Management Consultative Committee<br />

The following are comments I would ask <strong>Council</strong> to consider<br />

prior to adopting/deferring the following recommendation.<br />

It is my belief that the Roadside Vegetation Management<br />

Consultative Committee was to include former <strong>Council</strong>lor Mr G<br />

Smith who is the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment representative on the Native<br />

Vegetation <strong>Council</strong> of South Australia. I further understood that<br />

his appointment was to provide a larger state wide perspective.<br />

Accordingly I believe that he should be invited to join the<br />

committee. In addition, the composition of this Committee should<br />

reflect a broad cross section of the community to provide balance.<br />

There is a lack of broadacre expertise on the Committee and as<br />

the vast majority of roadside vegetation is adjacent to the farming<br />

sector it is critical that they have significant input.<br />

The Management Plan also in my opinion requires considerable<br />

input from officers. <strong>Council</strong> may recall that a significant court<br />

case occurred in the recent past, thus it is important that officers<br />

have involvement in the early stages of the review.<br />

The plan is a management tool for <strong>Council</strong> staff and should not<br />

be overly large as the operators need to refer to it sometimes on<br />

the job. The plan was arrived at after considerable work and<br />

needs some updating but no significant change.<br />

Moved Cr<br />

Seconded Cr<br />

That the minutes of the Roadside Vegetation Management<br />

Consultative Committee meeting held on 22.8.03 be received and<br />

the recommendations therein be adopted.<br />

CARRIED.<br />

Minutes of a Roadside Vegetation Management Consultative Committee<br />

Meeting held in the <strong>Council</strong> Chambers, D<strong>au</strong>ncey Street Kingscote on Friday,<br />

22 August <strong>2003</strong> commencing at 2:00pm<br />

1.0 Present<br />

Cr C Wickham, Cr D McDonald, Cr R Davis, B Overton (Botanist),<br />

N Flynn (Eco Action), B Haddrill (DEH), M Maguire (FPO), D Rowley<br />

(Parks and Community Services Co-ordinator).<br />

2.0 Apologies<br />

Cr W Richards, P Martin (KI Flora & F<strong>au</strong>na).<br />

3.0 Election Chairperson<br />

Moved- N Flynn<br />

Seconded- Cr R Davis<br />

Cr C Wickham be elected Chairperson<br />

CARRIED


9<br />

4.0 Minutes of Meeting held 28.3.03<br />

Moved- Cr D MacDonald Seconded- Cr R Davis<br />

That the Minutes of Meeting held on the 28.3.03 be confirmed.<br />

CARRIED<br />

5.0 Business Arising from the Minutes of 28.3.03<br />

5.2 Cross Rib Roller<br />

Determined that it was too dangerous to use the Cross Rib Roller<br />

on Seal Bay Road so Harriet Road (from South Coast Road to<br />

East West 2) 11km was done.<br />

6.0 General Business<br />

6.1 <strong>2003</strong>/04 Roadside Vegetation Management Program<br />

* PCSC to contact D’Estrees Bay residents re proposed road<br />

management program<br />

* Media release to be done regarding the program and that a 10 year<br />

program is available for perusal<br />

* Place the program on the webpage when done<br />

Road Section Distance Method<br />

Snug Cove Rd Playford to Colemans 3 km Cross Rib Roller<br />

Bark Hut Rd Playford to Stokes Bay 19 km Cross Rib Roller<br />

North Coast Rd Stokes Bay to Mc Brides 9 km Hydroaxe<br />

Branch Creek Rd 5 km Hydroaxe<br />

Rolland Hill Hwy Parndana to Timber Creek 4 km Hydroaxe<br />

Margries Rd 8 km Hydroaxe<br />

South Coast Road Elsegood to Hawkes Nest 17 km Hydroaxe<br />

D’Estrees Bay Road 7 km Hydroaxe<br />

Birchmore Road Playford to Wests 11 km Envirotrim<br />

Seal Bay Road 9 km Envirotrim<br />

Moved- Cr R Davis<br />

Seconded- B Overton<br />

The Roadside Vegetation Management Program for <strong>2003</strong>/04 be<br />

implemented as outlined in Appendix 3 (as per above) of the Draft<br />

<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Roadside Vegetation Management Plan<br />

CARRIED<br />

6.2 Draft <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Roadside Vegetation Management Plan<br />

* Only committee members received a copy bec<strong>au</strong>se the committee is<br />

driving the review. <strong>Council</strong> employees (other than Committee<br />

members) will have an opportunity to comment through the<br />

consultation process. This was seen as a way of giving everyone an<br />

equal opportunity and not having a bias in one direction.<br />

* The Plan is designed to give <strong>Council</strong> delegated responsibility for the<br />

management of Native Vegetation on roadside under the Native<br />

Vegetation Act. Any actions outside the guidelines within this plan<br />

require Native Vegetation <strong>Council</strong> approval, Commonwealth Approval<br />

and <strong>Council</strong> approval prior to proceeding. (This clarification is to be<br />

added to the draft plan)


Summary of modifications required-<br />

* Determine how individuals can be covered by Public Liability<br />

Insurance if say weeding on a road reserve<br />

* Provide examples of Restricted Access Vehicles<br />

* No firewood collection on road reserves<br />

* No cropping or grazing of roadside<br />

* Placement of farm plant and equipment and hay bales not to be<br />

permitted on road reserves<br />

* Pollarding to create a mosaic of vegetation structures<br />

* Roadsides can be used a fuel reduction zones if part of a larger<br />

vegetation plan<br />

* Discuss with Environmental Services Department how roadside<br />

vegetation considerations can be incorporated into planning<br />

requirements<br />

* Consider the implementation of school bus “hard stand” areas for bus<br />

stops to prevent Phytophthora spread<br />

Plan to be presented to the next meeting for review and possible<br />

recommendation for public release<br />

7.0 Other Business<br />

7.1 History<br />

* There is a need to develop an information database of what work has<br />

been done.<br />

* PCSC will keep this information<br />

7.2 Contact Person<br />

* PCSC administers the plan and will keep all relevant information in<br />

relation to the Committee<br />

7.3 Chapman Tce<br />

* Firewood is being collected on Chapman Tce<br />

* The people who reported this occurring have been advised to provide<br />

Names or registration numbers and it will be followed through<br />

* All reports of firewood collection are followed through<br />

7.4 Draft Plan<br />

* Graham Smith to be sent a copy of the draft plan for his comments<br />

prior to the next meeting<br />

7.5 CFS Access Issues<br />

* M Maguire to provide PCSC with a list of these issues for collation<br />

and discussion at next meeting<br />

8.0 Next Meeting<br />

24 October <strong>2003</strong> at 1pm<br />

9.0 Closure<br />

1650<br />

10


10.4 TOMM Committee<br />

Moved Cr<br />

Seconded Cr<br />

That the minutes of the TOMM Committee meeting held on<br />

12.8.03, along with the Terms of Reference and Memorandum of<br />

Understanding (attached) be received and the recommendations<br />

therein be adopted<br />

CARRIED.<br />

TOMM Management Committee Meeting<br />

KI <strong>Council</strong> Chambers, D<strong>au</strong>ncey Street, Kingscote<br />

12 th August <strong>2003</strong><br />

10.00 am<br />

MINUTES<br />

1) Present<br />

Tony Jarvis (KIC), Jackie Kelly (Community), Craig Wickham (Industry), Scott<br />

McDonald (KIC), David Crinion (<strong>SA</strong>TC), David Honner (KIDB), Dianne Morris<br />

(TKI), Madelaine McQueen (minutes), Toni Duka (Project Manager).<br />

2) Apologies<br />

Chris Schuman (TKI), Marc Warren (TKI), Bob Rattray (KIC), Michael Pengilly<br />

(Mayor), David Furniss (KIDB), Jeanette Gellard (NPW<strong>SA</strong>), Helen Richards<br />

(KINRB, Jo Davidson (KINRB).<br />

Chairperson<br />

Michael Pengilly had a late priority and could not make today’s meeting. The<br />

Committee resolved it would be appropriate for J Kelly to chair in his absence.<br />

CARRIED<br />

3) Previous Minutes<br />

4) Financial report and delegation for responsibility<br />

Financial report presented. It was noted that TOMM project purchased laptop.<br />

That the 2002-03 financial report be accepted.<br />

Moved C Wickham<br />

Seconded D Morris<br />

CARRIED<br />

Resolved: A budget for TOMM will be made to the TOMM Management Committee<br />

by the <strong>Council</strong> and any spending above the budgeted figures will need to be approved<br />

by the committee.<br />

A $1,000 financial delegation is given to the Project Manager, to be spent within the<br />

budget.<br />

Moved C Wickham<br />

Seconded S McDonald<br />

CARRIED<br />

The KI <strong>Council</strong> continues to undertake financial management of project on behalf of<br />

TOMM Committee and the Finance Officer continues to report to TOMM<br />

Management Committee meetings.<br />

Moved by C Wickham<br />

Seconded D Honner<br />

CARRIED<br />

11


12<br />

Resolved: Toni Duka and Bob Rattray will work with Louise Eves (Finance Officer)<br />

to develop <strong>2003</strong>/04 budget for presentation at next Management Committee meeting.<br />

This budget will reflect cash and in-kind contributions to the project.<br />

Colmar Brunton Survey Contract - Project Confirmation<br />

The Committee approves in principle that we proceed with the Colmar Brunton<br />

contract of $40,000. Project Confirmation to be signed and returned to Colmar<br />

Brunton.<br />

Moved by D Honner<br />

Seconded D Morris<br />

CARRIED<br />

A sub-committee will review the process of data collection by Colmar Brunton,<br />

including potential use of data card and core data versus market intelligence.<br />

Moved C Wickham<br />

Seconded S McDonald<br />

CARRIED<br />

5) Partners Commitment<br />

KI <strong>Council</strong> – $10,000 (to be confirmed)<br />

DEH - $5,000<br />

KI Development Board – Confirmed commitment to 30 th June 2004 of $5,000<br />

Tourism KI - $15,000<br />

KINRB – Advised by way of letter that $5,000 has been committed, subject to<br />

conditions as per previous year.<br />

<strong>SA</strong>TC – in-kind commitment.<br />

Toni Duka will formally reply to KINRB letter and include a copy of the stakeholder<br />

agreement (MOU)<br />

Moved S McDonald<br />

Seconded D Crinion<br />

CARRIED<br />

Resolved: Toni Duka will contact stakeholder agencies to confirm commitment and<br />

subsequently send invoices by next Management Committee meeting.<br />

6) Outcomes from Planning Day<br />

a) Education<br />

i) Community, Business and Stakeholder/Agency<br />

Not discussed<br />

b) Data<br />

i) Revision of questionnaire (sub-group)<br />

ii) Indicator review and Agency Responsibility (sub-group)<br />

Resolved: C Wickham, D Honner, T Duka (and J Gellard if happy) to review<br />

questionnaire, input will be sought from Richard Trembath, <strong>SA</strong>TC<br />

Resolved: Toni Duka will meet with stakeholders to discuss indicator review, collate<br />

feedback and present information to Management Committee for decision. May seek<br />

input from Richard Trembath, <strong>SA</strong>TC. Indicator review needs to occur before<br />

questionnaire review. This is a high priority.<br />

Resident Survey will need to be considered very soon also.<br />

Possibility of including questions from external agencies/bodies/businesses would<br />

need to be considered by the Management Committee on a case by case basis to<br />

ensure appropriateness.


13<br />

Resolved: Presentations need to be given to staff at Sealink and Emu Airways to keep<br />

these businesses informed of outcomes from surveys distributed by them.<br />

iii) Annual report - Colmar Brunton<br />

The production of the Annual Report by Colmar Brunton is currently waiting on<br />

transport data (which is waiting on May data from one operator).<br />

Possibility of Operator Survey being conducted with KIDB, this would need to be<br />

included in KIDB Strategic Plan for 04/05.<br />

iv) Update of website<br />

Website update: Priority action.<br />

Resolved: T Duka will look into possibility and cost of alternate arrangements for<br />

hosting and upgrading site due to expense of current provider (IT&e). In doing this<br />

will consider internode, Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association (links with KI <strong>Council</strong>),<br />

Schools and Sharon Menz. C Wickham may assist with technological information.<br />

Information will be presented at next Management Committee meeting for<br />

consideration.<br />

c) Structure of TOMM<br />

i) Housing<br />

ii) Autonomy<br />

Discussion surrounding issues relating to TOMM being a Section 41 Committee<br />

under <strong>Council</strong>. The previous Committee members believed that the Committee was<br />

intended to be established under Section 42, to maintain its <strong>au</strong>tonomy. Autonomy of<br />

the TOMM project is an important issue, particularly concerning the community and<br />

when looking for corporate sponsorship. Autonomy is critical for the efficiency of the<br />

Committee and its decision making process. The status of the committee will need to<br />

be raised with <strong>Council</strong> and progressed.<br />

J Kelly, S McDonald, T Duka, R Rattray and M Pengilly meet to discuss the<br />

independence of TOMM Management Committee and review the Terms of Reference<br />

with <strong>Council</strong> delegating powers to the Committee as an interim before moving<br />

towards a section that allows more <strong>au</strong>tonomy for the Committee.<br />

Moved C Wickham<br />

Seconded D Crinion<br />

CARRIED<br />

iii) Committee Membership (determined by who)<br />

Membership: The Committee is happy with the current committee structure, as<br />

follows:<br />

Mayor, <strong>Council</strong>or, CEO KI <strong>Council</strong>, TOMM Project Manager, Industry<br />

representative, KIDB, TKI, DEH, KINRB, <strong>SA</strong>TC and a community representative.<br />

Matter of Chair – Michael has indicated he feels it may be appropriate for the duties<br />

of chair be handed over to a person with a strong commitment and more extensive<br />

background. Michael has also indicated he will certainly remain on the TOMM<br />

Management Committee and is committed to the project.<br />

That Jackie Kelly is elected as chair of the TOMM Management Committee.<br />

Moved C Wickham<br />

Seconded D Crinion<br />

CARRIED


14<br />

iv) MOU for Stakeholders<br />

Resolved: T Duka will review the MOU for stakeholders, circulate for comment and<br />

present the final copy at the next meeting for signing.<br />

v) MOU for Advisors<br />

Resolved: The MOU Advisors be re-worded to an MOU for Ambassadors. Liz Jack<br />

and Simon McArthur will be invited to be Ambassadors on the basis that they add<br />

value from their respective fields of work and their ongoing connections in the<br />

industry. If the Committee requires input on a professional basis Ambassadors would<br />

be financially remunerated for their input. The Committee believes this would<br />

recognize the mutual value of this partnership.<br />

J Kelly to write to Andris Stepanuks to thank him for his commitment to TOMM and<br />

assistance in handover with T Duka.<br />

Moved C Wickham<br />

CARRIED<br />

Seconded D Crinion<br />

That the contribution made by Liz Jack during the planning day and subsequent time<br />

be acknowledged to the amount of $500.<br />

Moved C Wickham<br />

Seconded D Morris<br />

CARRIED<br />

Resolved: Sub-Committees will be established to progress works, they will be:<br />

Data<br />

Business Plan<br />

Long-term Funding<br />

Marketing Tool Kit<br />

C Wickham, D Honner, J Gellard and T Duka<br />

D Crinion and T Duka<br />

D Crinion, T Jarvis and Liz Jack<br />

Liz Jack, D Crinion and T Duka<br />

The Long-term Funding sub-committee will consider options including corporate<br />

sponsorship, such as NEC, Travel World, Dick Smith (Craig to talk too) and<br />

establishment of a Trust Fund.<br />

Resolved: The following time frames:<br />

Data<br />

by next Management Committee meeting<br />

Business Plan draft for circulation within 2 weeks<br />

Long-term Funding draft to be developed by next Management Committee meeting<br />

Marketing Tool Kit aim for draft/concept by next meeting (subject to L J<br />

availability)<br />

D Crinion committed time out of his current works program to focus on these<br />

commitments.<br />

T Duka will ensure Website is also refreshed with this information when it is<br />

available.<br />

d) Budget<br />

i) short-fall<br />

ii) medium term<br />

iii) long-term<br />

iv) INRM Investment Strategy<br />

v) Fundable Projects


15<br />

A sub-committee has been appointed. An update on INRM was given by T Duka;<br />

further discussion will take place with D Crinion after meeting.<br />

e) Vision<br />

The vision statement will be discussed in the context of the one-page business plan.<br />

Resolved: D Crinion and T Duka to address this item, taking into account planning<br />

day comments.<br />

7) One-page Business Plan<br />

A sub-committee has been appointed.<br />

8) Re-l<strong>au</strong>nch of TOMM<br />

An abstract has been submitted to Ecotourism Australia for its November <strong>2003</strong><br />

Conference in Adelaide. The Committee supported this. D Crinion generously<br />

offered to sponsor T Duka’s attendance at the conference, with benefits for the project<br />

as well as a development opportunity for T Duka. This offer was accepted with much<br />

gratitude from the Committee and T Duka.<br />

Resolved: The re-l<strong>au</strong>nch of TOMM on the <strong>Island</strong> could be conducted through a<br />

business breakfast, presenting time series data. D Honner and T Duka to progress<br />

this.<br />

9) Sustainable Tourism Development Strategy<br />

D Crinion gave background and an update on this Strategy. D Crinion will ensure a<br />

copy of the Draft Project Brief for the KI Integrated Strategic Tourism Plan is<br />

circulated to TOMM Committee members.<br />

10) Correspondence<br />

A copy of correspondence sent to Tourism KI members via email by Mr John Ayliffe<br />

was circulated. The committee resolved that J Kelly would respond to this<br />

correspondence on behalf of the Committee rejecting the aspersions made by Mr<br />

Ayliffe regarding TOMM and members of the Committee.<br />

11) Other Business<br />

T Duka has accepted a student for internship to complete a project on the<br />

environmental indicators of TOMM. Kyoko Miura is a Masters of Environmental<br />

Studies student at the University of Adelaide and will spend 2 months part-time<br />

working on the project with T Duka. The Committee supported the internship, which<br />

is of no direct cost to the project. K Miura is covered by the Universities insurance<br />

policy whilst working on the project.<br />

D Honner suggested other intern/educational programs TOMM could tap into include:<br />

• Flinders University, Louise Ranfry (Biology)<br />

• University <strong>SA</strong>, Marilyn Olsen (Statistics) and the Cultural Tourism section<br />

• Schools on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>.<br />

D Crinion informed the committee the University of <strong>SA</strong> has a submission into CRC<br />

for Sustainable Tourism that includes aspects of TOMM.<br />

12) Next Meeting and Close<br />

The next meeting is scheduled for:


16<br />

Friday 12 th September<br />

10:00am – 1pm<br />

at the <strong>Council</strong> Chambers,<br />

Cnr Drew and Murray Streets, Kingscote.<br />

Please advise T Duka, Project Manager of your availability for this meeting via phone<br />

8553 4518 or email community@kicouncil.sa.gov.<strong>au</strong><br />

Meeting Closed at 1:50pm<br />

11.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES REPORTS<br />

Your Worship Mayor Pengilly and <strong>Council</strong>lors, I submit the<br />

following reports for the Ordinary Meeting of <strong>Council</strong> to be held<br />

on Wednesday 10 September <strong>2003</strong>.<br />

Moved Cr<br />

Seconded Cr<br />

That the Environmental Services Reports be received.<br />

CARRIED.<br />

11.1 REPORT TITLE: ALTERATION TO<br />

AUTHORI<strong>SA</strong>TIONS<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

LAURENCE EVES, ESM<br />

PURPOSE<br />

This report serves to advise <strong>Council</strong> of the need to increase and<br />

alter the <strong>au</strong>thorisations of its officers as they appear under:<br />

• Section 4(1) of the Impounding Act<br />

• Section 44(1) of the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Act<br />

• Section 26(1)(c) of the Dog and Cat Management Act<br />

• Sections 27,28 & 68 of the Dog and Cat Management Act<br />

Staff Involved<br />

For the purposes of streamlining this process and being able to<br />

operate dog and cat management effectively at times when staff<br />

are on leave or simply absent, it is important to have staff<br />

<strong>au</strong>thorised to undertake duties as required. These staff are:<br />

• Robert Rattray (CEO)<br />

• L<strong>au</strong>rence Eves (ESM)<br />

• Anthony Jarvis (CSM)<br />

• Ken Liu (TSM)<br />

RECOMMENDATION 1<br />

That pursuant to Section 44 of the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Act 1999<br />

and Section 26(1)(c) of the Dog and Cat Management Act,<br />

L<strong>au</strong>rence Gregory Eves be hereby delegated the powers of the<br />

Registrar for issuing and replacing certificates of registration and<br />

registration discs.


17<br />

RECOMMENDATION 2<br />

That pursuant to Section 4(1) of the Impounding Act, 1920<br />

Robert Rattray, L<strong>au</strong>rence Gregory Eves, Anthony John Charles<br />

Jarvis and Kin Chou Liu be hereby appointed as Authorised<br />

Officers.<br />

RECOMMENDATION 3<br />

That pursuant to Sections 27, 28 & 68 of the Dog & Cat<br />

Management Act 1995 that Robert Rattray, L<strong>au</strong>rence Gregory<br />

Eves, Anthony John Charles Jarvis and Kin Chou Liu be<br />

appointed as Authorised Dog & Cat Management Officers with<br />

powers as defined by that Act.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Given that the General Inspector is now a member of the<br />

Environmental Services Section, it has become necessary to alter<br />

the existing structure of <strong>au</strong>thorisations so as to be able to manage<br />

this area of <strong>Council</strong>’s responsibility effectively.<br />

The amended <strong>au</strong>thorisation will allow a more expedient approach<br />

to the task when the General Inspector is absent or on leave. The<br />

ongoing arrangement will still need to have a member or two<br />

from the out door staff trained in this work however, it is often<br />

the administration and day to day operation of the programme<br />

that is not controlled.<br />

11.2 REPORT TITLE: STAFF VISIT TO ADELAIDE<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

LAURENCE EVES, ESM<br />

PURPOSE<br />

This report serves to advise <strong>Council</strong> on specific outcomes from a<br />

<strong>Council</strong> officer visit to Adelaide on 28 th & 29 th August, <strong>2003</strong>.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That the report be received and noted.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

On 28 th & 29 th August this year <strong>Council</strong>’s ESM & Planning<br />

Officer undertook a trip to Adelaide for the purpose of<br />

interviewing consultants to assist with <strong>Council</strong>’s Heritage Study<br />

and Streetscape design for the four main towns on <strong>Kangaroo</strong><br />

<strong>Island</strong>. Included in the trip was a visit to Planning <strong>SA</strong> where<br />

discussions with several officers were undertaken on a range of<br />

issues. The following information details outcomes from the trip:


Planning <strong>SA</strong><br />

• Discussions were held with Mr Jason Green from Planning<br />

<strong>SA</strong> regarding the potential for <strong>Council</strong> to access grant<br />

funding via the “Places for People” programme.<br />

Discussions were fruitful and revolved around <strong>Council</strong><br />

being able to utilise the four main town Heritage and<br />

Streetscape review as the subject for the grant application.<br />

Planning <strong>SA</strong> raised some specific criteria that the<br />

application would need to meet in order to qualify for<br />

consideration as a grant application. The major amendment<br />

to the task was to include a high degree of Urban Design<br />

consideration and assessment with heritage, streetscape<br />

and a traffic study feeding into that process.<br />

An application has been lodged and negotiations with Planning<br />

<strong>SA</strong> have resulted in <strong>Council</strong> having an additional week to<br />

forward further details and mapping to support the application.<br />

• Discussion was also held with David Lake and Darren<br />

Starr from the Plan Amendment Branch of Planning <strong>SA</strong><br />

with a view to informing them of <strong>Council</strong>’s direction in<br />

terms of the Section 30 process.<br />

Once again they were most supportive of <strong>Council</strong> in this<br />

matter and indicated that they were happy for <strong>Council</strong> staff<br />

to undertake the work in-house and would assist wherever<br />

they could.<br />

Discussion was also held on the public consultation<br />

process and areas of content that are likely to arise and on<br />

how they should be dealt with.<br />

• Appointments were made with David Goodwins and Ray<br />

Nash from the Department’s mapping section in order to try<br />

and obtain mapping to further a Bushfire PAR for <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

This meeting was also quite successful as Dave Goodwins<br />

indicated that he felt positive he could assist <strong>Council</strong> with<br />

the mapping requested.<br />

Other mapping for the major centres of KI was also looked<br />

at and a better insight into how Planning <strong>SA</strong> might assist<br />

with mapping in the future was gained.<br />

• A meeting was also held with Kim Gurner, a project<br />

officer for DAC at Planning <strong>SA</strong>, regarding the<br />

consideration of <strong>Council</strong>’s Community Service Centre.<br />

18


Kim advised that a hearing will occur on KI on 25 th<br />

September in order to hear submissions from those persons<br />

who made a representation on the application.<br />

It is at that time also that the Commission is likely to make<br />

a decision on the matter.<br />

Consultant Interviews<br />

<strong>Council</strong> Officers also went on to undertake interviews of<br />

consultant bodies with a view to selecting an appropriate<br />

organisation to assist with providing accreditation to <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

Heritage and Streetscape study of the four main towns on KI.<br />

The project was also discussed with Planning <strong>SA</strong> and an<br />

application for funding has been lodged under the “Places for<br />

People” grant scheme. Some modification to the programme has<br />

had to be considered in order to fit the funding criteria.<br />

It is anticipated that a consultant organisation will be<br />

recommended to <strong>Council</strong> for this work soon and that this project<br />

will proceed as planned for this financial year.<br />

11.3 REPORT TITLE: COMMUNITY TITLES<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

LAURENCE EVES, ESM<br />

19<br />

PURPOSE<br />

The purpose of this report is to give <strong>Council</strong> an insight into the<br />

direction of the Community Titles legislation and process.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That the information be received and noted.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lors and <strong>Council</strong> officers have attended two meetings on<br />

the matter of Community Titles during the month of August with<br />

a view to gaining a better insight into the potential of this<br />

legislation to impact on development outcomes on <strong>Kangaroo</strong><br />

<strong>Island</strong>.<br />

Meetings were attended at Victor Harbour on the 22 nd August,<br />

<strong>2003</strong> and again at the Ozone Hotel on the 25 th August, <strong>2003</strong>.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Community Titling is a means of dividing land that creates<br />

nominated areas for the private use of occupants and common<br />

areas within the allotment administered by a body corporate.


20<br />

There are two types of community titles available:<br />

• A Community Scheme<br />

• A Community Strata Scheme.<br />

A Community Scheme comprises the scheme for the division,<br />

development and administration of the land set out in the scheme<br />

description (if any), plan of community division, by-laws and the<br />

development contract (if any) lodged with the Registrar General<br />

under the Community Titles Act.<br />

A Community Strata Scheme comprises a plan of community<br />

division (to be called a strata plan) that may create community<br />

lots with defined upper and lower boundaries as well as lateral<br />

boundaries.<br />

Potential Issues<br />

Whilst there are recognised useful and beneficial aspects to this<br />

legislation, there are also potential issues associated with the<br />

setting up and administration of the process.<br />

Allotment Size<br />

Discussion has revealed that there is a large potential for<br />

developers to seek an adjustment to the minimum allotment size<br />

as it appears within <strong>Council</strong> Development Plans.<br />

Developers allege that some <strong>Council</strong>’s are giving way and<br />

allowing allotment sizes for Community Housing that are less<br />

than that prescribed within the Development Plan. The argument<br />

is such that community areas provide the required additional<br />

space and that the community area may be used to calculate the<br />

open space requirements for all dwellings within the complex and<br />

not be aligned to units on an individual basis.<br />

The danger is that this logic allows for the provision of additional<br />

units on the basis of common and open space duplication.<br />

Zoning<br />

Discussion also revolved around the notion by developers that<br />

Community Titling was suitable anywhere. <strong>Council</strong>’s officers raised the<br />

issues associated with this thought on the basis that medium or high<br />

density residential development was definitely not suitable to many zones.<br />

Examples of this include community titling in General Farming<br />

Zones where obvious land use issues can occur or community<br />

titling adjacent to sensitive Coastal areas.<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s Jurisdiction<br />

A further point of issue is the potential for <strong>Council</strong> to have a<br />

limited amount of jurisdiction with Community Titling especially<br />

in the area of infrastructure provision.


Legal opinion would suggest that <strong>Council</strong> may have difficulty in<br />

enforcing infrastructure provision by developers and further that,<br />

provision of infrastructure would be an issue between a purchaser<br />

and the developer where it was not supplied.<br />

The point of issue here is that if infrastructure forms a part of the<br />

Scheme Description then the enforcement role for its provision is<br />

likely between the developer and a purchaser of an allotment. It is<br />

also not likely that a <strong>Council</strong> can condition a consent to require a<br />

developer to comply with a Scheme Description.<br />

A scheme description is not required where the plan does not<br />

create more than six lots used predominantly for residential<br />

purposes without the creation of a development lot.<br />

Should <strong>Council</strong>lors wish to undertake a little more reading on this<br />

issue, <strong>Council</strong>’s Environmental Services Department can assist.<br />

11.4 REPORT TITLE: VERANDAH/SHELTER STRUCTURE<br />

ADDITION – KINGSCOTE OVAL<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

PATRICK MITCHELL,<br />

PLANNING OFFICER<br />

FILE NUMBER: 520/187/03<br />

ATTACHMENTS: APPLICATION DETAIL<br />

21<br />

PURPOSE<br />

<strong>Council</strong> has received Development Application 520/187/03 by<br />

the Kingscote Football Club to construct a verandah<br />

addition/shelter structure to be attached to the existing club rooms<br />

building at Lot 124 Centenary Avenue, Kingscote, being on land<br />

under the care and control of <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

This matter is referred to <strong>Council</strong> for consideration of the<br />

proposal and approval to allow for the lodgement of the<br />

application should <strong>Council</strong> be satisfied with the proposal.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> consent to the lodgement of Development<br />

Application 520/187/03 by the Kingscote Football Club to<br />

construct a verandah addition/shelter structure to be attached to<br />

the existing club rooms building at Lot 124 Centenary Avenue,<br />

Kingscote being land under the care and control of <strong>Council</strong><br />

therefore, allowing the application to proceed.


DISCUSSION<br />

The application proposes the development of a 5.0 metres x 27.0<br />

metres, veranda structure to the eastern aspect of the existing<br />

clubrooms at Centenary Avenue and 4.2 metres x 8.0 metres<br />

weather shelter to the southern aspect of the clubrooms.<br />

The veranda structure is proposed to be constructed from steel<br />

uprights to a maximum height of 7.0m and clad with trimdex<br />

sheeting to match the roof height of the existing building.<br />

The weather shelter is proposed to be constructed from masonry<br />

columns and clad in roof sheeting to match the existing building.<br />

The application further proposes internal additions and<br />

modifications, as an overall upgrade of the Kingscote Football<br />

Club room facilities, to allow the existing kitchen and servery to<br />

be upgraded and better utilised by patrons and staff of the facility<br />

as well as to provide shelter to cater for the canteen servery and<br />

shelter for patrons of the oval generally.<br />

POLICY IMPLICATIONS<br />

The application will require assessment against Residential Zone<br />

provisions of the Kingscote (DC) Development Plan. The<br />

proposal will be associated with and ancillary to the existing<br />

recreational use of the site and is therefore expected to be<br />

consistent with the Zoning provisions of the Kingscote (DC)<br />

Development Plan.<br />

Further, the proposal is considered to be of a minor nature only<br />

and unlikely to be the subject of objection from the owners or<br />

occupiers of land in the locality.<br />

Therefore, should <strong>Council</strong> consent to the lodgement of the<br />

application, it is likely that <strong>Council</strong> officers will be able to<br />

proceed with the assessment and approval of the application.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Should <strong>Council</strong> therefore be satisfied with the proposal it is<br />

recommended that <strong>Council</strong> approve the application, thereby<br />

allowing the construction of the proposed development to<br />

proceed.<br />

22


11.5 REPORT ITEM: APPEAL AGAINST KI COUNCIL<br />

& OYSTER COVE SHELLFISH<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

PATRICK MITCHELL,<br />

PLANNING OFFICER<br />

FILE NUMBER: DA520/037/03<br />

ATTACHMENTS: YES<br />

23<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To advise <strong>Council</strong> that a Notice of Appeal has been lodged by<br />

Kenneth William Grinter, Gabriel Bittar, Deborah Sleeman &<br />

Anthony Klieve with the Environment, Resources and<br />

Development Court against <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s decision<br />

to grant provisional Development Plan consent to Development<br />

Application 520/037/03 by Oyster Cove Shellfish Pty Ltd for the<br />

purpose of a Oyster Grading, Packaging & storage shed at Part<br />

Section 271 Tangara Drive, American River.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That the <strong>Council</strong> receive and note the report.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The application was subject to the Category 3 public notification<br />

process in accordance with the Development Act 1993, with 10<br />

submissions raising objection to the proposal and one submission<br />

in support of the proposal being received.<br />

While 3 submissions raising objection to the proposal expressed a<br />

desire to be heard, only Mr Grinter and Mr Klieve addressed the<br />

meeting.<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lors will recall that at the May <strong>2003</strong> meeting, the Panel<br />

resolved to delegate to <strong>Council</strong>’s Planning Officer, its powers in<br />

relation to assessment and approval of the application, subject to<br />

receipt of additional detail, discussions with the applicant in<br />

regards to re-siting the proposed building, subject to appropriate<br />

conditions and any further conditions deemed necessary by<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s ESM.<br />

The applicant subsequently submitted additional information<br />

including a plan demonstrating a revised siting of the proposed<br />

building that is expected to reduce the impact of views from<br />

neighbouring properties. The application was subsequently<br />

granted provisional Development Plan consent on the 25 July<br />

<strong>2003</strong>, subject to appropriate conditions.


24<br />

Section 86(1)(b) of the Development Act provides for a right of<br />

appeal to the Environment, Resources and Development Court<br />

against a decision, which involves a Category 3 development.<br />

Four objectors to the proposal have taken advantage of their right<br />

to lodge a Notice of Appeal with the Environment, Resources and<br />

Development Court.<br />

Accordingly, the Environment, Resources and Development<br />

Court has given preliminary notice that a conference between all<br />

parties will be held at the Kingscote Courthouse, on the 30<br />

September <strong>2003</strong>.<br />

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS<br />

The compulsory conference will require some limited financial<br />

expenditure primarily relating to <strong>Council</strong> officers time in terms of<br />

researching and attendance at the conference.<br />

Should a reasonable compromise not be reached at the<br />

conference, the matter will be put to a hearing of the<br />

Environment, Resources and Development Court, which will<br />

require financial expenditure for <strong>Council</strong> to appoint a solicitor to<br />

represent <strong>Council</strong> in its decision.<br />

11.6 REPORT TITLE: THE ENVIRONMENT<br />

PROTECTION (WATER<br />

QUALITY) POLICY <strong>2003</strong><br />

AUTHOR:<br />

PETER H MOORS,<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH<br />

OFFICER<br />

FILE NUMBER: 061<br />

PURPOSE<br />

This report is an information report and serves to advise <strong>Council</strong><br />

that a number of <strong>Council</strong> employees attended an information<br />

session on the new Environment Protection (Water Quality)<br />

Policy <strong>2003</strong>, at the Ozone Hotel on Thursday 28 August.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That the report be received and noted.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

Peter Scott and Keith Bilsborough from the EPA explained to<br />

<strong>Council</strong> employees what an Environment Protection Policy is, the<br />

purpose of the new Water Quality Policy and the issues that it<br />

covers, the specific obligations under the new policy and the<br />

enforcement of the policy.


25<br />

There are some specific (and sometimes mandatory) obligations<br />

that will apply for some industries and activities, including:<br />

• Applying antifoulants<br />

• Septic systems<br />

• Septic tank effluent disposal schemes<br />

• Fish processing works<br />

• Waste depots wineries and distilleries<br />

The policy uses codes of practice or guidelines as a means of<br />

describing how people can comply with their general<br />

environmental duty and obligations under the policy. Although<br />

failure to comply with a code is not an offence, compliance can<br />

be enforced through the issuing of an Environmental Protection<br />

Order. The codes of practice have been around for some time, but<br />

the new policy will now make compliance a legal requirement. In<br />

addition, there will be new provisions incorporated into <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

Development Policy.<br />

<strong>Council</strong> may appoint its own officers to police the water quality<br />

policy and it is proposed to send at least three officers to an EPA<br />

training session set down for mid October.<br />

Further details can be obtained from the Environmental Health<br />

Officer.<br />

11.7 REPORT TITLE: STEDS PUMP STATIONS<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

PETER H MOORS,<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH<br />

OFFICER<br />

FILE NUMBER: 125<br />

PURPOSE<br />

The Inspection report from ITT Flygt Pty Ltd has now been<br />

received, complete with recommendations for additional work<br />

that needs to be done.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> accept the recommendations made by Flygt Pty Ltd,<br />

and in particular, agree to replace the pump station guide rails<br />

with stainless steel rails rather than galvanised rails.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

Test showed that all stations operated correctly in relation to the<br />

<strong>au</strong>tomatic functions of the pump control panels.<br />

Recommendations in the report are summarised below:<br />

• The lids on the pump chambers at Pump Stations A, B & D be<br />

replaced or repaired as soon as possible. Replacement lids have<br />

already been requested for these and for Pump Station C.


26<br />

• Replacement of the old galvanised guide rails in all pump<br />

chambers to ensure both the longevity of the rails and to<br />

ensure that the pumps can be removed safely from above the<br />

chamber. Flygt have provided quotes for replacing the rails<br />

with galvanised rails ($3,940-00) or with stainless steel<br />

($5,190-00) exclusive of GST.<br />

• Pump 1 at Pump Station A and pump 2 at Pump Station C<br />

both show the presence of water inside the oil chambers and<br />

they should be removed and serviced to avoid costly rewind<br />

repairs and service calls should a burn-out occur.<br />

• A number of indicator lamps were blown and needed<br />

replacement. This has now been done.<br />

• Pump Station E in front of the museum has a badly corroded<br />

pump lifting chain which needs replacement, as well as a<br />

chain hook to allow safe fastening of the chain. In addition,<br />

the existing pipe-work is rigid PVC set down quite deep in<br />

the pumping chamber. It is recommended that this be<br />

replaced with “Helifex” style flexible hose complete with<br />

“Camlock” fitting for ease of pump removal, in case there is a<br />

need to repair the pump in an emergency.<br />

11.8 REPORT TITLE: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION<br />

COMPARISON<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

LAURENCE EVES, ESM<br />

PURPOSE<br />

This report serves to display the trends as they have developed<br />

within the processing of Development Applications over the last<br />

5 years.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

The report be received and noted.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

Simple graphing of applications for the purpose of identifying the<br />

need to develop better processing systems for development<br />

applications has revealed a significant upward trend in the<br />

quantity of work within the Environmental Services Department<br />

over the last five years.<br />

Comment as to the need for resources and staff to spend time in<br />

this area is readily identified when the situation is displayed in<br />

graph form. This discussion does not take into account land<br />

divisions or any other associated work aligned with development<br />

processes.


27<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The data produced for this report is seen as a simple way of<br />

demonstrating to <strong>Council</strong>lors that the trend for development on<br />

<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> is alive and well.<br />

The information provided for the years 1999 to 2002 reveal a bar<br />

graph relevant to a whole year. The current year, <strong>2003</strong>, reveals a<br />

graph relevant to the January/August period only.<br />

For the sake of comparison, figures are provided that terminate at<br />

31 st August for each year and are represented as follows:<br />

Year<br />

No. of Applications<br />

1999 155<br />

2000 158<br />

2001 170<br />

2002 205<br />

<strong>2003</strong> 215<br />

The trend shows a steady increase in applications over the last 5<br />

years with an approximate 30% increase in overall intake. What<br />

the graph cannot show of course is the complexity of those<br />

applications or the amount of associated extra duty via legislation<br />

that has accompanied that increase.<br />

<strong>Council</strong> should be aware that the move by State <strong>Gov</strong>ernment is to<br />

divest itself of the expensive aspects of managing areas of control<br />

and one of those areas is planning and building. <strong>Council</strong> has had<br />

to pick up many mandatory duties without an associated budget<br />

that otherwise could have assisted with staff resourcing.<br />

So Where to From Here.<br />

The logic behind this report is to advise <strong>Council</strong> of difficulties<br />

and hopefully provide solutions, not provide additional problems.<br />

The Environmental Services Team has been working on staff<br />

management plans for projects and ways to better manage our<br />

budget. We feel we are achieving in this area. The next step is to<br />

complete a whole of department project and task management<br />

programme and then to benchmark that programme in<br />

collaboration with the CEO. In this way we feel that we will<br />

better identify areas of crisis management.<br />

I would suggest that a graph for land division, general complaint<br />

or mandatory inspection in any area would reveal a similar<br />

outcome. As such our department is working to identify these<br />

needs and address them in a more consistently manageable way.


Some Interesting Results.<br />

January – This year has recorded the highest intake of<br />

applications in five years. There is no particular reason for this<br />

other than to say that there is an upward trend in development on<br />

KI.<br />

February – This month was slower than usual and may correlate<br />

more with market and tourism trends than with the real situation<br />

on the <strong>Island</strong>. Whilst development was within the ball park, it<br />

was not significantly strong.<br />

March – This month was amazing and quite out of character for<br />

this time of year. March almost revealed a record growth for a<br />

five year monthly review of data and c<strong>au</strong>sed significant difficulty<br />

given its out of character performance.<br />

April – This month was also strong without setting a record for<br />

the five year period. Some c<strong>au</strong>sation may have been the record<br />

month prior however, the drop still resulted in the second highest<br />

figure for April in five years. This figure still revealed a strong<br />

building market on KI.<br />

May – This figure represented the record for DA lodgement over<br />

the last five years. The figure once again reveals a significant<br />

upward trend in building approvals for KI.<br />

June – This month also recorded the highest figure for June over<br />

the last five years.<br />

July – This month held pace with the previous month however it<br />

did reveal a drop on the previous year.<br />

August – This month once again recorded well for the five year<br />

period and once again revealed a drop on the previous year whilst<br />

still retaining a very high average for the five year grouping.<br />

Conclusions<br />

It is difficult to accurately establish as to why some months are<br />

out of the usual performers. It may have something to do with<br />

crop or product sales, trends in stay at home tourist locations or<br />

the like however, there is a trend upward in development on KI<br />

that expert opinion predicted would have slowed down for the<br />

last three years. In closing this report suggests that all are<br />

prepared and plan for the future in this area.<br />

28


29<br />

12.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INFORMATION<br />

REPORTS<br />

Moved Cr<br />

Seconded Cr<br />

That the Environmental Services Information reports on Waste<br />

Control System Applications, Food Businesses, Other<br />

Environmental Health Issues and Fire Prevention Officer’s<br />

Report be received for information.<br />

CARRIED.<br />

12.1 REPORT TITLE: WASTE CONTROL SYSTEM<br />

APPLICATIONS<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

PETER H MOORS,<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH<br />

OFFICER<br />

The following waste control (septic tank) applications were<br />

received during August <strong>2003</strong> for consideration by <strong>Council</strong>'s<br />

Environmental Health Officer pursuant to the Public and<br />

Environmental Health Regulations and related Codes and<br />

Standards.<br />

Application No.<br />

Site Address<br />

Owner/Applicant's Name<br />

Postal Address<br />

61/03<br />

Lot 114, Section 11 Wrights Road, Penneshaw<br />

Justin Harman<br />

150 Middle Terrace<br />

PENNESHAW <strong>SA</strong> 5222<br />

62/03<br />

Lot 79 Hog Bay Road, B<strong>au</strong>din Beach<br />

Andrew Boss<br />

PO Box 657<br />

PENNESHAW <strong>SA</strong> 5222<br />

63/03<br />

Lot 4 Scenic Drive, American River<br />

Mr & Mrs Sincock<br />

3 Osborne Street<br />

CAMPBELLTOWN <strong>SA</strong> 5074<br />

64/03<br />

Lot 38 Flinders Road, Harriet River/Vivonne Bay<br />

Nathan Guidera<br />

9 Burrows Street<br />

WILLASTON <strong>SA</strong> 5118


30<br />

65/03<br />

Lot 96 Flinders Grove, <strong>Island</strong> Beach<br />

Mr & Mrs JM McKinnon<br />

C/- Gawler Dental Clinic<br />

126 Murray Street<br />

GAWLER <strong>SA</strong> 5118<br />

66/03<br />

Lot 14 Bates Way, Penneshaw<br />

Malcolm Downie<br />

11 McIntosh Crescent<br />

BRAHMA LODGE <strong>SA</strong> 51<strong>09</strong><br />

67/03<br />

11 Dutton Street, Kingscote<br />

Peter & Barbara Miller<br />

RSD 520 Newland Service<br />

Via KINGSCOTE <strong>SA</strong> 5223<br />

68/03<br />

Lot 98 Flinders Grove, <strong>Island</strong> Beach<br />

R & A Anastasiou<br />

19 Farr Terrace<br />

GLENELG EAST <strong>SA</strong> 5045<br />

12.2 REPORT TITLE: FOOD BUSINESSES<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

PETER H MOORS,<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH<br />

OFFICER<br />

FILE NUMBER: 061<br />

FOOD PREMISES INSPECTIONS<br />

The inspection of food premises is proceeding, although still at a<br />

slower rate than was hoped, due to illness and other more urgent<br />

unscheduled commitments. The recent TAFE food safety training<br />

courses have been extremely well attended and as a result of this,<br />

many more food businesses are now completing food business<br />

notification forms and purchasing the required thermometers.<br />

Generic cleaning schedules and forms for both recording<br />

fridge/freezer temperatures and the temperatures of potentially<br />

hazardous food upon its receipt are being provided when<br />

requested.


FOOD RECALLS:<br />

Three food recalls were received for the month of August. These<br />

included the following:<br />

• Campbell’s Condensed Soup (Vegetable Beef) – pieces of<br />

rubber and rubber-coated metal detected in some cans.<br />

• Logan Farm Spinach Portions – Chopped Leaf Style<br />

(Frozen) – product may contain small thistles.<br />

• Dairy-free Fruccio ice dessert – all flavours – product<br />

labelled dairy-free but contains undeclared milk protein<br />

(casein).<br />

• Trident brand Oriental Favourites Pad Thai Noodles –<br />

incorrect labelling – undeclared allergen (wheat) in the<br />

flavour sachet.<br />

FOOD <strong>SA</strong>FETY TRAINING:<br />

The Environmental Health Officer addressed one morning and<br />

three evening food safety training sessions run by TAFE and<br />

again funded by the KI Development Board. Issues covered by<br />

the EHO were the new requirements for skills and knowledge and<br />

the need for all food businesses to complete notification forms.<br />

12.3 REPORT TITLE: OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL<br />

HEALTH ISSUES<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

PETER H MOORS,<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH<br />

OFFICER<br />

ATTACHMENTS: AUGUST FLOW METER<br />

READINGS<br />

FILE NUMBER: 061<br />

31<br />

FLOW METER READING:<br />

The STEDS flows for August are attached. Due to the recent<br />

heavy rains, there have been some very high readings.<br />

STEDS LAGOONS<br />

A close watch has been maintained on the lagoons since they<br />

went into overflow, with a daily inspection made by the<br />

Environmental Health Officer.<br />

BIOSOLIDS DEPOT:<br />

The recent high rainfall has c<strong>au</strong>sed a significant delay in the<br />

drying off of ponds No. 2 and 3. In addition, the level in pond No.<br />

1 has risen considerably. Consideration must soon be given to a<br />

possible extension of the Biosolids Depot which needs to<br />

incorporate another industrial/commercial pond and an increased<br />

flat area for the aging of stockpiles.


NOTIFIABLE DISEASES:<br />

The statistical report received from the Communicable Disease<br />

Control Branch of the Department of Human Services indicates<br />

that there was a case of Legionella longbeachae on the island<br />

during July. Since this strain of Legionella is generally associated<br />

with potting soils and compost rather than cooling towers, spas<br />

and warm water systems, no separate advice was received by<br />

<strong>Council</strong>. A reminder to residents that they should exercise care<br />

when using potting soils, by using gloves and preferably a face<br />

mask, will be circulated shortly.<br />

DERELICT HOUSE:<br />

The vacant house at American River mentioned in last month’s<br />

report has now been tidied up by the owner with some local help.<br />

The owner now has several local people who will keep an eye on<br />

the place for him while he is away and he has indicated that he<br />

will remain in contact with the Environmental Health Officer to<br />

keep him posted.<br />

IMMUNI<strong>SA</strong>TION:<br />

The normal monthly immunisation clinic was held during August,<br />

together with sessions at both Kingscote and Parndana Area<br />

Schools for Hep B and Meningococcal disease.<br />

PIR<strong>SA</strong> ENHANCED LIVESTOCK DISEASE SURVEILLANCE<br />

NEWSLETTER<br />

The latest issue of the above newsletter was recently received<br />

from PIR<strong>SA</strong>. Included in it was a reminder that no swill is to be<br />

fed to pigs. The term swill in this case refers to any mammalian<br />

material that has not been rendered (heat treated). There was also<br />

mention of the fact that as a result of a case of Mad Cow Disease<br />

being diagnosed in Canada some months ago, <strong>SA</strong> has to submit<br />

for testing, a quota of 16 cattle brains and 50 sheep brains from<br />

animals showing symptoms similar to those of TSE diseases<br />

(Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathys).<br />

12.4 REPORT TITLE: FIRE PREVENTION OFFICER'S<br />

REPORT - JULY/AUGUST <strong>2003</strong><br />

AUTHOR:<br />

MICHELLE MAGUIRE, FIRE<br />

PREVENTION OFFICER<br />

32<br />

The following report is presented for <strong>Council</strong> information:


Bushfire Prevention Planning<br />

• Vivonne Bay Bushfire Prevention Plan - The draft plan has<br />

been completed and was presented to the steering committee<br />

for corrections and/or endorsement in preparation for release<br />

for public comment. So far the only committee member<br />

comments received have been from Mr Roger Collins of the<br />

Department of Environment and Heritage. Only minor<br />

amendments were proposed. Unfortunately, DEH are not yet<br />

ready to include their Fire Management Statement for<br />

Vivonne Bay Conservation Park in the plan.<br />

• Southern Bay of Shoals Bushfire Prevention Plan -<br />

Planning was commenced for the protection of lives and<br />

property from bushfires in the developing area north of<br />

Kingscote. The major proportions of the plan, including land<br />

use, fire history and bushfire potential sections, were<br />

developed and forwarded to the steering committee for<br />

comment and input. Steering committee inspection of the<br />

main planning areas of concern focused on The Bullock<br />

Track. The Fire Prevention Officer will work with<br />

Department of Environment staff to develop proposals for the<br />

maintenance of emergency services access. Longer term<br />

proposals will also be developed for consideration by <strong>Council</strong><br />

and, later, the Native Vegetation <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

Hazard Management<br />

• Dangerous Substances Act 1979 - The Country Fire Services<br />

Region 1 Chief Officer was able to provide an extract from<br />

the Dangerous Substances Regulations 2002 to assist<br />

development of strategies for dealing with the handling of<br />

complaints regarding the dangerous and illegal storage of<br />

flammable substances, particularly fuel, within townships.<br />

This has been added to <strong>Council</strong> responsibilities with<br />

amendments to Section 40 of the Country Fires Act.<br />

• “Fire Track Classification” - The Country Fire Service<br />

requested the Fire Prevention Officer’s comments on a draft<br />

document setting standards for fuel breaks and fire access<br />

tracks on government land, as proposed by the <strong>Gov</strong>ernment<br />

Agencies Fire Liaison Committee.<br />

• Campfire Restrictions - Requests have been received and<br />

responded to regarding the restrictions on the use of campfires<br />

and cooking fires in public places outside the Fire Danger<br />

Season. While fire season restrictions do not apply, the public<br />

must meet fire safety and vegetation protection requirements<br />

year round.<br />

33


34<br />

Building and Development Standards<br />

• KI Roadside Vegetation Management Plan - The Fire<br />

Prevention Officer examined the first draft of the new<br />

roadside vegetation management plan.<br />

• Building Proposals - The Fire Prevention Officer undertook<br />

inspections of proposed dwelling sites in areas of potential<br />

significant wildfire threat. Written advice was provided<br />

according to the vulnerability of the proposed structures.<br />

State Fire Prevention Officer’s Seminar<br />

The Fire Prevention officer attended a two day conference for<br />

Fire Prevention Officers from around the State at the end of<br />

August. It is proposed that attendance and contribution to the<br />

future meetings will be required for the retention of FPO status<br />

under the Country Fires Act.<br />

Key issues covered by the seminar included reviews of current<br />

legislation, including the Environmental Protection (Burning) Policy<br />

1994 and the responsibilities of Authorised Officers under Section 38<br />

of the Country Fires Act. Des Parker, CFS Legislation Review Project<br />

Officer, outlined changes to the Country Fires Act which were<br />

forwarded to Parliamentary Counsel for their approval in late August.<br />

Mr Packer praised the <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Fire Prevention officer, noting<br />

CFS Board recommended changes to the Act which originated from<br />

issues identified and legislation proposed by the KI FPO.<br />

KI Bushfire Prevention Committee AGM<br />

The District Bushfire Prevention Committee strongly supported<br />

the approach of the Environmental Services Manager to have<br />

<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> gazetted as a Bushfire Prone Area under the<br />

Development Act and requested his invitation to the next<br />

Committee meeting.<br />

A co-operative planning approach between the Department of<br />

Environment and Heritage and the committee resulted in the<br />

decision that the bushfire prevention planning priority for<br />

<strong>2003</strong>/04 would be the development of a joint plan for the area<br />

north of Flinders Chase. Strategies will be developed by Robert<br />

Ellis of DEH and the FPO in the near future, however,<br />

commencement of the plan will await the outcomes of the DEH<br />

Flinders Chase Fire Management Plan. The second plan<br />

supported by the committee will be for the protection of<br />

Penneshaw township and its preparedness for bushfires. This plan<br />

will be commenced in the near future. The Antechamber Bay<br />

Bushfire Prevention Plan was identified as due for review. In<br />

accordance with the committee’s responsibilities under the<br />

Country Fires Act, Fire Danger Season dates and local permit to<br />

burn conditions were reconsidered and it was resolved that no<br />

changes should occur.


Work Programme – September/October <strong>2003</strong><br />

• Penneshaw Bushfire Prevention Plan - Commencement of the<br />

plan in accordance with the directions of the KI Bushfire<br />

Prevention Committee<br />

• Bushfire Prevention Planning Strategy - to be developed by<br />

DEH and the FPO<br />

• Section 40 Country Fires Act - Commencement of major<br />

inspections in October<br />

• Southern Bay of Shoals Bushfire Prevention Plan Steering<br />

Committee Meetings - Continuation of development of the<br />

draft plan.<br />

13.0 TECHNICAL SERVICES REPORTS<br />

Your Worship Mayor Pengilly and <strong>Council</strong>lors, I submit the<br />

following reports for the Ordinary Meeting of <strong>Council</strong> to be held on<br />

Wednesday 10 September <strong>2003</strong>.<br />

Moved Cr<br />

Seconded Cr<br />

That the Technical Service Manager’s Reports be received.<br />

CARRIED.<br />

13.1 REPORT TITLE: AUGUST <strong>2003</strong> PROGRESS OF<br />

WORK REPORT<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

TECHNICAL SERVICES<br />

COORDINATORS<br />

35<br />

PURPOSE<br />

For information of <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That the August <strong>2003</strong> progress of work report be received.<br />

<strong>2003</strong>/04 Capital & Construction Works:<br />

Project Name<br />

Status<br />

Stokes Bay Rd<br />

Commissioned KBR to undertake engineering survey<br />

& road design for 5kms<br />

Boat Ramp Rd<br />

Preliminary field works carried out<br />

Vivonne Ave<br />

No progress made<br />

Reeves Street<br />

Engineering survey by in-house staff prepared<br />

Parndana Mainstreet Engineering Surveyor engaged<br />

Bessell Drive<br />

No progress made<br />

Rapide Drive<br />

No progress made<br />

Hawthorne Ave<br />

No progress made<br />

Resheeting Program No progress made<br />

Vegetation Clearance Program adopted by the Committee<br />

Program


36<br />

Infrastructure Maintenance & Operations:<br />

Function<br />

Status<br />

Sealed Road Maintenance • Repaired sunken trench in Todd St<br />

• Maintenance run carried out on South Coast Rd,<br />

West End Hwy and Playford Hwy<br />

Unsealed Road Maintenance • Repaired Washout on Pratts Rd, Turkey Lane &<br />

Stevens Rd<br />

• Repaired bog holes on Shell Track & Ten Trees<br />

Rd<br />

• Repaired holes in North Coast Rd near Stokes Bay<br />

• Investigated rubble source at L.Turners property<br />

• Road Patching & general maintenance American<br />

River<br />

• Patching on Charring Cross Road, Willson River<br />

Road & Bluegums Road<br />

• Resheeted Pelican Street<br />

• Cut & reformed section of South Coast Rd near<br />

Emu Ridge<br />

• Patched bad potholes in sections of 3 Chain Road<br />

• Patrol grading as required & possible<br />

Traffic Control & Signs • Repair vandalised finger sign on Nepean St<br />

Kingscote<br />

• Sign maintenance undertaken throughout the<br />

district<br />

Culverts & Bridges • Cleaned out culverts & repaired to broken pipes<br />

on Gosse Ritche Rd, Mt Taylor Rd, Mt Stockdale<br />

Rd, Harriett Rd East West 1, East West 2 and<br />

Crabbs Rd<br />

• Repaired headwalls on Bark Hut Rd<br />

• Unblocked drain in Addison St by school<br />

• New culvert installed on Florence Road &<br />

Bluegums Road<br />

• Extensive drainage & Culvert maintenance<br />

undertaken this month<br />

• Installed driveway pipes on Pelican Street<br />

• Installed new culvert on Elsegood Road<br />

Reserves & Verges • Commenced removal of Oleander street trees on<br />

various streets in Kingscote<br />

• Removed “Street Trees” recently vandalised along<br />

Murray Street<br />

• Cleaned up weed on Kohinoor / Telegraph Rd /<br />

Information bays<br />

• Removed several fallen trees due to storm damage<br />

• Kingscote reserves slashing undertaken<br />

• General mowing maintenance in Penneshaw /<br />

Kingscote / American River / Emu Bay / Parndana<br />

• Weedicide program commenced on road verges<br />

& footpath areas


37<br />

Sports and Recreational<br />

Facilities<br />

Public Amenities & <strong>Council</strong><br />

Buildings<br />

More test holes dug at Kingscote oval following<br />

request from football club and has yet again proved<br />

that the irrigation system is not to blame for the<br />

drainage problem (refer to special report)<br />

• Maintenance carried out to vandalism at Vivonne<br />

bay Toilets / Penneshaw / Kingscote<br />

• Reported to police re “Toilet Paper Bandit”<br />

• Weather proof verandah undertaken at Penneshaw<br />

Hall & other minor repairs<br />

• Quotations being obtained on repairs of Ferry<br />

Terminal toilets which includes roof leaks / timber<br />

damage / additional weather proofing<br />

• Western River Cove shelter roof being repaired<br />

under insurance claim<br />

• Various electrical jobs conducted at Penneshaw /<br />

Kingscote and Operation centre<br />

• Kingscote swimming pool new plumbing, fittings,<br />

hardware and painting completed<br />

• Shifted furniture & installed blackboards &<br />

shelves<br />

• Arranged Air-conditioning Service to units in<br />

<strong>Council</strong> Office building<br />

• Roof repairs Electrical repairs at Penneshaw<br />

Penguin facility<br />

• Cleaned weeds / weedicide / tree planting at<br />

Kingscote Penguin facility<br />

Special Project Management:<br />

Project Name<br />

Status<br />

Ozone Lights • Meeting with Ozone re direction for these<br />

• “Street and Park Furniture” visiting in September<br />

to provide advise (FOC)<br />

Christmas Cove Harbour Refer to special report<br />

Redevelopment<br />

American River Land<br />

Division<br />

• Stormwater Drains along Buick Drive being laid<br />

• Superintendent & field supervision issues<br />

discussed with Developer’s Engineer<br />

• EPA approval of discharging SW onto the sea has<br />

yet to resolve<br />

Penneshaw Cemetery Extension Plan has been drawn up<br />

Dog and Cat Management Refer to special Report<br />

Plan<br />

Chapman River Footbridge Geotechnical field work conducted on 29/8/03<br />

Kingscote Cemetery Refer to special report<br />

Extension<br />

Fuel Supply Contract<br />

Emu Bay Overall Stormwater<br />

Drainage Plan<br />

Bullock Track<br />

Speed Zoning<br />

Progressing<br />

Advised L.Rawlings that fencing should be completed<br />

on the boundary alignment of his property and the<br />

Road reserve<br />

50 kph on Western Cove Road, Nepean Bay relocated<br />

on 6/8/03 at 11 am.


38<br />

Parks & Recreation Facility Management:<br />

Project/Function<br />

Status<br />

Lovering Park • Builders driving over the Park<br />

• Local residents have complained<br />

• Barriers erected to prevent everyone driving over<br />

the park<br />

• Trees will be planted in the future and barriers<br />

removed<br />

Landscape & Facilities Refer to special Report<br />

Design Plan<br />

Pelican Feeding Area Area surveyed for the development of a plan<br />

Reeves Point Quarry Area surveyed for the development of a plan<br />

Waste Management & STEDS:<br />

Fleurieu Regional Waste<br />

Management Strategy<br />

Committee<br />

• Crs Richards and McDonald and PCSC attended<br />

meeting<br />

• Report in <strong>Council</strong> minutes<br />

Water Management • Hired a 4” Trash Pump to remove the water from<br />

the Kingscote Dump<br />

• Considering purchasing a pump very soon<br />

Steel Amnesty • Commenced and will continue until end<br />

September<br />

• Numerous enquiries<br />

• Obtaining quotations from companies to come and<br />

collect in October 03<br />

Kingscote landfill<br />

&<br />

Transfer stations<br />

• Pumped water out of pit<br />

• Glass transfer with KI recycles working well<br />

• All sites gearing up for influx of steel in particular<br />

cars<br />

Recycling • Positive communications with two organisations<br />

interested in green waste composting and<br />

cardboard recycling<br />

Regional Waste Forum • Attended at Mt Barker hosted by Southern and<br />

Hills Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association<br />

• Every <strong>Council</strong> has the same issues as KI<br />

• Need to be involved in commenting on the “State<br />

Waste Strategy”<br />

EPA Water Policy<br />

Future Directions Project<br />

Kingscote STEDS<br />

Extensions<br />

Attended seminar in relation to the new policy<br />

M<strong>au</strong>nsell’s commenced the cost comparison and<br />

water monitoring parts of this project<br />

Refer to special report<br />

Staff & System Development:<br />

Program<br />

Radio Communication<br />

Fuel Supply<br />

Disposal sale by tender<br />

Annual Staff Clothing<br />

Status<br />

Austlink Communications installed new radio units in<br />

all mobile plant and vehicles<br />

Negotiations with Shell continuing in regard to<br />

relocation of fuel storage equipment<br />

Advertised the Chamberlain tractor for sale by tender<br />

Placed order for protective clothing and footwear


39<br />

Training<br />

E.P Water quality Policy<br />

Compiled Training record of employees from TAFE<br />

Attended Information session in regard to<br />

administration of policy<br />

Community Group Projects:<br />

Project Name/Services<br />

Status<br />

Independence Point Walk • Project Works completed building the bridges<br />

(refer to special report)<br />

• Provided “roadwork” signs, Equipment to<br />

American River Progress<br />

• Seat donated and installed for American River<br />

Progress<br />

Green Corps<br />

Attended project l<strong>au</strong>nch at Antechamber Bay<br />

Nepean Pine Rehabilitation • “Draft Management Plan” received for comment<br />

Project<br />

• Need a budget to manage this area if <strong>Council</strong><br />

endorses the plan.<br />

• Indicated to Flora and F<strong>au</strong>ns Club that no budget<br />

exists in <strong>2003</strong>/04 other than for ongoing<br />

maintenance.<br />

Sundry Works & External Services:<br />

Client Name<br />

Services Provided<br />

T<strong>SA</strong><br />

Road maintenance agreement<br />

KI <strong>Council</strong><br />

Built a sand bunker at Penneshaw Depot<br />

DEH<br />

Provided “Roadworks” signs to Dave Taylor for the<br />

grazing of Wattle Grove and Weatons Road. Grazing<br />

trial complete<br />

13.2 REPORT TITLE: CHRISTMAS COVE HARBOUR<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

KEN LIU, TSM<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To update the progress on the redevelopment of Christmas Cove<br />

project.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That the action taken by the Technical Services Manager in<br />

<strong>au</strong>thorising the additional works to be undertaken on Christmas<br />

Cove as outlined be ratified.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

<strong>SA</strong> Tourism Commission confirmed over the phone on 14/8/<strong>2003</strong><br />

that the supplementary funding of $50,000 is available for extra<br />

development works on the Cove, regardless <strong>Council</strong>’s application<br />

for additional grant from the <strong>SA</strong> Boating Facilities Advisory<br />

Committee is successful or not.


DISCUSSION<br />

Following further negotiations with the Contractor, Leed<br />

Engineering and Construction Pty Ltd, the indicative cost for the<br />

additional works (to enable limited future marina berths to be<br />

provided in the stage 1 redevelopment) is $82,500 including<br />

GST. The additional works (as shown on the modified plan<br />

below) include the following:<br />

• Extension of 32 metres revetment walling,<br />

• Excavation of 4,000 cubic metres basin material, and<br />

• Installation of five (5) piles.<br />

The contract price including the above additional works<br />

(excluding $30,000 for the supply and delivery of some 65 cubic<br />

metres of ready-mix concrete by <strong>Council</strong>) becomes $595,485 (ie<br />

$541,350 GST exclusive). The total project cost including<br />

engineering design and management is approximately $610,000<br />

GST exclusive.<br />

Total funding available for the project is $614,000 which is made<br />

up of:<br />

• $250,000 <strong>SA</strong>TC grant<br />

• $284,000 <strong>SA</strong> Recreational Boating Levy Fund<br />

• $50,000 (<strong>SA</strong>TC loan) & $30,000 (2002/03 Budget) from KI<br />

<strong>Council</strong><br />

As these additional works outlined above can be accommodated<br />

within the funding available, I have <strong>au</strong>thorised the inclusion of<br />

these works in the contract.<br />

Construction work is now planned to commence either the last<br />

week of September or immediately after the October’s Long<br />

Weekend.<br />

40


41<br />

13.3 REPORT TITLE: KINGSCOTE STEDS<br />

EXTENSIONS<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

KEN LIU, TSM<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To seek instructions from <strong>Council</strong> in relation to the proposed<br />

extensions of Kingscote STEDS.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That this matter be referred to the STEDS Committee for a<br />

recommendation, and further that in light of the complexity of<br />

this project, with the exception of the line on Marsden Crescent<br />

being extended to Lot 111 Investigator Avenue subject to site<br />

investigation by the Technical Services Manager, <strong>Council</strong> defers<br />

the extension of the existing system until those issues raised in<br />

the report are addressed.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

$138,200 has been provided in the current budget to extend the<br />

Kingscote’s STEDS connections to Vivonne Avenue and other<br />

areas.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Preliminary to the design of any STEDS project, it is necessary to<br />

determine the extent of the areas which are to be serviced and<br />

collect field data and information that would affect the outcomes.<br />

The process will involve the following:<br />

1. Ascertain as to how far <strong>Council</strong> wishes to provide STEDS<br />

connections to properties in Kingscote from the extensions (ie<br />

to properties with septic tanks only, all blocks within the<br />

existing township area, or beyond to include future urban<br />

land);<br />

2. Locate all minor STEDS extensions which have been installed<br />

since the implementation of the original scheme in 1976, but<br />

not recorded on the master plan;<br />

3. Find out the levels and sizes of existing gravity drains,<br />

capacity of the system, and any hydr<strong>au</strong>lic issues that would<br />

need to be included for engineering considerations;<br />

4. Identify the locations of all properties that have a septic tank<br />

installed in the ground, but not connected to the STED system<br />

and undertake field survey as required for more accurate<br />

information of these tanks, in particular their positions and<br />

outlet levels; and<br />

5. From the above information, develop option plans or a design<br />

brief for the preparation of construction drawings and<br />

technical specifications.


Due to lack of available engineering data and unknown<br />

magnitude of the existing problems with the existing STEDS, it<br />

would be difficult to advise <strong>Council</strong> the cost of the extensions<br />

and the extent of the problems without going through the above<br />

process. The key issues are:<br />

1. Whether the existing STEDS infrastructure (ie the gravity<br />

mains, the pumping stations and oxidation lagoon) has the<br />

sufficient capacity for extra flows<br />

2. Some of the existing septic tanks pending connection may be<br />

installed in wrong positions and the outlets put in may also be<br />

too low that will require relocations or otherwise connections<br />

cannot be provided.<br />

3. No easements on properties where the new drain lines may be<br />

laid have yet been acquired by <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

4. Some existing building works or structures may be on the<br />

alignment of the new drains which will create constraints in<br />

providing the connections.<br />

5. The existing minor STEDS extensions installed few years ago<br />

without proper engineering consideration may be built on<br />

wrong alignments or levels.<br />

6. Unless the current problem with the stormwater infiltration to<br />

the existing pipes is rectified, the hydr<strong>au</strong>lic performance of<br />

the entire system cannot be determined under the sanitary<br />

engineering principles.<br />

Initial assessment undertaken by searching through files and<br />

records and field inspections, have suggested that it will be an<br />

enormous task to find out exactly where all the existing septic<br />

tank outlets and extensions are, as it may be necessary to uncover<br />

some or most of the existing pipes installed over last 25 years so<br />

that the sizes, depths and alignments of these extensions can be<br />

determined.<br />

In light of the complexity of this project, it would be wise to have<br />

it investigated and planned properly before extending the existing<br />

pipes any further.<br />

42


43<br />

13.4 REPORT TITLE: KINGSCOTE CEMETERY<br />

REDEVELOPMENT<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

KEN LIU, TSM<br />

ATTACHMENTS: REDEVELOPMENTS PLANS &<br />

ACTION PLAN<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To consider the proposal for the extension of the Kingscote<br />

Cemetery.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That the proposed plan for the extension of Kingscote Cemetery<br />

be approved in principle and further that <strong>Council</strong> <strong>au</strong>thorises the<br />

CEO to commence negotiation with adjoining property owners on<br />

land acquisitions and undertake road closure process in<br />

accordance with the Road Opening & Closing Act.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

Kingscote cemetery is almost full and with the recent site<br />

clearance work done on the north western corner, the burial site<br />

available will last only for few more years.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Accordingly, a concept plan has been developed with a view to<br />

extend the existing site. The proposal which is shown on the<br />

attached plans recommends the purchase of additional land from<br />

the adjoining properties coloured in blue, road closures in yellow,<br />

and road opening in green. Three (3) parcels of land owned by<br />

<strong>Council</strong> for cemetery extensions are in orange colour. Combining<br />

these additional parcels of land available for the extension, the<br />

cemetery can be properly redeveloped.<br />

The proposed road closures will also improve junction safety at<br />

this location as well as providing opportunity for integrating the<br />

existing <strong>Council</strong> owned land on both sides of the road into one.<br />

Bullock Track approach at the intersection with <strong>Gov</strong>ernor Wallen<br />

Drive will need realigning to incorporate with the sealing of<br />

Seaview Road extension to the boat ramp planned for the current<br />

financial year as well as the closure to through traffic on Karatta<br />

Terrace.<br />

An action plan with nominated time frames and tasks for the<br />

project is also provided in the report. The most important needs<br />

doing this year is to negotiate with the adjoining property owners<br />

in order to secure the land required for the extension, then follow<br />

by physical works such as road closure and realignment, sealing<br />

of Seaview Road extension, and perimeter fence installation.


Once the extra land is secured, the next step is to get the<br />

community involved by inviting their input as part of the<br />

redevelopment process as to how the site should be landscaped,<br />

type of burials, cemetery facilities, etc.<br />

13.5 TITLE: STORAGE SHED –<br />

RECREATION & WASTE<br />

SERVICES<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

DANIEL ROWLEY, TECHNICAL<br />

SERVICES COORDINATOR<br />

44<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To recommend the construction of a shed for the Green Team at<br />

the Operations Centre within existing budget items.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That part of the Capital funds allocated in this years budget be<br />

redirected to building a storage shed for the Recreation & Waste<br />

Services.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

Plant and equipment operated and maintained by the Green Team<br />

is currently being stored in an inappropriate manner resulting in<br />

an increased rate of degradation. The following are some<br />

examples-<br />

• Lawn Mowers (value in excess of $30K each) not being<br />

protected undercover;<br />

• Vehicle being stored outside;<br />

• Tractor and mower not properly placed undercover<br />

• Small equipment items scattered amongst other plant and<br />

equipment items;<br />

• Signs scattered all over the place;<br />

• Toilet cleaning consumables being placed in a location that has<br />

no door and is inadequate;<br />

• Security of all plant and equipment is compromised;<br />

• The current nursery is inadequate and results in many plants<br />

not surviving.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

As the security and caring of <strong>Council</strong>’s equipment and goods in<br />

the Depot have higher priority, the upgrading of office facilities<br />

at the Operations Centre would be more appropriate to be<br />

deferred for future funding consideration.


The Green Team proposes to build a shed at the Works Depot to<br />

relocate and house the following items from the capital budget set<br />

aside for the Operations Centre’s Office during the current<br />

financial year:<br />

• Vehicle<br />

• Tractor and mower<br />

• Spray equipment<br />

• All ride on mowers<br />

• Small plant and equipment<br />

• Signs and other small items<br />

• Other Green Team specific items<br />

The building will be a 4-bay, 12.2m x 7.5m x 4m shed with<br />

lockable doors at a cost of $6,086 GST exclusive.<br />

The concrete floor proposed can be funded from the remaining<br />

funds and the existing operating budget for the purchase of ready<br />

mix concrete with the construction being undertaken by in-house<br />

staff.<br />

The existing shed currently occupied by the Green Team will be<br />

used to store the toilet consumables and dump materials. The<br />

Blue Team will use the shed where the tractor and other small<br />

Green Team items are currently stored.<br />

The current Nursery will also be upgraded, using materials<br />

surplus available at the site. This will ensure the staff have the<br />

ability to manage plantings in an appropriate manner.<br />

The provisions of the proposed storage facilities will ensure better<br />

management and security of <strong>Council</strong>’s goods and assets.<br />

13.6 REPORT TITLE: DOG & CAT MANAGEMENT<br />

PLAN<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

DANIEL ROWLEY,TECHNICAL<br />

SERVICES COORDINATOR<br />

ATTACHMENTS: SUMMARY REPORT (UNDER<br />

SEPARATE COVER)<br />

45<br />

PURPOSE<br />

For adoption of the revised Dog and Cat Management Plan<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> adopts the revised Dog and Cat Management Plan<br />

for implementation.


46<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

The Draft Dog and Cat Management Plan released for public<br />

comments closed on 18 July <strong>2003</strong>.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Nineteen (19) written responses to the released Draft Dog and Cat<br />

Management Plan have been received.<br />

It was clear from the responses received that many people were<br />

unaware of their requirements under the Dog and Cat<br />

Management Act 1995. The first draft also did not have an Action<br />

Plan and information on implementation cost.<br />

Following the receipt of public comments, the plan was rewritten<br />

to include the requirements under the Act, appropriate public<br />

recommendations, an Action Plan and a summary of all public<br />

comments. The plan is also rewritten so that actions required are<br />

easier to follow.<br />

POLICY IMPLICATIONS<br />

1. Financial/budget<br />

The financial implications of implementing this plan are as<br />

follows-<br />

• Maintain existing budget<br />

• Increase in 0.5FTE General Inspector- $20,000<br />

(ongoing)<br />

• Consumables (eg Traps)- $1,000 (ongoing)<br />

• <strong>Council</strong> call out system- $5,000 (ongoing)<br />

• Once of purchases for implementation- $15,000<br />

2. Legal<br />

As part of the review of <strong>Council</strong> Bylaws, recommendations<br />

within this plan need to be incorporated into Bylaws.<br />

13.7 REPORT TITLE: KINGSCOTE OVAL<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

KEN LIU, TSM<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To provide solutions regarding drainage problems on Kingscote<br />

Oval as requested by Mayor Pengilly.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> seeks advice from a turf management expert on how<br />

to improve the Oval surface.


47<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

The Kingscote Football Club President, Mr Green made an<br />

accusation at the June meeting that <strong>Council</strong> staff cut or damaged<br />

the existing sub-soil drains, while installing the <strong>au</strong>tomatic watering<br />

system on the Oval, c<strong>au</strong>sing stormwater to pond on the playing<br />

surface. Later, the allegation was proven to be unfounded.<br />

The Kingscote Football Club did not accept the TSM’s response<br />

to the Club’s accusation (documented in TSM Report Item No<br />

13.3, meeting of 9/7/03), despite that the explanation was<br />

accepted by the <strong>Council</strong> (refer to Minutes No 36.0).<br />

The Football Club however, still maintains that the oval being<br />

subjected to waterlogging is due to either a busted watering pipe<br />

or blocked sub-surface drainage and has made further complaint<br />

to the Mayor. As a result, Mayor Pengilly has requested for more<br />

information bec<strong>au</strong>se at present <strong>Council</strong> is getting the blame.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

It was somewhat disappointing to receive the comments from the<br />

Club despite explanation was given. While <strong>Council</strong> staff was<br />

deeply embarrassed by the Club's action and did not expect an<br />

apology, I do believe under this circumstance, staff should have at<br />

least received support or respect from the community and Elected<br />

Members.<br />

In addition to the previous accusation of damage to sub-soil<br />

drains, the Club now is alleging that the problem is the busted<br />

water pipes installed by <strong>Council</strong> staff.<br />

In my previous report, I advised that the current problems on the<br />

Oval are obvious and the c<strong>au</strong>ses could be due to:<br />

• Lack of hydr<strong>au</strong>lic consideration in the design & construction<br />

of the sub-soil drains;<br />

• Excessive stormwater runoff onto the oval from the higher<br />

area and lack of overall surface drainage management;<br />

• Poor quality soil on Oval (only approximately 25mm of soil<br />

with thick clay below);<br />

• No maintenance/monitoring program in place for the sub-soil<br />

drainage system; and<br />

• The last four years have been relatively dry resulting reduction<br />

in void ratio (ie allowing the water to get through to the filter<br />

lay).<br />

The above comment is my opinion without any laboratory test<br />

information, whether <strong>Council</strong> or the Football Club wants to<br />

accept it or not is not my call. Perhaps it may be in the best<br />

interest of everyone, <strong>Council</strong> should obtain an independent<br />

engineer report so that the accusation of any wrong doing by the<br />

staff may be put to rest.


48<br />

Clearly, the oval was badly built in the first place and if <strong>Council</strong><br />

is serious about fixing the surface, it will need to do the following<br />

things properly:<br />

1. Extend the existing kerbing to redirect the stormwater runoff<br />

away from the Oval surface (as stormwater carries the fines or<br />

clay and deposits onto the lower area of the Oval).<br />

2. Make corrections to the oval levels to improve surface<br />

drainage.<br />

3. Replace the top layer of soil with suitable type or seek expert<br />

advice to improve its permeability.<br />

4. Undertake remedial works or install flashing points as<br />

required to the existing sub-surface drainage system so that<br />

effective maintenance program can be put in place.<br />

No resources have been provided from the current budget to<br />

rectify these problems. In any event, <strong>Council</strong> should seek advice<br />

from a turf management specialist before deciding what is the<br />

best course of action to address these problems.<br />

13.8 REPORT TITLE: INDEPENDENCE POINT WALK-<br />

AMERICAN RIVER<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

DANIEL ROWLEY, TECHNICAL<br />

SERVICES COORDINATOR<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To provide information regarding contribution made by <strong>Council</strong><br />

to the Independence Point Walk at American River.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That the information be received.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

The American River Progress Association, through Irene Halley,<br />

has been developing a walking trail from Tangara Drive to<br />

Independence Point near American River.<br />

The group has undertaken a lengthy approval process to receive<br />

permission for the construction of the walk. The organisations<br />

involved included:<br />

o <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

o National Parks and Wildlife <strong>SA</strong> (NPW<strong>SA</strong>)<br />

o Native Vegetation <strong>Council</strong><br />

o Transport <strong>SA</strong><br />

Following the approval process the group marked the trail and<br />

commenced the construction. Project Works were contacted and<br />

asked to construct two bridges over some road culverts.


49<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Council</strong> in conjunction with the American River<br />

Progress Association applied for funding from the Coast<br />

Protection Board in March <strong>2003</strong> and were successful in obtaining<br />

funding for the materials.<br />

Project Works were then used to undertake the construction of the<br />

bridges in the appropriate locations to the design standards<br />

developed by NPW<strong>SA</strong> on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>. <strong>Council</strong> contributed<br />

extensively with logistics and the provision of some materials.<br />

The completed works were undertaken to a high quality and to<br />

the standards provided. The students involved were committed to<br />

the project even though they were required to catch the Sealink<br />

Shuttle Bus at 6:30am each morning.<br />

This project is a good example of how Project Works can be used<br />

to undertake small construction projects for community<br />

organisations. The people leading Project Works will provide<br />

students to project undertaken on any part of <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> if<br />

possible.<br />

The American River Progress Association is looking at obtaining<br />

sponsorship from organisations to provide seats along the trail.<br />

<strong>Council</strong> has already supplied a seat as part of this initiative.<br />

Following are some photos of the works undertaken and a copy of<br />

the recent <strong>Island</strong>er article.


An innovative project is underway at<br />

American River that will link Remembrance<br />

Reserve and Independence Point with a<br />

three kilometre walking trail.<br />

The walkway is a joint effort between<br />

Coastcare, Project Works, <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>, <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> SeaLink,<br />

<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Lions and a very keen<br />

band of volunteers.<br />

Coastcare have provided grant money for<br />

the project, while Project Works, which<br />

provides opportunities for local youth to<br />

gain valuable employment skills, are<br />

undertaking the construction of the walkway<br />

that includes two creek crossings.<br />

Volunteers who have dedicated their time<br />

for the project include Irene Halley, Judy<br />

and Dean Johnson, Nigel Humphrys, Tom<br />

Appleby, P<strong>au</strong>line Rattray, Jan Peachey and<br />

Daniel Catmur (at just four years of age).<br />

Sponsors are being sought to provide bench<br />

seats along the walkway to take in the<br />

sweeping views of Pelican Lagoon each of<br />

whom will be acknowledged with a<br />

commemorative plaque at the site of their<br />

seat.<br />

If you are interested in providing the $200<br />

necessary for a seat please contact Irene<br />

Halley on 8553 7337.<br />

50


13.9 REPORT TITLE: KANGAROO ISLAND COUNCIL<br />

LANDSCAPE AND FACILITIES<br />

DESIGN PLAN<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

DANIEL ROWLEY, TECHNICAL<br />

SERVICES COORDINATOR<br />

51<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To advise <strong>Council</strong> of the cost associated with the development of<br />

a <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Landscape and Facilities Design Plan<br />

based on the plan developed by National Parks and Wildlife <strong>SA</strong><br />

on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

(1) That the report be received.<br />

(2) That the development of a landscape and facilities design plan<br />

for <strong>Council</strong>’s open space as outlined be considered in next<br />

year’s budget and further that in the interim, <strong>Council</strong> adopts<br />

similar approach as the NP&WS for implementation.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

At the <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Council</strong> budget workshop, the Parks and<br />

Community Services Coordinator was requested to obtain a<br />

quotation for the development of a <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

Landscape and Facilities Design Plan.<br />

Taylor and Cullity Pty Ltd, the company who developed the<br />

NPW<strong>SA</strong> plan and has undertaken the majority of landscape<br />

planning for NPW<strong>SA</strong>, were contacted and requested to provide a<br />

quotation. The <strong>Council</strong> plan is to be developed using the NPW<strong>SA</strong><br />

planning brief as a starting point.<br />

A Landscape and Facilities Design Plan will standardise all<br />

facilities constructed on <strong>Council</strong> property ensuring a consistent<br />

planning approach is taken for all facilities. It will also provide<br />

the planning for many community groups resulting in their ability<br />

to commence construction at the start of the project rather than<br />

undertaking planning first.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Taylor and Cullity were provided with a “Scope of Works”<br />

comprising two parts:<br />

(1) Develop Facility Plans for the following facilities (Concept<br />

followed by working drawings), including toilet, BBQ shelter,<br />

shelter, camping, self registration station, sign shelter,<br />

interpretation sign, sheltered seat and table, seat, table, memorial<br />

seat, post and rail fence, low tension wire fence, vehicle barrier,<br />

pedestrian barrier, road and path materials, duckboard, boardwalk,<br />

revegetation fencing, lookout stone, lookout timber; and


52<br />

(2) Develop Site Plans (concept followed by working drawings)<br />

for the following sites (many will not require working<br />

drawings as a concept is adequate) including Antechamber<br />

Bay, Browns Beach, American River Campground and<br />

Remembrance Reserve, Pennington Bay/Prospect Hill<br />

precinct, Swimming Pool to Brownlow Walk, Stokes Bay<br />

Camping and Day Visitor Area, Snellings Beach Day Visitor<br />

Area, Western River Cove Day Visitor Area, Vivonne Bay<br />

Campground, Duck Lagoon (inc campground), B<strong>au</strong>din Beach<br />

Reserves, Constitution Hill, American River Foreshore,<br />

Vivonne Bay Surf Beach, Independence Point, <strong>Gov</strong>ernor<br />

Wallen, Pigs Head Corner, Kingscote Swimming Pool,<br />

Muston Lookout, Flour Cask Bay, Sealink Warf to<br />

Frenchmans Rock, Playford Highway Lookout, Hansen Bay<br />

Day Visitor Area, Emu Bay Cemetery, August Fiebig<br />

Monument, Corner South Coast and Birchmore Roads, Emu<br />

Bay Day Visitor Area, American River Turn off, War<br />

Services Land Settlement Monument.<br />

The quotation is as follows-<br />

Facilities-<br />

Concept Plans $6,200<br />

Working Drawings $9,700<br />

Sites-<br />

Concept Plans $15,400<br />

Working Drawings $11,100<br />

Disbursements-<br />

Travel, accommodation etc $5,000<br />

TOTAL<br />

$47,400 + GST<br />

The following reserves could be added to the list as required-<br />

American River Reserve<br />

Muston<br />

Emu Bay Campground (at Cemetery)<br />

Kingscote Entrance<br />

Youth Park<br />

Grassed area at the bottom of Penneshaw Hill<br />

(B<strong>au</strong>din Beach side)<br />

The budget for this project is substantial however the benefits to<br />

<strong>Council</strong> in the long term will be substantial as:<br />

• The plan will provide a basis for external funding,<br />

• Consistent design will be used across all reserves on<br />

<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> creating a high quality product,<br />

• Enable community groups to easily implement projects to<br />

<strong>Council</strong> Standards


The current “Reserves Budget” cannot fund this project so funds<br />

from another source within the budget will need to be sought if<br />

this project is to proceed.<br />

It is possible to reduce the budget required to have the majority of<br />

the project completed. Our suggestion would be-<br />

Priority 1- Facilities working drawings<br />

This will ensure all facilities on <strong>Council</strong> reserves are of a<br />

consistent design and will provide community groups with<br />

designs for the construction of the facilities.<br />

Priority 2- Site Concept Plans<br />

Many of the sites listed will only require Concept Plans for the<br />

construction. The development of these will provide the<br />

motivation for community groups to apply for funds to construct<br />

these site plans.<br />

Priority 3- Site working drawings<br />

These drawings could be prioritised in blocks of 10 sites (as per<br />

above) and budgeted in that way.<br />

It is suggest that Priority 1 & 2 should be committed and<br />

developed as part of a construction project.<br />

The implementation of this project will require a substantial<br />

amount of consultation with the community and elected members<br />

it is therefore proposed that a “Steering Committee” consisting<br />

the Parks and Community Services Coordinator and Two (2)<br />

elected members, be established to deliver the project.<br />

Key community representative would be involved in the site<br />

appraisal for the development of Site Concept plans followed by<br />

public presentations to the community. Once this has occurred<br />

then the Site Working Drawings would be developed.<br />

13.10 REPORT TITLE: WASTE MANAGEMENT<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

DANIEL ROWLEY, TECHNICAL<br />

SERVICES COORDINATOR<br />

53<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To advise <strong>Council</strong> on the direction waste management on<br />

<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> needs to take and the implementation plan.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> receives the report and acknowledges the<br />

implications of this direction.


BACKGROUND<br />

Numerous reports and information has been presented to <strong>Council</strong><br />

in relation to the costs and future directions of waste management<br />

on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>. In summary the following is what has been<br />

presented:<br />

• Not viable for <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to manage a landfill<br />

(whole of life) on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>;<br />

• EPA approve for regional landfill on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> is very<br />

unlikely;<br />

• Legislative requirements to undertake recycling;<br />

• High cost of future waste management services.<br />

M<strong>au</strong>nsell is undertaking the future directions project which will<br />

develop:<br />

• a cost comparison model on landfill on KI vs transport to<br />

mainland,<br />

• a Closure and Post Closure Plan for Kingscote Landfill,<br />

• a Groundwater Monitoring Program for Kingscote Landfill, and<br />

• best practice designs for Transfer Stations.<br />

The May 03 <strong>Council</strong> Meeting resolved that the “2001 Integrated<br />

Waste Management Plan” be modified to meet the needs of waste<br />

management services on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>.<br />

As part of the formation of Zero Waste <strong>SA</strong> and the passage of the<br />

Zero Waste <strong>SA</strong> Bill <strong>2003</strong> a “State Waste Strategy” will be<br />

developed. Funding from Zero Waste <strong>SA</strong> will only be available if<br />

the project is a part of the strategy.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

While the concept at face value may not seem an option, the cost<br />

of transporting waste to the mainland is comparable to managing<br />

a landfill on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>. The costs of managing a landfill<br />

goes well beyond placing waste in the cell and could last for over<br />

100 years following dumping if impacts on the environment<br />

occur.<br />

It is anticipated the actual cost comparison model, transporting to<br />

mainland vs managing landfill on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>, will be<br />

presented to <strong>Council</strong> at the October meeting. Early indications<br />

suggest the cost is approximately the same.<br />

Primarily all waste, except green waste and building and<br />

demolition (soil, concrete etc), under this model will be<br />

transported to the mainland for recycling or landfill. In summary<br />

it is proposed to modify the Integrated Waste Management Plan<br />

to incorporate the concepts. Many of these concepts will need to<br />

be introduced, even if a landfill is managed on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>,<br />

as there is a legislative requirement and cost incentives to<br />

undertake recycling programs.<br />

54


55<br />

Kerbside Collection<br />

Introduce a Kerbside Recyclable Collection Service by<br />

undertaking the following:<br />

• Modify existing 240L bins to become “split” bins, one side for<br />

recyclables and one for landfill waste. A divider is all that is<br />

required to be purchased<br />

• Trade the “blue” truck in for a compactor truck that takes both<br />

recyclables and normal waste<br />

• No green waste in kerbside collection<br />

• No glass products in kerbside collection. Glass breaks in<br />

compactors and cannot be removed contaminating the products<br />

• Similar bin collection procedures for public places introduced<br />

Transfer Stations<br />

Kingscote (or Penneshaw) will become the primary transfer<br />

station where all waste (except green waste and soil and concrete)<br />

is processed for transportation to the mainland. The following is<br />

to occur:<br />

• Large Skip bins introduced for waste transfer operations<br />

• “White” truck traded in for a flat bed truck to take skip bins<br />

• All products sorted and fee incentives introduced if the public<br />

sort prior to arrival at the transfer stations<br />

• Purchase a “baler” to compact all types of waste for transfer to<br />

mainland, may not be required if provided by a company<br />

• Purchase a “loader” to assist in moving waste over the<br />

Kingscote site, does not need to be new or in an extremely<br />

good condition<br />

• All sites become undercover with specific areas (bins) for each<br />

product<br />

• Partnerships developed with recycling companies and local<br />

businesses<br />

• Community run small transfer stations established for<br />

American River and Vivonne Bay to take what is not collected<br />

via kerbside collection (primarily green waste and glass)<br />

• Install a weigh bridge at the Kingscote (or Penneshaw)<br />

Transfer Station to measure incoming and outgoing waste<br />

which will reduce our EPA levy<br />

• Implement a Green Waste composting program<br />

• Appoint a Waste Overseer to oversee all day to day waste<br />

management on KI with a corresponding increase in the<br />

reserves budget to offset the reserve budget implications.<br />

Commercial Waste<br />

Large businesses will be encouraged to have large skips, as per<br />

above, to collect their recyclable waste. <strong>Council</strong> will then collect<br />

at a cost recovery fee. The objectives of this major shift in the<br />

way waste is managed are:


• Reduce the amount of waste going to landfill. This will enable<br />

<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> to use landfills on Fleurieu Peninsula for a<br />

longer period of time, reducing the transport costs and landfill<br />

costs. There is also legislative responsibilities and cost<br />

incentives to undertake this action<br />

• Make the collection and transport of waste efficient and cost<br />

effective<br />

• Reduce the amount of contaminants being placed with the<br />

recyclables<br />

• Reduce the long term financial, social and environmental<br />

burden of landfill management on the <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong><br />

community.<br />

The cost of this major shift in the way waste is managed on<br />

<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> will be high. Some of the up front capital costs<br />

maybe funded from external sources, eg Zero Waste <strong>SA</strong> however<br />

this cannot be guaranteed so the budget will need to be<br />

committed to the program and if not spent then the excess<br />

returned to the general pool. This is the way the <strong>2003</strong>/04 budget<br />

will be managed. The waste management budget also needs to be<br />

all encompassing, not subject to other budgets, eg plant purchases<br />

and replacement, wages and other capital costs and these costs<br />

will need to be included in the budget.<br />

History, from other <strong>Council</strong>s, has shown that every person wants<br />

recycling but are not prepared to pay through rates. <strong>Council</strong>s who<br />

undertake major marketing programs are successful in<br />

introducing recycling programs. Elected members and <strong>Council</strong><br />

staff will need to support this change to ensure it is successful.<br />

This will need to be backed up with media promotion.<br />

The revised Integrated Waste Management Plan will have an<br />

“Action Plan” and a “Financial Plan” and is anticipated to be<br />

presented to <strong>Council</strong> for consideration as part of the 2004/05<br />

budget process. Once endorsed by <strong>Council</strong> the budget will need<br />

to ensure that the program can be implemented fully. It is<br />

anticipated that the implementation of this change will be<br />

completed by 1 July 2006 or 1 July 2007 depending on what is<br />

required from a budget perspective.<br />

Zero Waste <strong>SA</strong> primary function involves “Resource Recovery”<br />

or recycling programs. Zero Waste <strong>SA</strong> funding is determined by<br />

the priorities in the “State Waste Strategy”. As the strategy is still<br />

to be developed <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> must be involved in the<br />

development of this strategy and ensure our unique situation is<br />

catered for.<br />

56


It has been shown that if <strong>Council</strong> is moving in the direction the<br />

EPA wish things to happen, <strong>Council</strong> will not be placed under the<br />

spotlight. However if change is resisted, then the EPA will place<br />

the legislative requirements on the <strong>Council</strong> and will back this up<br />

with prosecution.<br />

14.0 CORPORATE & COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORTS<br />

Your Worship Mayor Pengilly and <strong>Council</strong>lors, I submit the<br />

following Reports for the Ordinary Meeting of <strong>Council</strong> to be held<br />

on Wednesday 10 September <strong>2003</strong>.<br />

Moved Cr<br />

That the Corporate & Community Services Reports be received.<br />

CARRIED.<br />

14.1 REPORT TITLE: OBJECTION TO ATTRIBUTION<br />

OF LAND USE CODE<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

MICHAEL BARRETT, RATES<br />

OFFICER<br />

FILE NUMBER: 123<br />

ATTACHMENT: CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To consider an objection to the attribution of land use code<br />

applied to Mr & Mrs Dieckmann’s property at Section 155,<br />

Juniper Road, Hundred of Menzies.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> alter the land use code to applied to A/N 5201580403<br />

to become residential for the <strong>2003</strong>/2004 financial year.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

Under section 156 of the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Act a <strong>Council</strong> may<br />

use differential rates which may vary according to the use of the<br />

land. For the purposes of section 156 of the Act there are 9<br />

categories of land use under the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Regulations<br />

declared as permissible differentiating factors.<br />

The Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Act under section 156(9) enables a<br />

ratepayer to object to the attribution of the local government land<br />

use code applied if they are of the opinion that a particular land<br />

use has been wrongly attributed.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Mr & Mrs Dieckmann have objected to the land use code of 7<br />

‘primary production’ and wish to have their property reclassified<br />

as ‘1’ residential. Under the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Regulations 1999<br />

primary production comprises ‘farming, horticulture, the use of<br />

land for horse keeping or intensive animal keeping, a dairy or<br />

commercial forestry’ all of which are as defined within the<br />

meaning of the Development Regulations 1993.<br />

57


58<br />

On inspection of the 4.6 acre property and discussing the issue<br />

with the Dieckmann's it is clear that none of these activities are<br />

being undertaken on their property. As they have mentioned in<br />

their correspondence they have had a few sheep run on their<br />

property on occasion to reduce the grass for fire reduction. I<br />

would not determine this to be ‘farming’.<br />

It should also be noted this property appears inconsistent with<br />

others of similar circumstance in the area.<br />

POLICY IMPLICATIONS<br />

1. Financial/Budget<br />

A reclassification of land use to residential would result in less<br />

rates being charged on the Dieckmann’s property.<br />

2. Legal<br />

Section 156 of the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Act enables <strong>Council</strong> to<br />

alter a land use code on objection.<br />

14.2 REPORT TITLE: BOARD RESTRUCTURING<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

A. JARVIS, CORPORATE AND<br />

COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />

MANAGER<br />

FILE NUMBER:<br />

ATTACHMENTS:<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To inform <strong>Council</strong> of progress with regard to the provision of<br />

secretariat functions for the various Boards.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That the report on Board restructuring be received for<br />

information.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

The <strong>SA</strong> <strong>Gov</strong>ernment has the perception that there are too many<br />

boards within the State structure and that duplication of both<br />

services and administration detracts from the ability of the Boards<br />

to ensure a coordinated, cooperative effective delivery of<br />

services.<br />

Given the <strong>Island</strong>’s unique position being separate from other<br />

similar organisations, remote and with a small population it was<br />

considered timely to investigate the various roles of the Board’s<br />

and their administrative structures so that any economies of scale<br />

can be achieved and duplication of effort reduced.


The committee charged with investigating these matters have met<br />

on a number of occasions and various alternatives considered.<br />

Whilst there is general consensus that outsourcing corporate<br />

governance matters for the Boards to <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

had merit the committee members had differing views on the<br />

proposed structures placed before them. It was agreed therefore<br />

that Mr Joe Collins, who has been involved with the strategic<br />

plans for both the boards and <strong>Council</strong>, be invited to review the<br />

plans and carry out a SWOT analysis for the island. This project<br />

is to be funded by the Office of Regional Affairs with a report to<br />

be submitted prior to the end of September.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

For information only.<br />

14.3 REPORT TITLE: PUBLIC STREET LIGHTING<br />

REVIEW<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

A. JARVIS, CORPORATE AND<br />

COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />

MANAGER<br />

FILE NUMBER: 101<br />

59<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To update <strong>Council</strong> on the status of contract arrangements relative<br />

to the Street Lighting use of System (SLUOS) charges.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That the report on public street lighting review be received for<br />

information.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

The public lighting steering committee of the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment<br />

Association have raised a number of concerns with ET<strong>SA</strong><br />

Utilities Street lighting Use of System (SLUOS) charges for<br />

public lighting. The LGA raised these concerns with the Essential<br />

Services Commission of South Australia (ESCO<strong>SA</strong>) and the LGA<br />

has been informed that ESCO<strong>SA</strong> will review the street lighting<br />

use of system charges for public lighting.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association wrote to ESCO<strong>SA</strong> on 20 th<br />

June <strong>2003</strong> in regard to concerns the Association has with two<br />

excluded distribution services and the charges levied in respect of<br />

these services namely Pole attachment and the operation and<br />

maintenance of public lighting. The LGA has sought ESCO<strong>SA</strong>’s<br />

determination on whether the charges for these excluded services<br />

are fair and reasonable.


Following a meeting between the LGA and ESCO<strong>SA</strong> is was<br />

confirmed that a dispute has occurred between councils and<br />

ET<strong>SA</strong> Utilities. In view of the existence of this dispute ESCOA<br />

will determine a timeline for a review and will inform <strong>Council</strong>s<br />

through the LGA of the outcome of their review<br />

14.4 REPORT TITLE: <strong>SA</strong>LE OF LAND AT CENTENARY<br />

AVENUE, KINGSCOTE<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

A. JARVIS, CORPORATE AND<br />

COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />

MANAGER<br />

FILE NUMBER: 041<br />

ATTACHMENTS: LETTER<br />

60<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To consider a review of the price requested for the sale of this<br />

parcel of land.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> give consideration to a reduction in the sale price<br />

for this property.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

<strong>Council</strong> was asked to give “in principle” support for the sale of<br />

this piece of land for the purposes of a potential development<br />

application. Following this agreement <strong>Council</strong> engaged a valuer<br />

to offer advice as to the current market value of this land and<br />

following submission of the valuer’s appraisal set a price of<br />

$90,000.<br />

The potential purchasers consider that the price set by <strong>Council</strong> is<br />

excessive and would ask that <strong>Council</strong> consider a revised offer of<br />

$50,000.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The prospective purchasers have submitted a development<br />

application for tourist accommodation on this site and have asked<br />

to purchase this block in order to ensure that there is sufficient<br />

land available to them to enable units to be developed and<br />

adequate landscaping to be built into the development. Should<br />

they not be able to acquire the land at a reasonable cost they will<br />

consider reducing the number of units to 12 (the current proposal<br />

is to build 14 units) and also reduce the level of landscaping over<br />

the entire project.


14.5 REPORT TITLE: <strong>SA</strong> GREAT REGIONAL AWARDS<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

A. JARVIS, CORPORATE AND<br />

COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />

MANAGER<br />

FILE NUMBER: 029<br />

61<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To advise <strong>Council</strong> of the call for nominations for the <strong>SA</strong> Regional<br />

Awards.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> considers and nominates one or more candidates for<br />

an award in this region.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

<strong>Council</strong> has received notification that nominations for these<br />

prestigious awards close on 29 th September <strong>2003</strong>. <strong>Council</strong>lors are<br />

therefore invited to nominate persons or organisations for<br />

consideration.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

<strong>SA</strong> Great is calling for nominations for the <strong>2003</strong> <strong>SA</strong> Great<br />

Regional Awards.<br />

The Awards recognise and celebrate individuals and enterprises<br />

that have made a significant contribution to their region over the<br />

past year.<br />

The program has been expanded to nine categories this year to<br />

include a new Family Business category. Winners receive the<br />

Regional Category award, promotion of their achievements in<br />

<strong>SA</strong> Great’s broader program and honorary membership of <strong>SA</strong><br />

Great for 2004.<br />

Categories include the arts, business, family business, health,<br />

sport, community, science and environment, tourism and<br />

youth. Regional areas include Mid North, Fleurieu<br />

Peninsula/<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>, Limestone Coast,<br />

Riverland/Murraylands, Barossa & Light, Flinders/Outback,<br />

Yorke Peninsula, Eyre Peninsula and Adelaide Hills.<br />

Nominations close on Monday 29 September <strong>2003</strong> and winners<br />

will be announced in November.


62<br />

14.6 REPORT TITLE: PEST CONTROL COUNCIL<br />

BUILDINGS<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

A. JARVIS, CORPORATE AND<br />

COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />

MANAGER<br />

FILE NUMBER: 061<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To consider pest control and monitoring for major council owned<br />

buildings.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> accept the Pest Control and monitoring management<br />

plan as proposed at a total annual cost of $13,289 to be sourced<br />

from the various maintenance budgets.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

<strong>Council</strong> has a number of building assets that are not currently<br />

checked for termites and other pests. In order to adequately<br />

protect building assets from damage by termites and other pests it<br />

is necessary to engage a professional organisation to carry out<br />

regular inspections.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

W.A. Flick & Co Pty Ltd have submitted a proposal to carry out<br />

regular inspections and control programs on <strong>Council</strong> owned<br />

buildings. These buildings can be described as: Kingscote Offices<br />

including Offices, main hall, kitchen, banquet room, wet areas,<br />

store rooms, and library. Masonic building including hall, office,<br />

wet areas, kitchenette and common areas. KIDB offices including<br />

Offices, wet areas, kitchenette, cells and store rooms. Parndana<br />

Hall and Museum inclusive of Hall, toilets, store rooms,<br />

kitchens, shed, hall and common areas. American River Hall<br />

Hall, toilets and common areas. <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Tourist<br />

Information Centre including Main room, toilets, store room,<br />

kitchens and shed. Penneshaw Hall inclusive of Hall, toilets,<br />

store room, stage, meeting room, post office and offices.<br />

The proposed service will be based on the following:<br />

1. Gaining agreement to a level of pricing, service frequencies,<br />

areas covered, pests covered, service specification and future<br />

reporting and invoicing requirements;<br />

2. Introducing our local Flick Branch and Account Manager and<br />

Flickmen to the site manager as to item 1 above;<br />

3. Flick Service Registers to be set up for each site and explained<br />

to Site Managers which include:<br />

Exact procedures of service for the Flickman and areas covered<br />

under the contract;


Material safety data sheets of all materials and chemicals used;<br />

Service reports detailing service carried out together with<br />

recommendations on hygiene and site maintenance directly<br />

affecting the pest control program;<br />

Pest sighting reports and activity documentation;<br />

Mapping locations of all pest equipment.<br />

4. Formalising regular <strong>au</strong>dit report to be forwarded to all<br />

appropriate Management which highlights:<br />

Items requiring attention by Flick as to service delivery;<br />

Any items of non-conformity with rectification plans included;<br />

Maintenance and hygiene recommendations directly affecting<br />

pest occurrence.<br />

Pests Covered – base contract (three monthly intervals) $8146.80<br />

per annum<br />

• Rodents<br />

• Spiders<br />

• Ants<br />

• Cockroaches<br />

Pests Covered – periodicals (six monthly intervals) $5142.20 per<br />

annum.<br />

• Termites<br />

14.7 REPORT TITLE: AFTER HOURS AND<br />

EMERGENCY CALL SERVICES<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

A. JARVIS, CORPORATE AND<br />

COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />

MANAGER<br />

63<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To update <strong>Council</strong> on the status of after hours and emergency call<br />

services.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That the report on after hours and emergency call services be<br />

received for information.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

<strong>Council</strong> previously resolved to enter into an agreement with<br />

Ecouncil and the RAA for the provision of after hours and<br />

emergency telephone response. This has now been formalized<br />

with the service commencing on 21 st October following<br />

development of our answering and response protocols.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

For information only.


64<br />

14.8 REPORT TITLE: KINGSCOTE TIDAL POOL<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

A. JARVIS, CORPORATE AND<br />

COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />

MANAGER<br />

FILE NUMBER: 047<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To inform <strong>Council</strong> of recent complaints regarding the Kingscote<br />

Tidal swimming pool.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> resolve to carry out major maintenance works on<br />

the pool and to make financial provision for such works.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

The tidal swimming pool in Kingscote has not been drained and<br />

cleaned for some years and is now subject of a number of<br />

complaints regarding both the quality of water and retention of<br />

solids within the structure. Whilst the water in the pool is<br />

replenished with each tidal flow the very nature of the pool<br />

enclosure precludes the flushing of solid matter and encourages<br />

the gradual build up of sludge and algae. The number and nature<br />

of complaints now requires consideration by <strong>Council</strong> as to the<br />

most effective manner in which to remedy this situation and to<br />

prepare the pool for the summer swimming season.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The staff of the Technical Services Department have suggested a<br />

number of options available to <strong>Council</strong> in respect of this matter<br />

and have submitted these options for consideration and approval.<br />

Option 1 - Engage contractors involved with the Christmas Cove<br />

development to pump out and desludge the pool at an estimated<br />

cost of $30,000.<br />

Option 2 - Engage a pool cleaning company from Adelaide to<br />

clean and prepare the pool at an estimated cost of $20,000; or<br />

Option 3 - Utilise <strong>Council</strong>’s own workforce (subject to the<br />

availability of plant, equipment and personnel) Close the pool,<br />

Empty water out (pump), Use excavator to remove silt, Cart away<br />

with our trucks, Put sand back (30 x truck loads). This would be<br />

in the order of $5000 to $10,000 however as this is not a project<br />

previously considered by the Technical Services Department may<br />

not be achievable within a reasonable timeframe. Current<br />

budgetary provision for pool maintenance <strong>2003</strong>/2004 $7000.


14.9 REPORT TITLE: ADOPTION OF POLICY<br />

MANUAL<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

A. JARVIS, CORPORATE AND<br />

COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />

MANAGER<br />

ATTACHMENTS: SEPARATE COPY OF REVISED<br />

MANUAL<br />

65<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To resolve to accept the revised policy manual.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> adopts the policy manual as presented for<br />

immediate implementation.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

<strong>Council</strong> and staff have prepared a revised policy manual which<br />

has been discussed at length and amended to comply with current<br />

legislation and the needs of <strong>Council</strong>. The completed revisions<br />

have been included as a separate document for the use of<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lors and staff and following formal adoption by <strong>Council</strong><br />

will be implemented immediately.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

For formal resolution and adoption.<br />

14.10 REPORT TITLE: BANK RECONCILIATION<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

NICKI PUTLAND, FINANCE<br />

OFFICER<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Provided for information.<br />

BANK RECONCILIATION STATEMENTS<br />

AS AT 30.6.03<br />

District Fund - Bank <strong>SA</strong> Cheque A/c<br />

Balance as per Bank Statement $ 12376.38 Cr<br />

Less Outstanding Cheques $ 270772.24 Dr<br />

----------------<br />

$ 258395.86 Dr<br />

Balance as per Cash Book $ 258395.86 Cr


66<br />

Short Term Investment - LGFA<br />

District Fund $ 1665051.30<br />

Machinery Replacement $ 13081.71<br />

Long Service Leave $ 979.41<br />

Property $ 27987.53<br />

Airport $ 763346.00<br />

Open Space $ 35300.00<br />

----------------<br />

$ 2505745.95 Cr<br />

Balance as per Cash Book $ 2505745.95 Dr<br />

14.11 REPORT TITLE : BUDGET COMPARISON<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

LOUISE EVES<br />

AUTHOR’S TITLE: FINANCE OFFICER<br />

ATTACHMENTS: BUDGET COMPARATIVE<br />

STATEMENT (BLUE PAGES)<br />

PURPOSE:<br />

Provide members with current v’s actual budget position for last<br />

quarter April to June <strong>2003</strong>.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That the 2002/03 Budget be revised to reflect actual expenditures<br />

at 30/6/<strong>2003</strong>. Detailed list and corresponding notes will be<br />

provided at the <strong>Council</strong> meeting.<br />

POLICY IMPLICATIONS<br />

Financial / Budget<br />

Refer budget comparative statement (attached).<br />

14.12 REPORT TITLE: EXTENSIONS TO AGED CARE<br />

FACILITY, KANGAROO ISLAND<br />

HEALTH SERVICE<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

A. JARVIS, CORPORATE AND<br />

COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />

MANAGER<br />

FILE NUMBER: 027<br />

ATTACHMENTS: CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To consider the proposal to extend the realignment of Wheelton<br />

Street.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That the extension of the realignment of Wheelton Street as<br />

requested by the <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Health Service be approved.


BACKGROUND<br />

When the hospital was extended some years ago the extension<br />

encroached on the road reserve in Wheelton Street. <strong>Council</strong>, at<br />

that time, agreed to the realignment of the road to accommodate<br />

the new extension of the hospital.<br />

The <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Health service has now received approval to<br />

construct a 6 bed extension to the high level aged care<br />

accommodation unit and have asked that <strong>Council</strong> favourably<br />

respond to their request for the extension to encroach onto the<br />

road reserve.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The attached plan shows that the requested realignment follows<br />

the same line as previously agreed and would provide a natural<br />

extension of the current alignment to the existing driveway. As<br />

such it is recommended that <strong>Council</strong> approves the encroachment<br />

and requests the CCSM to arrange for this portion of the road<br />

reserve to be made available to the health service.<br />

67


15.0 CHIEF EXECUTIVE REPORTS<br />

Your Worship, Mayor Pengilly and <strong>Council</strong>lors I present the<br />

following reports for the Ordinary Meeting of <strong>Council</strong> to be held<br />

on Wednesday 10 September <strong>2003</strong>.<br />

Moved Cr<br />

Seconded Cr<br />

That the Chief Executive Officer’s reports be received.<br />

CARRIED.<br />

15.1 REPORT TITLE: INVESTMENT PROPO<strong>SA</strong>LS<br />

COMMITTEE<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

R RATTRAY, CEO<br />

FILE NUMBER: 149<br />

68<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To establish a Committee to look at investment proposals<br />

received.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> establish an Investment Advisory Committee with<br />

the responsibility to encourage investors to submit realistic<br />

proposals to comprise of the Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Development<br />

Assessment Panel Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer and an<br />

Officer of the KI Development Board as required.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

<strong>Council</strong> asked that the Chief Executive Officer prepare a report<br />

for <strong>Council</strong> on establishing a Committee to look at all investment<br />

proposals received for <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>.<br />

Some <strong>Council</strong>s have a Committee which progresses potential<br />

investment proposals.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Development enquiries are often made to the senior staff. It is not<br />

proposed that this Committee would take all enquiries but to<br />

consult with investors who wish to take their enquiries further.<br />

This Committee is not to be seen as making a decision but merely<br />

to encourage investors to submit realistic proposals.<br />

It is my belief that such a Committee should comprise of the<br />

Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Development Assessment Panel<br />

Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer and an Officer of the KI<br />

Development Board as required.


69<br />

15.2 REPORT TITLE: RECREATION BOATING LEVY<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

R RATTRAY, CEO<br />

FILE NUMBER: 105<br />

ATTACHMENT: LETTER FROM DC YORKE<br />

PENINSULA<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Recreation boating levy (increase).<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> write to the <strong>SA</strong> Boating Facility Advisory<br />

Committee (<strong>SA</strong>BFAC) seeking a review of boating levy charges<br />

and maintenance funding to local <strong>Gov</strong>ernments.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

The Southern & Hills Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association have been<br />

asked to provide comment on the attached letters. S&H LGA<br />

suggested that individual <strong>Council</strong>s respond as not all <strong>Council</strong>s has<br />

coastline.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Many <strong>Council</strong>s are now imposing a user charge fee on boat<br />

ramps. If <strong>Council</strong>s can’t receive some certainty of funding from<br />

<strong>SA</strong>BFAC to maintain boat ramps, this <strong>Council</strong> will need to<br />

explore this avenue. However, we should in the first instance seek<br />

a review which incorporates a certainty of funding to local<br />

<strong>Council</strong>s from the <strong>SA</strong>BFAC.<br />

15.3 REPORT TITLE: <strong>SA</strong>LE OF SEC 376, HD HAINES<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

R RATTRAY, CEO<br />

FILE NUMBER: 041<br />

ATTACHMENT: SITE PLAN<br />

PURPOSE<br />

The sale of Section 376, Hundred of Haines.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> delegates to the Chief Executive Officer to consult<br />

with the community and provided no objections are raised, to<br />

advise the Crown to sell Section 376, Hundred of Haines.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

<strong>Council</strong> resolved at its last meeting that it had no objection to the<br />

Crown selling Section 376, Hundred of Haines. The Department<br />

of Crown Lands require <strong>Council</strong> to consult with the community.


DISCUSSION<br />

<strong>Council</strong> does not own the land and will receive no benefit from its<br />

sale. The area of land (adjacent to the Hog Bay Road/Min Oil<br />

Road corner) is however subject to continual vandalism with<br />

damage being done to the vegetation.<br />

15.4 REPORT TITLE: OH&S POLICIES/PROCEDURES<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

R RATTRAY, CEO<br />

FILE NUMBER: 017<br />

70<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Occupational Health and Safety policies and procedures.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That Chief Executive Officer be delegated <strong>au</strong>thority to adopt and<br />

sign policies and procedures as determined by the Occupational<br />

Health, Safety and Welfare Committee regarding occupational<br />

health and safety matters.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

<strong>Council</strong> approximately 12 months ago had a <strong>Council</strong>lor on this<br />

Committee and sought <strong>Council</strong> approval for decisions.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Occupational health and safety is the responsibility of the CEO.<br />

Accordingly the CEO should then have the delegated <strong>au</strong>thority to<br />

sign off on staffing matters and to expend the budget within<br />

normal budget guidelines.<br />

15.5 REPORT TITLE: RATE COMPARISONS<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

R RATTRAY, CEO<br />

FILE NUMBER: 123<br />

ATTACHMENT: COMPARATIVE DATA<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Southern & Hills Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association providing a<br />

comparative data update for August <strong>2003</strong>.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That the comparative data update be received for information.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

<strong>Council</strong> recognises that rates have increased over this year.<br />

However, <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> is the lowest rating <strong>Council</strong> in the<br />

region (Southern and Hills Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association).<br />

The attached shows a comparison of our neighbouring <strong>Council</strong>s.<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s debt shows that we are the average of the region.


71<br />

15.6 REPORT TITLE: CEO’S INFORMATION REPORT<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

R RATTRAY, CEO<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To advise <strong>Council</strong> of the meetings attended by the Chief<br />

Executive Officer.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> note the Chief Executive Officer’s attendance at the<br />

meetings listed.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

Each month a report is made available to <strong>Council</strong> on the meetings<br />

and contacts I have had which may at some time in the future<br />

have an impact on <strong>Council</strong> or development on the <strong>Island</strong>.<br />

Staffing changes are noted for your information.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The following are a list of meetings attended during the last<br />

month:<br />

6 th August - <strong>Council</strong> meeting.<br />

7 th August - Meeting with Pierre Gregor re: facilities at<br />

Penneshaw.<br />

7 th August - Attended KI Ferry Service presentation at<br />

Kingscote..<br />

11 th August - Spoke with Marketing Officer from Barossa<br />

Organisation re: assisting with events and heritage site in<br />

Kingscote.<br />

12 th August - Meeting with Developer re wharf development and<br />

retail development on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>.<br />

14 th August - Met with Business Development Manager Great<br />

Western Airlines re: CA<strong>SA</strong> approving flight<br />

15 th August - Met with Land Agent re: potential subdivision of<br />

land at American River.<br />

18 th August - Meeting to discuss TOMM re: MOU.<br />

21 st August - Mayors forum discussing <strong>Council</strong>s Policies and<br />

Strategic Plan.


72<br />

21 st August - Meeting with potential developer re: American<br />

River.<br />

22 nd August - Southern and Hills Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Assn. AGM<br />

at Stirling.<br />

22 nd August - The Mayor and I met with Messrs Wilkinson re:<br />

potential subdivision on farming property.<br />

25 th August - Attended seminar on Community Title held at<br />

Ozone Hotel.<br />

25 th August - Attended meeting at American River (Shed) re:<br />

development at American River and in particular at the oval.<br />

28 th August - Met with Tony Trethewey and Simone Somerfield<br />

re: penguin area at Penneshaw.<br />

29 th August - The Mayor and I met with various Airline<br />

Executives.<br />

STAFFING MATTERS<br />

Nicki Putland is on annual leave and will be working 2 days a<br />

month when she returns.<br />

Natasha Kearslake is working part time 3 (part) days.<br />

Michelle Bell is <strong>Council</strong>’s new Records Manager working part<br />

time 5 days a week.<br />

John Van der Giesen is on sick leave.<br />

I will be on holidays from 11 September till 1 October. Tony<br />

Jarvis will be acting CEO during my absence.<br />

16.0 CORRESPONDENCE FOR DISCUSSION<br />

Moved Cr<br />

Seconded Cr<br />

That the correspondence be received and that the items listed by<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lors for special consideration be individually dealt with<br />

and that in all other matters the listed recommendations be<br />

adopted.<br />

CARRIED.


16.1 CORRESPONDENT: LOCAL GOVERNMENT<br />

ASSOCIATION - LGA PRESIDENT<br />

POSITION<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

R RATTRAY<br />

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER<br />

FILE NUMBER: 080<br />

ATTACHMENTS: 1/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

73<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To vote for the position of a new Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association<br />

President.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> vote …………………….. for the position of<br />

President of the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

The Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association is seeking <strong>Council</strong>’s vote for<br />

the position of President.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The candidates for the position are listed in this correspondence<br />

and attached are letters from the candidates outlining their<br />

respective qualities. It is suggested that <strong>Council</strong> select its voting<br />

choice by a ballot at the meeting with a first past the post system<br />

and the result of that ballot determine the resolution you then<br />

make.<br />

16.2 CORRESPONDENT: KI ROTARY CLUB - ROADSIDE<br />

CRASH MARKERS<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

R RATTRAY<br />

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER<br />

FILE NUMBER: 043<br />

ATTACHMENTS: 2/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Installation of roadside crash markers on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> roads.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> support the concept of roadside crash markers and<br />

offer to assist by placing the markers at the appropriate sites.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The Rotary Club are seeking permission to install roadside crash<br />

markers on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>.


16.3 REPORT TITLE: LOCAL GOVERNMENT<br />

ASSOCIATION - VOLUNTEER<br />

MINISTERIAL ADVISORY GROUP<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

R RATTRAY, CEO<br />

FILE NUMBER: 029<br />

ATTACHMENTS: 3/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

74<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Seeking nominations for the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association’s<br />

representative on the Volunteer Ministerial Advisory Group.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> nominate Janice Kelly for the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment<br />

Association’s representative on the Volunteer Ministerial<br />

Advisory Group.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

Members of the Volunteer Ministerial Advisory Group will<br />

participate in the implementation of the Advancing the<br />

Community Together: A Partnership between the Volunteer<br />

Section and the South Australian <strong>Gov</strong>ernment.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Jackie Kelly has indicated her willingness to be nominated as a<br />

representative on this Group.<br />

16.4 CORRESPONDENT: ROBERT TIGGEMANN - REQUEST<br />

FAMILY NAMED ROAD<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

R RATTRAY, CEO<br />

FILE NUMBER: 066<br />

ATTACHMENTS: 4/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Requesting a road/street be named after the family.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That the Corporate & Community Services Manager ascertain an<br />

appropriate street/road to be named after the Tiggemann Family<br />

and report back to <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

The Tiggemann Family have had an association with KI for over<br />

100 years. The family request that a street/road be named after the<br />

family to acknowledge their contribution to the <strong>Island</strong>.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

It is my opinion that the naming of a road after the Tiggemann<br />

family should be a new road.


75<br />

16.5 CORRESPONDENT: C & M FOYLE - YOUTH PARK<br />

CONCERN<br />

AUTHOR: R RATTRAY, CEO<br />

FILE NUMBER: 1<strong>09</strong><br />

ATTACHMENTS: 5/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Advising concern at the proposed youth park at Brownlow.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That the correspondence received from Mr & Mrs M Foyle be<br />

received and noted.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Adjoining land holder has some concerns regarding the<br />

establishing of a youth park at Brownlow.<br />

16.6 CORRESPONDENT: DAIS, GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES<br />

UNIT - FIDES BLUFF NAMING<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

R RATTRAY, CEO<br />

FILE NUMBER: 066<br />

ATTACHMENTS: 6/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To name the bluff directly above the “Fides” shipwreck.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> supports the naming of the bluff above the “Fides”<br />

shipwreck as Fides Bluff.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Public submissions will be sought through the <strong>Gov</strong>ernment<br />

Gazette on 4 September <strong>2003</strong>.<br />

16.7 CORRESPONDENT: SOUTHERN & HILLS LGA -<br />

AGM OUTCOMES<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

R RATTRAY, CEO<br />

FILE NUMBER: <strong>09</strong>5<br />

ATTACHMENT: 7/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To advise the outcomes of the Annual General Meeting held on<br />

21 August <strong>2003</strong>.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That the correspondence from the Southern & Hills Local<br />

<strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association be received and noted.


76<br />

16.8 CORRESPONDENT: D BROWN MP, MEMBER FOR<br />

FINNISS - CROWN LAND<br />

ACQUISITION<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

R RATTRAY, CEO<br />

FILE NUMBER: 041<br />

ATTACHMENT: 8/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Requesting <strong>Council</strong> to acquire Crown Land at Nepean Bay to<br />

enable KI Oyster Growers Association to establish a processing<br />

shed.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

For <strong>Council</strong> comment.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The local member of Parliament is seeking ways of progressing<br />

an oyster processing shed for <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Oyster Growers<br />

Association.<br />

Crown Land has available 2.46 hectares at $60,000 adjacent to<br />

Nepean Bay.<br />

The Local Member is seeking <strong>Council</strong> assistance in progressing<br />

this matter.<br />

<strong>Council</strong>: - may wish to debate the merits at this meeting, or<br />

- this meeting may seek assistance from the<br />

Development Proposals Advisory Committee, or<br />

- may seek a further report from officers.<br />

16.9 CORRESPONDENT: KE<strong>SA</strong>B - SIGNAGE, PARNDANA<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

PATRICK MITCHELL,<br />

PLANNING OFFICER<br />

FILE NUMBER: 031<br />

ATTACHMENT: 9/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

<strong>Council</strong> has received correspondence by the KE<strong>SA</strong>B Road Watch<br />

Co-ordinator seeking consent to allow for the placement of a sign<br />

on the Wedgewood Road reserve opposite the Parndana<br />

Community Club, being on land under the care and control of<br />

<strong>Council</strong>.<br />

This matter is referred to <strong>Council</strong> for consideration of the<br />

proposal and approval to allow for the placement of the sign<br />

being on land under the care and control of <strong>Council</strong> should<br />

<strong>Council</strong> be satisfied with the proposal.


77<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> consent to the lodgement of a Development<br />

Application pursuant to the Development Act 1993, to allow for<br />

the placement of a sign on the Wedgewood Road reserve, being<br />

land under the care and control of <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The correspondence seeks consent to allow for the placement of<br />

two signs within the Parndana Township. One sign is proposed to<br />

be placed on the Parndana Area School fence fronting<br />

Wedgewood Road and the other sign is proposed to be placed on<br />

the Wedgewood Road reserve opposite the hotel.<br />

The correspondence advises that the signs:<br />

• are designed and approved by Transport <strong>SA</strong>;<br />

• are manufactured and paid by KE<strong>SA</strong>B;<br />

• are provided by KE<strong>SA</strong>B to reward community organisations<br />

in their efforts; and<br />

• keep the road litter message in the public eye.<br />

However, the correspondence does not provide any detail on the<br />

type of signage proposed (i.e. colour, size anchoring detail, et<br />

cetera...).<br />

POLICY IMPLICATIONS<br />

While the one sign is proposed to be located on State<br />

<strong>Gov</strong>ernment land and is therefore exempt from assessment<br />

process, the other sign is proposed to be located on land under the<br />

care and control of <strong>Council</strong> and constitutes development under<br />

the Development Act 1993.<br />

The proposal does not comply with <strong>Council</strong>’s existing Signage<br />

Policies or constitute traffic warning or directional signage under<br />

the Road Traffic Act.<br />

The proposal has been facilitated to encourage the local Area<br />

School to maintain litter control, roadside vegetation and report<br />

on roadside safety issues. Given the local Area Schools<br />

involvement in the project the proposal would appear to be of a<br />

minor nature only and unlikely to be the subject of objection from<br />

the owners or occupiers of land in the locality.<br />

Therefore, should <strong>Council</strong> consent to the lodgement of the<br />

application, it is likely that <strong>Council</strong> officers will be able to<br />

proceed with the assessment and approval of the application.<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s Technical Services Manager has advised that he has no<br />

objection to the proposal and will erect the sign if requested and<br />

approved by <strong>Council</strong>.


78<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Should <strong>Council</strong> therefore be satisfied with the proposal it is<br />

recommended that <strong>Council</strong> consent to the lodgement of an<br />

application, thereby allowing the assessment of a Development<br />

Application to proceed.<br />

16.10 CORRESPONDENT: DEPT FOR ENVIRONMENT &<br />

HERITAGE, REGIONAL<br />

CONSERVATION SERVICES -<br />

NARROW-LEAF MALLE<br />

DISTURBANCE<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

R RATTRAY, CEO<br />

FILE NUMBER: 077<br />

ATTACHMENT: 10/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Research, investigating the impact of disturbance on narrow-leaf<br />

mallee.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> advise the Department for Environment and<br />

Heritage, Regional Conservation Services on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> it<br />

has no objection to its project.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Refer attached correspondence.<br />

16.11 CORRESPONDENT: FLEURIEU REGIONAL<br />

DEVELOPMENT INC - WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

D ROWLEY, TECHNICAL<br />

SERVICES COORDINATOR<br />

FILE NUMBER: 147<br />

ATTACHMENTS: 11/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To support the development of a feasibility cost study for waste<br />

management on the Fleurieu Peninsula.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That $10,000 be allocated to the feasibility study on waste<br />

disposal options within the Fleurieu Peninsula from the Kingscote<br />

Landfill budget.


BACKGROUND<br />

<strong>Council</strong> is undertaking a cost study to develop a cost comparison<br />

model between managing waste of <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> v’s<br />

transporting the waste to the mainland.<br />

The minutes of the last Fleurieu Regional Waste Management<br />

Strategy Committee (enclosed in the <strong>Council</strong> agenda) refer to this<br />

correspondence.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

A waste feasibility cost study, in collaboration with the Fleurieu<br />

Peninsula <strong>Council</strong>s, will assist <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> in developing the<br />

best model for managing waste in our region.<br />

Managing waste in collaboration with the Fleurieu Peninsula will<br />

ensure there is enough waste available for the management of<br />

landfills to be cost effective. The quantity will also enable<br />

negotiations to be undertaken with landfill and recycling<br />

companies to make cost savings and efficiencies.<br />

This study is critical to the future of waste management in our<br />

region.<br />

16.12 CORRESPONDENT: IAN G TAYLOR - ROAD<br />

CONDITION<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

KEN LIU, TSM<br />

FILE NUMBER: 022<br />

ATTACHMENTS: 12/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

79<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To consider a complaint about the conditions of unsealed roads<br />

on KI.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That Mr Taylor’s comments be noted.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

Mr Taylor, a visitor commented on the conditions of unsealed<br />

roads.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

No further comments.


80<br />

16.13 CORRESPONDENT: PENNESHAW AREA SCHOOL -<br />

SCHOOL CROSSING<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

KEN LIU<br />

FILE NUMBER: 043<br />

ATTACHMENTS: 13/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To request for a footpath from the School to Penneshaw Town.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That the construction of a footpath from Penneshaw School to the<br />

town centre be considered during the formulation of next year’s<br />

budget.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

It is correct that the installation of a school crossing was<br />

abandoned due to objections received.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

No funds are available for the construction of a footpath as<br />

requested from the current budget.<br />

17.0 CORRESPONDENCE FOR INFORMATION<br />

Moved Cr<br />

Seconded Cr<br />

That the following items of correspondence be received for<br />

information.<br />

17.1 CORRESPONDENT: KI NATURAL RESOURCES<br />

BOARD - NRM PLAN & NRM<br />

INTEGRATION REFORM<br />

FILE NUMBER: 077<br />

ATTACHMENT: 14/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Providing an update on the Natural Resources Management Plan<br />

and associated Investment Strategy for the KI region and the<br />

NRM integrated reform happening across South Australia.<br />

17.2 CORRESPONDENT: CONSERVATION<br />

DEPARTMENT - NRM REFORM<br />

UNIT<br />

FILE NUMBER: 077<br />

ATTACHMENT: 15/903 CORRESPONDENCE


PURPOSE<br />

Providing a summary of the key points raised at the workshop on<br />

the draft Natural Resources Management Bill.<br />

17.3 CORRESPONDENT: LGFA - AGM<br />

FILE NUMBER: <strong>09</strong>1<br />

ATTACHMENT: 16/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

81<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Advising the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Finance Authority Annual<br />

General Meeting to be held on 3 rd October <strong>2003</strong>.<br />

17.4 CORRESPONDENT: EPA - PARNDANA LANDFILL<br />

ENVIRONMENT<br />

MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

FILE NUMBER: 102<br />

ATTACHMENT: 17/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Advising acceptance of the Landfill Environment Management<br />

Plan for the Parndana Waste Transfer Station at Section 82,<br />

Hundred of Seddon.<br />

17.5 CORRESPONDENT: KI HEALTH SERVICE - YOUTH<br />

PARK<br />

FILE NUMBER: 1<strong>09</strong><br />

ATTACHMENT: 18/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Congratulating <strong>Council</strong> on the proposal to establish a youth park<br />

at Brownlow.<br />

17.6 CORRESPONDENT: LGA - RAISE THE ROOF<br />

FILE NUMBER: 042<br />

ATTACHMENT: 19/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Encouraging <strong>Council</strong> to participate in the ‘Raise the Roof - A<br />

Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Showcase”.


82<br />

17.7 CORRESPONDENT: KI FERRY SERVICES -<br />

PRESENTATION<br />

FILE NUMBER: 020<br />

ATTACHMENT: 20/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Thanking <strong>Council</strong> for attending their presentation on their new<br />

ferry service.<br />

17.8 CORRESPONDENT: AUSTRALIAN RED CROSS -<br />

BALI ASSISTANCE FUND<br />

REPORT<br />

FILE NUMBER: 1<strong>09</strong><br />

ATTACHMENT: 21/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Providing a copy of the report on the <strong>au</strong>dit of the Bali Assistance<br />

Fund.<br />

17.9 CORRESPONDENT: TRANSPORT <strong>SA</strong> - PENNESHAW<br />

BREAKWATER<br />

FILE NUMBER: 124<br />

ATTACHMENT: 22/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Providing a response to <strong>Council</strong>’s correspondence advising<br />

concern with the damage to Penneshaw breakwater.<br />

17.10 CORRESPONDENT: AUSINDUSTRY - REGIONAL<br />

TOURISM PROGRAM<br />

APPLICATION<br />

FILE NUMBER: 044<br />

ATTACHMENT: 23/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Advising our application for the Regional Tourism Program<br />

being ‘Developing Kingscote (<strong>SA</strong>’s First Settlement) as a<br />

Tourism Target’ was unsuccessful.


83<br />

17.11 CORRESPONDENT: AUSINDUSTRY - REGIONAL<br />

TOURISM PROGRAM<br />

APPLICATION<br />

FILE NUMBER: 044<br />

ATTACHMENT: 24/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Advising our application for the Regional Tourism Program<br />

being ‘Christmas Cove Redevelopment’ was unsuccessful.<br />

17.12 CORRESPONDENT: KI BEEKEEPERS ASSOCIATION<br />

- INDUSTRY PLAN FOR KI<br />

APIARISTS<br />

FILE NUMBER: 077<br />

ATTACHMENT: 25/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Providing copies of correspondence to the Cropping Association<br />

regarding GM crops and Yankalilla <strong>Council</strong> regarding a bin for<br />

disposal of quarantine items.<br />

17.13 CORRESPONDENT: LGA MEDIA RELEASE -<br />

COUNCILLOR ALLOWANCES<br />

FILE NUMBER: 057<br />

ATTACHMENT: 26/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Providing results of a survey indicating the community want to<br />

pay <strong>Council</strong>lors more.<br />

17.14 CORRESPONDENT: FLEURIEU REGIONAL WASTE<br />

MANAGEMENT STRATEGY<br />

COMMITTEE - MINUTES<br />

FILE NUMBER: 147<br />

ATTACHMENT: 27/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Providing a copy of the Fleurieu Regional Waste Management<br />

Strategy Committee minutes from 15 August <strong>2003</strong>.


84<br />

17.15 CORRESPONDENT: AUSTRALIA DAY COUNCIL -<br />

LG AWARDS<br />

FILE NUMBER: 148<br />

ATTACHMENT: 28/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

Providing information on the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Awards.<br />

18.0 NOTICES OF MOTIONS<br />

Cr Br<strong>au</strong>er has given notice of his intention to move the following<br />

motion (Refer Attachment):-<br />

“That <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Council</strong> immediately develop a plan of<br />

action to source outside funding to repair the unsealed road<br />

network on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>.”<br />

19.0 OTHER BUSINESS<br />

20.0 IN-CAMERA BUSINESS<br />

21.0 CLOSURE BY MAYOR


85<br />

LATE CORRESPONDENCE - 10 SEPTEMBER <strong>2003</strong><br />

COUNCIL MEETING<br />

16.14 CORRESPONDENT: KI NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD<br />

- COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

R RATTRAY<br />

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER<br />

FILE NUMBER: 077<br />

ATTACHMENTS: 29/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />

PURPOSE<br />

<strong>Council</strong> representative at KI Natural Resources Board meetings.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

For <strong>Council</strong> consideration.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

<strong>Council</strong> has resolved that the Chief Executive Officer is the<br />

nomination for the KI Natural Resources Board with the<br />

Environmental Services Manager as his proxy.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Both the Chief Executive Officer and Environmental Services<br />

Manager have found the last few meetings difficult to attend and<br />

have sent the Health Officer.<br />

This Committee (KINRB) is in my opinion a very important<br />

organisation. Thus <strong>Council</strong> may wish to alter its representation as<br />

KINRB perceive we have not attended regularly.<br />

Both the Environmental Services Manager and I are committed to<br />

attending as regularly as possible.


86<br />

LATE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S REPORT TO THE<br />

COUNCIL MEETING HELD 10 SEPTEMBER <strong>2003</strong><br />

15.7 REPORT TITLE: CHRISTMAS COVE -<br />

MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

R RATTRAY, CEO<br />

FILE NUMBER: 124<br />

PURPOSE<br />

To establish a Christmas Cove Management Committee.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> establish a Christmas Cove Management<br />

Committee as a Section 41 Committee to comprise of the<br />

Mayor, two <strong>Council</strong>lors being ………………. &<br />

…………………., Chief Executive Officer and three<br />

community representatives.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

In December 2002 I floated the idea of establishing a committee<br />

to manage the proposed new marina.<br />

With construction about to start it is now the right time to<br />

establish a management committee.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Although it is not planned to have Christmas Cove fully<br />

established as a marina, it is appropriate that a committee<br />

establish initial ground rules.<br />

It is envisaged that the committee would establish its aims, goals<br />

and objectives plus establish policies etc for marina usage. The<br />

Committee must ensure that this area is not a continual drain on<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s resources and at the lease is cost neutral. In addition,<br />

<strong>Council</strong> should be the predominant membership holder.<br />

<strong>Council</strong> should target the community representators who would<br />

have an interest in the Boat Club/recreational fishing.


87<br />

LATE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S REPORT TO THE<br />

COUNCIL MEETING HELD 10 SEPTEMBER <strong>2003</strong><br />

15.8 REPORT TITLE: COMMERCIAL LAND - THE LANE,<br />

PENNESHAW<br />

AUTHOR:<br />

R RATTRAY, CEO<br />

FILE NUMBER: 041<br />

PURPOSE<br />

The release of Crown Land.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> <strong>au</strong>thorises the Chief Executive Officer to have<br />

discussions with various <strong>Gov</strong>ernment departments<br />

regarding the Crown selling land adjacent to The<br />

Lane, Penneshaw.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s new Development Plan enables commercial activities<br />

to occur on The Lane, Penneshaw.<br />

A public meeting was held on 1 st September at Penneshaw<br />

seeking community comment. Various questions were asked and<br />

it was decided prior to finalising the acquisition of the land<br />

further consultation would occur.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

To enable the Crown to dispose of the land, <strong>Council</strong> should<br />

progress its discussions with the Crown Lands Department, but<br />

still recognising its commitment to the community.<br />

My answers follow each question.<br />

The questions raised are:<br />

If a commercial zone was established allowing for heavy vehicle parking, could<br />

<strong>Council</strong> ban heavy vehicle parking in town<br />

Yes<br />

Could <strong>Council</strong> buy and rent out the land<br />

Yes, however I believe other options would better suit the<br />

use of this site.<br />

Minimum size of commercial blocks<br />

At least 1200m 2 to accommodate STEDS but subject to<br />

use.


Would The Lane be upgraded and appropriate drainage installed<br />

I believe <strong>Council</strong> would look at all these matters with the<br />

creation of commercial allotments.<br />

What kind of water treatment and wash down area would be required<br />

The EPA guidelines and requirements would be adhered<br />

to.<br />

Could land be set aside for commercial business at present in the town, to<br />

relocate Ordways garage and pumps [could land up near the cemetery (2<br />

acres) be set aside]<br />

Town Centre - yes. Cemetery - no (cemetery reserve)<br />

Residential zone is non complying<br />

What if <strong>Council</strong> can not afford to buy the land from the Crown<br />

An option available to <strong>Council</strong> may be, to buy, subdivide,<br />

improve road etc and sell off surplus land to <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

requirements.<br />

How much of the sand hill would be removed<br />

Approximately 50m from roadway.<br />

Would <strong>Council</strong> draw up the bylaws to force trucks and coaches to park and<br />

wash down in the zoned area<br />

<strong>Council</strong> may establish bylaws and/or parking controls to<br />

assist with traffic management of the town.<br />

How many trucks and buses would be parked there at any one time<br />

This would depend on the size allocated for parking.<br />

Would <strong>Council</strong> buy the whole area in question, develop staging area in part for<br />

trucks and buses and sell off the rest at a profit to cover outlays<br />

This is an option available to <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

It is my opinion that the Penneshaw community is quite<br />

supportive of this commercial zone and would like to see a<br />

sensible development. However, an undertaking was given to<br />

consult further. It is also important that <strong>Council</strong> continues<br />

preliminary discussions with the various <strong>Gov</strong>ernment<br />

departments and not let the matter stall.<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!