LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

concordiasem.ab.ca
from concordiasem.ab.ca More from this publisher
03.01.2015 Views

80 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV It also happened that, being Protestant, they had their own difficulties with both Pope and Emperor, and therefore wondered if they and England might be of some mutual benefit to one another. To discuss the terms of a possible alliance, they dispatched an embassy to London in 1534. Among the ambassadors from Hamburg was, fortuitously as it would turn out, Robert Barnes. 16 Barnes remained in England with this delegation into the next year, meeting almost daily with prominent English bishops as terms of a possible alliance were discussed. The negotiations eventually broke off without success, in part because the Lutheran delegates insisted that any alliance be built upon specifically theological agreement. Particularly troublesome to traditionalist English bishops were an insistence upon the doctrine of justification by faith alone and questions regarding sacramental theology, two points to which we will have to return in a short while. Despite the failure of these negotiations, Barnes seems at least to have proved his worth as an effective middle-man for any future Anglo-Lutheran politics. Even while the doctrinal conversations were still taking place, Henry asked Barnes to stand ready for a mission to Denmark as his own ambassador to the Danish King. This request marks the beginning of a sea change in Barnes’s fortunes. No longer considered a renegade friar or a lapsed heretic, from 1535 to 1540 he was an employee of the English crown. There is a great deal of available information concerning Barnes’s activities in the next few years. Most of it concerns the more mundane matters of international diplomacy, but a few highlights are worthy of mention. In 1535 he returned to Wittenberg, this time with letters of commendation that designate him as the King’s personal chaplain. 17 At the end of the year he, Melanchthon, and others drew up a series of articles known as the “Christmas Articles”, which outlined German conditions for England’s entrance into the League of Smalcald, an alliance of Lutheran states preparing for the possibility of armed conflict with the Emperor. 18 Early in the next year Barnes, Luther, Melanchthon, and others also formulated what are now called the “Wittenberg Articles”. 19 In contrast to the more political considerations of the Christmas Articles, these were a series of specifically doctrinal statements upon which, it was hoped, England and the Lutheran states could reach agreement. In 1538 Barnes is again engaged in theological negotiations between England and the Lutherans, this 16 LP 7:871; 7:873; 7:874; 7:957; 7:1064; 8:121. 17 Ecclesiastical Memorials Relating Chiefly to Religion and the Reformation of it under King Henry VIII, 3 vols, ed. J. Strype (London, 1721), 1/1:357. 18 For the articles in translation see LP 9:1016. 19 Documents of the English Reformation [hereinafter cited as Documents], ed. G. Bray (Cambridge, 1994), 118-61.

MAAS: BARNES AND EARLY ENGLISH LUTHERANISM 81 time in London. The result of this meeting was a document referred to as the “Thirteen Articles”, another theological statement of the points on which both parties could agree. 20 It should be noted that none of these series of articles was ever in any way accepted as authoritative in England. Nor, contrary to what one sometimes reads, were any of them a significant influence on the formulation of English confessions produced in the later reigns of Edward and Elizabeth. They are here mentioned only to point up the fact that Barnes was, for a few years, at the very centre of efforts to bring England officially into the Lutheran camp. If he was ultimately unsuccessful in this regard, he did at the same time enjoy some considerable success on a more local level. In addition to his diplomatic responsibilities, Barnes was also a frequent and persuasive preacher when his duties allowed him to remain in England. He was well regarded by the laity, preaching funeral sermons for several prominent Londoners. 21 Englishmen wrote to friends on the continent that “the word is powerfully preached by an individual named Barnes”. 22 And Hugh Latimer, perhaps the greatest Protestant preacher of the day, regularly praised Barnes’s homiletical abilities, once noting matter-of-factly that “he is alone in handling a piece of scripture, and in setting forth of Christ he hath no fellow”. 23 This opinion is even confirmed by those who were less favourable to Barnes. On several occasions supporters of the old faith condemned his preaching precisely because it was so effective. He was briefly imprisoned again after a 1536 sermon. 24 Stephen Gardiner later warned that if the King continued to allow Barnes to preach then the whole nation would be lost to Protestantism. 25 And at one point an observer even noted in unpleasant detail that the Bishop of London, in an attempt to avoid answering one of Barnes’s more pointed sermons, was feigning sickness by gorging himself on laxatives. 26 Keeping this in mind, and remembering that it was his preaching which first brought him into trouble in 1525, it will not be surprising to learn that it was yet another sermon which eventually reversed the good fortune he had for a few years enjoyed. 20 Documents, 184-221. 21 Public Record Office (London), PCC, Prob. 11/27, fos 32, 93ff., and 232ff. Also see LP 15:306. 22 Original Letters Relative to the English Reformation, 2 vols, ed. H. Robinson (Parker Society, 1846-47), 2:627. 23 Hugh Latimer, Sermons and Remains of Hugh Latimer, ed. G. E. Corrie (Parker Society, 1845), 389. 24 LP 11:1097. 25 See the anonymous Chronicle of King Henry VIII of England, ed./tr. M.A.S. Hume (London, 1889), 194. 26 LP 11:1355.

80 <strong>LUTHERAN</strong> <strong>THEOLOGICAL</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong> XV<br />

It also happened that, being Protestant, they had their own difficulties with<br />

both Pope and Emperor, and therefore wondered if they and England might<br />

be of some mutual benefit to one another. To discuss the terms of a possible<br />

alliance, they dispatched an embassy to London in 1534. Among the<br />

ambassadors from Hamburg was, fortuitously as it would turn out, Robert<br />

Barnes. 16<br />

Barnes remained in England with this delegation into the next year,<br />

meeting almost daily with prominent English bishops as terms of a possible<br />

alliance were discussed. The negotiations eventually broke off without<br />

success, in part because the Lutheran delegates insisted that any alliance be<br />

built upon specifically theological agreement. Particularly troublesome to<br />

traditionalist English bishops were an insistence upon the doctrine of<br />

justification by faith alone and questions regarding sacramental theology,<br />

two points to which we will have to return in a short while. Despite the<br />

failure of these negotiations, Barnes seems at least to have proved his worth<br />

as an effective middle-man for any future Anglo-Lutheran politics. Even<br />

while the doctrinal conversations were still taking place, Henry asked Barnes<br />

to stand ready for a mission to Denmark as his own ambassador to the<br />

Danish King. This request marks the beginning of a sea change in Barnes’s<br />

fortunes. No longer considered a renegade friar or a lapsed heretic, from<br />

1535 to 1540 he was an employee of the English crown.<br />

There is a great deal of available information concerning Barnes’s<br />

activities in the next few years. Most of it concerns the more mundane<br />

matters of international diplomacy, but a few highlights are worthy of<br />

mention. In 1535 he returned to Wittenberg, this time with letters of<br />

commendation that designate him as the King’s personal chaplain. 17 At the<br />

end of the year he, Melanchthon, and others drew up a series of articles<br />

known as the “Christmas Articles”, which outlined German conditions for<br />

England’s entrance into the League of Smalcald, an alliance of Lutheran<br />

states preparing for the possibility of armed conflict with the Emperor. 18<br />

Early in the next year Barnes, Luther, Melanchthon, and others also<br />

formulated what are now called the “Wittenberg Articles”. 19 In contrast to<br />

the more political considerations of the Christmas Articles, these were a<br />

series of specifically doctrinal statements upon which, it was hoped, England<br />

and the Lutheran states could reach agreement. In 1538 Barnes is again<br />

engaged in theological negotiations between England and the Lutherans, this<br />

16 LP 7:871; 7:873; 7:874; 7:957; 7:1064; 8:121.<br />

17 Ecclesiastical Memorials Relating Chiefly to Religion and the Reformation of it under<br />

King Henry VIII, 3 vols, ed. J. Strype (London, 1721), 1/1:357.<br />

18 For the articles in translation see LP 9:1016.<br />

19 Documents of the English Reformation [hereinafter cited as Documents], ed. G. Bray<br />

(Cambridge, 1994), 118-61.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!