03.01.2015 Views

Psychiatric Diagnosis and Classification - ResearchGate

Psychiatric Diagnosis and Classification - ResearchGate

Psychiatric Diagnosis and Classification - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE ROLE OF PHENOMENOLOGY IN PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS 149<br />

Both retention <strong>and</strong> protention have to be distinguished from the proper<br />

thematic) recollection <strong>and</strong> expectation. There is an obvious difference between<br />

retaining <strong>and</strong> protending the tones that have just sounded <strong>and</strong> are<br />

just about to sound, <strong>and</strong> to remember a past holiday, or look forward to the<br />

next vacation. Whereas the two latter experiences presuppose the work of the<br />

retention <strong>and</strong> the protention, the protention <strong>and</strong> retention are intrinsic<br />

moments of any occurrent experience I might be having. They provide us<br />

with consciousness of the temporal horizon of the present object, they are<br />

the a priori structures of our consciousness, structures which are the very<br />

condition of temporal experience. They are passive or automatic processes<br />

that take place without our active contribution.<br />

Comprehending the structure of time-consciousness proves crucial if we<br />

for instance wish to underst<strong>and</strong> the important syntheses of identity: if I move<br />

around a tree in order to obtain a more exhaustive presentation of it, then<br />

the different profiles of the tree, its front, sides <strong>and</strong> back, do not present<br />

themselves as disjointed fragments, but are perceived as synthetically integrated<br />

moments. This synthetic process is temporal in nature. Ultimately,<br />

time-consciousness must be regarded as the formal condition of possibility<br />

for the constitution of any objects [36, 37].<br />

Intentionality<br />

An intrinsic, fundamental feature of consciousness is its object-directedness<br />

or intentionality. One does not merely love, fear, see or judge; one loves,<br />

fears, sees or judges something. In short, it characterizes many of our experiences,<br />

that they are exactly conscious of something. Regardless of whether<br />

we are talking of a perception, a thought, a judgement, a fantasy, a doubt, an<br />

expectation, a recollection, etc., all of these diverse forms of consciousness<br />

are characterized by intending objects, <strong>and</strong> they cannot be analyzed properly<br />

without a look at their objective correlate, i.e. the perceived, doubted,<br />

expected object. Likewise, affectivity discloses also intentional structure:<br />

whereas feelings are about the objects of feelings, moods exhibit a global<br />

intentionality of horizons of being by coloring the world <strong>and</strong> so exp<strong>and</strong>,<br />

restrict or modify our existential possibilities.<br />

The decisive question is how to account for this intentionality. One<br />

common suggestion is to reduce intentionality to causality. According to<br />

this view consciousness can be likened to a container. In itself it has no<br />

relation to the world; only if it is causally influenced by an external object<br />

can such a relation occur. That this model is severely inadequate is easy to<br />

show. The real existing spatial objects in my immediate physical surrounding<br />

only constitute a minority of that of which I can be conscious. When I am<br />

thinking about absent objects, impossible objects, non-existing objects, future

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!