OPINION Vol.1, No.1 June 2013 - National Defence University
OPINION Vol.1, No.1 June 2013 - National Defence University
OPINION Vol.1, No.1 June 2013 - National Defence University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• Terrorists now have transnational reach and affiliates and are hence able to unleash<br />
appalling attacks that will over shadow even attacks of 9/11.<br />
• Insurgencies are more complex as they combine ideology with hard core ideologues as<br />
leaders and unsatisfied citizens acting as foot soldiers. Insurgencies thus present both<br />
political and military challenges and can only be defeated through ideas. Al-Qaeda is a case<br />
in point as Salafist theology forms its bedrock and through its ideology it attracts the Muslim<br />
population besides justifying use of terror.<br />
Future Insurgencies. Future insurgencies will differ significantly from those of the 1960s 22 as:-<br />
• Historically, insurgencies were limited to a certain area; however future insurgencies will<br />
have transnational character like Al Qaeda 23 .<br />
• Increased fusion as a result of technology will allow national and transnational actors to<br />
swarm a state from within besides isolating it from international support 24 .<br />
• A number of insurgent groups with entirely different motives will co-exist in a geographical<br />
zone in a marriage of convenience 25 .<br />
• Power of narratives can be judged from the fact that a single narrative can nullify or<br />
seriously question intentions and thus put additional constraints and restraints over use of<br />
force and political liberty of action thereby outweighing progress as was observed time and<br />
again in SWA and Swat.<br />
• In history, insurgents were the initiators but now local armed forces can be portrayed as<br />
initiators through use of narratives and manipulation of media thus by implication projecting<br />
insurgents as victim instead of monster.<br />
• In the classic insurgencies, insurgent was dependant on population however; present and<br />
future insurgents may be wealthier thus changing the economic relationship between<br />
insurgent and population.<br />
• Insurgent tactics and weapons like IEDs, remote control bombs and sniping etc will<br />
simultaneously target security forces and the population thus weaning away the population<br />
besides raising questions about efficacy of some classical tactics like patrolling etc.<br />
Future of Fourth Generation Warfare. 4GW can then take the shape of either ‘compound 26 or<br />
hybrid wars’. 1971 India – Pakistan war in now Bangladesh and Vietnam War 27 are examples of<br />
compound wars in which irregular forces attacked weak areas while opposing conventional forces<br />
took advantage of resultant dispersion to concentrate. But in Compound Wars, forces lacked<br />
required fusion thus allowed the opponent to regroup and protract the conflict.<br />
Possibility of Transition to Fifth Generation Warfare. Future warriors will not be contend with<br />
compound wars and as technologies improve, might focus on lesser but more lethal attacks. Future<br />
warriors hence can either transit to 5 th GW or more complex hybrid wars. Evolution into 5GW<br />
seems distant as access to bio and nano technologies remains elusive for non-state actors, controls<br />
on air travel are further tightened and sea mode of travel comes under focus as a result of creation<br />
and operationalization of proliferation security initiative (PSI). The options of future terrorist while<br />
so limited might see him waging ‘open source warfare’ 28 in which networks of peers rather than<br />
the hierarchies will be relied upon. Multiple, smaller attacks are becoming a rational choice and<br />
already we can witness this in attacks on pipelines across Balochistan which caused losses worth<br />
millions. Even possession of bio and nano technologies thus might not fundamentally change<br />
character of war into 5GW in the absence of any durable war fighting idea and this new threat<br />
might also unfold as advanced form of Hybrid war.<br />
Transition to Hybrid Wars. Few important characteristics of Hybrid Wars or Sub conventional<br />
wars (SCW) 29 will be as under:-<br />
• Fusion of conventional and unconventional capabilities due to technology may be even more<br />
complex while also improving adaptation and learning.<br />
• Blurring and blending of lethality of state conflict with the protracted nature of irregular<br />
warfare will be witnessed 30 .<br />
<strong>OPINION</strong> <strong>Vol.1</strong> <strong>No.1</strong> 133 <strong>June</strong> <strong>2013</strong>