LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MAAS: BARNES AND EARLY ENGLISH <strong>LUTHERAN</strong>ISM 81<br />
time in London. The result of this meeting was a document referred to as the<br />
“Thirteen Articles”, another theological statement of the points on which<br />
both parties could agree. 20 It should be noted that none of these series of<br />
articles was ever in any way accepted as authoritative in England. Nor,<br />
contrary to what one sometimes reads, were any of them a significant<br />
influence on the formulation of English confessions produced in the later<br />
reigns of Edward and Elizabeth. They are here mentioned only to point up<br />
the fact that Barnes was, for a few years, at the very centre of efforts to bring<br />
England officially into the Lutheran camp.<br />
If he was ultimately unsuccessful in this regard, he did at the same time<br />
enjoy some considerable success on a more local level. In addition to his<br />
diplomatic responsibilities, Barnes was also a frequent and persuasive<br />
preacher when his duties allowed him to remain in England. He was well<br />
regarded by the laity, preaching funeral sermons for several prominent<br />
Londoners. 21 Englishmen wrote to friends on the continent that “the word is<br />
powerfully preached by an individual named Barnes”. 22 And Hugh Latimer,<br />
perhaps the greatest Protestant preacher of the day, regularly praised<br />
Barnes’s homiletical abilities, once noting matter-of-factly that “he is alone<br />
in handling a piece of scripture, and in setting forth of Christ he hath no<br />
fellow”. 23 This opinion is even confirmed by those who were less favourable<br />
to Barnes. On several occasions supporters of the old faith condemned his<br />
preaching precisely because it was so effective. He was briefly imprisoned<br />
again after a 1536 sermon. 24 Stephen Gardiner later warned that if the King<br />
continued to allow Barnes to preach then the whole nation would be lost to<br />
Protestantism. 25 And at one point an observer even noted in unpleasant detail<br />
that the Bishop of London, in an attempt to avoid answering one of Barnes’s<br />
more pointed sermons, was feigning sickness by gorging himself on<br />
laxatives. 26 Keeping this in mind, and remembering that it was his preaching<br />
which first brought him into trouble in 1525, it will not be surprising to learn<br />
that it was yet another sermon which eventually reversed the good fortune he<br />
had for a few years enjoyed.<br />
20 Documents, 184-221.<br />
21 Public Record Office (London), PCC, Prob. 11/27, fos 32, 93ff., and 232ff. Also see LP<br />
15:306.<br />
22 Original Letters Relative to the English Reformation, 2 vols, ed. H. Robinson (Parker<br />
Society, 1846-47), 2:627.<br />
23 Hugh Latimer, Sermons and Remains of Hugh Latimer, ed. G. E. Corrie (Parker Society,<br />
1845), 389.<br />
24 LP 11:1097.<br />
25 See the anonymous Chronicle of King Henry VIII of England, ed./tr. M.A.S. Hume<br />
(London, 1889), 194.<br />
26 LP 11:1355.