The Indian Journal of Tuberculosis - LRS Institute of Tuberculosis ...
The Indian Journal of Tuberculosis - LRS Institute of Tuberculosis ...
The Indian Journal of Tuberculosis - LRS Institute of Tuberculosis ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
174<br />
SUMMARIES OF PAPERS<br />
rate (CDR) <strong>of</strong> 70% <strong>of</strong> new smear-positive cases.<br />
COR is the number <strong>of</strong> reported cases per 100,000<br />
persons annually divided by incidence per 100,000<br />
per year. <strong>The</strong> incidence is uncertain, not measured<br />
but estimated. An alternative indicator is patient<br />
diagnostic rate (PDR), which is measured as number<br />
<strong>of</strong> reported cases per 100,000 persons annually<br />
divided by prevalence per 100,000 per year.<br />
Objective: To estimate the PDR and compare it with<br />
CDR.<br />
Methodology: TB Research Centre has generated<br />
data on prevalence and incidence among the adult<br />
population aged 15 years and above from community<br />
surveys in a rural area <strong>of</strong> 580,000 population in<br />
Tiruvallur district, Tamil Nadu after implementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> RNTCP. TB Patients attending the health facilities<br />
were registered under RNTCP. <strong>The</strong> prevalence and<br />
incidence <strong>of</strong> TB and the number <strong>of</strong> cases reported<br />
per 100,000 per year (notification rate) were used<br />
to estimate PDR and CDR. <strong>The</strong> estimation <strong>of</strong> PDR<br />
is restricted to the .new cases.<br />
Results: <strong>The</strong> prevalence and incidence <strong>of</strong> new smearpositive<br />
cases were 153 and 127 respectively per<br />
100,000 as estimated from the survey conducted<br />
during 2001-2003. During 2003, 446 new smearpositive<br />
cases were detected and treated. Assuming<br />
70% <strong>of</strong> the general population aged >15 years, the<br />
notification rate was 11 0 11 00,000. <strong>The</strong> PDR was<br />
72% against the CDR <strong>of</strong> 87% in 2003.<br />
Conclusion: Monitoring the TB control programme<br />
measured by PDR through prevalence survey is<br />
reliable compared to CDR estimated from incidence.<br />
<strong>Indian</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tuberculosis</strong>