03.01.2015 Views

OPINION Vol.1, No.1 June 2013 - National Defence University

OPINION Vol.1, No.1 June 2013 - National Defence University

OPINION Vol.1, No.1 June 2013 - National Defence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introduction<br />

RISING INDIA - A CRITICAL APPRAISAL<br />

More than sixty five years ago, in 1947, the Indian nation was struggling for its very survival.<br />

Recovering from the shattered dreams of ‘Akhand Bharat’ with urgency to resettle eight million refugees;<br />

provided with land, homes, employment and a sense of citizenship. Over five hundred and sixty princely<br />

states 1 had to be integrated. The question then being asked everywhere was ‘Will India Survive’ Now,<br />

sixty-five years down the road, that fearful query has been replaced by a far more impressive one, namely,<br />

‘Will India become a Great Power’<br />

There are different theories which examine the phenomenon of the Rise of the Nations. Professor<br />

Alastair Johnston of Harvard <strong>University</strong> has suggested following criterion 2 :-<br />

In material context, is there an increase in a state’s capabilities in either relative or absolute<br />

sense<br />

In historical context, is the rising state more powerful than the past<br />

In diplomatic context is the state more engaged in the world than previously<br />

In competing context, how do other states view the rising state having a larger role in the world<br />

than in the past<br />

In domestic context, does the state increasingly affect the lives of ordinary people<br />

In terms of measures of power, what are the net capabilities in terms of power projection, control<br />

over territory, alliance construction, share of world material capabilities, and the collective will to<br />

assume the role of a great power.<br />

Keeping the above criterion in mind, does India deserve the status of a great power by any<br />

measure, has to be analysed by close examination of factors like the extent and strategic location of its<br />

territory; the size and dynamism of its population; the value and growth rate of its economy; the increased<br />

trade volume; the inflow of foreign direct investments; the entrepreneurial drive especially in cutting-edge<br />

sectors like information technology; the creation of an ever larger and ever more confident middle class<br />

and the strength of its military.<br />

In international arena, United States needs India to become a true global power so as to guard her<br />

interests in the region. In the historical context India has all the advantages the United States once had in<br />

her infancy: size, diversity, strategic location, a stable government and a thriving economy. Now India<br />

aspires to convert these advantages into raw power. Nonetheless, world will not grant India that status<br />

because of her size and economic potential alone; India has to reach out and grab it 3 . This article is about a<br />

critical appraisal of the Indian competing prospects and problems; enabling or hindering to achieve such a<br />

coveted status.<br />

Important Landmarks from Indian History<br />

In 1950, India’s share of global wealth was just over four percent as compared to sixteen percent in<br />

1820 4 ; erosion of Indian wealth continued after independence. Marginal growth rates with phenomenal<br />

expansion in population made rich richer and poor a bit less poor. Between 1950 and 1980, the socialist<br />

model remained applied in India and produced disappointing results. Over a period of 30 years, India’s<br />

gross domestic product (GDP) grew by an average of 3.7 per cent per annum while the population virtually<br />

got doubled from 372 to 689 million people. The per capita annual average growth rate was a mere 1.5 per<br />

cent. It came to be known as the ‘Hindu Rate of Growth’ 5 .<br />

In 1980s, the Indian Government displayed reluctance to turn back on longstanding policy of<br />

curbing and regulating the private sector. Rajiv Gandhi on assumption of office, committed himself to<br />

deregulation, import liberalization and access to foreign technology, recognizing the role of private sector<br />

in economic development. 6 It was only in the early 1990s that there was an evident radical change in<br />

course. The immediate cause for this change was the threat of bankruptcy facing the Indian state in 1991.<br />

Major shift in Indian foreign policy was also noticed in 1990s 7 . The cardinal of change included shift from<br />

a ‘Socialist to building a ‘Modern Capitalist Society’ with increased emphasis on geo-economics. Here,<br />

India also started cherishing status of an emerging global power status with demonstration of flexibility to<br />

heed to pro-west alliances; shift from idealism to realism.<br />

<strong>OPINION</strong> <strong>Vol.1</strong> <strong>No.1</strong> 33 <strong>June</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!