03.01.2015 Views

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32 <strong>LUTHERAN</strong> <strong>THEOLOGICAL</strong> <strong>REVIEW</strong> XV<br />

for a more noble use. Gen. 13.11: “Lot evxele,xato - chose for himself the<br />

region around the Jordan.” 59<br />

He goes on to say that in reference to persons, it is used to refer to the<br />

election of Christ as Redeemer by God from before the foundation of the<br />

world, and to refer also to the election of persons as well: “It is used to refer<br />

to the entire assembly of the church which God gathers for Himself through<br />

His Word from all assemblies or peoples and has selected to be His peculiar<br />

people … or it is used about true members of the church and who persevere<br />

in Him until the end of life.” 60 Likewise he explains the word<br />

proori,zw/proorismo,j, which means “to destine and to ordain for a definite<br />

end so that at the same time the means leading to that end are defined.” 61<br />

That is to say, when God predestines us to eternal life, he always brings this<br />

about through the means of grace, that is, the Word and Sacraments. Thus<br />

when this word, normally translated “predestination”, is used to refer to<br />

persons, “it always signifies in Scripture their election to eternal life”. Here<br />

again Gerhard rejects double predestination: “Some assert without written<br />

proof that there is one predestination for life, another for death and the<br />

causes of eternal death.” 62<br />

Samuel Huber, the Swiss theologian, had put forth erroneous ideas<br />

concerning predestination. Gerhard says, “In our time, the Swiss Samuel<br />

Huber in 1592 began to teach and argue in favor of the universal election of<br />

all people.” 63 This of course is patent nonsense, and Gerhard notes that this<br />

idea was dealt with already in the Book of Concord. Huber’s teaching<br />

continued to have influence, however, and Walther refers to him in his<br />

Theses on Predestination of 1881.<br />

Another false teaching was the notion of predestination intuitu fidei, “in<br />

view of faith”. Gerhard, on the basis of Eph. 1:4; 3:17; I Tim. 1:16; II Thess.<br />

2:13, and many other passages says,<br />

We profess with a loud voice that we claim that God has found nothing good<br />

in man in electing him for eternal life, that He has not considered good works<br />

nor the use of free will nor even faith itself in such a way as to choose some<br />

because of or on account of these impulses. We rather say that that is only<br />

and solely the merit of Christ, whose worth God has respected and made His<br />

decree of election purely out of grace. 64<br />

59 Gerhard, para. 24.<br />

60 Gerhard, para. 24.<br />

61 Gerhard, para. 27.<br />

62 Gerhard, para. 28. Gerhard rejects double predestination in Beza, Zanch, and Piscator in<br />

para. 29. In para. 103 he rejects Calvin, who in the Institutes, Book 3, Chapter 23, Section 7,<br />

says of double predestination, “I admit that it is a horrible decree.”<br />

63 Gerhard, para. 201.<br />

64 Gerhard, para. 161.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!