Council Agenda 2003/09 - Kangaroo Island Council - SA.Gov.au
Council Agenda 2003/09 - Kangaroo Island Council - SA.Gov.au
Council Agenda 2003/09 - Kangaroo Island Council - SA.Gov.au
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1<br />
KANGAROO ISLAND COUNCIL<br />
NOTICE is given that an Ordinary Meeting of <strong>Council</strong> is to be held at the<br />
Penneshaw Hall, Middle Terrace, Penneshaw on Wednesday 10 th September<br />
<strong>2003</strong> at 1.00pm.<br />
..................................<br />
R Rattray<br />
Chief Executive Officer<br />
AGENDA<br />
1.0 OPENING BY HIS WORSHIP THE MAYOR<br />
2.0 APOLOGIES<br />
3.0 DEPUTATION<br />
3.1 Dean Brown MP, Member for Finniss to address <strong>Council</strong><br />
4.0 MINUTES OF MEETING HELD 6.8.03 (yellow pages)<br />
Moved Cr<br />
Seconded Cr<br />
That the Minutes of the Meeting held on 6.8.03 be confirmed.<br />
CARRIED.<br />
5.0 BUSINESS ARISING FROM MINUTES OF 6.8.03<br />
6.0 MAYOR'S REPORT<br />
Moved Cr<br />
That the Mayor’s Report be received.<br />
CARRIED.<br />
Seconded Cr<br />
MAYOR’S REPORT<br />
12/8/03 TOMM Committee. This Committee has new drive and<br />
I have asked Jackie Kelly to chair it. Jackie has a<br />
passion and knowledge of TOMM which will assist in<br />
driving it along. It is my intention to continue as a<br />
member, however make it more active and get<br />
considerable community inertia if possible<br />
21/8/03 Our workshop day was a great success and gives us all<br />
the time and opportunity to talk through matters without<br />
the pressures of a <strong>Council</strong> meeting.
22/8/03 Southern & Hills Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association<br />
Annual General Meeting. Mayor Kym McHugh is chair<br />
for the next 12 months, the February meeting will be on<br />
<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>. We had a presentation on the proposed<br />
changes to the planning system, however we will be<br />
relatively immune to “regionalisation” if we continue to<br />
have a DAP structured as we do.<br />
23/8/03 I had the pleasure of opening the Western Districts<br />
Sports Club’s new playground. Cr Davis was enlisted by<br />
me to assist. The WD community deserves a letter of<br />
congratulations for their efforts and I believe a motion<br />
in that direction should be forthcoming from <strong>Council</strong>.<br />
25/8/03 A meeting of the Minister’s Committee to look at the<br />
islands administrative arrangements was held. The<br />
Minister’s office is going to get an overview from a<br />
consultant [paid for by the Minister] to be completed by<br />
late September so we can progress from broad<br />
discussions to maybe an overview of what could be<br />
possibilities. I would stress that these discussions are at<br />
the Minister’s direction and not a secret method of<br />
taking over everything. At their conclusion a report will<br />
go to Minister McEwen. Tony Jarvis and myself are the<br />
<strong>Council</strong> representatives. In the afternoon I was asked to<br />
attend a meeting of the KI Development Board.<br />
28/8/03 The AGM of Tourism KI at Penneshaw was a success,<br />
Chris Schumann was returned as chair.<br />
29/8/03 CEO, Bob Rattray and I met with airline principles in<br />
Adelaide.<br />
30/8/03 I attended a function at American River with Qantas<br />
travel staff from interstate.<br />
1/9/03 Public meeting re. community land at Penneshaw.<br />
Details to be provided at the meeting.<br />
3/9/03 KI Information Services Committee meeting at the<br />
chambers.<br />
7.0 QUESTIONS FROM THE GALLERY<br />
8.0 PETITION - Nil.<br />
2
3<br />
9.0 QUESTIONS<br />
9.1 Questions on Notice - Nil.<br />
9.2 Questions without Notice<br />
10.0 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES<br />
10.1 Community Passenger Network Committee<br />
Moved Cr<br />
Seconded Cr<br />
That the notes of the Community Passenger Network Committee<br />
meeting held on 6.8.03 be received and the minutes of the<br />
Community Passenger Network Committee meeting held on<br />
27.8.03 be received and the recommendations therein be adopted.<br />
CARRIED.<br />
NOTES OF COMMUNITY PASSENGER NETWORK COMMITTEE<br />
MEETING HELD ON IN THE COUNCIL MEETING ROOM,<br />
6 th AUGUST, <strong>2003</strong><br />
1. ATTENDANCE<br />
Present;<br />
Peter Richards, Pilippa Kneebone, Rafferty Fynn<br />
Apologies:<br />
Toni Duka, Bec Davis, Chari Pahl, Vi Vincent, Kerrie Kromer<br />
2. COMFIRMATION OF PREVIOUS MINUTES<br />
The previous minutes were accepted.<br />
3. BUSINESS ARISING FROM PREVIOUS MINUTES<br />
3.1 Statistics<br />
Rafferty Fynn felt that the statistical information regarding the Transport<br />
Disadvantaged is a little scant. Philippa Kneebone said she would ask<br />
Mary Elliot to see if she were able to further break down the HACC<br />
clients in to Transport Disadvantaged and others.<br />
3.2 Report for the passenger Transport Board.<br />
As above it was agreed to get more information on the transport<br />
disadvantaged for inclusion in the report.<br />
For the information of the CPN, Peter Richards reported that since REX<br />
has ceased to fly to the <strong>Island</strong> on a regular basis there is no way for<br />
wheel chair bound people to fly off the <strong>Island</strong>, and the ferry confines<br />
them to their vehicle, without access to toilets as there is no wheel chair<br />
access to the lounges on either ferry.<br />
3.3 Results from <strong>Island</strong> wide mail drop.<br />
Discussed and reported on in the monthly report.
4<br />
3.4 Requests for assistance with transport<br />
Discussed and reported on in the monthly report<br />
4. ANY OTHER BUSINESS<br />
4.1 Visit to KI by Manager of Integrated Regional Services, Phil<br />
S<strong>au</strong>nders.<br />
Peter Richards will chase up any Cook Centre staff who may be<br />
interested in attending the meeting with Phil S<strong>au</strong>ders, including Lyndel<br />
Santibanez and Kerrie Kroner’s replacement. It was agreed that we<br />
should meet at 2 o’clock, with a view to finishing by 4. Rafferty Fynn<br />
will let Bob Rattray and Tony Jarvis know about this meeting should<br />
they wish to participate.<br />
5. NEXT MEETING<br />
At 2 pm on the 20 th August <strong>2003</strong> in the <strong>Council</strong> Chambers.<br />
6. MEETING CLOSED<br />
1.45pm.<br />
MINUTES FOR THE KANGAROO ISLAND COMMUNITY<br />
PASSENGER NETWORK COMMITTEE ON THE 27 th OF AUGUST IN<br />
THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, AT 2 PM.<br />
1. PRESENT<br />
Pete Richards, Toni Duka, Kate Bishop, Madeleine McQueen, Beck<br />
Davis, Rafferty Fynn<br />
APOLOGIES<br />
Philippa Kneebone, Chari Pahl, Vi Vincent<br />
2. CONFIRMATION OF PREVIOUS MINUTES<br />
Moved Peter Richards Seconded Rafferty Fynn<br />
3. BUSINESS ARISING FROM PREVIOUS MINUTES.<br />
3.1 Rafferty Fynn told the committee that an interim report has been<br />
complied form figures given to the CPN by various organizations on the<br />
island.<br />
4. ANY OTHER BUSINESS.<br />
Preamble. The meeting (held on the 20/8/02) to which Mr Phil<br />
S<strong>au</strong>nders and Ms Belinda White (both from Integrated Regional<br />
Services of the PTB) were invited, was basically regarded by all as<br />
‘disappointing’ regarding the lack of commitment made by the PTB to<br />
establishing any form of transport system on the <strong>Island</strong> before the next<br />
financial year. Mr. Phil S<strong>au</strong>nders told the meeting that the CPN
Coordinator’s role before that time was to prepare a detailed report that<br />
would culminate in finding enough work to keep a 22 seater bus<br />
employed for 40 hours per week. It is important to note that part of this<br />
concept is to sell bus time to other <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Departments such as the<br />
Health Services and the Education Department. To this end Belinda<br />
White agreed to send to R. Fynn the results of the surveys conducted in<br />
the Riverlands in recent months as a guide.<br />
4.1 It was agreed by the committee that Rafferty Fynn should make a<br />
special trip to the Yorke Peninsula CPN to get ideas and to find out how<br />
they operate. This CPN operates within the new guide lines of the PTB,<br />
in that it does not provide a transport service as its core business, which<br />
is to coordinate existing transport.<br />
Moved Toni Duka Second Beck Davis<br />
4.2 It was agreed that R. Fynn will make an appointment with the new<br />
hospital CEO regarding matters concerning the KICPN<br />
4.3 <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Community Forum is willing to support any initiatives<br />
of the KICPN. This support will be in the form of a letter of<br />
endorsement from the Forum members.<br />
4.4 It was suggested by Toni Duka that it was possible to perhaps obtain<br />
funding from one of the many Grants organizations to purchase a<br />
suitable vehicle for the carriage of the transport disadvantaged. This<br />
suggestion was made bec<strong>au</strong>se of the lack of commitment by the PTB to<br />
have any funds available for the KICPN before the next financial year<br />
and the fact that the ‘Hospital Bus’ is on its last legs. Toni Duka agreed<br />
that she would speak to Lyndel Santibanez, Manager, Community<br />
Health, regarding this matter with the view to forming a partnership . (A<br />
receiver of Grant money needs to be an incorporated body )<br />
4.5 R. Fynn to conduct a survey of transport needs in the following centers;-<br />
- Vivonne Bay<br />
- Parndana<br />
- Kingscote<br />
- American River<br />
- Penneshaw<br />
This will result in a report that duplicates the reporting format that the<br />
PTB has adopted for other areas of South Australia that have had similar<br />
surveys done.<br />
5. NEXT MEETING.<br />
Wednesday 24 September <strong>2003</strong> at 3pm at the <strong>Council</strong> Meeting Room<br />
6. MEETING CLOSED<br />
3pm<br />
5
10.2 Information Services Committee<br />
Moved Cr<br />
Seconded Cr<br />
That the minutes of the Information Services Committee meeting<br />
held on 3.9.03 be received and the recommendations therein be<br />
adopted.<br />
CARRIED.<br />
MINUTES OF THE INFORMATION SERVICES COMMITTEE<br />
MEETING HELD IN THE MEETING ROOM, COUNCIL OFFICES<br />
0N WEDNESDAY 3 rd SEPTEMBER <strong>2003</strong><br />
COMMENCING AT 9.30am<br />
1.0 Present<br />
Cr. Rebecca Davis (Chair), Mayor Michael Pengilly, Cr. Scott McDonald,<br />
Jean Woolley (Community Representative), Tony Jarvis (Corporate &<br />
Community Services Manager), Sharon Gullickson (Chief Librarian)<br />
2.0 Apologies<br />
Jackie Kelly (Community Representative), Shirley Simcock (Community<br />
Representative)<br />
6<br />
In the absence of the Chairman, the Mayor M. Pengilly declared the<br />
meeting open and welcomed those present.<br />
3.0 Minutes of the Meeting held on 25-6-03<br />
Moved J Woolley<br />
Seconded S McDonald<br />
That the Minutes of the Meeting held on the 25-6-03 be confirmed<br />
subject to Minute 1.0 being altered to include Jackie Kelly being present.<br />
CARRIED<br />
4.0 Business arising from the Minutes of 2-4-<strong>2003</strong><br />
Nil<br />
5.0 Correspondence<br />
Moved S McDonald<br />
That the Correspondence be received.<br />
Seconded J Woolley<br />
CARRIED<br />
Incoming<br />
Public Library and Community Information Services grants – PLAIN<br />
Central Services<br />
PLAIN Telecommunications and Internet Upgrade Project - PLAIN<br />
Central<br />
Services<br />
Invitation to Stakeholders Meeting – TAFE <strong>SA</strong><br />
6.0 Community Information Centre Report<br />
Moved J Woolley<br />
Seconded S McDonald<br />
That the Community Information Centre Report be received<br />
CARRIED
7<br />
6.1 The librarian stated that the Community Information Centre had largely<br />
being absorbed into the daily operation of the Library. The creation of<br />
the reading room has been well received and all community information<br />
enquiries were being managed from the main counter.<br />
7.0 Librarian’s Report<br />
Moved J Woolley<br />
That the Librarian’s Report is received.<br />
Seconded S McDonald<br />
CARRIED<br />
Cr R Davis joined the meeting and resumed the Chair<br />
7.1 The librarian outlined the need to extend the opening hours of the library.<br />
The Committee suggested that further investigations on the impact to the<br />
library budget and staffing be conducted prior to any alterations to the<br />
library hours.<br />
8.0 School Community Library<br />
The Committee discussed the concept of a joint-use library being<br />
established within the Kingscote Area School. Long term solution to the<br />
library facility needs to be determined and a joint-use library may be an<br />
option.<br />
Alternative long term solutions such as moving to the old J&B site were<br />
discussed.<br />
In the interim, short term cost effective solutions for address immediate<br />
concerns within the current library building also need to be investigated.<br />
Moved M Pengilly<br />
Seconded S McDonald<br />
CARRIED<br />
That Tony Jarvis and Sharon Gullickson to investigate options for the<br />
future of the library services including approaching the Kingscote Area<br />
School regarding the concept of a joint-use library facility.<br />
9.0 General Business<br />
9.1 J Woolley informed the committee that after a very tentative start at the<br />
beginning of February 03, the Friends have grown substantially and are<br />
a very and enthusiast group with positive ideas for the library.<br />
10.0 Next Meeting<br />
Moved S McDonald<br />
Seconded J Woolley<br />
CARRIED<br />
That a special meeting be held on November 5 th <strong>2003</strong> to further discuss the<br />
long and short term solutions for the library.<br />
11.0 Closure<br />
Cr R. Davis declared the meeting closed at 10.10am
8<br />
10.3 Roadside Vegetation Management Consultative Committee<br />
The following are comments I would ask <strong>Council</strong> to consider<br />
prior to adopting/deferring the following recommendation.<br />
It is my belief that the Roadside Vegetation Management<br />
Consultative Committee was to include former <strong>Council</strong>lor Mr G<br />
Smith who is the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment representative on the Native<br />
Vegetation <strong>Council</strong> of South Australia. I further understood that<br />
his appointment was to provide a larger state wide perspective.<br />
Accordingly I believe that he should be invited to join the<br />
committee. In addition, the composition of this Committee should<br />
reflect a broad cross section of the community to provide balance.<br />
There is a lack of broadacre expertise on the Committee and as<br />
the vast majority of roadside vegetation is adjacent to the farming<br />
sector it is critical that they have significant input.<br />
The Management Plan also in my opinion requires considerable<br />
input from officers. <strong>Council</strong> may recall that a significant court<br />
case occurred in the recent past, thus it is important that officers<br />
have involvement in the early stages of the review.<br />
The plan is a management tool for <strong>Council</strong> staff and should not<br />
be overly large as the operators need to refer to it sometimes on<br />
the job. The plan was arrived at after considerable work and<br />
needs some updating but no significant change.<br />
Moved Cr<br />
Seconded Cr<br />
That the minutes of the Roadside Vegetation Management<br />
Consultative Committee meeting held on 22.8.03 be received and<br />
the recommendations therein be adopted.<br />
CARRIED.<br />
Minutes of a Roadside Vegetation Management Consultative Committee<br />
Meeting held in the <strong>Council</strong> Chambers, D<strong>au</strong>ncey Street Kingscote on Friday,<br />
22 August <strong>2003</strong> commencing at 2:00pm<br />
1.0 Present<br />
Cr C Wickham, Cr D McDonald, Cr R Davis, B Overton (Botanist),<br />
N Flynn (Eco Action), B Haddrill (DEH), M Maguire (FPO), D Rowley<br />
(Parks and Community Services Co-ordinator).<br />
2.0 Apologies<br />
Cr W Richards, P Martin (KI Flora & F<strong>au</strong>na).<br />
3.0 Election Chairperson<br />
Moved- N Flynn<br />
Seconded- Cr R Davis<br />
Cr C Wickham be elected Chairperson<br />
CARRIED
9<br />
4.0 Minutes of Meeting held 28.3.03<br />
Moved- Cr D MacDonald Seconded- Cr R Davis<br />
That the Minutes of Meeting held on the 28.3.03 be confirmed.<br />
CARRIED<br />
5.0 Business Arising from the Minutes of 28.3.03<br />
5.2 Cross Rib Roller<br />
Determined that it was too dangerous to use the Cross Rib Roller<br />
on Seal Bay Road so Harriet Road (from South Coast Road to<br />
East West 2) 11km was done.<br />
6.0 General Business<br />
6.1 <strong>2003</strong>/04 Roadside Vegetation Management Program<br />
* PCSC to contact D’Estrees Bay residents re proposed road<br />
management program<br />
* Media release to be done regarding the program and that a 10 year<br />
program is available for perusal<br />
* Place the program on the webpage when done<br />
Road Section Distance Method<br />
Snug Cove Rd Playford to Colemans 3 km Cross Rib Roller<br />
Bark Hut Rd Playford to Stokes Bay 19 km Cross Rib Roller<br />
North Coast Rd Stokes Bay to Mc Brides 9 km Hydroaxe<br />
Branch Creek Rd 5 km Hydroaxe<br />
Rolland Hill Hwy Parndana to Timber Creek 4 km Hydroaxe<br />
Margries Rd 8 km Hydroaxe<br />
South Coast Road Elsegood to Hawkes Nest 17 km Hydroaxe<br />
D’Estrees Bay Road 7 km Hydroaxe<br />
Birchmore Road Playford to Wests 11 km Envirotrim<br />
Seal Bay Road 9 km Envirotrim<br />
Moved- Cr R Davis<br />
Seconded- B Overton<br />
The Roadside Vegetation Management Program for <strong>2003</strong>/04 be<br />
implemented as outlined in Appendix 3 (as per above) of the Draft<br />
<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Roadside Vegetation Management Plan<br />
CARRIED<br />
6.2 Draft <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Roadside Vegetation Management Plan<br />
* Only committee members received a copy bec<strong>au</strong>se the committee is<br />
driving the review. <strong>Council</strong> employees (other than Committee<br />
members) will have an opportunity to comment through the<br />
consultation process. This was seen as a way of giving everyone an<br />
equal opportunity and not having a bias in one direction.<br />
* The Plan is designed to give <strong>Council</strong> delegated responsibility for the<br />
management of Native Vegetation on roadside under the Native<br />
Vegetation Act. Any actions outside the guidelines within this plan<br />
require Native Vegetation <strong>Council</strong> approval, Commonwealth Approval<br />
and <strong>Council</strong> approval prior to proceeding. (This clarification is to be<br />
added to the draft plan)
Summary of modifications required-<br />
* Determine how individuals can be covered by Public Liability<br />
Insurance if say weeding on a road reserve<br />
* Provide examples of Restricted Access Vehicles<br />
* No firewood collection on road reserves<br />
* No cropping or grazing of roadside<br />
* Placement of farm plant and equipment and hay bales not to be<br />
permitted on road reserves<br />
* Pollarding to create a mosaic of vegetation structures<br />
* Roadsides can be used a fuel reduction zones if part of a larger<br />
vegetation plan<br />
* Discuss with Environmental Services Department how roadside<br />
vegetation considerations can be incorporated into planning<br />
requirements<br />
* Consider the implementation of school bus “hard stand” areas for bus<br />
stops to prevent Phytophthora spread<br />
Plan to be presented to the next meeting for review and possible<br />
recommendation for public release<br />
7.0 Other Business<br />
7.1 History<br />
* There is a need to develop an information database of what work has<br />
been done.<br />
* PCSC will keep this information<br />
7.2 Contact Person<br />
* PCSC administers the plan and will keep all relevant information in<br />
relation to the Committee<br />
7.3 Chapman Tce<br />
* Firewood is being collected on Chapman Tce<br />
* The people who reported this occurring have been advised to provide<br />
Names or registration numbers and it will be followed through<br />
* All reports of firewood collection are followed through<br />
7.4 Draft Plan<br />
* Graham Smith to be sent a copy of the draft plan for his comments<br />
prior to the next meeting<br />
7.5 CFS Access Issues<br />
* M Maguire to provide PCSC with a list of these issues for collation<br />
and discussion at next meeting<br />
8.0 Next Meeting<br />
24 October <strong>2003</strong> at 1pm<br />
9.0 Closure<br />
1650<br />
10
10.4 TOMM Committee<br />
Moved Cr<br />
Seconded Cr<br />
That the minutes of the TOMM Committee meeting held on<br />
12.8.03, along with the Terms of Reference and Memorandum of<br />
Understanding (attached) be received and the recommendations<br />
therein be adopted<br />
CARRIED.<br />
TOMM Management Committee Meeting<br />
KI <strong>Council</strong> Chambers, D<strong>au</strong>ncey Street, Kingscote<br />
12 th August <strong>2003</strong><br />
10.00 am<br />
MINUTES<br />
1) Present<br />
Tony Jarvis (KIC), Jackie Kelly (Community), Craig Wickham (Industry), Scott<br />
McDonald (KIC), David Crinion (<strong>SA</strong>TC), David Honner (KIDB), Dianne Morris<br />
(TKI), Madelaine McQueen (minutes), Toni Duka (Project Manager).<br />
2) Apologies<br />
Chris Schuman (TKI), Marc Warren (TKI), Bob Rattray (KIC), Michael Pengilly<br />
(Mayor), David Furniss (KIDB), Jeanette Gellard (NPW<strong>SA</strong>), Helen Richards<br />
(KINRB, Jo Davidson (KINRB).<br />
Chairperson<br />
Michael Pengilly had a late priority and could not make today’s meeting. The<br />
Committee resolved it would be appropriate for J Kelly to chair in his absence.<br />
CARRIED<br />
3) Previous Minutes<br />
4) Financial report and delegation for responsibility<br />
Financial report presented. It was noted that TOMM project purchased laptop.<br />
That the 2002-03 financial report be accepted.<br />
Moved C Wickham<br />
Seconded D Morris<br />
CARRIED<br />
Resolved: A budget for TOMM will be made to the TOMM Management Committee<br />
by the <strong>Council</strong> and any spending above the budgeted figures will need to be approved<br />
by the committee.<br />
A $1,000 financial delegation is given to the Project Manager, to be spent within the<br />
budget.<br />
Moved C Wickham<br />
Seconded S McDonald<br />
CARRIED<br />
The KI <strong>Council</strong> continues to undertake financial management of project on behalf of<br />
TOMM Committee and the Finance Officer continues to report to TOMM<br />
Management Committee meetings.<br />
Moved by C Wickham<br />
Seconded D Honner<br />
CARRIED<br />
11
12<br />
Resolved: Toni Duka and Bob Rattray will work with Louise Eves (Finance Officer)<br />
to develop <strong>2003</strong>/04 budget for presentation at next Management Committee meeting.<br />
This budget will reflect cash and in-kind contributions to the project.<br />
Colmar Brunton Survey Contract - Project Confirmation<br />
The Committee approves in principle that we proceed with the Colmar Brunton<br />
contract of $40,000. Project Confirmation to be signed and returned to Colmar<br />
Brunton.<br />
Moved by D Honner<br />
Seconded D Morris<br />
CARRIED<br />
A sub-committee will review the process of data collection by Colmar Brunton,<br />
including potential use of data card and core data versus market intelligence.<br />
Moved C Wickham<br />
Seconded S McDonald<br />
CARRIED<br />
5) Partners Commitment<br />
KI <strong>Council</strong> – $10,000 (to be confirmed)<br />
DEH - $5,000<br />
KI Development Board – Confirmed commitment to 30 th June 2004 of $5,000<br />
Tourism KI - $15,000<br />
KINRB – Advised by way of letter that $5,000 has been committed, subject to<br />
conditions as per previous year.<br />
<strong>SA</strong>TC – in-kind commitment.<br />
Toni Duka will formally reply to KINRB letter and include a copy of the stakeholder<br />
agreement (MOU)<br />
Moved S McDonald<br />
Seconded D Crinion<br />
CARRIED<br />
Resolved: Toni Duka will contact stakeholder agencies to confirm commitment and<br />
subsequently send invoices by next Management Committee meeting.<br />
6) Outcomes from Planning Day<br />
a) Education<br />
i) Community, Business and Stakeholder/Agency<br />
Not discussed<br />
b) Data<br />
i) Revision of questionnaire (sub-group)<br />
ii) Indicator review and Agency Responsibility (sub-group)<br />
Resolved: C Wickham, D Honner, T Duka (and J Gellard if happy) to review<br />
questionnaire, input will be sought from Richard Trembath, <strong>SA</strong>TC<br />
Resolved: Toni Duka will meet with stakeholders to discuss indicator review, collate<br />
feedback and present information to Management Committee for decision. May seek<br />
input from Richard Trembath, <strong>SA</strong>TC. Indicator review needs to occur before<br />
questionnaire review. This is a high priority.<br />
Resident Survey will need to be considered very soon also.<br />
Possibility of including questions from external agencies/bodies/businesses would<br />
need to be considered by the Management Committee on a case by case basis to<br />
ensure appropriateness.
13<br />
Resolved: Presentations need to be given to staff at Sealink and Emu Airways to keep<br />
these businesses informed of outcomes from surveys distributed by them.<br />
iii) Annual report - Colmar Brunton<br />
The production of the Annual Report by Colmar Brunton is currently waiting on<br />
transport data (which is waiting on May data from one operator).<br />
Possibility of Operator Survey being conducted with KIDB, this would need to be<br />
included in KIDB Strategic Plan for 04/05.<br />
iv) Update of website<br />
Website update: Priority action.<br />
Resolved: T Duka will look into possibility and cost of alternate arrangements for<br />
hosting and upgrading site due to expense of current provider (IT&e). In doing this<br />
will consider internode, Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association (links with KI <strong>Council</strong>),<br />
Schools and Sharon Menz. C Wickham may assist with technological information.<br />
Information will be presented at next Management Committee meeting for<br />
consideration.<br />
c) Structure of TOMM<br />
i) Housing<br />
ii) Autonomy<br />
Discussion surrounding issues relating to TOMM being a Section 41 Committee<br />
under <strong>Council</strong>. The previous Committee members believed that the Committee was<br />
intended to be established under Section 42, to maintain its <strong>au</strong>tonomy. Autonomy of<br />
the TOMM project is an important issue, particularly concerning the community and<br />
when looking for corporate sponsorship. Autonomy is critical for the efficiency of the<br />
Committee and its decision making process. The status of the committee will need to<br />
be raised with <strong>Council</strong> and progressed.<br />
J Kelly, S McDonald, T Duka, R Rattray and M Pengilly meet to discuss the<br />
independence of TOMM Management Committee and review the Terms of Reference<br />
with <strong>Council</strong> delegating powers to the Committee as an interim before moving<br />
towards a section that allows more <strong>au</strong>tonomy for the Committee.<br />
Moved C Wickham<br />
Seconded D Crinion<br />
CARRIED<br />
iii) Committee Membership (determined by who)<br />
Membership: The Committee is happy with the current committee structure, as<br />
follows:<br />
Mayor, <strong>Council</strong>or, CEO KI <strong>Council</strong>, TOMM Project Manager, Industry<br />
representative, KIDB, TKI, DEH, KINRB, <strong>SA</strong>TC and a community representative.<br />
Matter of Chair – Michael has indicated he feels it may be appropriate for the duties<br />
of chair be handed over to a person with a strong commitment and more extensive<br />
background. Michael has also indicated he will certainly remain on the TOMM<br />
Management Committee and is committed to the project.<br />
That Jackie Kelly is elected as chair of the TOMM Management Committee.<br />
Moved C Wickham<br />
Seconded D Crinion<br />
CARRIED
14<br />
iv) MOU for Stakeholders<br />
Resolved: T Duka will review the MOU for stakeholders, circulate for comment and<br />
present the final copy at the next meeting for signing.<br />
v) MOU for Advisors<br />
Resolved: The MOU Advisors be re-worded to an MOU for Ambassadors. Liz Jack<br />
and Simon McArthur will be invited to be Ambassadors on the basis that they add<br />
value from their respective fields of work and their ongoing connections in the<br />
industry. If the Committee requires input on a professional basis Ambassadors would<br />
be financially remunerated for their input. The Committee believes this would<br />
recognize the mutual value of this partnership.<br />
J Kelly to write to Andris Stepanuks to thank him for his commitment to TOMM and<br />
assistance in handover with T Duka.<br />
Moved C Wickham<br />
CARRIED<br />
Seconded D Crinion<br />
That the contribution made by Liz Jack during the planning day and subsequent time<br />
be acknowledged to the amount of $500.<br />
Moved C Wickham<br />
Seconded D Morris<br />
CARRIED<br />
Resolved: Sub-Committees will be established to progress works, they will be:<br />
Data<br />
Business Plan<br />
Long-term Funding<br />
Marketing Tool Kit<br />
C Wickham, D Honner, J Gellard and T Duka<br />
D Crinion and T Duka<br />
D Crinion, T Jarvis and Liz Jack<br />
Liz Jack, D Crinion and T Duka<br />
The Long-term Funding sub-committee will consider options including corporate<br />
sponsorship, such as NEC, Travel World, Dick Smith (Craig to talk too) and<br />
establishment of a Trust Fund.<br />
Resolved: The following time frames:<br />
Data<br />
by next Management Committee meeting<br />
Business Plan draft for circulation within 2 weeks<br />
Long-term Funding draft to be developed by next Management Committee meeting<br />
Marketing Tool Kit aim for draft/concept by next meeting (subject to L J<br />
availability)<br />
D Crinion committed time out of his current works program to focus on these<br />
commitments.<br />
T Duka will ensure Website is also refreshed with this information when it is<br />
available.<br />
d) Budget<br />
i) short-fall<br />
ii) medium term<br />
iii) long-term<br />
iv) INRM Investment Strategy<br />
v) Fundable Projects
15<br />
A sub-committee has been appointed. An update on INRM was given by T Duka;<br />
further discussion will take place with D Crinion after meeting.<br />
e) Vision<br />
The vision statement will be discussed in the context of the one-page business plan.<br />
Resolved: D Crinion and T Duka to address this item, taking into account planning<br />
day comments.<br />
7) One-page Business Plan<br />
A sub-committee has been appointed.<br />
8) Re-l<strong>au</strong>nch of TOMM<br />
An abstract has been submitted to Ecotourism Australia for its November <strong>2003</strong><br />
Conference in Adelaide. The Committee supported this. D Crinion generously<br />
offered to sponsor T Duka’s attendance at the conference, with benefits for the project<br />
as well as a development opportunity for T Duka. This offer was accepted with much<br />
gratitude from the Committee and T Duka.<br />
Resolved: The re-l<strong>au</strong>nch of TOMM on the <strong>Island</strong> could be conducted through a<br />
business breakfast, presenting time series data. D Honner and T Duka to progress<br />
this.<br />
9) Sustainable Tourism Development Strategy<br />
D Crinion gave background and an update on this Strategy. D Crinion will ensure a<br />
copy of the Draft Project Brief for the KI Integrated Strategic Tourism Plan is<br />
circulated to TOMM Committee members.<br />
10) Correspondence<br />
A copy of correspondence sent to Tourism KI members via email by Mr John Ayliffe<br />
was circulated. The committee resolved that J Kelly would respond to this<br />
correspondence on behalf of the Committee rejecting the aspersions made by Mr<br />
Ayliffe regarding TOMM and members of the Committee.<br />
11) Other Business<br />
T Duka has accepted a student for internship to complete a project on the<br />
environmental indicators of TOMM. Kyoko Miura is a Masters of Environmental<br />
Studies student at the University of Adelaide and will spend 2 months part-time<br />
working on the project with T Duka. The Committee supported the internship, which<br />
is of no direct cost to the project. K Miura is covered by the Universities insurance<br />
policy whilst working on the project.<br />
D Honner suggested other intern/educational programs TOMM could tap into include:<br />
• Flinders University, Louise Ranfry (Biology)<br />
• University <strong>SA</strong>, Marilyn Olsen (Statistics) and the Cultural Tourism section<br />
• Schools on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>.<br />
D Crinion informed the committee the University of <strong>SA</strong> has a submission into CRC<br />
for Sustainable Tourism that includes aspects of TOMM.<br />
12) Next Meeting and Close<br />
The next meeting is scheduled for:
16<br />
Friday 12 th September<br />
10:00am – 1pm<br />
at the <strong>Council</strong> Chambers,<br />
Cnr Drew and Murray Streets, Kingscote.<br />
Please advise T Duka, Project Manager of your availability for this meeting via phone<br />
8553 4518 or email community@kicouncil.sa.gov.<strong>au</strong><br />
Meeting Closed at 1:50pm<br />
11.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES REPORTS<br />
Your Worship Mayor Pengilly and <strong>Council</strong>lors, I submit the<br />
following reports for the Ordinary Meeting of <strong>Council</strong> to be held<br />
on Wednesday 10 September <strong>2003</strong>.<br />
Moved Cr<br />
Seconded Cr<br />
That the Environmental Services Reports be received.<br />
CARRIED.<br />
11.1 REPORT TITLE: ALTERATION TO<br />
AUTHORI<strong>SA</strong>TIONS<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
LAURENCE EVES, ESM<br />
PURPOSE<br />
This report serves to advise <strong>Council</strong> of the need to increase and<br />
alter the <strong>au</strong>thorisations of its officers as they appear under:<br />
• Section 4(1) of the Impounding Act<br />
• Section 44(1) of the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Act<br />
• Section 26(1)(c) of the Dog and Cat Management Act<br />
• Sections 27,28 & 68 of the Dog and Cat Management Act<br />
Staff Involved<br />
For the purposes of streamlining this process and being able to<br />
operate dog and cat management effectively at times when staff<br />
are on leave or simply absent, it is important to have staff<br />
<strong>au</strong>thorised to undertake duties as required. These staff are:<br />
• Robert Rattray (CEO)<br />
• L<strong>au</strong>rence Eves (ESM)<br />
• Anthony Jarvis (CSM)<br />
• Ken Liu (TSM)<br />
RECOMMENDATION 1<br />
That pursuant to Section 44 of the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Act 1999<br />
and Section 26(1)(c) of the Dog and Cat Management Act,<br />
L<strong>au</strong>rence Gregory Eves be hereby delegated the powers of the<br />
Registrar for issuing and replacing certificates of registration and<br />
registration discs.
17<br />
RECOMMENDATION 2<br />
That pursuant to Section 4(1) of the Impounding Act, 1920<br />
Robert Rattray, L<strong>au</strong>rence Gregory Eves, Anthony John Charles<br />
Jarvis and Kin Chou Liu be hereby appointed as Authorised<br />
Officers.<br />
RECOMMENDATION 3<br />
That pursuant to Sections 27, 28 & 68 of the Dog & Cat<br />
Management Act 1995 that Robert Rattray, L<strong>au</strong>rence Gregory<br />
Eves, Anthony John Charles Jarvis and Kin Chou Liu be<br />
appointed as Authorised Dog & Cat Management Officers with<br />
powers as defined by that Act.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Given that the General Inspector is now a member of the<br />
Environmental Services Section, it has become necessary to alter<br />
the existing structure of <strong>au</strong>thorisations so as to be able to manage<br />
this area of <strong>Council</strong>’s responsibility effectively.<br />
The amended <strong>au</strong>thorisation will allow a more expedient approach<br />
to the task when the General Inspector is absent or on leave. The<br />
ongoing arrangement will still need to have a member or two<br />
from the out door staff trained in this work however, it is often<br />
the administration and day to day operation of the programme<br />
that is not controlled.<br />
11.2 REPORT TITLE: STAFF VISIT TO ADELAIDE<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
LAURENCE EVES, ESM<br />
PURPOSE<br />
This report serves to advise <strong>Council</strong> on specific outcomes from a<br />
<strong>Council</strong> officer visit to Adelaide on 28 th & 29 th August, <strong>2003</strong>.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That the report be received and noted.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
On 28 th & 29 th August this year <strong>Council</strong>’s ESM & Planning<br />
Officer undertook a trip to Adelaide for the purpose of<br />
interviewing consultants to assist with <strong>Council</strong>’s Heritage Study<br />
and Streetscape design for the four main towns on <strong>Kangaroo</strong><br />
<strong>Island</strong>. Included in the trip was a visit to Planning <strong>SA</strong> where<br />
discussions with several officers were undertaken on a range of<br />
issues. The following information details outcomes from the trip:
Planning <strong>SA</strong><br />
• Discussions were held with Mr Jason Green from Planning<br />
<strong>SA</strong> regarding the potential for <strong>Council</strong> to access grant<br />
funding via the “Places for People” programme.<br />
Discussions were fruitful and revolved around <strong>Council</strong><br />
being able to utilise the four main town Heritage and<br />
Streetscape review as the subject for the grant application.<br />
Planning <strong>SA</strong> raised some specific criteria that the<br />
application would need to meet in order to qualify for<br />
consideration as a grant application. The major amendment<br />
to the task was to include a high degree of Urban Design<br />
consideration and assessment with heritage, streetscape<br />
and a traffic study feeding into that process.<br />
An application has been lodged and negotiations with Planning<br />
<strong>SA</strong> have resulted in <strong>Council</strong> having an additional week to<br />
forward further details and mapping to support the application.<br />
• Discussion was also held with David Lake and Darren<br />
Starr from the Plan Amendment Branch of Planning <strong>SA</strong><br />
with a view to informing them of <strong>Council</strong>’s direction in<br />
terms of the Section 30 process.<br />
Once again they were most supportive of <strong>Council</strong> in this<br />
matter and indicated that they were happy for <strong>Council</strong> staff<br />
to undertake the work in-house and would assist wherever<br />
they could.<br />
Discussion was also held on the public consultation<br />
process and areas of content that are likely to arise and on<br />
how they should be dealt with.<br />
• Appointments were made with David Goodwins and Ray<br />
Nash from the Department’s mapping section in order to try<br />
and obtain mapping to further a Bushfire PAR for <strong>Council</strong>.<br />
This meeting was also quite successful as Dave Goodwins<br />
indicated that he felt positive he could assist <strong>Council</strong> with<br />
the mapping requested.<br />
Other mapping for the major centres of KI was also looked<br />
at and a better insight into how Planning <strong>SA</strong> might assist<br />
with mapping in the future was gained.<br />
• A meeting was also held with Kim Gurner, a project<br />
officer for DAC at Planning <strong>SA</strong>, regarding the<br />
consideration of <strong>Council</strong>’s Community Service Centre.<br />
18
Kim advised that a hearing will occur on KI on 25 th<br />
September in order to hear submissions from those persons<br />
who made a representation on the application.<br />
It is at that time also that the Commission is likely to make<br />
a decision on the matter.<br />
Consultant Interviews<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Officers also went on to undertake interviews of<br />
consultant bodies with a view to selecting an appropriate<br />
organisation to assist with providing accreditation to <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />
Heritage and Streetscape study of the four main towns on KI.<br />
The project was also discussed with Planning <strong>SA</strong> and an<br />
application for funding has been lodged under the “Places for<br />
People” grant scheme. Some modification to the programme has<br />
had to be considered in order to fit the funding criteria.<br />
It is anticipated that a consultant organisation will be<br />
recommended to <strong>Council</strong> for this work soon and that this project<br />
will proceed as planned for this financial year.<br />
11.3 REPORT TITLE: COMMUNITY TITLES<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
LAURENCE EVES, ESM<br />
19<br />
PURPOSE<br />
The purpose of this report is to give <strong>Council</strong> an insight into the<br />
direction of the Community Titles legislation and process.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That the information be received and noted.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
<strong>Council</strong>lors and <strong>Council</strong> officers have attended two meetings on<br />
the matter of Community Titles during the month of August with<br />
a view to gaining a better insight into the potential of this<br />
legislation to impact on development outcomes on <strong>Kangaroo</strong><br />
<strong>Island</strong>.<br />
Meetings were attended at Victor Harbour on the 22 nd August,<br />
<strong>2003</strong> and again at the Ozone Hotel on the 25 th August, <strong>2003</strong>.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Community Titling is a means of dividing land that creates<br />
nominated areas for the private use of occupants and common<br />
areas within the allotment administered by a body corporate.
20<br />
There are two types of community titles available:<br />
• A Community Scheme<br />
• A Community Strata Scheme.<br />
A Community Scheme comprises the scheme for the division,<br />
development and administration of the land set out in the scheme<br />
description (if any), plan of community division, by-laws and the<br />
development contract (if any) lodged with the Registrar General<br />
under the Community Titles Act.<br />
A Community Strata Scheme comprises a plan of community<br />
division (to be called a strata plan) that may create community<br />
lots with defined upper and lower boundaries as well as lateral<br />
boundaries.<br />
Potential Issues<br />
Whilst there are recognised useful and beneficial aspects to this<br />
legislation, there are also potential issues associated with the<br />
setting up and administration of the process.<br />
Allotment Size<br />
Discussion has revealed that there is a large potential for<br />
developers to seek an adjustment to the minimum allotment size<br />
as it appears within <strong>Council</strong> Development Plans.<br />
Developers allege that some <strong>Council</strong>’s are giving way and<br />
allowing allotment sizes for Community Housing that are less<br />
than that prescribed within the Development Plan. The argument<br />
is such that community areas provide the required additional<br />
space and that the community area may be used to calculate the<br />
open space requirements for all dwellings within the complex and<br />
not be aligned to units on an individual basis.<br />
The danger is that this logic allows for the provision of additional<br />
units on the basis of common and open space duplication.<br />
Zoning<br />
Discussion also revolved around the notion by developers that<br />
Community Titling was suitable anywhere. <strong>Council</strong>’s officers raised the<br />
issues associated with this thought on the basis that medium or high<br />
density residential development was definitely not suitable to many zones.<br />
Examples of this include community titling in General Farming<br />
Zones where obvious land use issues can occur or community<br />
titling adjacent to sensitive Coastal areas.<br />
<strong>Council</strong>’s Jurisdiction<br />
A further point of issue is the potential for <strong>Council</strong> to have a<br />
limited amount of jurisdiction with Community Titling especially<br />
in the area of infrastructure provision.
Legal opinion would suggest that <strong>Council</strong> may have difficulty in<br />
enforcing infrastructure provision by developers and further that,<br />
provision of infrastructure would be an issue between a purchaser<br />
and the developer where it was not supplied.<br />
The point of issue here is that if infrastructure forms a part of the<br />
Scheme Description then the enforcement role for its provision is<br />
likely between the developer and a purchaser of an allotment. It is<br />
also not likely that a <strong>Council</strong> can condition a consent to require a<br />
developer to comply with a Scheme Description.<br />
A scheme description is not required where the plan does not<br />
create more than six lots used predominantly for residential<br />
purposes without the creation of a development lot.<br />
Should <strong>Council</strong>lors wish to undertake a little more reading on this<br />
issue, <strong>Council</strong>’s Environmental Services Department can assist.<br />
11.4 REPORT TITLE: VERANDAH/SHELTER STRUCTURE<br />
ADDITION – KINGSCOTE OVAL<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
PATRICK MITCHELL,<br />
PLANNING OFFICER<br />
FILE NUMBER: 520/187/03<br />
ATTACHMENTS: APPLICATION DETAIL<br />
21<br />
PURPOSE<br />
<strong>Council</strong> has received Development Application 520/187/03 by<br />
the Kingscote Football Club to construct a verandah<br />
addition/shelter structure to be attached to the existing club rooms<br />
building at Lot 124 Centenary Avenue, Kingscote, being on land<br />
under the care and control of <strong>Council</strong>.<br />
This matter is referred to <strong>Council</strong> for consideration of the<br />
proposal and approval to allow for the lodgement of the<br />
application should <strong>Council</strong> be satisfied with the proposal.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> consent to the lodgement of Development<br />
Application 520/187/03 by the Kingscote Football Club to<br />
construct a verandah addition/shelter structure to be attached to<br />
the existing club rooms building at Lot 124 Centenary Avenue,<br />
Kingscote being land under the care and control of <strong>Council</strong><br />
therefore, allowing the application to proceed.
DISCUSSION<br />
The application proposes the development of a 5.0 metres x 27.0<br />
metres, veranda structure to the eastern aspect of the existing<br />
clubrooms at Centenary Avenue and 4.2 metres x 8.0 metres<br />
weather shelter to the southern aspect of the clubrooms.<br />
The veranda structure is proposed to be constructed from steel<br />
uprights to a maximum height of 7.0m and clad with trimdex<br />
sheeting to match the roof height of the existing building.<br />
The weather shelter is proposed to be constructed from masonry<br />
columns and clad in roof sheeting to match the existing building.<br />
The application further proposes internal additions and<br />
modifications, as an overall upgrade of the Kingscote Football<br />
Club room facilities, to allow the existing kitchen and servery to<br />
be upgraded and better utilised by patrons and staff of the facility<br />
as well as to provide shelter to cater for the canteen servery and<br />
shelter for patrons of the oval generally.<br />
POLICY IMPLICATIONS<br />
The application will require assessment against Residential Zone<br />
provisions of the Kingscote (DC) Development Plan. The<br />
proposal will be associated with and ancillary to the existing<br />
recreational use of the site and is therefore expected to be<br />
consistent with the Zoning provisions of the Kingscote (DC)<br />
Development Plan.<br />
Further, the proposal is considered to be of a minor nature only<br />
and unlikely to be the subject of objection from the owners or<br />
occupiers of land in the locality.<br />
Therefore, should <strong>Council</strong> consent to the lodgement of the<br />
application, it is likely that <strong>Council</strong> officers will be able to<br />
proceed with the assessment and approval of the application.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Should <strong>Council</strong> therefore be satisfied with the proposal it is<br />
recommended that <strong>Council</strong> approve the application, thereby<br />
allowing the construction of the proposed development to<br />
proceed.<br />
22
11.5 REPORT ITEM: APPEAL AGAINST KI COUNCIL<br />
& OYSTER COVE SHELLFISH<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
PATRICK MITCHELL,<br />
PLANNING OFFICER<br />
FILE NUMBER: DA520/037/03<br />
ATTACHMENTS: YES<br />
23<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To advise <strong>Council</strong> that a Notice of Appeal has been lodged by<br />
Kenneth William Grinter, Gabriel Bittar, Deborah Sleeman &<br />
Anthony Klieve with the Environment, Resources and<br />
Development Court against <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s decision<br />
to grant provisional Development Plan consent to Development<br />
Application 520/037/03 by Oyster Cove Shellfish Pty Ltd for the<br />
purpose of a Oyster Grading, Packaging & storage shed at Part<br />
Section 271 Tangara Drive, American River.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That the <strong>Council</strong> receive and note the report.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The application was subject to the Category 3 public notification<br />
process in accordance with the Development Act 1993, with 10<br />
submissions raising objection to the proposal and one submission<br />
in support of the proposal being received.<br />
While 3 submissions raising objection to the proposal expressed a<br />
desire to be heard, only Mr Grinter and Mr Klieve addressed the<br />
meeting.<br />
<strong>Council</strong>lors will recall that at the May <strong>2003</strong> meeting, the Panel<br />
resolved to delegate to <strong>Council</strong>’s Planning Officer, its powers in<br />
relation to assessment and approval of the application, subject to<br />
receipt of additional detail, discussions with the applicant in<br />
regards to re-siting the proposed building, subject to appropriate<br />
conditions and any further conditions deemed necessary by<br />
<strong>Council</strong>’s ESM.<br />
The applicant subsequently submitted additional information<br />
including a plan demonstrating a revised siting of the proposed<br />
building that is expected to reduce the impact of views from<br />
neighbouring properties. The application was subsequently<br />
granted provisional Development Plan consent on the 25 July<br />
<strong>2003</strong>, subject to appropriate conditions.
24<br />
Section 86(1)(b) of the Development Act provides for a right of<br />
appeal to the Environment, Resources and Development Court<br />
against a decision, which involves a Category 3 development.<br />
Four objectors to the proposal have taken advantage of their right<br />
to lodge a Notice of Appeal with the Environment, Resources and<br />
Development Court.<br />
Accordingly, the Environment, Resources and Development<br />
Court has given preliminary notice that a conference between all<br />
parties will be held at the Kingscote Courthouse, on the 30<br />
September <strong>2003</strong>.<br />
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS<br />
The compulsory conference will require some limited financial<br />
expenditure primarily relating to <strong>Council</strong> officers time in terms of<br />
researching and attendance at the conference.<br />
Should a reasonable compromise not be reached at the<br />
conference, the matter will be put to a hearing of the<br />
Environment, Resources and Development Court, which will<br />
require financial expenditure for <strong>Council</strong> to appoint a solicitor to<br />
represent <strong>Council</strong> in its decision.<br />
11.6 REPORT TITLE: THE ENVIRONMENT<br />
PROTECTION (WATER<br />
QUALITY) POLICY <strong>2003</strong><br />
AUTHOR:<br />
PETER H MOORS,<br />
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH<br />
OFFICER<br />
FILE NUMBER: 061<br />
PURPOSE<br />
This report is an information report and serves to advise <strong>Council</strong><br />
that a number of <strong>Council</strong> employees attended an information<br />
session on the new Environment Protection (Water Quality)<br />
Policy <strong>2003</strong>, at the Ozone Hotel on Thursday 28 August.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That the report be received and noted.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
Peter Scott and Keith Bilsborough from the EPA explained to<br />
<strong>Council</strong> employees what an Environment Protection Policy is, the<br />
purpose of the new Water Quality Policy and the issues that it<br />
covers, the specific obligations under the new policy and the<br />
enforcement of the policy.
25<br />
There are some specific (and sometimes mandatory) obligations<br />
that will apply for some industries and activities, including:<br />
• Applying antifoulants<br />
• Septic systems<br />
• Septic tank effluent disposal schemes<br />
• Fish processing works<br />
• Waste depots wineries and distilleries<br />
The policy uses codes of practice or guidelines as a means of<br />
describing how people can comply with their general<br />
environmental duty and obligations under the policy. Although<br />
failure to comply with a code is not an offence, compliance can<br />
be enforced through the issuing of an Environmental Protection<br />
Order. The codes of practice have been around for some time, but<br />
the new policy will now make compliance a legal requirement. In<br />
addition, there will be new provisions incorporated into <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />
Development Policy.<br />
<strong>Council</strong> may appoint its own officers to police the water quality<br />
policy and it is proposed to send at least three officers to an EPA<br />
training session set down for mid October.<br />
Further details can be obtained from the Environmental Health<br />
Officer.<br />
11.7 REPORT TITLE: STEDS PUMP STATIONS<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
PETER H MOORS,<br />
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH<br />
OFFICER<br />
FILE NUMBER: 125<br />
PURPOSE<br />
The Inspection report from ITT Flygt Pty Ltd has now been<br />
received, complete with recommendations for additional work<br />
that needs to be done.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> accept the recommendations made by Flygt Pty Ltd,<br />
and in particular, agree to replace the pump station guide rails<br />
with stainless steel rails rather than galvanised rails.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
Test showed that all stations operated correctly in relation to the<br />
<strong>au</strong>tomatic functions of the pump control panels.<br />
Recommendations in the report are summarised below:<br />
• The lids on the pump chambers at Pump Stations A, B & D be<br />
replaced or repaired as soon as possible. Replacement lids have<br />
already been requested for these and for Pump Station C.
26<br />
• Replacement of the old galvanised guide rails in all pump<br />
chambers to ensure both the longevity of the rails and to<br />
ensure that the pumps can be removed safely from above the<br />
chamber. Flygt have provided quotes for replacing the rails<br />
with galvanised rails ($3,940-00) or with stainless steel<br />
($5,190-00) exclusive of GST.<br />
• Pump 1 at Pump Station A and pump 2 at Pump Station C<br />
both show the presence of water inside the oil chambers and<br />
they should be removed and serviced to avoid costly rewind<br />
repairs and service calls should a burn-out occur.<br />
• A number of indicator lamps were blown and needed<br />
replacement. This has now been done.<br />
• Pump Station E in front of the museum has a badly corroded<br />
pump lifting chain which needs replacement, as well as a<br />
chain hook to allow safe fastening of the chain. In addition,<br />
the existing pipe-work is rigid PVC set down quite deep in<br />
the pumping chamber. It is recommended that this be<br />
replaced with “Helifex” style flexible hose complete with<br />
“Camlock” fitting for ease of pump removal, in case there is a<br />
need to repair the pump in an emergency.<br />
11.8 REPORT TITLE: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION<br />
COMPARISON<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
LAURENCE EVES, ESM<br />
PURPOSE<br />
This report serves to display the trends as they have developed<br />
within the processing of Development Applications over the last<br />
5 years.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
The report be received and noted.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
Simple graphing of applications for the purpose of identifying the<br />
need to develop better processing systems for development<br />
applications has revealed a significant upward trend in the<br />
quantity of work within the Environmental Services Department<br />
over the last five years.<br />
Comment as to the need for resources and staff to spend time in<br />
this area is readily identified when the situation is displayed in<br />
graph form. This discussion does not take into account land<br />
divisions or any other associated work aligned with development<br />
processes.
27<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The data produced for this report is seen as a simple way of<br />
demonstrating to <strong>Council</strong>lors that the trend for development on<br />
<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> is alive and well.<br />
The information provided for the years 1999 to 2002 reveal a bar<br />
graph relevant to a whole year. The current year, <strong>2003</strong>, reveals a<br />
graph relevant to the January/August period only.<br />
For the sake of comparison, figures are provided that terminate at<br />
31 st August for each year and are represented as follows:<br />
Year<br />
No. of Applications<br />
1999 155<br />
2000 158<br />
2001 170<br />
2002 205<br />
<strong>2003</strong> 215<br />
The trend shows a steady increase in applications over the last 5<br />
years with an approximate 30% increase in overall intake. What<br />
the graph cannot show of course is the complexity of those<br />
applications or the amount of associated extra duty via legislation<br />
that has accompanied that increase.<br />
<strong>Council</strong> should be aware that the move by State <strong>Gov</strong>ernment is to<br />
divest itself of the expensive aspects of managing areas of control<br />
and one of those areas is planning and building. <strong>Council</strong> has had<br />
to pick up many mandatory duties without an associated budget<br />
that otherwise could have assisted with staff resourcing.<br />
So Where to From Here.<br />
The logic behind this report is to advise <strong>Council</strong> of difficulties<br />
and hopefully provide solutions, not provide additional problems.<br />
The Environmental Services Team has been working on staff<br />
management plans for projects and ways to better manage our<br />
budget. We feel we are achieving in this area. The next step is to<br />
complete a whole of department project and task management<br />
programme and then to benchmark that programme in<br />
collaboration with the CEO. In this way we feel that we will<br />
better identify areas of crisis management.<br />
I would suggest that a graph for land division, general complaint<br />
or mandatory inspection in any area would reveal a similar<br />
outcome. As such our department is working to identify these<br />
needs and address them in a more consistently manageable way.
Some Interesting Results.<br />
January – This year has recorded the highest intake of<br />
applications in five years. There is no particular reason for this<br />
other than to say that there is an upward trend in development on<br />
KI.<br />
February – This month was slower than usual and may correlate<br />
more with market and tourism trends than with the real situation<br />
on the <strong>Island</strong>. Whilst development was within the ball park, it<br />
was not significantly strong.<br />
March – This month was amazing and quite out of character for<br />
this time of year. March almost revealed a record growth for a<br />
five year monthly review of data and c<strong>au</strong>sed significant difficulty<br />
given its out of character performance.<br />
April – This month was also strong without setting a record for<br />
the five year period. Some c<strong>au</strong>sation may have been the record<br />
month prior however, the drop still resulted in the second highest<br />
figure for April in five years. This figure still revealed a strong<br />
building market on KI.<br />
May – This figure represented the record for DA lodgement over<br />
the last five years. The figure once again reveals a significant<br />
upward trend in building approvals for KI.<br />
June – This month also recorded the highest figure for June over<br />
the last five years.<br />
July – This month held pace with the previous month however it<br />
did reveal a drop on the previous year.<br />
August – This month once again recorded well for the five year<br />
period and once again revealed a drop on the previous year whilst<br />
still retaining a very high average for the five year grouping.<br />
Conclusions<br />
It is difficult to accurately establish as to why some months are<br />
out of the usual performers. It may have something to do with<br />
crop or product sales, trends in stay at home tourist locations or<br />
the like however, there is a trend upward in development on KI<br />
that expert opinion predicted would have slowed down for the<br />
last three years. In closing this report suggests that all are<br />
prepared and plan for the future in this area.<br />
28
29<br />
12.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INFORMATION<br />
REPORTS<br />
Moved Cr<br />
Seconded Cr<br />
That the Environmental Services Information reports on Waste<br />
Control System Applications, Food Businesses, Other<br />
Environmental Health Issues and Fire Prevention Officer’s<br />
Report be received for information.<br />
CARRIED.<br />
12.1 REPORT TITLE: WASTE CONTROL SYSTEM<br />
APPLICATIONS<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
PETER H MOORS,<br />
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH<br />
OFFICER<br />
The following waste control (septic tank) applications were<br />
received during August <strong>2003</strong> for consideration by <strong>Council</strong>'s<br />
Environmental Health Officer pursuant to the Public and<br />
Environmental Health Regulations and related Codes and<br />
Standards.<br />
Application No.<br />
Site Address<br />
Owner/Applicant's Name<br />
Postal Address<br />
61/03<br />
Lot 114, Section 11 Wrights Road, Penneshaw<br />
Justin Harman<br />
150 Middle Terrace<br />
PENNESHAW <strong>SA</strong> 5222<br />
62/03<br />
Lot 79 Hog Bay Road, B<strong>au</strong>din Beach<br />
Andrew Boss<br />
PO Box 657<br />
PENNESHAW <strong>SA</strong> 5222<br />
63/03<br />
Lot 4 Scenic Drive, American River<br />
Mr & Mrs Sincock<br />
3 Osborne Street<br />
CAMPBELLTOWN <strong>SA</strong> 5074<br />
64/03<br />
Lot 38 Flinders Road, Harriet River/Vivonne Bay<br />
Nathan Guidera<br />
9 Burrows Street<br />
WILLASTON <strong>SA</strong> 5118
30<br />
65/03<br />
Lot 96 Flinders Grove, <strong>Island</strong> Beach<br />
Mr & Mrs JM McKinnon<br />
C/- Gawler Dental Clinic<br />
126 Murray Street<br />
GAWLER <strong>SA</strong> 5118<br />
66/03<br />
Lot 14 Bates Way, Penneshaw<br />
Malcolm Downie<br />
11 McIntosh Crescent<br />
BRAHMA LODGE <strong>SA</strong> 51<strong>09</strong><br />
67/03<br />
11 Dutton Street, Kingscote<br />
Peter & Barbara Miller<br />
RSD 520 Newland Service<br />
Via KINGSCOTE <strong>SA</strong> 5223<br />
68/03<br />
Lot 98 Flinders Grove, <strong>Island</strong> Beach<br />
R & A Anastasiou<br />
19 Farr Terrace<br />
GLENELG EAST <strong>SA</strong> 5045<br />
12.2 REPORT TITLE: FOOD BUSINESSES<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
PETER H MOORS,<br />
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH<br />
OFFICER<br />
FILE NUMBER: 061<br />
FOOD PREMISES INSPECTIONS<br />
The inspection of food premises is proceeding, although still at a<br />
slower rate than was hoped, due to illness and other more urgent<br />
unscheduled commitments. The recent TAFE food safety training<br />
courses have been extremely well attended and as a result of this,<br />
many more food businesses are now completing food business<br />
notification forms and purchasing the required thermometers.<br />
Generic cleaning schedules and forms for both recording<br />
fridge/freezer temperatures and the temperatures of potentially<br />
hazardous food upon its receipt are being provided when<br />
requested.
FOOD RECALLS:<br />
Three food recalls were received for the month of August. These<br />
included the following:<br />
• Campbell’s Condensed Soup (Vegetable Beef) – pieces of<br />
rubber and rubber-coated metal detected in some cans.<br />
• Logan Farm Spinach Portions – Chopped Leaf Style<br />
(Frozen) – product may contain small thistles.<br />
• Dairy-free Fruccio ice dessert – all flavours – product<br />
labelled dairy-free but contains undeclared milk protein<br />
(casein).<br />
• Trident brand Oriental Favourites Pad Thai Noodles –<br />
incorrect labelling – undeclared allergen (wheat) in the<br />
flavour sachet.<br />
FOOD <strong>SA</strong>FETY TRAINING:<br />
The Environmental Health Officer addressed one morning and<br />
three evening food safety training sessions run by TAFE and<br />
again funded by the KI Development Board. Issues covered by<br />
the EHO were the new requirements for skills and knowledge and<br />
the need for all food businesses to complete notification forms.<br />
12.3 REPORT TITLE: OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL<br />
HEALTH ISSUES<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
PETER H MOORS,<br />
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH<br />
OFFICER<br />
ATTACHMENTS: AUGUST FLOW METER<br />
READINGS<br />
FILE NUMBER: 061<br />
31<br />
FLOW METER READING:<br />
The STEDS flows for August are attached. Due to the recent<br />
heavy rains, there have been some very high readings.<br />
STEDS LAGOONS<br />
A close watch has been maintained on the lagoons since they<br />
went into overflow, with a daily inspection made by the<br />
Environmental Health Officer.<br />
BIOSOLIDS DEPOT:<br />
The recent high rainfall has c<strong>au</strong>sed a significant delay in the<br />
drying off of ponds No. 2 and 3. In addition, the level in pond No.<br />
1 has risen considerably. Consideration must soon be given to a<br />
possible extension of the Biosolids Depot which needs to<br />
incorporate another industrial/commercial pond and an increased<br />
flat area for the aging of stockpiles.
NOTIFIABLE DISEASES:<br />
The statistical report received from the Communicable Disease<br />
Control Branch of the Department of Human Services indicates<br />
that there was a case of Legionella longbeachae on the island<br />
during July. Since this strain of Legionella is generally associated<br />
with potting soils and compost rather than cooling towers, spas<br />
and warm water systems, no separate advice was received by<br />
<strong>Council</strong>. A reminder to residents that they should exercise care<br />
when using potting soils, by using gloves and preferably a face<br />
mask, will be circulated shortly.<br />
DERELICT HOUSE:<br />
The vacant house at American River mentioned in last month’s<br />
report has now been tidied up by the owner with some local help.<br />
The owner now has several local people who will keep an eye on<br />
the place for him while he is away and he has indicated that he<br />
will remain in contact with the Environmental Health Officer to<br />
keep him posted.<br />
IMMUNI<strong>SA</strong>TION:<br />
The normal monthly immunisation clinic was held during August,<br />
together with sessions at both Kingscote and Parndana Area<br />
Schools for Hep B and Meningococcal disease.<br />
PIR<strong>SA</strong> ENHANCED LIVESTOCK DISEASE SURVEILLANCE<br />
NEWSLETTER<br />
The latest issue of the above newsletter was recently received<br />
from PIR<strong>SA</strong>. Included in it was a reminder that no swill is to be<br />
fed to pigs. The term swill in this case refers to any mammalian<br />
material that has not been rendered (heat treated). There was also<br />
mention of the fact that as a result of a case of Mad Cow Disease<br />
being diagnosed in Canada some months ago, <strong>SA</strong> has to submit<br />
for testing, a quota of 16 cattle brains and 50 sheep brains from<br />
animals showing symptoms similar to those of TSE diseases<br />
(Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathys).<br />
12.4 REPORT TITLE: FIRE PREVENTION OFFICER'S<br />
REPORT - JULY/AUGUST <strong>2003</strong><br />
AUTHOR:<br />
MICHELLE MAGUIRE, FIRE<br />
PREVENTION OFFICER<br />
32<br />
The following report is presented for <strong>Council</strong> information:
Bushfire Prevention Planning<br />
• Vivonne Bay Bushfire Prevention Plan - The draft plan has<br />
been completed and was presented to the steering committee<br />
for corrections and/or endorsement in preparation for release<br />
for public comment. So far the only committee member<br />
comments received have been from Mr Roger Collins of the<br />
Department of Environment and Heritage. Only minor<br />
amendments were proposed. Unfortunately, DEH are not yet<br />
ready to include their Fire Management Statement for<br />
Vivonne Bay Conservation Park in the plan.<br />
• Southern Bay of Shoals Bushfire Prevention Plan -<br />
Planning was commenced for the protection of lives and<br />
property from bushfires in the developing area north of<br />
Kingscote. The major proportions of the plan, including land<br />
use, fire history and bushfire potential sections, were<br />
developed and forwarded to the steering committee for<br />
comment and input. Steering committee inspection of the<br />
main planning areas of concern focused on The Bullock<br />
Track. The Fire Prevention Officer will work with<br />
Department of Environment staff to develop proposals for the<br />
maintenance of emergency services access. Longer term<br />
proposals will also be developed for consideration by <strong>Council</strong><br />
and, later, the Native Vegetation <strong>Council</strong>.<br />
Hazard Management<br />
• Dangerous Substances Act 1979 - The Country Fire Services<br />
Region 1 Chief Officer was able to provide an extract from<br />
the Dangerous Substances Regulations 2002 to assist<br />
development of strategies for dealing with the handling of<br />
complaints regarding the dangerous and illegal storage of<br />
flammable substances, particularly fuel, within townships.<br />
This has been added to <strong>Council</strong> responsibilities with<br />
amendments to Section 40 of the Country Fires Act.<br />
• “Fire Track Classification” - The Country Fire Service<br />
requested the Fire Prevention Officer’s comments on a draft<br />
document setting standards for fuel breaks and fire access<br />
tracks on government land, as proposed by the <strong>Gov</strong>ernment<br />
Agencies Fire Liaison Committee.<br />
• Campfire Restrictions - Requests have been received and<br />
responded to regarding the restrictions on the use of campfires<br />
and cooking fires in public places outside the Fire Danger<br />
Season. While fire season restrictions do not apply, the public<br />
must meet fire safety and vegetation protection requirements<br />
year round.<br />
33
34<br />
Building and Development Standards<br />
• KI Roadside Vegetation Management Plan - The Fire<br />
Prevention Officer examined the first draft of the new<br />
roadside vegetation management plan.<br />
• Building Proposals - The Fire Prevention Officer undertook<br />
inspections of proposed dwelling sites in areas of potential<br />
significant wildfire threat. Written advice was provided<br />
according to the vulnerability of the proposed structures.<br />
State Fire Prevention Officer’s Seminar<br />
The Fire Prevention officer attended a two day conference for<br />
Fire Prevention Officers from around the State at the end of<br />
August. It is proposed that attendance and contribution to the<br />
future meetings will be required for the retention of FPO status<br />
under the Country Fires Act.<br />
Key issues covered by the seminar included reviews of current<br />
legislation, including the Environmental Protection (Burning) Policy<br />
1994 and the responsibilities of Authorised Officers under Section 38<br />
of the Country Fires Act. Des Parker, CFS Legislation Review Project<br />
Officer, outlined changes to the Country Fires Act which were<br />
forwarded to Parliamentary Counsel for their approval in late August.<br />
Mr Packer praised the <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Fire Prevention officer, noting<br />
CFS Board recommended changes to the Act which originated from<br />
issues identified and legislation proposed by the KI FPO.<br />
KI Bushfire Prevention Committee AGM<br />
The District Bushfire Prevention Committee strongly supported<br />
the approach of the Environmental Services Manager to have<br />
<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> gazetted as a Bushfire Prone Area under the<br />
Development Act and requested his invitation to the next<br />
Committee meeting.<br />
A co-operative planning approach between the Department of<br />
Environment and Heritage and the committee resulted in the<br />
decision that the bushfire prevention planning priority for<br />
<strong>2003</strong>/04 would be the development of a joint plan for the area<br />
north of Flinders Chase. Strategies will be developed by Robert<br />
Ellis of DEH and the FPO in the near future, however,<br />
commencement of the plan will await the outcomes of the DEH<br />
Flinders Chase Fire Management Plan. The second plan<br />
supported by the committee will be for the protection of<br />
Penneshaw township and its preparedness for bushfires. This plan<br />
will be commenced in the near future. The Antechamber Bay<br />
Bushfire Prevention Plan was identified as due for review. In<br />
accordance with the committee’s responsibilities under the<br />
Country Fires Act, Fire Danger Season dates and local permit to<br />
burn conditions were reconsidered and it was resolved that no<br />
changes should occur.
Work Programme – September/October <strong>2003</strong><br />
• Penneshaw Bushfire Prevention Plan - Commencement of the<br />
plan in accordance with the directions of the KI Bushfire<br />
Prevention Committee<br />
• Bushfire Prevention Planning Strategy - to be developed by<br />
DEH and the FPO<br />
• Section 40 Country Fires Act - Commencement of major<br />
inspections in October<br />
• Southern Bay of Shoals Bushfire Prevention Plan Steering<br />
Committee Meetings - Continuation of development of the<br />
draft plan.<br />
13.0 TECHNICAL SERVICES REPORTS<br />
Your Worship Mayor Pengilly and <strong>Council</strong>lors, I submit the<br />
following reports for the Ordinary Meeting of <strong>Council</strong> to be held on<br />
Wednesday 10 September <strong>2003</strong>.<br />
Moved Cr<br />
Seconded Cr<br />
That the Technical Service Manager’s Reports be received.<br />
CARRIED.<br />
13.1 REPORT TITLE: AUGUST <strong>2003</strong> PROGRESS OF<br />
WORK REPORT<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
TECHNICAL SERVICES<br />
COORDINATORS<br />
35<br />
PURPOSE<br />
For information of <strong>Council</strong>.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That the August <strong>2003</strong> progress of work report be received.<br />
<strong>2003</strong>/04 Capital & Construction Works:<br />
Project Name<br />
Status<br />
Stokes Bay Rd<br />
Commissioned KBR to undertake engineering survey<br />
& road design for 5kms<br />
Boat Ramp Rd<br />
Preliminary field works carried out<br />
Vivonne Ave<br />
No progress made<br />
Reeves Street<br />
Engineering survey by in-house staff prepared<br />
Parndana Mainstreet Engineering Surveyor engaged<br />
Bessell Drive<br />
No progress made<br />
Rapide Drive<br />
No progress made<br />
Hawthorne Ave<br />
No progress made<br />
Resheeting Program No progress made<br />
Vegetation Clearance Program adopted by the Committee<br />
Program
36<br />
Infrastructure Maintenance & Operations:<br />
Function<br />
Status<br />
Sealed Road Maintenance • Repaired sunken trench in Todd St<br />
• Maintenance run carried out on South Coast Rd,<br />
West End Hwy and Playford Hwy<br />
Unsealed Road Maintenance • Repaired Washout on Pratts Rd, Turkey Lane &<br />
Stevens Rd<br />
• Repaired bog holes on Shell Track & Ten Trees<br />
Rd<br />
• Repaired holes in North Coast Rd near Stokes Bay<br />
• Investigated rubble source at L.Turners property<br />
• Road Patching & general maintenance American<br />
River<br />
• Patching on Charring Cross Road, Willson River<br />
Road & Bluegums Road<br />
• Resheeted Pelican Street<br />
• Cut & reformed section of South Coast Rd near<br />
Emu Ridge<br />
• Patched bad potholes in sections of 3 Chain Road<br />
• Patrol grading as required & possible<br />
Traffic Control & Signs • Repair vandalised finger sign on Nepean St<br />
Kingscote<br />
• Sign maintenance undertaken throughout the<br />
district<br />
Culverts & Bridges • Cleaned out culverts & repaired to broken pipes<br />
on Gosse Ritche Rd, Mt Taylor Rd, Mt Stockdale<br />
Rd, Harriett Rd East West 1, East West 2 and<br />
Crabbs Rd<br />
• Repaired headwalls on Bark Hut Rd<br />
• Unblocked drain in Addison St by school<br />
• New culvert installed on Florence Road &<br />
Bluegums Road<br />
• Extensive drainage & Culvert maintenance<br />
undertaken this month<br />
• Installed driveway pipes on Pelican Street<br />
• Installed new culvert on Elsegood Road<br />
Reserves & Verges • Commenced removal of Oleander street trees on<br />
various streets in Kingscote<br />
• Removed “Street Trees” recently vandalised along<br />
Murray Street<br />
• Cleaned up weed on Kohinoor / Telegraph Rd /<br />
Information bays<br />
• Removed several fallen trees due to storm damage<br />
• Kingscote reserves slashing undertaken<br />
• General mowing maintenance in Penneshaw /<br />
Kingscote / American River / Emu Bay / Parndana<br />
• Weedicide program commenced on road verges<br />
& footpath areas
37<br />
Sports and Recreational<br />
Facilities<br />
Public Amenities & <strong>Council</strong><br />
Buildings<br />
More test holes dug at Kingscote oval following<br />
request from football club and has yet again proved<br />
that the irrigation system is not to blame for the<br />
drainage problem (refer to special report)<br />
• Maintenance carried out to vandalism at Vivonne<br />
bay Toilets / Penneshaw / Kingscote<br />
• Reported to police re “Toilet Paper Bandit”<br />
• Weather proof verandah undertaken at Penneshaw<br />
Hall & other minor repairs<br />
• Quotations being obtained on repairs of Ferry<br />
Terminal toilets which includes roof leaks / timber<br />
damage / additional weather proofing<br />
• Western River Cove shelter roof being repaired<br />
under insurance claim<br />
• Various electrical jobs conducted at Penneshaw /<br />
Kingscote and Operation centre<br />
• Kingscote swimming pool new plumbing, fittings,<br />
hardware and painting completed<br />
• Shifted furniture & installed blackboards &<br />
shelves<br />
• Arranged Air-conditioning Service to units in<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Office building<br />
• Roof repairs Electrical repairs at Penneshaw<br />
Penguin facility<br />
• Cleaned weeds / weedicide / tree planting at<br />
Kingscote Penguin facility<br />
Special Project Management:<br />
Project Name<br />
Status<br />
Ozone Lights • Meeting with Ozone re direction for these<br />
• “Street and Park Furniture” visiting in September<br />
to provide advise (FOC)<br />
Christmas Cove Harbour Refer to special report<br />
Redevelopment<br />
American River Land<br />
Division<br />
• Stormwater Drains along Buick Drive being laid<br />
• Superintendent & field supervision issues<br />
discussed with Developer’s Engineer<br />
• EPA approval of discharging SW onto the sea has<br />
yet to resolve<br />
Penneshaw Cemetery Extension Plan has been drawn up<br />
Dog and Cat Management Refer to special Report<br />
Plan<br />
Chapman River Footbridge Geotechnical field work conducted on 29/8/03<br />
Kingscote Cemetery Refer to special report<br />
Extension<br />
Fuel Supply Contract<br />
Emu Bay Overall Stormwater<br />
Drainage Plan<br />
Bullock Track<br />
Speed Zoning<br />
Progressing<br />
Advised L.Rawlings that fencing should be completed<br />
on the boundary alignment of his property and the<br />
Road reserve<br />
50 kph on Western Cove Road, Nepean Bay relocated<br />
on 6/8/03 at 11 am.
38<br />
Parks & Recreation Facility Management:<br />
Project/Function<br />
Status<br />
Lovering Park • Builders driving over the Park<br />
• Local residents have complained<br />
• Barriers erected to prevent everyone driving over<br />
the park<br />
• Trees will be planted in the future and barriers<br />
removed<br />
Landscape & Facilities Refer to special Report<br />
Design Plan<br />
Pelican Feeding Area Area surveyed for the development of a plan<br />
Reeves Point Quarry Area surveyed for the development of a plan<br />
Waste Management & STEDS:<br />
Fleurieu Regional Waste<br />
Management Strategy<br />
Committee<br />
• Crs Richards and McDonald and PCSC attended<br />
meeting<br />
• Report in <strong>Council</strong> minutes<br />
Water Management • Hired a 4” Trash Pump to remove the water from<br />
the Kingscote Dump<br />
• Considering purchasing a pump very soon<br />
Steel Amnesty • Commenced and will continue until end<br />
September<br />
• Numerous enquiries<br />
• Obtaining quotations from companies to come and<br />
collect in October 03<br />
Kingscote landfill<br />
&<br />
Transfer stations<br />
• Pumped water out of pit<br />
• Glass transfer with KI recycles working well<br />
• All sites gearing up for influx of steel in particular<br />
cars<br />
Recycling • Positive communications with two organisations<br />
interested in green waste composting and<br />
cardboard recycling<br />
Regional Waste Forum • Attended at Mt Barker hosted by Southern and<br />
Hills Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association<br />
• Every <strong>Council</strong> has the same issues as KI<br />
• Need to be involved in commenting on the “State<br />
Waste Strategy”<br />
EPA Water Policy<br />
Future Directions Project<br />
Kingscote STEDS<br />
Extensions<br />
Attended seminar in relation to the new policy<br />
M<strong>au</strong>nsell’s commenced the cost comparison and<br />
water monitoring parts of this project<br />
Refer to special report<br />
Staff & System Development:<br />
Program<br />
Radio Communication<br />
Fuel Supply<br />
Disposal sale by tender<br />
Annual Staff Clothing<br />
Status<br />
Austlink Communications installed new radio units in<br />
all mobile plant and vehicles<br />
Negotiations with Shell continuing in regard to<br />
relocation of fuel storage equipment<br />
Advertised the Chamberlain tractor for sale by tender<br />
Placed order for protective clothing and footwear
39<br />
Training<br />
E.P Water quality Policy<br />
Compiled Training record of employees from TAFE<br />
Attended Information session in regard to<br />
administration of policy<br />
Community Group Projects:<br />
Project Name/Services<br />
Status<br />
Independence Point Walk • Project Works completed building the bridges<br />
(refer to special report)<br />
• Provided “roadwork” signs, Equipment to<br />
American River Progress<br />
• Seat donated and installed for American River<br />
Progress<br />
Green Corps<br />
Attended project l<strong>au</strong>nch at Antechamber Bay<br />
Nepean Pine Rehabilitation • “Draft Management Plan” received for comment<br />
Project<br />
• Need a budget to manage this area if <strong>Council</strong><br />
endorses the plan.<br />
• Indicated to Flora and F<strong>au</strong>ns Club that no budget<br />
exists in <strong>2003</strong>/04 other than for ongoing<br />
maintenance.<br />
Sundry Works & External Services:<br />
Client Name<br />
Services Provided<br />
T<strong>SA</strong><br />
Road maintenance agreement<br />
KI <strong>Council</strong><br />
Built a sand bunker at Penneshaw Depot<br />
DEH<br />
Provided “Roadworks” signs to Dave Taylor for the<br />
grazing of Wattle Grove and Weatons Road. Grazing<br />
trial complete<br />
13.2 REPORT TITLE: CHRISTMAS COVE HARBOUR<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
KEN LIU, TSM<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To update the progress on the redevelopment of Christmas Cove<br />
project.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That the action taken by the Technical Services Manager in<br />
<strong>au</strong>thorising the additional works to be undertaken on Christmas<br />
Cove as outlined be ratified.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
<strong>SA</strong> Tourism Commission confirmed over the phone on 14/8/<strong>2003</strong><br />
that the supplementary funding of $50,000 is available for extra<br />
development works on the Cove, regardless <strong>Council</strong>’s application<br />
for additional grant from the <strong>SA</strong> Boating Facilities Advisory<br />
Committee is successful or not.
DISCUSSION<br />
Following further negotiations with the Contractor, Leed<br />
Engineering and Construction Pty Ltd, the indicative cost for the<br />
additional works (to enable limited future marina berths to be<br />
provided in the stage 1 redevelopment) is $82,500 including<br />
GST. The additional works (as shown on the modified plan<br />
below) include the following:<br />
• Extension of 32 metres revetment walling,<br />
• Excavation of 4,000 cubic metres basin material, and<br />
• Installation of five (5) piles.<br />
The contract price including the above additional works<br />
(excluding $30,000 for the supply and delivery of some 65 cubic<br />
metres of ready-mix concrete by <strong>Council</strong>) becomes $595,485 (ie<br />
$541,350 GST exclusive). The total project cost including<br />
engineering design and management is approximately $610,000<br />
GST exclusive.<br />
Total funding available for the project is $614,000 which is made<br />
up of:<br />
• $250,000 <strong>SA</strong>TC grant<br />
• $284,000 <strong>SA</strong> Recreational Boating Levy Fund<br />
• $50,000 (<strong>SA</strong>TC loan) & $30,000 (2002/03 Budget) from KI<br />
<strong>Council</strong><br />
As these additional works outlined above can be accommodated<br />
within the funding available, I have <strong>au</strong>thorised the inclusion of<br />
these works in the contract.<br />
Construction work is now planned to commence either the last<br />
week of September or immediately after the October’s Long<br />
Weekend.<br />
40
41<br />
13.3 REPORT TITLE: KINGSCOTE STEDS<br />
EXTENSIONS<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
KEN LIU, TSM<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To seek instructions from <strong>Council</strong> in relation to the proposed<br />
extensions of Kingscote STEDS.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That this matter be referred to the STEDS Committee for a<br />
recommendation, and further that in light of the complexity of<br />
this project, with the exception of the line on Marsden Crescent<br />
being extended to Lot 111 Investigator Avenue subject to site<br />
investigation by the Technical Services Manager, <strong>Council</strong> defers<br />
the extension of the existing system until those issues raised in<br />
the report are addressed.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
$138,200 has been provided in the current budget to extend the<br />
Kingscote’s STEDS connections to Vivonne Avenue and other<br />
areas.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Preliminary to the design of any STEDS project, it is necessary to<br />
determine the extent of the areas which are to be serviced and<br />
collect field data and information that would affect the outcomes.<br />
The process will involve the following:<br />
1. Ascertain as to how far <strong>Council</strong> wishes to provide STEDS<br />
connections to properties in Kingscote from the extensions (ie<br />
to properties with septic tanks only, all blocks within the<br />
existing township area, or beyond to include future urban<br />
land);<br />
2. Locate all minor STEDS extensions which have been installed<br />
since the implementation of the original scheme in 1976, but<br />
not recorded on the master plan;<br />
3. Find out the levels and sizes of existing gravity drains,<br />
capacity of the system, and any hydr<strong>au</strong>lic issues that would<br />
need to be included for engineering considerations;<br />
4. Identify the locations of all properties that have a septic tank<br />
installed in the ground, but not connected to the STED system<br />
and undertake field survey as required for more accurate<br />
information of these tanks, in particular their positions and<br />
outlet levels; and<br />
5. From the above information, develop option plans or a design<br />
brief for the preparation of construction drawings and<br />
technical specifications.
Due to lack of available engineering data and unknown<br />
magnitude of the existing problems with the existing STEDS, it<br />
would be difficult to advise <strong>Council</strong> the cost of the extensions<br />
and the extent of the problems without going through the above<br />
process. The key issues are:<br />
1. Whether the existing STEDS infrastructure (ie the gravity<br />
mains, the pumping stations and oxidation lagoon) has the<br />
sufficient capacity for extra flows<br />
2. Some of the existing septic tanks pending connection may be<br />
installed in wrong positions and the outlets put in may also be<br />
too low that will require relocations or otherwise connections<br />
cannot be provided.<br />
3. No easements on properties where the new drain lines may be<br />
laid have yet been acquired by <strong>Council</strong>.<br />
4. Some existing building works or structures may be on the<br />
alignment of the new drains which will create constraints in<br />
providing the connections.<br />
5. The existing minor STEDS extensions installed few years ago<br />
without proper engineering consideration may be built on<br />
wrong alignments or levels.<br />
6. Unless the current problem with the stormwater infiltration to<br />
the existing pipes is rectified, the hydr<strong>au</strong>lic performance of<br />
the entire system cannot be determined under the sanitary<br />
engineering principles.<br />
Initial assessment undertaken by searching through files and<br />
records and field inspections, have suggested that it will be an<br />
enormous task to find out exactly where all the existing septic<br />
tank outlets and extensions are, as it may be necessary to uncover<br />
some or most of the existing pipes installed over last 25 years so<br />
that the sizes, depths and alignments of these extensions can be<br />
determined.<br />
In light of the complexity of this project, it would be wise to have<br />
it investigated and planned properly before extending the existing<br />
pipes any further.<br />
42
43<br />
13.4 REPORT TITLE: KINGSCOTE CEMETERY<br />
REDEVELOPMENT<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
KEN LIU, TSM<br />
ATTACHMENTS: REDEVELOPMENTS PLANS &<br />
ACTION PLAN<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To consider the proposal for the extension of the Kingscote<br />
Cemetery.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That the proposed plan for the extension of Kingscote Cemetery<br />
be approved in principle and further that <strong>Council</strong> <strong>au</strong>thorises the<br />
CEO to commence negotiation with adjoining property owners on<br />
land acquisitions and undertake road closure process in<br />
accordance with the Road Opening & Closing Act.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
Kingscote cemetery is almost full and with the recent site<br />
clearance work done on the north western corner, the burial site<br />
available will last only for few more years.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Accordingly, a concept plan has been developed with a view to<br />
extend the existing site. The proposal which is shown on the<br />
attached plans recommends the purchase of additional land from<br />
the adjoining properties coloured in blue, road closures in yellow,<br />
and road opening in green. Three (3) parcels of land owned by<br />
<strong>Council</strong> for cemetery extensions are in orange colour. Combining<br />
these additional parcels of land available for the extension, the<br />
cemetery can be properly redeveloped.<br />
The proposed road closures will also improve junction safety at<br />
this location as well as providing opportunity for integrating the<br />
existing <strong>Council</strong> owned land on both sides of the road into one.<br />
Bullock Track approach at the intersection with <strong>Gov</strong>ernor Wallen<br />
Drive will need realigning to incorporate with the sealing of<br />
Seaview Road extension to the boat ramp planned for the current<br />
financial year as well as the closure to through traffic on Karatta<br />
Terrace.<br />
An action plan with nominated time frames and tasks for the<br />
project is also provided in the report. The most important needs<br />
doing this year is to negotiate with the adjoining property owners<br />
in order to secure the land required for the extension, then follow<br />
by physical works such as road closure and realignment, sealing<br />
of Seaview Road extension, and perimeter fence installation.
Once the extra land is secured, the next step is to get the<br />
community involved by inviting their input as part of the<br />
redevelopment process as to how the site should be landscaped,<br />
type of burials, cemetery facilities, etc.<br />
13.5 TITLE: STORAGE SHED –<br />
RECREATION & WASTE<br />
SERVICES<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
DANIEL ROWLEY, TECHNICAL<br />
SERVICES COORDINATOR<br />
44<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To recommend the construction of a shed for the Green Team at<br />
the Operations Centre within existing budget items.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That part of the Capital funds allocated in this years budget be<br />
redirected to building a storage shed for the Recreation & Waste<br />
Services.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
Plant and equipment operated and maintained by the Green Team<br />
is currently being stored in an inappropriate manner resulting in<br />
an increased rate of degradation. The following are some<br />
examples-<br />
• Lawn Mowers (value in excess of $30K each) not being<br />
protected undercover;<br />
• Vehicle being stored outside;<br />
• Tractor and mower not properly placed undercover<br />
• Small equipment items scattered amongst other plant and<br />
equipment items;<br />
• Signs scattered all over the place;<br />
• Toilet cleaning consumables being placed in a location that has<br />
no door and is inadequate;<br />
• Security of all plant and equipment is compromised;<br />
• The current nursery is inadequate and results in many plants<br />
not surviving.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
As the security and caring of <strong>Council</strong>’s equipment and goods in<br />
the Depot have higher priority, the upgrading of office facilities<br />
at the Operations Centre would be more appropriate to be<br />
deferred for future funding consideration.
The Green Team proposes to build a shed at the Works Depot to<br />
relocate and house the following items from the capital budget set<br />
aside for the Operations Centre’s Office during the current<br />
financial year:<br />
• Vehicle<br />
• Tractor and mower<br />
• Spray equipment<br />
• All ride on mowers<br />
• Small plant and equipment<br />
• Signs and other small items<br />
• Other Green Team specific items<br />
The building will be a 4-bay, 12.2m x 7.5m x 4m shed with<br />
lockable doors at a cost of $6,086 GST exclusive.<br />
The concrete floor proposed can be funded from the remaining<br />
funds and the existing operating budget for the purchase of ready<br />
mix concrete with the construction being undertaken by in-house<br />
staff.<br />
The existing shed currently occupied by the Green Team will be<br />
used to store the toilet consumables and dump materials. The<br />
Blue Team will use the shed where the tractor and other small<br />
Green Team items are currently stored.<br />
The current Nursery will also be upgraded, using materials<br />
surplus available at the site. This will ensure the staff have the<br />
ability to manage plantings in an appropriate manner.<br />
The provisions of the proposed storage facilities will ensure better<br />
management and security of <strong>Council</strong>’s goods and assets.<br />
13.6 REPORT TITLE: DOG & CAT MANAGEMENT<br />
PLAN<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
DANIEL ROWLEY,TECHNICAL<br />
SERVICES COORDINATOR<br />
ATTACHMENTS: SUMMARY REPORT (UNDER<br />
SEPARATE COVER)<br />
45<br />
PURPOSE<br />
For adoption of the revised Dog and Cat Management Plan<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> adopts the revised Dog and Cat Management Plan<br />
for implementation.
46<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
The Draft Dog and Cat Management Plan released for public<br />
comments closed on 18 July <strong>2003</strong>.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Nineteen (19) written responses to the released Draft Dog and Cat<br />
Management Plan have been received.<br />
It was clear from the responses received that many people were<br />
unaware of their requirements under the Dog and Cat<br />
Management Act 1995. The first draft also did not have an Action<br />
Plan and information on implementation cost.<br />
Following the receipt of public comments, the plan was rewritten<br />
to include the requirements under the Act, appropriate public<br />
recommendations, an Action Plan and a summary of all public<br />
comments. The plan is also rewritten so that actions required are<br />
easier to follow.<br />
POLICY IMPLICATIONS<br />
1. Financial/budget<br />
The financial implications of implementing this plan are as<br />
follows-<br />
• Maintain existing budget<br />
• Increase in 0.5FTE General Inspector- $20,000<br />
(ongoing)<br />
• Consumables (eg Traps)- $1,000 (ongoing)<br />
• <strong>Council</strong> call out system- $5,000 (ongoing)<br />
• Once of purchases for implementation- $15,000<br />
2. Legal<br />
As part of the review of <strong>Council</strong> Bylaws, recommendations<br />
within this plan need to be incorporated into Bylaws.<br />
13.7 REPORT TITLE: KINGSCOTE OVAL<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
KEN LIU, TSM<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To provide solutions regarding drainage problems on Kingscote<br />
Oval as requested by Mayor Pengilly.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> seeks advice from a turf management expert on how<br />
to improve the Oval surface.
47<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
The Kingscote Football Club President, Mr Green made an<br />
accusation at the June meeting that <strong>Council</strong> staff cut or damaged<br />
the existing sub-soil drains, while installing the <strong>au</strong>tomatic watering<br />
system on the Oval, c<strong>au</strong>sing stormwater to pond on the playing<br />
surface. Later, the allegation was proven to be unfounded.<br />
The Kingscote Football Club did not accept the TSM’s response<br />
to the Club’s accusation (documented in TSM Report Item No<br />
13.3, meeting of 9/7/03), despite that the explanation was<br />
accepted by the <strong>Council</strong> (refer to Minutes No 36.0).<br />
The Football Club however, still maintains that the oval being<br />
subjected to waterlogging is due to either a busted watering pipe<br />
or blocked sub-surface drainage and has made further complaint<br />
to the Mayor. As a result, Mayor Pengilly has requested for more<br />
information bec<strong>au</strong>se at present <strong>Council</strong> is getting the blame.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
It was somewhat disappointing to receive the comments from the<br />
Club despite explanation was given. While <strong>Council</strong> staff was<br />
deeply embarrassed by the Club's action and did not expect an<br />
apology, I do believe under this circumstance, staff should have at<br />
least received support or respect from the community and Elected<br />
Members.<br />
In addition to the previous accusation of damage to sub-soil<br />
drains, the Club now is alleging that the problem is the busted<br />
water pipes installed by <strong>Council</strong> staff.<br />
In my previous report, I advised that the current problems on the<br />
Oval are obvious and the c<strong>au</strong>ses could be due to:<br />
• Lack of hydr<strong>au</strong>lic consideration in the design & construction<br />
of the sub-soil drains;<br />
• Excessive stormwater runoff onto the oval from the higher<br />
area and lack of overall surface drainage management;<br />
• Poor quality soil on Oval (only approximately 25mm of soil<br />
with thick clay below);<br />
• No maintenance/monitoring program in place for the sub-soil<br />
drainage system; and<br />
• The last four years have been relatively dry resulting reduction<br />
in void ratio (ie allowing the water to get through to the filter<br />
lay).<br />
The above comment is my opinion without any laboratory test<br />
information, whether <strong>Council</strong> or the Football Club wants to<br />
accept it or not is not my call. Perhaps it may be in the best<br />
interest of everyone, <strong>Council</strong> should obtain an independent<br />
engineer report so that the accusation of any wrong doing by the<br />
staff may be put to rest.
48<br />
Clearly, the oval was badly built in the first place and if <strong>Council</strong><br />
is serious about fixing the surface, it will need to do the following<br />
things properly:<br />
1. Extend the existing kerbing to redirect the stormwater runoff<br />
away from the Oval surface (as stormwater carries the fines or<br />
clay and deposits onto the lower area of the Oval).<br />
2. Make corrections to the oval levels to improve surface<br />
drainage.<br />
3. Replace the top layer of soil with suitable type or seek expert<br />
advice to improve its permeability.<br />
4. Undertake remedial works or install flashing points as<br />
required to the existing sub-surface drainage system so that<br />
effective maintenance program can be put in place.<br />
No resources have been provided from the current budget to<br />
rectify these problems. In any event, <strong>Council</strong> should seek advice<br />
from a turf management specialist before deciding what is the<br />
best course of action to address these problems.<br />
13.8 REPORT TITLE: INDEPENDENCE POINT WALK-<br />
AMERICAN RIVER<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
DANIEL ROWLEY, TECHNICAL<br />
SERVICES COORDINATOR<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To provide information regarding contribution made by <strong>Council</strong><br />
to the Independence Point Walk at American River.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That the information be received.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
The American River Progress Association, through Irene Halley,<br />
has been developing a walking trail from Tangara Drive to<br />
Independence Point near American River.<br />
The group has undertaken a lengthy approval process to receive<br />
permission for the construction of the walk. The organisations<br />
involved included:<br />
o <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
o National Parks and Wildlife <strong>SA</strong> (NPW<strong>SA</strong>)<br />
o Native Vegetation <strong>Council</strong><br />
o Transport <strong>SA</strong><br />
Following the approval process the group marked the trail and<br />
commenced the construction. Project Works were contacted and<br />
asked to construct two bridges over some road culverts.
49<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Council</strong> in conjunction with the American River<br />
Progress Association applied for funding from the Coast<br />
Protection Board in March <strong>2003</strong> and were successful in obtaining<br />
funding for the materials.<br />
Project Works were then used to undertake the construction of the<br />
bridges in the appropriate locations to the design standards<br />
developed by NPW<strong>SA</strong> on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>. <strong>Council</strong> contributed<br />
extensively with logistics and the provision of some materials.<br />
The completed works were undertaken to a high quality and to<br />
the standards provided. The students involved were committed to<br />
the project even though they were required to catch the Sealink<br />
Shuttle Bus at 6:30am each morning.<br />
This project is a good example of how Project Works can be used<br />
to undertake small construction projects for community<br />
organisations. The people leading Project Works will provide<br />
students to project undertaken on any part of <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> if<br />
possible.<br />
The American River Progress Association is looking at obtaining<br />
sponsorship from organisations to provide seats along the trail.<br />
<strong>Council</strong> has already supplied a seat as part of this initiative.<br />
Following are some photos of the works undertaken and a copy of<br />
the recent <strong>Island</strong>er article.
An innovative project is underway at<br />
American River that will link Remembrance<br />
Reserve and Independence Point with a<br />
three kilometre walking trail.<br />
The walkway is a joint effort between<br />
Coastcare, Project Works, <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong><br />
<strong>Council</strong>, <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> SeaLink,<br />
<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Lions and a very keen<br />
band of volunteers.<br />
Coastcare have provided grant money for<br />
the project, while Project Works, which<br />
provides opportunities for local youth to<br />
gain valuable employment skills, are<br />
undertaking the construction of the walkway<br />
that includes two creek crossings.<br />
Volunteers who have dedicated their time<br />
for the project include Irene Halley, Judy<br />
and Dean Johnson, Nigel Humphrys, Tom<br />
Appleby, P<strong>au</strong>line Rattray, Jan Peachey and<br />
Daniel Catmur (at just four years of age).<br />
Sponsors are being sought to provide bench<br />
seats along the walkway to take in the<br />
sweeping views of Pelican Lagoon each of<br />
whom will be acknowledged with a<br />
commemorative plaque at the site of their<br />
seat.<br />
If you are interested in providing the $200<br />
necessary for a seat please contact Irene<br />
Halley on 8553 7337.<br />
50
13.9 REPORT TITLE: KANGAROO ISLAND COUNCIL<br />
LANDSCAPE AND FACILITIES<br />
DESIGN PLAN<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
DANIEL ROWLEY, TECHNICAL<br />
SERVICES COORDINATOR<br />
51<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To advise <strong>Council</strong> of the cost associated with the development of<br />
a <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Landscape and Facilities Design Plan<br />
based on the plan developed by National Parks and Wildlife <strong>SA</strong><br />
on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
(1) That the report be received.<br />
(2) That the development of a landscape and facilities design plan<br />
for <strong>Council</strong>’s open space as outlined be considered in next<br />
year’s budget and further that in the interim, <strong>Council</strong> adopts<br />
similar approach as the NP&WS for implementation.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
At the <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Council</strong> budget workshop, the Parks and<br />
Community Services Coordinator was requested to obtain a<br />
quotation for the development of a <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Landscape and Facilities Design Plan.<br />
Taylor and Cullity Pty Ltd, the company who developed the<br />
NPW<strong>SA</strong> plan and has undertaken the majority of landscape<br />
planning for NPW<strong>SA</strong>, were contacted and requested to provide a<br />
quotation. The <strong>Council</strong> plan is to be developed using the NPW<strong>SA</strong><br />
planning brief as a starting point.<br />
A Landscape and Facilities Design Plan will standardise all<br />
facilities constructed on <strong>Council</strong> property ensuring a consistent<br />
planning approach is taken for all facilities. It will also provide<br />
the planning for many community groups resulting in their ability<br />
to commence construction at the start of the project rather than<br />
undertaking planning first.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Taylor and Cullity were provided with a “Scope of Works”<br />
comprising two parts:<br />
(1) Develop Facility Plans for the following facilities (Concept<br />
followed by working drawings), including toilet, BBQ shelter,<br />
shelter, camping, self registration station, sign shelter,<br />
interpretation sign, sheltered seat and table, seat, table, memorial<br />
seat, post and rail fence, low tension wire fence, vehicle barrier,<br />
pedestrian barrier, road and path materials, duckboard, boardwalk,<br />
revegetation fencing, lookout stone, lookout timber; and
52<br />
(2) Develop Site Plans (concept followed by working drawings)<br />
for the following sites (many will not require working<br />
drawings as a concept is adequate) including Antechamber<br />
Bay, Browns Beach, American River Campground and<br />
Remembrance Reserve, Pennington Bay/Prospect Hill<br />
precinct, Swimming Pool to Brownlow Walk, Stokes Bay<br />
Camping and Day Visitor Area, Snellings Beach Day Visitor<br />
Area, Western River Cove Day Visitor Area, Vivonne Bay<br />
Campground, Duck Lagoon (inc campground), B<strong>au</strong>din Beach<br />
Reserves, Constitution Hill, American River Foreshore,<br />
Vivonne Bay Surf Beach, Independence Point, <strong>Gov</strong>ernor<br />
Wallen, Pigs Head Corner, Kingscote Swimming Pool,<br />
Muston Lookout, Flour Cask Bay, Sealink Warf to<br />
Frenchmans Rock, Playford Highway Lookout, Hansen Bay<br />
Day Visitor Area, Emu Bay Cemetery, August Fiebig<br />
Monument, Corner South Coast and Birchmore Roads, Emu<br />
Bay Day Visitor Area, American River Turn off, War<br />
Services Land Settlement Monument.<br />
The quotation is as follows-<br />
Facilities-<br />
Concept Plans $6,200<br />
Working Drawings $9,700<br />
Sites-<br />
Concept Plans $15,400<br />
Working Drawings $11,100<br />
Disbursements-<br />
Travel, accommodation etc $5,000<br />
TOTAL<br />
$47,400 + GST<br />
The following reserves could be added to the list as required-<br />
American River Reserve<br />
Muston<br />
Emu Bay Campground (at Cemetery)<br />
Kingscote Entrance<br />
Youth Park<br />
Grassed area at the bottom of Penneshaw Hill<br />
(B<strong>au</strong>din Beach side)<br />
The budget for this project is substantial however the benefits to<br />
<strong>Council</strong> in the long term will be substantial as:<br />
• The plan will provide a basis for external funding,<br />
• Consistent design will be used across all reserves on<br />
<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> creating a high quality product,<br />
• Enable community groups to easily implement projects to<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Standards
The current “Reserves Budget” cannot fund this project so funds<br />
from another source within the budget will need to be sought if<br />
this project is to proceed.<br />
It is possible to reduce the budget required to have the majority of<br />
the project completed. Our suggestion would be-<br />
Priority 1- Facilities working drawings<br />
This will ensure all facilities on <strong>Council</strong> reserves are of a<br />
consistent design and will provide community groups with<br />
designs for the construction of the facilities.<br />
Priority 2- Site Concept Plans<br />
Many of the sites listed will only require Concept Plans for the<br />
construction. The development of these will provide the<br />
motivation for community groups to apply for funds to construct<br />
these site plans.<br />
Priority 3- Site working drawings<br />
These drawings could be prioritised in blocks of 10 sites (as per<br />
above) and budgeted in that way.<br />
It is suggest that Priority 1 & 2 should be committed and<br />
developed as part of a construction project.<br />
The implementation of this project will require a substantial<br />
amount of consultation with the community and elected members<br />
it is therefore proposed that a “Steering Committee” consisting<br />
the Parks and Community Services Coordinator and Two (2)<br />
elected members, be established to deliver the project.<br />
Key community representative would be involved in the site<br />
appraisal for the development of Site Concept plans followed by<br />
public presentations to the community. Once this has occurred<br />
then the Site Working Drawings would be developed.<br />
13.10 REPORT TITLE: WASTE MANAGEMENT<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
DANIEL ROWLEY, TECHNICAL<br />
SERVICES COORDINATOR<br />
53<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To advise <strong>Council</strong> on the direction waste management on<br />
<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> needs to take and the implementation plan.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> receives the report and acknowledges the<br />
implications of this direction.
BACKGROUND<br />
Numerous reports and information has been presented to <strong>Council</strong><br />
in relation to the costs and future directions of waste management<br />
on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>. In summary the following is what has been<br />
presented:<br />
• Not viable for <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to manage a landfill<br />
(whole of life) on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>;<br />
• EPA approve for regional landfill on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> is very<br />
unlikely;<br />
• Legislative requirements to undertake recycling;<br />
• High cost of future waste management services.<br />
M<strong>au</strong>nsell is undertaking the future directions project which will<br />
develop:<br />
• a cost comparison model on landfill on KI vs transport to<br />
mainland,<br />
• a Closure and Post Closure Plan for Kingscote Landfill,<br />
• a Groundwater Monitoring Program for Kingscote Landfill, and<br />
• best practice designs for Transfer Stations.<br />
The May 03 <strong>Council</strong> Meeting resolved that the “2001 Integrated<br />
Waste Management Plan” be modified to meet the needs of waste<br />
management services on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>.<br />
As part of the formation of Zero Waste <strong>SA</strong> and the passage of the<br />
Zero Waste <strong>SA</strong> Bill <strong>2003</strong> a “State Waste Strategy” will be<br />
developed. Funding from Zero Waste <strong>SA</strong> will only be available if<br />
the project is a part of the strategy.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
While the concept at face value may not seem an option, the cost<br />
of transporting waste to the mainland is comparable to managing<br />
a landfill on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>. The costs of managing a landfill<br />
goes well beyond placing waste in the cell and could last for over<br />
100 years following dumping if impacts on the environment<br />
occur.<br />
It is anticipated the actual cost comparison model, transporting to<br />
mainland vs managing landfill on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>, will be<br />
presented to <strong>Council</strong> at the October meeting. Early indications<br />
suggest the cost is approximately the same.<br />
Primarily all waste, except green waste and building and<br />
demolition (soil, concrete etc), under this model will be<br />
transported to the mainland for recycling or landfill. In summary<br />
it is proposed to modify the Integrated Waste Management Plan<br />
to incorporate the concepts. Many of these concepts will need to<br />
be introduced, even if a landfill is managed on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>,<br />
as there is a legislative requirement and cost incentives to<br />
undertake recycling programs.<br />
54
55<br />
Kerbside Collection<br />
Introduce a Kerbside Recyclable Collection Service by<br />
undertaking the following:<br />
• Modify existing 240L bins to become “split” bins, one side for<br />
recyclables and one for landfill waste. A divider is all that is<br />
required to be purchased<br />
• Trade the “blue” truck in for a compactor truck that takes both<br />
recyclables and normal waste<br />
• No green waste in kerbside collection<br />
• No glass products in kerbside collection. Glass breaks in<br />
compactors and cannot be removed contaminating the products<br />
• Similar bin collection procedures for public places introduced<br />
Transfer Stations<br />
Kingscote (or Penneshaw) will become the primary transfer<br />
station where all waste (except green waste and soil and concrete)<br />
is processed for transportation to the mainland. The following is<br />
to occur:<br />
• Large Skip bins introduced for waste transfer operations<br />
• “White” truck traded in for a flat bed truck to take skip bins<br />
• All products sorted and fee incentives introduced if the public<br />
sort prior to arrival at the transfer stations<br />
• Purchase a “baler” to compact all types of waste for transfer to<br />
mainland, may not be required if provided by a company<br />
• Purchase a “loader” to assist in moving waste over the<br />
Kingscote site, does not need to be new or in an extremely<br />
good condition<br />
• All sites become undercover with specific areas (bins) for each<br />
product<br />
• Partnerships developed with recycling companies and local<br />
businesses<br />
• Community run small transfer stations established for<br />
American River and Vivonne Bay to take what is not collected<br />
via kerbside collection (primarily green waste and glass)<br />
• Install a weigh bridge at the Kingscote (or Penneshaw)<br />
Transfer Station to measure incoming and outgoing waste<br />
which will reduce our EPA levy<br />
• Implement a Green Waste composting program<br />
• Appoint a Waste Overseer to oversee all day to day waste<br />
management on KI with a corresponding increase in the<br />
reserves budget to offset the reserve budget implications.<br />
Commercial Waste<br />
Large businesses will be encouraged to have large skips, as per<br />
above, to collect their recyclable waste. <strong>Council</strong> will then collect<br />
at a cost recovery fee. The objectives of this major shift in the<br />
way waste is managed are:
• Reduce the amount of waste going to landfill. This will enable<br />
<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> to use landfills on Fleurieu Peninsula for a<br />
longer period of time, reducing the transport costs and landfill<br />
costs. There is also legislative responsibilities and cost<br />
incentives to undertake this action<br />
• Make the collection and transport of waste efficient and cost<br />
effective<br />
• Reduce the amount of contaminants being placed with the<br />
recyclables<br />
• Reduce the long term financial, social and environmental<br />
burden of landfill management on the <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong><br />
community.<br />
The cost of this major shift in the way waste is managed on<br />
<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> will be high. Some of the up front capital costs<br />
maybe funded from external sources, eg Zero Waste <strong>SA</strong> however<br />
this cannot be guaranteed so the budget will need to be<br />
committed to the program and if not spent then the excess<br />
returned to the general pool. This is the way the <strong>2003</strong>/04 budget<br />
will be managed. The waste management budget also needs to be<br />
all encompassing, not subject to other budgets, eg plant purchases<br />
and replacement, wages and other capital costs and these costs<br />
will need to be included in the budget.<br />
History, from other <strong>Council</strong>s, has shown that every person wants<br />
recycling but are not prepared to pay through rates. <strong>Council</strong>s who<br />
undertake major marketing programs are successful in<br />
introducing recycling programs. Elected members and <strong>Council</strong><br />
staff will need to support this change to ensure it is successful.<br />
This will need to be backed up with media promotion.<br />
The revised Integrated Waste Management Plan will have an<br />
“Action Plan” and a “Financial Plan” and is anticipated to be<br />
presented to <strong>Council</strong> for consideration as part of the 2004/05<br />
budget process. Once endorsed by <strong>Council</strong> the budget will need<br />
to ensure that the program can be implemented fully. It is<br />
anticipated that the implementation of this change will be<br />
completed by 1 July 2006 or 1 July 2007 depending on what is<br />
required from a budget perspective.<br />
Zero Waste <strong>SA</strong> primary function involves “Resource Recovery”<br />
or recycling programs. Zero Waste <strong>SA</strong> funding is determined by<br />
the priorities in the “State Waste Strategy”. As the strategy is still<br />
to be developed <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> must be involved in the<br />
development of this strategy and ensure our unique situation is<br />
catered for.<br />
56
It has been shown that if <strong>Council</strong> is moving in the direction the<br />
EPA wish things to happen, <strong>Council</strong> will not be placed under the<br />
spotlight. However if change is resisted, then the EPA will place<br />
the legislative requirements on the <strong>Council</strong> and will back this up<br />
with prosecution.<br />
14.0 CORPORATE & COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORTS<br />
Your Worship Mayor Pengilly and <strong>Council</strong>lors, I submit the<br />
following Reports for the Ordinary Meeting of <strong>Council</strong> to be held<br />
on Wednesday 10 September <strong>2003</strong>.<br />
Moved Cr<br />
That the Corporate & Community Services Reports be received.<br />
CARRIED.<br />
14.1 REPORT TITLE: OBJECTION TO ATTRIBUTION<br />
OF LAND USE CODE<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
MICHAEL BARRETT, RATES<br />
OFFICER<br />
FILE NUMBER: 123<br />
ATTACHMENT: CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To consider an objection to the attribution of land use code<br />
applied to Mr & Mrs Dieckmann’s property at Section 155,<br />
Juniper Road, Hundred of Menzies.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> alter the land use code to applied to A/N 5201580403<br />
to become residential for the <strong>2003</strong>/2004 financial year.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
Under section 156 of the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Act a <strong>Council</strong> may<br />
use differential rates which may vary according to the use of the<br />
land. For the purposes of section 156 of the Act there are 9<br />
categories of land use under the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Regulations<br />
declared as permissible differentiating factors.<br />
The Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Act under section 156(9) enables a<br />
ratepayer to object to the attribution of the local government land<br />
use code applied if they are of the opinion that a particular land<br />
use has been wrongly attributed.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Mr & Mrs Dieckmann have objected to the land use code of 7<br />
‘primary production’ and wish to have their property reclassified<br />
as ‘1’ residential. Under the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Regulations 1999<br />
primary production comprises ‘farming, horticulture, the use of<br />
land for horse keeping or intensive animal keeping, a dairy or<br />
commercial forestry’ all of which are as defined within the<br />
meaning of the Development Regulations 1993.<br />
57
58<br />
On inspection of the 4.6 acre property and discussing the issue<br />
with the Dieckmann's it is clear that none of these activities are<br />
being undertaken on their property. As they have mentioned in<br />
their correspondence they have had a few sheep run on their<br />
property on occasion to reduce the grass for fire reduction. I<br />
would not determine this to be ‘farming’.<br />
It should also be noted this property appears inconsistent with<br />
others of similar circumstance in the area.<br />
POLICY IMPLICATIONS<br />
1. Financial/Budget<br />
A reclassification of land use to residential would result in less<br />
rates being charged on the Dieckmann’s property.<br />
2. Legal<br />
Section 156 of the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Act enables <strong>Council</strong> to<br />
alter a land use code on objection.<br />
14.2 REPORT TITLE: BOARD RESTRUCTURING<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
A. JARVIS, CORPORATE AND<br />
COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />
MANAGER<br />
FILE NUMBER:<br />
ATTACHMENTS:<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To inform <strong>Council</strong> of progress with regard to the provision of<br />
secretariat functions for the various Boards.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That the report on Board restructuring be received for<br />
information.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
The <strong>SA</strong> <strong>Gov</strong>ernment has the perception that there are too many<br />
boards within the State structure and that duplication of both<br />
services and administration detracts from the ability of the Boards<br />
to ensure a coordinated, cooperative effective delivery of<br />
services.<br />
Given the <strong>Island</strong>’s unique position being separate from other<br />
similar organisations, remote and with a small population it was<br />
considered timely to investigate the various roles of the Board’s<br />
and their administrative structures so that any economies of scale<br />
can be achieved and duplication of effort reduced.
The committee charged with investigating these matters have met<br />
on a number of occasions and various alternatives considered.<br />
Whilst there is general consensus that outsourcing corporate<br />
governance matters for the Boards to <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
had merit the committee members had differing views on the<br />
proposed structures placed before them. It was agreed therefore<br />
that Mr Joe Collins, who has been involved with the strategic<br />
plans for both the boards and <strong>Council</strong>, be invited to review the<br />
plans and carry out a SWOT analysis for the island. This project<br />
is to be funded by the Office of Regional Affairs with a report to<br />
be submitted prior to the end of September.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
For information only.<br />
14.3 REPORT TITLE: PUBLIC STREET LIGHTING<br />
REVIEW<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
A. JARVIS, CORPORATE AND<br />
COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />
MANAGER<br />
FILE NUMBER: 101<br />
59<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To update <strong>Council</strong> on the status of contract arrangements relative<br />
to the Street Lighting use of System (SLUOS) charges.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That the report on public street lighting review be received for<br />
information.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
The public lighting steering committee of the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment<br />
Association have raised a number of concerns with ET<strong>SA</strong><br />
Utilities Street lighting Use of System (SLUOS) charges for<br />
public lighting. The LGA raised these concerns with the Essential<br />
Services Commission of South Australia (ESCO<strong>SA</strong>) and the LGA<br />
has been informed that ESCO<strong>SA</strong> will review the street lighting<br />
use of system charges for public lighting.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association wrote to ESCO<strong>SA</strong> on 20 th<br />
June <strong>2003</strong> in regard to concerns the Association has with two<br />
excluded distribution services and the charges levied in respect of<br />
these services namely Pole attachment and the operation and<br />
maintenance of public lighting. The LGA has sought ESCO<strong>SA</strong>’s<br />
determination on whether the charges for these excluded services<br />
are fair and reasonable.
Following a meeting between the LGA and ESCO<strong>SA</strong> is was<br />
confirmed that a dispute has occurred between councils and<br />
ET<strong>SA</strong> Utilities. In view of the existence of this dispute ESCOA<br />
will determine a timeline for a review and will inform <strong>Council</strong>s<br />
through the LGA of the outcome of their review<br />
14.4 REPORT TITLE: <strong>SA</strong>LE OF LAND AT CENTENARY<br />
AVENUE, KINGSCOTE<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
A. JARVIS, CORPORATE AND<br />
COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />
MANAGER<br />
FILE NUMBER: 041<br />
ATTACHMENTS: LETTER<br />
60<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To consider a review of the price requested for the sale of this<br />
parcel of land.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> give consideration to a reduction in the sale price<br />
for this property.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
<strong>Council</strong> was asked to give “in principle” support for the sale of<br />
this piece of land for the purposes of a potential development<br />
application. Following this agreement <strong>Council</strong> engaged a valuer<br />
to offer advice as to the current market value of this land and<br />
following submission of the valuer’s appraisal set a price of<br />
$90,000.<br />
The potential purchasers consider that the price set by <strong>Council</strong> is<br />
excessive and would ask that <strong>Council</strong> consider a revised offer of<br />
$50,000.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The prospective purchasers have submitted a development<br />
application for tourist accommodation on this site and have asked<br />
to purchase this block in order to ensure that there is sufficient<br />
land available to them to enable units to be developed and<br />
adequate landscaping to be built into the development. Should<br />
they not be able to acquire the land at a reasonable cost they will<br />
consider reducing the number of units to 12 (the current proposal<br />
is to build 14 units) and also reduce the level of landscaping over<br />
the entire project.
14.5 REPORT TITLE: <strong>SA</strong> GREAT REGIONAL AWARDS<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
A. JARVIS, CORPORATE AND<br />
COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />
MANAGER<br />
FILE NUMBER: 029<br />
61<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To advise <strong>Council</strong> of the call for nominations for the <strong>SA</strong> Regional<br />
Awards.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> considers and nominates one or more candidates for<br />
an award in this region.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
<strong>Council</strong> has received notification that nominations for these<br />
prestigious awards close on 29 th September <strong>2003</strong>. <strong>Council</strong>lors are<br />
therefore invited to nominate persons or organisations for<br />
consideration.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
<strong>SA</strong> Great is calling for nominations for the <strong>2003</strong> <strong>SA</strong> Great<br />
Regional Awards.<br />
The Awards recognise and celebrate individuals and enterprises<br />
that have made a significant contribution to their region over the<br />
past year.<br />
The program has been expanded to nine categories this year to<br />
include a new Family Business category. Winners receive the<br />
Regional Category award, promotion of their achievements in<br />
<strong>SA</strong> Great’s broader program and honorary membership of <strong>SA</strong><br />
Great for 2004.<br />
Categories include the arts, business, family business, health,<br />
sport, community, science and environment, tourism and<br />
youth. Regional areas include Mid North, Fleurieu<br />
Peninsula/<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>, Limestone Coast,<br />
Riverland/Murraylands, Barossa & Light, Flinders/Outback,<br />
Yorke Peninsula, Eyre Peninsula and Adelaide Hills.<br />
Nominations close on Monday 29 September <strong>2003</strong> and winners<br />
will be announced in November.
62<br />
14.6 REPORT TITLE: PEST CONTROL COUNCIL<br />
BUILDINGS<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
A. JARVIS, CORPORATE AND<br />
COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />
MANAGER<br />
FILE NUMBER: 061<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To consider pest control and monitoring for major council owned<br />
buildings.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> accept the Pest Control and monitoring management<br />
plan as proposed at a total annual cost of $13,289 to be sourced<br />
from the various maintenance budgets.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
<strong>Council</strong> has a number of building assets that are not currently<br />
checked for termites and other pests. In order to adequately<br />
protect building assets from damage by termites and other pests it<br />
is necessary to engage a professional organisation to carry out<br />
regular inspections.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
W.A. Flick & Co Pty Ltd have submitted a proposal to carry out<br />
regular inspections and control programs on <strong>Council</strong> owned<br />
buildings. These buildings can be described as: Kingscote Offices<br />
including Offices, main hall, kitchen, banquet room, wet areas,<br />
store rooms, and library. Masonic building including hall, office,<br />
wet areas, kitchenette and common areas. KIDB offices including<br />
Offices, wet areas, kitchenette, cells and store rooms. Parndana<br />
Hall and Museum inclusive of Hall, toilets, store rooms,<br />
kitchens, shed, hall and common areas. American River Hall<br />
Hall, toilets and common areas. <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Tourist<br />
Information Centre including Main room, toilets, store room,<br />
kitchens and shed. Penneshaw Hall inclusive of Hall, toilets,<br />
store room, stage, meeting room, post office and offices.<br />
The proposed service will be based on the following:<br />
1. Gaining agreement to a level of pricing, service frequencies,<br />
areas covered, pests covered, service specification and future<br />
reporting and invoicing requirements;<br />
2. Introducing our local Flick Branch and Account Manager and<br />
Flickmen to the site manager as to item 1 above;<br />
3. Flick Service Registers to be set up for each site and explained<br />
to Site Managers which include:<br />
Exact procedures of service for the Flickman and areas covered<br />
under the contract;
Material safety data sheets of all materials and chemicals used;<br />
Service reports detailing service carried out together with<br />
recommendations on hygiene and site maintenance directly<br />
affecting the pest control program;<br />
Pest sighting reports and activity documentation;<br />
Mapping locations of all pest equipment.<br />
4. Formalising regular <strong>au</strong>dit report to be forwarded to all<br />
appropriate Management which highlights:<br />
Items requiring attention by Flick as to service delivery;<br />
Any items of non-conformity with rectification plans included;<br />
Maintenance and hygiene recommendations directly affecting<br />
pest occurrence.<br />
Pests Covered – base contract (three monthly intervals) $8146.80<br />
per annum<br />
• Rodents<br />
• Spiders<br />
• Ants<br />
• Cockroaches<br />
Pests Covered – periodicals (six monthly intervals) $5142.20 per<br />
annum.<br />
• Termites<br />
14.7 REPORT TITLE: AFTER HOURS AND<br />
EMERGENCY CALL SERVICES<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
A. JARVIS, CORPORATE AND<br />
COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />
MANAGER<br />
63<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To update <strong>Council</strong> on the status of after hours and emergency call<br />
services.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That the report on after hours and emergency call services be<br />
received for information.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
<strong>Council</strong> previously resolved to enter into an agreement with<br />
Ecouncil and the RAA for the provision of after hours and<br />
emergency telephone response. This has now been formalized<br />
with the service commencing on 21 st October following<br />
development of our answering and response protocols.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
For information only.
64<br />
14.8 REPORT TITLE: KINGSCOTE TIDAL POOL<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
A. JARVIS, CORPORATE AND<br />
COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />
MANAGER<br />
FILE NUMBER: 047<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To inform <strong>Council</strong> of recent complaints regarding the Kingscote<br />
Tidal swimming pool.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> resolve to carry out major maintenance works on<br />
the pool and to make financial provision for such works.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
The tidal swimming pool in Kingscote has not been drained and<br />
cleaned for some years and is now subject of a number of<br />
complaints regarding both the quality of water and retention of<br />
solids within the structure. Whilst the water in the pool is<br />
replenished with each tidal flow the very nature of the pool<br />
enclosure precludes the flushing of solid matter and encourages<br />
the gradual build up of sludge and algae. The number and nature<br />
of complaints now requires consideration by <strong>Council</strong> as to the<br />
most effective manner in which to remedy this situation and to<br />
prepare the pool for the summer swimming season.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The staff of the Technical Services Department have suggested a<br />
number of options available to <strong>Council</strong> in respect of this matter<br />
and have submitted these options for consideration and approval.<br />
Option 1 - Engage contractors involved with the Christmas Cove<br />
development to pump out and desludge the pool at an estimated<br />
cost of $30,000.<br />
Option 2 - Engage a pool cleaning company from Adelaide to<br />
clean and prepare the pool at an estimated cost of $20,000; or<br />
Option 3 - Utilise <strong>Council</strong>’s own workforce (subject to the<br />
availability of plant, equipment and personnel) Close the pool,<br />
Empty water out (pump), Use excavator to remove silt, Cart away<br />
with our trucks, Put sand back (30 x truck loads). This would be<br />
in the order of $5000 to $10,000 however as this is not a project<br />
previously considered by the Technical Services Department may<br />
not be achievable within a reasonable timeframe. Current<br />
budgetary provision for pool maintenance <strong>2003</strong>/2004 $7000.
14.9 REPORT TITLE: ADOPTION OF POLICY<br />
MANUAL<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
A. JARVIS, CORPORATE AND<br />
COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />
MANAGER<br />
ATTACHMENTS: SEPARATE COPY OF REVISED<br />
MANUAL<br />
65<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To resolve to accept the revised policy manual.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> adopts the policy manual as presented for<br />
immediate implementation.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
<strong>Council</strong> and staff have prepared a revised policy manual which<br />
has been discussed at length and amended to comply with current<br />
legislation and the needs of <strong>Council</strong>. The completed revisions<br />
have been included as a separate document for the use of<br />
<strong>Council</strong>lors and staff and following formal adoption by <strong>Council</strong><br />
will be implemented immediately.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
For formal resolution and adoption.<br />
14.10 REPORT TITLE: BANK RECONCILIATION<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
NICKI PUTLAND, FINANCE<br />
OFFICER<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Provided for information.<br />
BANK RECONCILIATION STATEMENTS<br />
AS AT 30.6.03<br />
District Fund - Bank <strong>SA</strong> Cheque A/c<br />
Balance as per Bank Statement $ 12376.38 Cr<br />
Less Outstanding Cheques $ 270772.24 Dr<br />
----------------<br />
$ 258395.86 Dr<br />
Balance as per Cash Book $ 258395.86 Cr
66<br />
Short Term Investment - LGFA<br />
District Fund $ 1665051.30<br />
Machinery Replacement $ 13081.71<br />
Long Service Leave $ 979.41<br />
Property $ 27987.53<br />
Airport $ 763346.00<br />
Open Space $ 35300.00<br />
----------------<br />
$ 2505745.95 Cr<br />
Balance as per Cash Book $ 2505745.95 Dr<br />
14.11 REPORT TITLE : BUDGET COMPARISON<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
LOUISE EVES<br />
AUTHOR’S TITLE: FINANCE OFFICER<br />
ATTACHMENTS: BUDGET COMPARATIVE<br />
STATEMENT (BLUE PAGES)<br />
PURPOSE:<br />
Provide members with current v’s actual budget position for last<br />
quarter April to June <strong>2003</strong>.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That the 2002/03 Budget be revised to reflect actual expenditures<br />
at 30/6/<strong>2003</strong>. Detailed list and corresponding notes will be<br />
provided at the <strong>Council</strong> meeting.<br />
POLICY IMPLICATIONS<br />
Financial / Budget<br />
Refer budget comparative statement (attached).<br />
14.12 REPORT TITLE: EXTENSIONS TO AGED CARE<br />
FACILITY, KANGAROO ISLAND<br />
HEALTH SERVICE<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
A. JARVIS, CORPORATE AND<br />
COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />
MANAGER<br />
FILE NUMBER: 027<br />
ATTACHMENTS: CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To consider the proposal to extend the realignment of Wheelton<br />
Street.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That the extension of the realignment of Wheelton Street as<br />
requested by the <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Health Service be approved.
BACKGROUND<br />
When the hospital was extended some years ago the extension<br />
encroached on the road reserve in Wheelton Street. <strong>Council</strong>, at<br />
that time, agreed to the realignment of the road to accommodate<br />
the new extension of the hospital.<br />
The <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Health service has now received approval to<br />
construct a 6 bed extension to the high level aged care<br />
accommodation unit and have asked that <strong>Council</strong> favourably<br />
respond to their request for the extension to encroach onto the<br />
road reserve.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The attached plan shows that the requested realignment follows<br />
the same line as previously agreed and would provide a natural<br />
extension of the current alignment to the existing driveway. As<br />
such it is recommended that <strong>Council</strong> approves the encroachment<br />
and requests the CCSM to arrange for this portion of the road<br />
reserve to be made available to the health service.<br />
67
15.0 CHIEF EXECUTIVE REPORTS<br />
Your Worship, Mayor Pengilly and <strong>Council</strong>lors I present the<br />
following reports for the Ordinary Meeting of <strong>Council</strong> to be held<br />
on Wednesday 10 September <strong>2003</strong>.<br />
Moved Cr<br />
Seconded Cr<br />
That the Chief Executive Officer’s reports be received.<br />
CARRIED.<br />
15.1 REPORT TITLE: INVESTMENT PROPO<strong>SA</strong>LS<br />
COMMITTEE<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
R RATTRAY, CEO<br />
FILE NUMBER: 149<br />
68<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To establish a Committee to look at investment proposals<br />
received.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> establish an Investment Advisory Committee with<br />
the responsibility to encourage investors to submit realistic<br />
proposals to comprise of the Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Development<br />
Assessment Panel Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer and an<br />
Officer of the KI Development Board as required.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
<strong>Council</strong> asked that the Chief Executive Officer prepare a report<br />
for <strong>Council</strong> on establishing a Committee to look at all investment<br />
proposals received for <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>.<br />
Some <strong>Council</strong>s have a Committee which progresses potential<br />
investment proposals.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Development enquiries are often made to the senior staff. It is not<br />
proposed that this Committee would take all enquiries but to<br />
consult with investors who wish to take their enquiries further.<br />
This Committee is not to be seen as making a decision but merely<br />
to encourage investors to submit realistic proposals.<br />
It is my belief that such a Committee should comprise of the<br />
Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Development Assessment Panel<br />
Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer and an Officer of the KI<br />
Development Board as required.
69<br />
15.2 REPORT TITLE: RECREATION BOATING LEVY<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
R RATTRAY, CEO<br />
FILE NUMBER: 105<br />
ATTACHMENT: LETTER FROM DC YORKE<br />
PENINSULA<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Recreation boating levy (increase).<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> write to the <strong>SA</strong> Boating Facility Advisory<br />
Committee (<strong>SA</strong>BFAC) seeking a review of boating levy charges<br />
and maintenance funding to local <strong>Gov</strong>ernments.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
The Southern & Hills Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association have been<br />
asked to provide comment on the attached letters. S&H LGA<br />
suggested that individual <strong>Council</strong>s respond as not all <strong>Council</strong>s has<br />
coastline.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Many <strong>Council</strong>s are now imposing a user charge fee on boat<br />
ramps. If <strong>Council</strong>s can’t receive some certainty of funding from<br />
<strong>SA</strong>BFAC to maintain boat ramps, this <strong>Council</strong> will need to<br />
explore this avenue. However, we should in the first instance seek<br />
a review which incorporates a certainty of funding to local<br />
<strong>Council</strong>s from the <strong>SA</strong>BFAC.<br />
15.3 REPORT TITLE: <strong>SA</strong>LE OF SEC 376, HD HAINES<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
R RATTRAY, CEO<br />
FILE NUMBER: 041<br />
ATTACHMENT: SITE PLAN<br />
PURPOSE<br />
The sale of Section 376, Hundred of Haines.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> delegates to the Chief Executive Officer to consult<br />
with the community and provided no objections are raised, to<br />
advise the Crown to sell Section 376, Hundred of Haines.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
<strong>Council</strong> resolved at its last meeting that it had no objection to the<br />
Crown selling Section 376, Hundred of Haines. The Department<br />
of Crown Lands require <strong>Council</strong> to consult with the community.
DISCUSSION<br />
<strong>Council</strong> does not own the land and will receive no benefit from its<br />
sale. The area of land (adjacent to the Hog Bay Road/Min Oil<br />
Road corner) is however subject to continual vandalism with<br />
damage being done to the vegetation.<br />
15.4 REPORT TITLE: OH&S POLICIES/PROCEDURES<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
R RATTRAY, CEO<br />
FILE NUMBER: 017<br />
70<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Occupational Health and Safety policies and procedures.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That Chief Executive Officer be delegated <strong>au</strong>thority to adopt and<br />
sign policies and procedures as determined by the Occupational<br />
Health, Safety and Welfare Committee regarding occupational<br />
health and safety matters.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
<strong>Council</strong> approximately 12 months ago had a <strong>Council</strong>lor on this<br />
Committee and sought <strong>Council</strong> approval for decisions.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Occupational health and safety is the responsibility of the CEO.<br />
Accordingly the CEO should then have the delegated <strong>au</strong>thority to<br />
sign off on staffing matters and to expend the budget within<br />
normal budget guidelines.<br />
15.5 REPORT TITLE: RATE COMPARISONS<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
R RATTRAY, CEO<br />
FILE NUMBER: 123<br />
ATTACHMENT: COMPARATIVE DATA<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Southern & Hills Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association providing a<br />
comparative data update for August <strong>2003</strong>.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That the comparative data update be received for information.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
<strong>Council</strong> recognises that rates have increased over this year.<br />
However, <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> is the lowest rating <strong>Council</strong> in the<br />
region (Southern and Hills Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association).<br />
The attached shows a comparison of our neighbouring <strong>Council</strong>s.<br />
<strong>Council</strong>’s debt shows that we are the average of the region.
71<br />
15.6 REPORT TITLE: CEO’S INFORMATION REPORT<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
R RATTRAY, CEO<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To advise <strong>Council</strong> of the meetings attended by the Chief<br />
Executive Officer.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> note the Chief Executive Officer’s attendance at the<br />
meetings listed.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
Each month a report is made available to <strong>Council</strong> on the meetings<br />
and contacts I have had which may at some time in the future<br />
have an impact on <strong>Council</strong> or development on the <strong>Island</strong>.<br />
Staffing changes are noted for your information.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The following are a list of meetings attended during the last<br />
month:<br />
6 th August - <strong>Council</strong> meeting.<br />
7 th August - Meeting with Pierre Gregor re: facilities at<br />
Penneshaw.<br />
7 th August - Attended KI Ferry Service presentation at<br />
Kingscote..<br />
11 th August - Spoke with Marketing Officer from Barossa<br />
Organisation re: assisting with events and heritage site in<br />
Kingscote.<br />
12 th August - Meeting with Developer re wharf development and<br />
retail development on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>.<br />
14 th August - Met with Business Development Manager Great<br />
Western Airlines re: CA<strong>SA</strong> approving flight<br />
15 th August - Met with Land Agent re: potential subdivision of<br />
land at American River.<br />
18 th August - Meeting to discuss TOMM re: MOU.<br />
21 st August - Mayors forum discussing <strong>Council</strong>s Policies and<br />
Strategic Plan.
72<br />
21 st August - Meeting with potential developer re: American<br />
River.<br />
22 nd August - Southern and Hills Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Assn. AGM<br />
at Stirling.<br />
22 nd August - The Mayor and I met with Messrs Wilkinson re:<br />
potential subdivision on farming property.<br />
25 th August - Attended seminar on Community Title held at<br />
Ozone Hotel.<br />
25 th August - Attended meeting at American River (Shed) re:<br />
development at American River and in particular at the oval.<br />
28 th August - Met with Tony Trethewey and Simone Somerfield<br />
re: penguin area at Penneshaw.<br />
29 th August - The Mayor and I met with various Airline<br />
Executives.<br />
STAFFING MATTERS<br />
Nicki Putland is on annual leave and will be working 2 days a<br />
month when she returns.<br />
Natasha Kearslake is working part time 3 (part) days.<br />
Michelle Bell is <strong>Council</strong>’s new Records Manager working part<br />
time 5 days a week.<br />
John Van der Giesen is on sick leave.<br />
I will be on holidays from 11 September till 1 October. Tony<br />
Jarvis will be acting CEO during my absence.<br />
16.0 CORRESPONDENCE FOR DISCUSSION<br />
Moved Cr<br />
Seconded Cr<br />
That the correspondence be received and that the items listed by<br />
<strong>Council</strong>lors for special consideration be individually dealt with<br />
and that in all other matters the listed recommendations be<br />
adopted.<br />
CARRIED.
16.1 CORRESPONDENT: LOCAL GOVERNMENT<br />
ASSOCIATION - LGA PRESIDENT<br />
POSITION<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
R RATTRAY<br />
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER<br />
FILE NUMBER: 080<br />
ATTACHMENTS: 1/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
73<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To vote for the position of a new Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association<br />
President.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> vote …………………….. for the position of<br />
President of the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
The Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association is seeking <strong>Council</strong>’s vote for<br />
the position of President.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The candidates for the position are listed in this correspondence<br />
and attached are letters from the candidates outlining their<br />
respective qualities. It is suggested that <strong>Council</strong> select its voting<br />
choice by a ballot at the meeting with a first past the post system<br />
and the result of that ballot determine the resolution you then<br />
make.<br />
16.2 CORRESPONDENT: KI ROTARY CLUB - ROADSIDE<br />
CRASH MARKERS<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
R RATTRAY<br />
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER<br />
FILE NUMBER: 043<br />
ATTACHMENTS: 2/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Installation of roadside crash markers on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> roads.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> support the concept of roadside crash markers and<br />
offer to assist by placing the markers at the appropriate sites.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The Rotary Club are seeking permission to install roadside crash<br />
markers on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>.
16.3 REPORT TITLE: LOCAL GOVERNMENT<br />
ASSOCIATION - VOLUNTEER<br />
MINISTERIAL ADVISORY GROUP<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
R RATTRAY, CEO<br />
FILE NUMBER: 029<br />
ATTACHMENTS: 3/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
74<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Seeking nominations for the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association’s<br />
representative on the Volunteer Ministerial Advisory Group.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> nominate Janice Kelly for the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment<br />
Association’s representative on the Volunteer Ministerial<br />
Advisory Group.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
Members of the Volunteer Ministerial Advisory Group will<br />
participate in the implementation of the Advancing the<br />
Community Together: A Partnership between the Volunteer<br />
Section and the South Australian <strong>Gov</strong>ernment.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Jackie Kelly has indicated her willingness to be nominated as a<br />
representative on this Group.<br />
16.4 CORRESPONDENT: ROBERT TIGGEMANN - REQUEST<br />
FAMILY NAMED ROAD<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
R RATTRAY, CEO<br />
FILE NUMBER: 066<br />
ATTACHMENTS: 4/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Requesting a road/street be named after the family.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That the Corporate & Community Services Manager ascertain an<br />
appropriate street/road to be named after the Tiggemann Family<br />
and report back to <strong>Council</strong>.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
The Tiggemann Family have had an association with KI for over<br />
100 years. The family request that a street/road be named after the<br />
family to acknowledge their contribution to the <strong>Island</strong>.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
It is my opinion that the naming of a road after the Tiggemann<br />
family should be a new road.
75<br />
16.5 CORRESPONDENT: C & M FOYLE - YOUTH PARK<br />
CONCERN<br />
AUTHOR: R RATTRAY, CEO<br />
FILE NUMBER: 1<strong>09</strong><br />
ATTACHMENTS: 5/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Advising concern at the proposed youth park at Brownlow.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That the correspondence received from Mr & Mrs M Foyle be<br />
received and noted.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Adjoining land holder has some concerns regarding the<br />
establishing of a youth park at Brownlow.<br />
16.6 CORRESPONDENT: DAIS, GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES<br />
UNIT - FIDES BLUFF NAMING<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
R RATTRAY, CEO<br />
FILE NUMBER: 066<br />
ATTACHMENTS: 6/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To name the bluff directly above the “Fides” shipwreck.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> supports the naming of the bluff above the “Fides”<br />
shipwreck as Fides Bluff.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Public submissions will be sought through the <strong>Gov</strong>ernment<br />
Gazette on 4 September <strong>2003</strong>.<br />
16.7 CORRESPONDENT: SOUTHERN & HILLS LGA -<br />
AGM OUTCOMES<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
R RATTRAY, CEO<br />
FILE NUMBER: <strong>09</strong>5<br />
ATTACHMENT: 7/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To advise the outcomes of the Annual General Meeting held on<br />
21 August <strong>2003</strong>.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That the correspondence from the Southern & Hills Local<br />
<strong>Gov</strong>ernment Association be received and noted.
76<br />
16.8 CORRESPONDENT: D BROWN MP, MEMBER FOR<br />
FINNISS - CROWN LAND<br />
ACQUISITION<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
R RATTRAY, CEO<br />
FILE NUMBER: 041<br />
ATTACHMENT: 8/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Requesting <strong>Council</strong> to acquire Crown Land at Nepean Bay to<br />
enable KI Oyster Growers Association to establish a processing<br />
shed.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
For <strong>Council</strong> comment.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The local member of Parliament is seeking ways of progressing<br />
an oyster processing shed for <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> Oyster Growers<br />
Association.<br />
Crown Land has available 2.46 hectares at $60,000 adjacent to<br />
Nepean Bay.<br />
The Local Member is seeking <strong>Council</strong> assistance in progressing<br />
this matter.<br />
<strong>Council</strong>: - may wish to debate the merits at this meeting, or<br />
- this meeting may seek assistance from the<br />
Development Proposals Advisory Committee, or<br />
- may seek a further report from officers.<br />
16.9 CORRESPONDENT: KE<strong>SA</strong>B - SIGNAGE, PARNDANA<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
PATRICK MITCHELL,<br />
PLANNING OFFICER<br />
FILE NUMBER: 031<br />
ATTACHMENT: 9/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
<strong>Council</strong> has received correspondence by the KE<strong>SA</strong>B Road Watch<br />
Co-ordinator seeking consent to allow for the placement of a sign<br />
on the Wedgewood Road reserve opposite the Parndana<br />
Community Club, being on land under the care and control of<br />
<strong>Council</strong>.<br />
This matter is referred to <strong>Council</strong> for consideration of the<br />
proposal and approval to allow for the placement of the sign<br />
being on land under the care and control of <strong>Council</strong> should<br />
<strong>Council</strong> be satisfied with the proposal.
77<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> consent to the lodgement of a Development<br />
Application pursuant to the Development Act 1993, to allow for<br />
the placement of a sign on the Wedgewood Road reserve, being<br />
land under the care and control of <strong>Council</strong>.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The correspondence seeks consent to allow for the placement of<br />
two signs within the Parndana Township. One sign is proposed to<br />
be placed on the Parndana Area School fence fronting<br />
Wedgewood Road and the other sign is proposed to be placed on<br />
the Wedgewood Road reserve opposite the hotel.<br />
The correspondence advises that the signs:<br />
• are designed and approved by Transport <strong>SA</strong>;<br />
• are manufactured and paid by KE<strong>SA</strong>B;<br />
• are provided by KE<strong>SA</strong>B to reward community organisations<br />
in their efforts; and<br />
• keep the road litter message in the public eye.<br />
However, the correspondence does not provide any detail on the<br />
type of signage proposed (i.e. colour, size anchoring detail, et<br />
cetera...).<br />
POLICY IMPLICATIONS<br />
While the one sign is proposed to be located on State<br />
<strong>Gov</strong>ernment land and is therefore exempt from assessment<br />
process, the other sign is proposed to be located on land under the<br />
care and control of <strong>Council</strong> and constitutes development under<br />
the Development Act 1993.<br />
The proposal does not comply with <strong>Council</strong>’s existing Signage<br />
Policies or constitute traffic warning or directional signage under<br />
the Road Traffic Act.<br />
The proposal has been facilitated to encourage the local Area<br />
School to maintain litter control, roadside vegetation and report<br />
on roadside safety issues. Given the local Area Schools<br />
involvement in the project the proposal would appear to be of a<br />
minor nature only and unlikely to be the subject of objection from<br />
the owners or occupiers of land in the locality.<br />
Therefore, should <strong>Council</strong> consent to the lodgement of the<br />
application, it is likely that <strong>Council</strong> officers will be able to<br />
proceed with the assessment and approval of the application.<br />
<strong>Council</strong>’s Technical Services Manager has advised that he has no<br />
objection to the proposal and will erect the sign if requested and<br />
approved by <strong>Council</strong>.
78<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Should <strong>Council</strong> therefore be satisfied with the proposal it is<br />
recommended that <strong>Council</strong> consent to the lodgement of an<br />
application, thereby allowing the assessment of a Development<br />
Application to proceed.<br />
16.10 CORRESPONDENT: DEPT FOR ENVIRONMENT &<br />
HERITAGE, REGIONAL<br />
CONSERVATION SERVICES -<br />
NARROW-LEAF MALLE<br />
DISTURBANCE<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
R RATTRAY, CEO<br />
FILE NUMBER: 077<br />
ATTACHMENT: 10/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Research, investigating the impact of disturbance on narrow-leaf<br />
mallee.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> advise the Department for Environment and<br />
Heritage, Regional Conservation Services on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> it<br />
has no objection to its project.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Refer attached correspondence.<br />
16.11 CORRESPONDENT: FLEURIEU REGIONAL<br />
DEVELOPMENT INC - WASTE<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
D ROWLEY, TECHNICAL<br />
SERVICES COORDINATOR<br />
FILE NUMBER: 147<br />
ATTACHMENTS: 11/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To support the development of a feasibility cost study for waste<br />
management on the Fleurieu Peninsula.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That $10,000 be allocated to the feasibility study on waste<br />
disposal options within the Fleurieu Peninsula from the Kingscote<br />
Landfill budget.
BACKGROUND<br />
<strong>Council</strong> is undertaking a cost study to develop a cost comparison<br />
model between managing waste of <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> v’s<br />
transporting the waste to the mainland.<br />
The minutes of the last Fleurieu Regional Waste Management<br />
Strategy Committee (enclosed in the <strong>Council</strong> agenda) refer to this<br />
correspondence.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
A waste feasibility cost study, in collaboration with the Fleurieu<br />
Peninsula <strong>Council</strong>s, will assist <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> in developing the<br />
best model for managing waste in our region.<br />
Managing waste in collaboration with the Fleurieu Peninsula will<br />
ensure there is enough waste available for the management of<br />
landfills to be cost effective. The quantity will also enable<br />
negotiations to be undertaken with landfill and recycling<br />
companies to make cost savings and efficiencies.<br />
This study is critical to the future of waste management in our<br />
region.<br />
16.12 CORRESPONDENT: IAN G TAYLOR - ROAD<br />
CONDITION<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
KEN LIU, TSM<br />
FILE NUMBER: 022<br />
ATTACHMENTS: 12/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
79<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To consider a complaint about the conditions of unsealed roads<br />
on KI.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That Mr Taylor’s comments be noted.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
Mr Taylor, a visitor commented on the conditions of unsealed<br />
roads.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
No further comments.
80<br />
16.13 CORRESPONDENT: PENNESHAW AREA SCHOOL -<br />
SCHOOL CROSSING<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
KEN LIU<br />
FILE NUMBER: 043<br />
ATTACHMENTS: 13/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To request for a footpath from the School to Penneshaw Town.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That the construction of a footpath from Penneshaw School to the<br />
town centre be considered during the formulation of next year’s<br />
budget.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
It is correct that the installation of a school crossing was<br />
abandoned due to objections received.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
No funds are available for the construction of a footpath as<br />
requested from the current budget.<br />
17.0 CORRESPONDENCE FOR INFORMATION<br />
Moved Cr<br />
Seconded Cr<br />
That the following items of correspondence be received for<br />
information.<br />
17.1 CORRESPONDENT: KI NATURAL RESOURCES<br />
BOARD - NRM PLAN & NRM<br />
INTEGRATION REFORM<br />
FILE NUMBER: 077<br />
ATTACHMENT: 14/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Providing an update on the Natural Resources Management Plan<br />
and associated Investment Strategy for the KI region and the<br />
NRM integrated reform happening across South Australia.<br />
17.2 CORRESPONDENT: CONSERVATION<br />
DEPARTMENT - NRM REFORM<br />
UNIT<br />
FILE NUMBER: 077<br />
ATTACHMENT: 15/903 CORRESPONDENCE
PURPOSE<br />
Providing a summary of the key points raised at the workshop on<br />
the draft Natural Resources Management Bill.<br />
17.3 CORRESPONDENT: LGFA - AGM<br />
FILE NUMBER: <strong>09</strong>1<br />
ATTACHMENT: 16/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
81<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Advising the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Finance Authority Annual<br />
General Meeting to be held on 3 rd October <strong>2003</strong>.<br />
17.4 CORRESPONDENT: EPA - PARNDANA LANDFILL<br />
ENVIRONMENT<br />
MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />
FILE NUMBER: 102<br />
ATTACHMENT: 17/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Advising acceptance of the Landfill Environment Management<br />
Plan for the Parndana Waste Transfer Station at Section 82,<br />
Hundred of Seddon.<br />
17.5 CORRESPONDENT: KI HEALTH SERVICE - YOUTH<br />
PARK<br />
FILE NUMBER: 1<strong>09</strong><br />
ATTACHMENT: 18/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Congratulating <strong>Council</strong> on the proposal to establish a youth park<br />
at Brownlow.<br />
17.6 CORRESPONDENT: LGA - RAISE THE ROOF<br />
FILE NUMBER: 042<br />
ATTACHMENT: 19/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Encouraging <strong>Council</strong> to participate in the ‘Raise the Roof - A<br />
Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Showcase”.
82<br />
17.7 CORRESPONDENT: KI FERRY SERVICES -<br />
PRESENTATION<br />
FILE NUMBER: 020<br />
ATTACHMENT: 20/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Thanking <strong>Council</strong> for attending their presentation on their new<br />
ferry service.<br />
17.8 CORRESPONDENT: AUSTRALIAN RED CROSS -<br />
BALI ASSISTANCE FUND<br />
REPORT<br />
FILE NUMBER: 1<strong>09</strong><br />
ATTACHMENT: 21/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Providing a copy of the report on the <strong>au</strong>dit of the Bali Assistance<br />
Fund.<br />
17.9 CORRESPONDENT: TRANSPORT <strong>SA</strong> - PENNESHAW<br />
BREAKWATER<br />
FILE NUMBER: 124<br />
ATTACHMENT: 22/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Providing a response to <strong>Council</strong>’s correspondence advising<br />
concern with the damage to Penneshaw breakwater.<br />
17.10 CORRESPONDENT: AUSINDUSTRY - REGIONAL<br />
TOURISM PROGRAM<br />
APPLICATION<br />
FILE NUMBER: 044<br />
ATTACHMENT: 23/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Advising our application for the Regional Tourism Program<br />
being ‘Developing Kingscote (<strong>SA</strong>’s First Settlement) as a<br />
Tourism Target’ was unsuccessful.
83<br />
17.11 CORRESPONDENT: AUSINDUSTRY - REGIONAL<br />
TOURISM PROGRAM<br />
APPLICATION<br />
FILE NUMBER: 044<br />
ATTACHMENT: 24/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Advising our application for the Regional Tourism Program<br />
being ‘Christmas Cove Redevelopment’ was unsuccessful.<br />
17.12 CORRESPONDENT: KI BEEKEEPERS ASSOCIATION<br />
- INDUSTRY PLAN FOR KI<br />
APIARISTS<br />
FILE NUMBER: 077<br />
ATTACHMENT: 25/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Providing copies of correspondence to the Cropping Association<br />
regarding GM crops and Yankalilla <strong>Council</strong> regarding a bin for<br />
disposal of quarantine items.<br />
17.13 CORRESPONDENT: LGA MEDIA RELEASE -<br />
COUNCILLOR ALLOWANCES<br />
FILE NUMBER: 057<br />
ATTACHMENT: 26/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Providing results of a survey indicating the community want to<br />
pay <strong>Council</strong>lors more.<br />
17.14 CORRESPONDENT: FLEURIEU REGIONAL WASTE<br />
MANAGEMENT STRATEGY<br />
COMMITTEE - MINUTES<br />
FILE NUMBER: 147<br />
ATTACHMENT: 27/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Providing a copy of the Fleurieu Regional Waste Management<br />
Strategy Committee minutes from 15 August <strong>2003</strong>.
84<br />
17.15 CORRESPONDENT: AUSTRALIA DAY COUNCIL -<br />
LG AWARDS<br />
FILE NUMBER: 148<br />
ATTACHMENT: 28/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
Providing information on the Local <strong>Gov</strong>ernment Awards.<br />
18.0 NOTICES OF MOTIONS<br />
Cr Br<strong>au</strong>er has given notice of his intention to move the following<br />
motion (Refer Attachment):-<br />
“That <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong>Council</strong> immediately develop a plan of<br />
action to source outside funding to repair the unsealed road<br />
network on <strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Island</strong>.”<br />
19.0 OTHER BUSINESS<br />
20.0 IN-CAMERA BUSINESS<br />
21.0 CLOSURE BY MAYOR
85<br />
LATE CORRESPONDENCE - 10 SEPTEMBER <strong>2003</strong><br />
COUNCIL MEETING<br />
16.14 CORRESPONDENT: KI NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD<br />
- COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
R RATTRAY<br />
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER<br />
FILE NUMBER: 077<br />
ATTACHMENTS: 29/903 CORRESPONDENCE<br />
PURPOSE<br />
<strong>Council</strong> representative at KI Natural Resources Board meetings.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
For <strong>Council</strong> consideration.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
<strong>Council</strong> has resolved that the Chief Executive Officer is the<br />
nomination for the KI Natural Resources Board with the<br />
Environmental Services Manager as his proxy.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Both the Chief Executive Officer and Environmental Services<br />
Manager have found the last few meetings difficult to attend and<br />
have sent the Health Officer.<br />
This Committee (KINRB) is in my opinion a very important<br />
organisation. Thus <strong>Council</strong> may wish to alter its representation as<br />
KINRB perceive we have not attended regularly.<br />
Both the Environmental Services Manager and I are committed to<br />
attending as regularly as possible.
86<br />
LATE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S REPORT TO THE<br />
COUNCIL MEETING HELD 10 SEPTEMBER <strong>2003</strong><br />
15.7 REPORT TITLE: CHRISTMAS COVE -<br />
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
R RATTRAY, CEO<br />
FILE NUMBER: 124<br />
PURPOSE<br />
To establish a Christmas Cove Management Committee.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> establish a Christmas Cove Management<br />
Committee as a Section 41 Committee to comprise of the<br />
Mayor, two <strong>Council</strong>lors being ………………. &<br />
…………………., Chief Executive Officer and three<br />
community representatives.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
In December 2002 I floated the idea of establishing a committee<br />
to manage the proposed new marina.<br />
With construction about to start it is now the right time to<br />
establish a management committee.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Although it is not planned to have Christmas Cove fully<br />
established as a marina, it is appropriate that a committee<br />
establish initial ground rules.<br />
It is envisaged that the committee would establish its aims, goals<br />
and objectives plus establish policies etc for marina usage. The<br />
Committee must ensure that this area is not a continual drain on<br />
<strong>Council</strong>’s resources and at the lease is cost neutral. In addition,<br />
<strong>Council</strong> should be the predominant membership holder.<br />
<strong>Council</strong> should target the community representators who would<br />
have an interest in the Boat Club/recreational fishing.
87<br />
LATE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S REPORT TO THE<br />
COUNCIL MEETING HELD 10 SEPTEMBER <strong>2003</strong><br />
15.8 REPORT TITLE: COMMERCIAL LAND - THE LANE,<br />
PENNESHAW<br />
AUTHOR:<br />
R RATTRAY, CEO<br />
FILE NUMBER: 041<br />
PURPOSE<br />
The release of Crown Land.<br />
RECOMMENDATION<br />
That <strong>Council</strong> <strong>au</strong>thorises the Chief Executive Officer to have<br />
discussions with various <strong>Gov</strong>ernment departments<br />
regarding the Crown selling land adjacent to The<br />
Lane, Penneshaw.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
<strong>Council</strong>’s new Development Plan enables commercial activities<br />
to occur on The Lane, Penneshaw.<br />
A public meeting was held on 1 st September at Penneshaw<br />
seeking community comment. Various questions were asked and<br />
it was decided prior to finalising the acquisition of the land<br />
further consultation would occur.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
To enable the Crown to dispose of the land, <strong>Council</strong> should<br />
progress its discussions with the Crown Lands Department, but<br />
still recognising its commitment to the community.<br />
My answers follow each question.<br />
The questions raised are:<br />
If a commercial zone was established allowing for heavy vehicle parking, could<br />
<strong>Council</strong> ban heavy vehicle parking in town<br />
Yes<br />
Could <strong>Council</strong> buy and rent out the land<br />
Yes, however I believe other options would better suit the<br />
use of this site.<br />
Minimum size of commercial blocks<br />
At least 1200m 2 to accommodate STEDS but subject to<br />
use.
Would The Lane be upgraded and appropriate drainage installed<br />
I believe <strong>Council</strong> would look at all these matters with the<br />
creation of commercial allotments.<br />
What kind of water treatment and wash down area would be required<br />
The EPA guidelines and requirements would be adhered<br />
to.<br />
Could land be set aside for commercial business at present in the town, to<br />
relocate Ordways garage and pumps [could land up near the cemetery (2<br />
acres) be set aside]<br />
Town Centre - yes. Cemetery - no (cemetery reserve)<br />
Residential zone is non complying<br />
What if <strong>Council</strong> can not afford to buy the land from the Crown<br />
An option available to <strong>Council</strong> may be, to buy, subdivide,<br />
improve road etc and sell off surplus land to <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />
requirements.<br />
How much of the sand hill would be removed<br />
Approximately 50m from roadway.<br />
Would <strong>Council</strong> draw up the bylaws to force trucks and coaches to park and<br />
wash down in the zoned area<br />
<strong>Council</strong> may establish bylaws and/or parking controls to<br />
assist with traffic management of the town.<br />
How many trucks and buses would be parked there at any one time<br />
This would depend on the size allocated for parking.<br />
Would <strong>Council</strong> buy the whole area in question, develop staging area in part for<br />
trucks and buses and sell off the rest at a profit to cover outlays<br />
This is an option available to <strong>Council</strong>.<br />
It is my opinion that the Penneshaw community is quite<br />
supportive of this commercial zone and would like to see a<br />
sensible development. However, an undertaking was given to<br />
consult further. It is also important that <strong>Council</strong> continues<br />
preliminary discussions with the various <strong>Gov</strong>ernment<br />
departments and not let the matter stall.<br />
88