LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

concordiasem.ab.ca
from concordiasem.ab.ca More from this publisher
03.01.2015 Views

LTR XV (Academic Year 2002-03): 92-96 BOOK REVIEW: HELP IN THE QUEST FOR THE HOLY GRAIL Paul D. Landgraf David P. Scaer. Discourses in Matthew: Jesus Teaches the Church. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2004. 415 pages, hardcover. T o be helpful, I’ll include some prolegomena. First of all, given the popularity of David P. Scaer in some Lutheran circles, I will state my previous connections to him. The number of times I have heard him speak could probably be counted on two hands. Although he is well known for his quick wit, most people have the sense, and rightly so, that his words which will last far into the future are those which appear on paper. I consider Dr Scaer a friend, but in my mind even more important than that friendship is my “friendship” for the past few years with the Gospel according to Matthew. I would hope that you would not consider me given to exaggeration, especially when dealing with such an important topic, but I consider the authentic structure of Matthew to be the “holy grail” of today’s biblical studies. The Gospel according to Matthew is at a critical position in the Scriptures, heavily dependent on the Old Testament and heavily influential on the New. Its importance is especially clear when examining the writings of the early church fathers. With such a critical book, it is no coincidence that modern scholarship lacks consensus when explaining its structure. The purpose of the Gospel which Scaer proposes in his new book pushes us another step forwards in our quest to find that illusive grail. The Gospel follows the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, and is therefore inherently structured. The Gospel according to Matthew also sets down a series of discourses, the conclusions of which have been clearly marked (“And when Jesus finished these sayings …”; 7:28, 11:1, 13:53, 19:1, 26:1). Some recent scholars have gravitated towards one or the other of these structural indicators. B. W. Bacon of Yale University is often credited with an emphasis on the five discourses; while even more recently, Jack Dean Kingsbury of Union Theological Seminary has essentially emphasized the life of Christ (“From that time Jesus began to …”; 4:17, 16:21). Although B. W. Bacon is never directly quoted within Scaer’s book (which was surprising), he treats the discourses as a significant indicator of the Gospel’s entire purpose. Rather than seeing the structure of Jesus’ life and that of His discourses as mutually exclusive alternatives, Scaer pushes forward and sees both aspects working together. Rather than seeing the final chapters of the Gospel as a conclusion to the discourses and therefore secondary in

LANDGRAF: BOOK REVIEW 93 importance, Scaer provides this picturesque resolution: “The concluding narrative of Matthew’s Gospel is a plateau on which the Gospel comes to rest” (p. 396).” The following helpful quotation makes reference to a frequently abused piece of Scripture commonly known as the Great Commission: “These Five Discourses, along with the events in Jesus’ life, are presupposed in the Gospel’s conclusion that the disciples are to teach the Gentiles all things” (p. 52, emphasis added). + + + The typical parish pastor is usually not consumed with talk of treasures such as the grail. The typical parish pastor is often not even concerned about the overall structure of the Gospel. The typical pastor is more given to the mundane than the mysteries. The typical parish pastor is more concerned with the structure of the sermon text for the coming Sunday. The typical pastor is concerned about the amount of time he takes to prepare for his next sermon without alienating the people in the congregation or his family. What parish pastor would not enjoy a book that would help him to see allusions to Holy Baptism and Holy Communion within the various sermon texts of the Gospel Lutherans do not say that a sacramental emphasis is simply a perspective of denomination, but an emphasis that comes from the Lord Himself and is reflected throughout the Scriptures. One professor at Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, was known to have said that if a pastor’s sermon had not mentioned the Lord’s Supper on a day when the Lord’s Supper was being served, that pastor had failed to preach the text. Scaer’s book is useful in providing a Means of Grace emphasis when preaching from the “A” series. With this book the pastor is given some help in describing the points at which salvation is delivered. The main thesis of his book is as follows: “In this volume, the idea will be advanced that Matthew’s Gospel was written as a catechesis or summary of what believers were taught before being admitted by Baptism into the full eucharistic membership of the church” (p. 9). The details of that statement are unfolded within the rest of the book. Some Lutheran pastors are probably put off whenever the word “catechesis” is mentioned. For some people it refers to a style of teaching that is not reflected in the Scriptures, some type of archconservative brainwashing. If you were put off when he used that word, you need not be. Scaer in his preface helps to put that word in perspective when he explains that the initial idea for the book was part of a larger project to “demonstrate that all the New Testament documents had a catechetical purpose” (p. 7, emphasis added). Taken within this context, the word “catechetical” obviously has heavy salvific and evangelism-related overtones, similar to those found within something like Luther’s Small Catechism. With such an

LANDGRAF: BOOK <strong>REVIEW</strong> 93<br />

importance, Scaer provides this picturesque resolution: “The concluding<br />

narrative of Matthew’s Gospel is a plateau on which the Gospel comes to<br />

rest” (p. 396).” The following helpful quotation makes reference to a<br />

frequently abused piece of Scripture commonly known as the Great<br />

Commission: “These Five Discourses, along with the events in Jesus’ life,<br />

are presupposed in the Gospel’s conclusion that the disciples are to teach the<br />

Gentiles all things” (p. 52, emphasis added).<br />

+ + +<br />

The typical parish pastor is usually not consumed with talk of treasures<br />

such as the grail. The typical parish pastor is often not even concerned about<br />

the overall structure of the Gospel. The typical pastor is more given to the<br />

mundane than the mysteries. The typical parish pastor is more concerned<br />

with the structure of the sermon text for the coming Sunday. The typical<br />

pastor is concerned about the amount of time he takes to prepare for his next<br />

sermon without alienating the people in the congregation or his family.<br />

What parish pastor would not enjoy a book that would help him to see<br />

allusions to Holy Baptism and Holy Communion within the various sermon<br />

texts of the Gospel Lutherans do not say that a sacramental emphasis is<br />

simply a perspective of denomination, but an emphasis that comes from the<br />

Lord Himself and is reflected throughout the Scriptures. One professor at<br />

Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, was known to have said that if a pastor’s<br />

sermon had not mentioned the Lord’s Supper on a day when the Lord’s<br />

Supper was being served, that pastor had failed to preach the text. Scaer’s<br />

book is useful in providing a Means of Grace emphasis when preaching from<br />

the “A” series. With this book the pastor is given some help in describing the<br />

points at which salvation is delivered. The main thesis of his book is as<br />

follows: “In this volume, the idea will be advanced that Matthew’s Gospel<br />

was written as a catechesis or summary of what believers were taught before<br />

being admitted by Baptism into the full eucharistic membership of the<br />

church” (p. 9). The details of that statement are unfolded within the rest of<br />

the book.<br />

Some Lutheran pastors are probably put off whenever the word<br />

“catechesis” is mentioned. For some people it refers to a style of teaching<br />

that is not reflected in the Scriptures, some type of archconservative<br />

brainwashing. If you were put off when he used that word, you need not be.<br />

Scaer in his preface helps to put that word in perspective when he explains<br />

that the initial idea for the book was part of a larger project to “demonstrate<br />

that all the New Testament documents had a catechetical purpose” (p. 7,<br />

emphasis added). Taken within this context, the word “catechetical”<br />

obviously has heavy salvific and evangelism-related overtones, similar to<br />

those found within something like Luther’s Small Catechism. With such an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!