03.01.2015 Views

OPINION Vol.1, No.1 June 2013 - National Defence University

OPINION Vol.1, No.1 June 2013 - National Defence University

OPINION Vol.1, No.1 June 2013 - National Defence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

aimed at denying breeding grounds for these grievances through effective management, better<br />

integration and by adopting people centric policies.<br />

Reforms for Capacity Building of LEAs. In most of the developing countries LEAs lack<br />

requisite capability, capacity and integration to fight future wars owing to a host of reasons. Police<br />

reforms should remain the starting point and be followed by civil armed forces to improve<br />

recruiting, development of better hierarchical structures and training to fight cybercrimes.<br />

Inter – State Cooperation. Future warriors are likely to exploit black holes in international law<br />

and discords between nation states to operate beyond national boundaries and closer to seam to<br />

avoid stringent laws and effective LEAs in one state thus bringing into light requirement of<br />

integrating efforts globally and in particular with neighbours and regional countries to deal with<br />

these threats. This is easier said than done.<br />

Capacity Building to Fight 5GW and Open Source Warfare. Creating cyber and space<br />

commands at national and armed forces level to fight cybercrimes, while at the same time,<br />

exercising control over proliferation of bio and nano technologies and developing national capacity<br />

by integrating human and technical elements to protect vital services against hacking remains vital<br />

to fight 5GW. Finally, legislating and then implementing laws against attack on vital assets like<br />

pipelines and grid stations and creating mechanisms to provide comprehensive security to them<br />

should also be pursued.<br />

Recommendations at Army Level<br />

Changes in Military Culture. Earlier generations of war seemed obsessed with order on the<br />

battlefield thus turning militaries into well oiled machines while countering terrorism forces a<br />

change. Difference between the nature of the modern battlefield and the traditional military culture<br />

can be addressed by redefining military cultures by accepting that initiative is more important than<br />

obedience.<br />

Ability to Adapt and Learn. Use of information technology will improve adaptation of<br />

insurgents while also giving them ability to quickly share techniques and lessons learnt from one<br />

geographical zone to another. As David Kilcullen puts it in ‘Accidental Guerrilla’, unless we adapt<br />

to today’s protean adversary and the merging modes of human conflict, “we are destined to<br />

maintain and upgrade our high-end, industrial age square pegs and be condemned for trying to<br />

force them into contemporary and increasingly complex round holes.”<br />

Adaptive Campaigning. Armies may not be able to dominate all aspects of future war but their<br />

role might be a bit toned in support of other elements of national power. As armies shrink in size<br />

and the complexity of intra state problems increases in size and context, militaries will have to<br />

carefully articulate their actions for more enduring results in support of the governmental<br />

departments. This is referred to as adaptive campaigning.<br />

Information Operations and Strategic Communication. Strategic communications is an upand-coming<br />

tool in the adaptive campaigning process and can be used for affecting changes in<br />

societal behaviour by understanding and responding to the thinking of population at large.<br />

Information operations aim at wining the psychological contest with real and potential enemies. A<br />

Whole of Government approach is required for development of Information Action objectives and<br />

Strategic Communication themes by developing credible narratives.<br />

Impact on Tactics and Operational Art in Fourth Generation Operational Art. Principal<br />

notions of operational art apply in 4GW, although context is somewhat changed.<br />

Reduced Emphasis on Operational Art. In fourth generation the first change would be that a<br />

campaign framework may be largely provided to the operational commander for implementation.<br />

In this context, Operational Art is likely to be a little more circumscribed than envisaged and might<br />

involve orchestration of tactical actions, through one or more lines of operation, to ultimately<br />

achieve the directed strategic accepted enduring conditions.<br />

Blending of Tactical and Strategic Levels. As the opponent's political infrastructure and civilian<br />

society become battlefield targets, blending of tactical and strategic levels will be witnessed. In<br />

future wars, spaces will remain important for the operational art and an operational commander<br />

will have to aim at denying critical spaces like population centres etc.<br />

<strong>OPINION</strong> <strong>Vol.1</strong> <strong>No.1</strong> 136 <strong>June</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!