03.01.2015 Views

OPINION Vol.1, No.1 June 2013 - National Defence University

OPINION Vol.1, No.1 June 2013 - National Defence University

OPINION Vol.1, No.1 June 2013 - National Defence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Terrorists now have transnational reach and affiliates and are hence able to unleash<br />

appalling attacks that will over shadow even attacks of 9/11.<br />

• Insurgencies are more complex as they combine ideology with hard core ideologues as<br />

leaders and unsatisfied citizens acting as foot soldiers. Insurgencies thus present both<br />

political and military challenges and can only be defeated through ideas. Al-Qaeda is a case<br />

in point as Salafist theology forms its bedrock and through its ideology it attracts the Muslim<br />

population besides justifying use of terror.<br />

Future Insurgencies. Future insurgencies will differ significantly from those of the 1960s 22 as:-<br />

• Historically, insurgencies were limited to a certain area; however future insurgencies will<br />

have transnational character like Al Qaeda 23 .<br />

• Increased fusion as a result of technology will allow national and transnational actors to<br />

swarm a state from within besides isolating it from international support 24 .<br />

• A number of insurgent groups with entirely different motives will co-exist in a geographical<br />

zone in a marriage of convenience 25 .<br />

• Power of narratives can be judged from the fact that a single narrative can nullify or<br />

seriously question intentions and thus put additional constraints and restraints over use of<br />

force and political liberty of action thereby outweighing progress as was observed time and<br />

again in SWA and Swat.<br />

• In history, insurgents were the initiators but now local armed forces can be portrayed as<br />

initiators through use of narratives and manipulation of media thus by implication projecting<br />

insurgents as victim instead of monster.<br />

• In the classic insurgencies, insurgent was dependant on population however; present and<br />

future insurgents may be wealthier thus changing the economic relationship between<br />

insurgent and population.<br />

• Insurgent tactics and weapons like IEDs, remote control bombs and sniping etc will<br />

simultaneously target security forces and the population thus weaning away the population<br />

besides raising questions about efficacy of some classical tactics like patrolling etc.<br />

Future of Fourth Generation Warfare. 4GW can then take the shape of either ‘compound 26 or<br />

hybrid wars’. 1971 India – Pakistan war in now Bangladesh and Vietnam War 27 are examples of<br />

compound wars in which irregular forces attacked weak areas while opposing conventional forces<br />

took advantage of resultant dispersion to concentrate. But in Compound Wars, forces lacked<br />

required fusion thus allowed the opponent to regroup and protract the conflict.<br />

Possibility of Transition to Fifth Generation Warfare. Future warriors will not be contend with<br />

compound wars and as technologies improve, might focus on lesser but more lethal attacks. Future<br />

warriors hence can either transit to 5 th GW or more complex hybrid wars. Evolution into 5GW<br />

seems distant as access to bio and nano technologies remains elusive for non-state actors, controls<br />

on air travel are further tightened and sea mode of travel comes under focus as a result of creation<br />

and operationalization of proliferation security initiative (PSI). The options of future terrorist while<br />

so limited might see him waging ‘open source warfare’ 28 in which networks of peers rather than<br />

the hierarchies will be relied upon. Multiple, smaller attacks are becoming a rational choice and<br />

already we can witness this in attacks on pipelines across Balochistan which caused losses worth<br />

millions. Even possession of bio and nano technologies thus might not fundamentally change<br />

character of war into 5GW in the absence of any durable war fighting idea and this new threat<br />

might also unfold as advanced form of Hybrid war.<br />

Transition to Hybrid Wars. Few important characteristics of Hybrid Wars or Sub conventional<br />

wars (SCW) 29 will be as under:-<br />

• Fusion of conventional and unconventional capabilities due to technology may be even more<br />

complex while also improving adaptation and learning.<br />

• Blurring and blending of lethality of state conflict with the protracted nature of irregular<br />

warfare will be witnessed 30 .<br />

<strong>OPINION</strong> <strong>Vol.1</strong> <strong>No.1</strong> 133 <strong>June</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!