LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
38 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV had become a central article of faith. Preus recapitulates the teaching of the earlier dogmaticians in saying that God’s foreknowledge is connected to divine providence, and sets limits on evil and controls all things to God’s glory, but is not the cause of evil. Predestination “effects, foreordains, and causes everything that pertains to the salvation of individual sinners”, but it must be seen only in the light of the Gospel and the Means of Grace. 76 Therefore, “since election is part of the Gospel, there is no predestination to damnation.” 77 This of course excludes all works righteousness. It also excludes election intuitu fidei “in view of faith”, foreseen by God in eternity, an idea first introduced by Aegidius Hunnius (1550-1603). 78 CONCLUSION As we have seen, it was this notion of intuitu fidei that F. A. Schmidt accepted and on account of which he opposed Walther and the Synodical Conference—a false teaching that Busch tried to minimize in his 1982 article on the Predestinarian Controversy, attempting to reduce a substantial doctrinal controversy to a personality clash between Walther and Schmidt, with the clear implication that the Seminex controversy was likewise a personality clash between J. A. O. Preus and John Tietjen. The Predestinarian Controversy thus becomes a paradigm for modern theological conflicts—doctrine doesn’t matter all that much; controversy stems from ivory tower theologians who squabble and argue and talk past each other. In this view, all denominations teach pretty much the same thing—something about Jesus—so we can minimize doctrinal differences for the sake of external unity in the church. As a result, liberal church bodies like the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and the Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A and the Episcopal Church U.S.A. have entered into altar and pulpit fellowship with one another. Conservative church bodies take doctrine more seriously. They recognize that external unity can only be achieved by internal unity—that is, full agreement on all points of Christian doctrine. Of course one point of doctrine over which there is serious disagreement is Predestination. Arminians and Calvinists and Lutherans have markedly different interpretations, with each group insisting that it is interpreting the Bible correctly. I hope that the Lutheran contribution to this topic might be helpful in helping to resolve this controversy and furthering Christian understanding and unity. 76 Preus, 273. 77 Preus, 274. 78 Preus, 275.
BAUE: THE CURRENT DEBATE ON PREDESTINATION 39 Rev. Frederic (Fritz) Baue, Ph.D., pastor, author, and musician, is currently serving Bethany Lutheran Church, Fairview Heights, Illinois, U.S.A. (LCMS).
- Page 1: LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW publish
- Page 4 and 5: 4 STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS AE BAG BAG
- Page 6 and 7: 6 Finally, Paul Landgraf reviews Da
- Page 8 and 9: 8 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV pr
- Page 10 and 11: 10 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV m
- Page 12 and 13: 12 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV r
- Page 14 and 15: 14 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV o
- Page 16 and 17: 16 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV I
- Page 18 and 19: LTR XV (Academic Year 2002-03): 18-
- Page 20 and 21: 20 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV t
- Page 22 and 23: 22 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV o
- Page 24 and 25: 24 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV I
- Page 26 and 27: 26 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV o
- Page 28 and 29: 28 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV a
- Page 30 and 31: 30 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV T
- Page 32 and 33: 32 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV f
- Page 34 and 35: 34 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV P
- Page 36 and 37: 36 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV I
- Page 40 and 41: LTR XV (Academic Year 2002-03): 40-
- Page 42 and 43: 42 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV t
- Page 44 and 45: 44 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV t
- Page 46 and 47: 46 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV C
- Page 48 and 49: 48 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV t
- Page 50 and 51: 50 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV B
- Page 52 and 53: 52 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV w
- Page 54 and 55: LTR XV (Academic Year 2002-03): 54-
- Page 56 and 57: 56 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV M
- Page 58 and 59: 58 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV O
- Page 60 and 61: 60 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV t
- Page 62 and 63: 62 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV t
- Page 64 and 65: 64 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV M
- Page 66 and 67: 66 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV G
- Page 68 and 69: 68 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV o
- Page 70 and 71: 70 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV t
- Page 72 and 73: 72 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV o
- Page 74 and 75: 74 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV r
- Page 76 and 77: 76 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV C
- Page 78 and 79: 78 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV s
- Page 80 and 81: 80 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV I
- Page 82 and 83: 82 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV B
- Page 84 and 85: 84 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV i
- Page 86 and 87: 86 LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW XV a
38 <strong>LUTHERAN</strong> <strong>THEOLOGICAL</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong> XV<br />
had become a central article of faith. Preus recapitulates the teaching of the<br />
earlier dogmaticians in saying that God’s foreknowledge is connected to<br />
divine providence, and sets limits on evil and controls all things to God’s<br />
glory, but is not the cause of evil. Predestination “effects, foreordains, and<br />
causes everything that pertains to the salvation of individual sinners”, but it<br />
must be seen only in the light of the Gospel and the Means of Grace. 76<br />
Therefore, “since election is part of the Gospel, there is no predestination to<br />
damnation.” 77 This of course excludes all works righteousness. It also<br />
excludes election intuitu fidei “in view of faith”, foreseen by God in eternity,<br />
an idea first introduced by Aegidius Hunnius (1550-1603). 78<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
As we have seen, it was this notion of intuitu fidei that F. A. Schmidt<br />
accepted and on account of which he opposed Walther and the Synodical<br />
Conference—a false teaching that Busch tried to minimize in his 1982 article<br />
on the Predestinarian Controversy, attempting to reduce a substantial<br />
doctrinal controversy to a personality clash between Walther and Schmidt,<br />
with the clear implication that the Seminex controversy was likewise a<br />
personality clash between J. A. O. Preus and John Tietjen. The<br />
Predestinarian Controversy thus becomes a paradigm for modern theological<br />
conflicts—doctrine doesn’t matter all that much; controversy stems from<br />
ivory tower theologians who squabble and argue and talk past each other. In<br />
this view, all denominations teach pretty much the same thing—something<br />
about Jesus—so we can minimize doctrinal differences for the sake of<br />
external unity in the church. As a result, liberal church bodies like the<br />
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and the Presbyterian Church in the<br />
U.S.A and the Episcopal Church U.S.A. have entered into altar and pulpit<br />
fellowship with one another.<br />
Conservative church bodies take doctrine more seriously. They recognize<br />
that external unity can only be achieved by internal unity—that is, full<br />
agreement on all points of Christian doctrine. Of course one point of doctrine<br />
over which there is serious disagreement is Predestination. Arminians and<br />
Calvinists and Lutherans have markedly different interpretations, with each<br />
group insisting that it is interpreting the Bible correctly. I hope that the<br />
Lutheran contribution to this topic might be helpful in helping to resolve this<br />
controversy and furthering Christian understanding and unity.<br />
76 Preus, 273.<br />
77 Preus, 274.<br />
78 Preus, 275.