LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW - Brock University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
BAUE: THE CURRENT DEBATE ON PREDESTINATION 25<br />
Other verses support free will: “We gave them guidance, but they preferred<br />
blindness (of heart) to Guidance: so the stunning Punishment of humiliation<br />
seized them, because of what they had earned” (41:17). And again,<br />
“Whatever misfortune happens to you, is because of the things your hands<br />
have wrought, and for many (of them) He grants forgiveness” (42:30).<br />
Thus we see that Islam is like a Christianity reduced to the First Article.<br />
There is no grace, no mercy, no Gospel, no assurance of salvation, no way to<br />
have a relationship with a loving and merciful God. Predestination in this<br />
scheme of thought is doubled in intensity.<br />
Not surprisingly, given the long exchange of ideas between Islamic and<br />
Christian thinkers, we find a current Muslim scholar drawing a parallel<br />
between the two religions on the subject of predestination. Ismail Mohamed,<br />
Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at the National <strong>University</strong> of Malasia, in a<br />
2000 English-language article in the London-based Islamic Quarterly, finds<br />
similar strains of thought between Aquinas, the Christian theologian, and<br />
Averroes (1126-1198), 27 the Muslim philosopher: “Predestination is a crucial<br />
problem not only in Islam but also in Christianity. There has been a long and<br />
continuous discussion by theologians on both sides.” 28 As Mohamed notes,<br />
the problem within Islam is whether or not man has free will. If he does not,<br />
then his action is controlled by an outside power. If he does, “God’s<br />
omnipotence is challenged”. 29 He cites Averroes to show that there is double<br />
predestination in Islam: “These were created for Paradise and they do work<br />
for the people of Paradise, and these were created for hell and they do work<br />
for the people of hell.” 30 And again, “Aquinas, like Averroes, recognizes that<br />
God separates men into two divisions, namely, to some God gives grace and<br />
guides them to his path, and the others he leaves in error.” 31 Mohamed<br />
explains by saying that “the first tradition [of Muhammad] shows that the<br />
cause of disbelief (Kufr) is one’s own environment, and the second points<br />
standard English translation of the Qur’an. I picked a free copy on a visit to the local mosque,<br />
Daar-ul-Islam, in St. Louis.<br />
27 http://i-cias.com/e.o/averroes.htm. Averroes (Arabic: Ibn Rushd) was born in Cordoba,<br />
Spain, 1126, and died in Marrakech, 1198. He was a Muslim thinker strongly influence by<br />
Aristotle, and had frequent dialogue with Christian theologians.<br />
28 Ismail Mohamed, “Concept of Predestination in Islam and Christianity: Special Reference<br />
to Averroes and Aquinas”, The Islamic Quarterly 44.2 (2000): 393. This periodical seems to<br />
represent the more moderate strain in Muslim thought. Averroes in his day was certainly a<br />
progressive thinker. Little of his work is available in Arabic.<br />
29 Mohamed, 393.<br />
30 Mohamed, 394. The fn. citing Averroes’ work is incomplete. There are a number of typos<br />
and editorial errors in Mohamed’s article, possibly due to an Arabic-speaking staff producing<br />
an English-language journal.<br />
31 Mohamed, 403.