03.01.2015 Views

The Indian Journal of Tuberculosis - LRS Institute of Tuberculosis ...

The Indian Journal of Tuberculosis - LRS Institute of Tuberculosis ...

The Indian Journal of Tuberculosis - LRS Institute of Tuberculosis ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

174<br />

SUMMARIES OF PAPERS<br />

rate (CDR) <strong>of</strong> 70% <strong>of</strong> new smear-positive cases.<br />

COR is the number <strong>of</strong> reported cases per 100,000<br />

persons annually divided by incidence per 100,000<br />

per year. <strong>The</strong> incidence is uncertain, not measured<br />

but estimated. An alternative indicator is patient<br />

diagnostic rate (PDR), which is measured as number<br />

<strong>of</strong> reported cases per 100,000 persons annually<br />

divided by prevalence per 100,000 per year.<br />

Objective: To estimate the PDR and compare it with<br />

CDR.<br />

Methodology: TB Research Centre has generated<br />

data on prevalence and incidence among the adult<br />

population aged 15 years and above from community<br />

surveys in a rural area <strong>of</strong> 580,000 population in<br />

Tiruvallur district, Tamil Nadu after implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> RNTCP. TB Patients attending the health facilities<br />

were registered under RNTCP. <strong>The</strong> prevalence and<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> TB and the number <strong>of</strong> cases reported<br />

per 100,000 per year (notification rate) were used<br />

to estimate PDR and CDR. <strong>The</strong> estimation <strong>of</strong> PDR<br />

is restricted to the .new cases.<br />

Results: <strong>The</strong> prevalence and incidence <strong>of</strong> new smearpositive<br />

cases were 153 and 127 respectively per<br />

100,000 as estimated from the survey conducted<br />

during 2001-2003. During 2003, 446 new smearpositive<br />

cases were detected and treated. Assuming<br />

70% <strong>of</strong> the general population aged >15 years, the<br />

notification rate was 11 0 11 00,000. <strong>The</strong> PDR was<br />

72% against the CDR <strong>of</strong> 87% in 2003.<br />

Conclusion: Monitoring the TB control programme<br />

measured by PDR through prevalence survey is<br />

reliable compared to CDR estimated from incidence.<br />

<strong>Indian</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tuberculosis</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!