MD - Health Care Compliance Association
MD - Health Care Compliance Association
MD - Health Care Compliance Association
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
JOSEPH M. WATT<br />
■ Solicit staff and employees’ impressions<br />
using questionnaires<br />
■ Review medical and financial records and<br />
other source documents<br />
■ Review written materials and documentation<br />
prepared by the hospital<br />
■ Analyze trends<br />
Despite the 1998 guidance, many hospitals<br />
have yet to perform periodic compliance effectiveness<br />
reviews. Consequently, the OIG published<br />
supplemental compliance guidance for<br />
hospitals in the January 31, 2005, Federal<br />
Register. In it, the OIG states there must be a<br />
commitment to active involvement of organizational<br />
leadership for every compliance program.<br />
The OIG expects a hospital’s leadership<br />
to promote a culture of values and rewards for<br />
prevention, detection, and resolution of compliance<br />
problems. Hospitals are expected to<br />
develop a culture that values compliance from<br />
the top down and fosters compliance from the<br />
bottom up. The OIG believes such an organizational<br />
culture is the foundation of an effective<br />
compliance program. The OIG recommends<br />
compliance program effectiveness be<br />
evaluated based on outcome indicators such as<br />
monitoring and evaluating billing and coding<br />
error rates and identifying overpayments.<br />
In addition to evaluating outcome indicators,<br />
the OIG recommends hospitals evaluate the<br />
seven elements through probing questions,<br />
including, but not limited to, the following:<br />
1. <strong>Compliance</strong> officer and committee<br />
■ Does the compliance department have a<br />
clear, well-crafted mission<br />
■ Is the compliance department properly<br />
organized<br />
■ Does the compliance department have<br />
sufficient resources<br />
■ Is there an active compliance committee,<br />
comprised of trained representatives<br />
from each of the relevant functioning<br />
departments<br />
■ Does the compliance officer have direct<br />
access to the governing body, CEO and<br />
legal counsel<br />
■ Does the compliance officer have a good<br />
working relationship with other key<br />
operational areas<br />
■ Does the compliance officer make regular<br />
reports to the board of directors and senior<br />
management<br />
2. Development of compliance polices<br />
and procedures<br />
■ Are policies and procedures clearly written<br />
■ Does the hospital monitor compliance<br />
with internal policies and procedures<br />
■ Have the standards of conduct been distributed<br />
to all members of the board of<br />
directors, officers, managers, employees,<br />
contractors, medical and clinical staff<br />
■ Has the hospital developed and implemented<br />
a risk assessment tool<br />
■ Does the risk assessment tool include an<br />
evaluation of federal health care program<br />
requirements<br />
3. Open lines of communication<br />
■ Has the hospital promoted a culture<br />
encouraging open communication without<br />
fear of retribution<br />
■ Has the hospital established an anonymous<br />
hotline or similar reporting mechanism<br />
■ Is the hotline or other reporting mechanism<br />
well publicized<br />
■ Are all instances of potential fraud and<br />
abuse investigated<br />
■ Are results of the investigation shared<br />
with the governing body and relevant<br />
departments<br />
4. Appropriate training and education<br />
■ Does the hospital provide qualified<br />
trainers<br />
■ Does the hospital conduct annual<br />
compliance training<br />
■ Is the training both general in nature and<br />
specific to pertinent staff responsibilities<br />
■ Does the hospital evaluate the contents of<br />
its education program annually<br />
■ Has the hospital kept current with<br />
changes in federal health care program<br />
requirements<br />
■ Does the hospital seek feedback after each<br />
training session to identify strengths and<br />
weaknesses of the compliance program<br />
■ Does the hospital administer post-training<br />
tests<br />
■ Has the hospital’s governing body been<br />
provided with appropriate training<br />
■ Has the hospital properly documented<br />
who has completed the training<br />
5. Internal monitoring and auditing<br />
■ Is the audit work plan reevaluated annually<br />
■ Does the work plan address the appropriate<br />
levels of concern<br />
■ Does the work plan include an assessment<br />
of billing systems<br />
■ Is the role of the auditors clearly<br />
established and are coding and auditing<br />
personnel independent and qualified<br />
■ Has the hospital evaluated the error rates<br />
identified in the annual audits<br />
■ Does the audit include a review of all<br />
billing documentation, including clinical<br />
documentation<br />
Continued on page 40<br />
<strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>Compliance</strong> <strong>Association</strong> • 888-580-8373 • www.hcca-info.org<br />
January 2006<br />
39