Accenture's fifth annual global e-government study
Accenture's fifth annual global e-government study
Accenture's fifth annual global e-government study
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Accenture Public Sector Value Model *<br />
The Accenture Public Sector Value Model was developed to address the challenge agencies face in developing<br />
a meaningful baseline for measuring performance and performance improvements. It proposes a more<br />
complete approach to measuring successful actions and provides a process for tracking progress over time.<br />
At its simplest, the Accenture Public Sector Value Model considers two levers of public value—outcomes and<br />
cost-effectiveness. By increasing one or the other, agencies can be understood to be creating value. By increasing<br />
one at the expense of the other, they can be understood to be making a trade-off between their two<br />
fundamental means of creating value. A decrease in both levers represents a clear reduction in public value.<br />
A Public Sector Value analysis defines outcomes for <strong>government</strong> agencies based on their:<br />
• Statutory purpose—What the agency is established to do (for example, a revenue agency is established to<br />
collect tax revenues; a school board is established to educate children; and a police force is established<br />
to maintain public order).<br />
• Stakeholder expectations—What the stakeholders expect of an agency as it performs its statutory duties<br />
(for example, that a social security agency’s interactions with citizens will be prompt, accurate and courteous<br />
and that a revenue agency will minimize the burden of compliance on businesses).<br />
These outcomes are weighted, based on relevant external factors for specific administrations. They are then<br />
measured using metrics, which can be grouped to develop an outcome score. Separately, the cost of the<br />
resources deployed in delivering these outcomes is calculated. Then, by dividing cost into outcomes a costeffectiveness<br />
score is developed (see Figure 16).<br />
Figure 16: A movement toward the top-right quadrant on the Accenture Public Sector Value<br />
Model graph represents real public-sector value creation<br />
Higher-performing<br />
public services<br />
Outcomes<br />
Lower-performing<br />
public services<br />
Cost-effectiveness<br />
• Outcomes are a weighted basket of social achievements<br />
Outcomes<br />
• Cost-effectiveness = (Annual expenditures - capital expenditure + capital charge)<br />
• Hypothesis = greater value is created through generating improved outcomes in a more cost-effective way<br />
A northeasterly movement on the Accenture Public Sector Value Model graph represents real public-sector value creation.<br />
Public-sector value is created as the delivery of outcomes is improved in a cost-effective fashion. Highperforming<br />
agencies will consistently increase the public-sector value they deliver year after year by a<br />
combination of service delivery improvements balanced by increases in cost-efficiency.<br />
The Accenture Public Sector Value Model cannot tell whether a <strong>government</strong> is performing well or badly.<br />
However, it can tell whether a <strong>government</strong> is doing better or worse from year to year, or whether it is performing<br />
better or worse than comparable agencies elsewhere. It can identify what actions were taken to<br />
cause improvements and help pinpoint problems. It should not replace other performance measures; rather, it<br />
complements these other approaches. Other performance measures—such as the balanced scorecard approach,<br />
the US Program Assessment Rating Tool or the UK Public Service Agreements—will still be required to measure<br />
whether an agency is being well run.<br />
* Patent pending.<br />
39