Accenture's fifth annual global e-government study
Accenture's fifth annual global e-government study
Accenture's fifth annual global e-government study
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The citizens’ view<br />
Current usage<br />
We found that eGovernment usage in general is<br />
concentrated at both ends of the Internet penetration<br />
spectrum. We attribute this to the fact that in<br />
high-penetration countries, such as the United<br />
States and Australia, people have experience with<br />
the Internet and have explored its potential for<br />
many uses. In lower penetration countries, such as<br />
France, Italy and Spain, the high enthusiasm of the<br />
early adopters also may lead them to explore. In<br />
contrast, some medium penetration countries, such<br />
as the United Kingdom, Ireland and Belgium, have<br />
the lowest usage rates of eGovernment services,<br />
suggesting the need for exposure to, and actual<br />
experience with, eGovernment to drive take-up.<br />
Germany’s Internet users were the least likely to<br />
have ever used eGovernment. Fewer than half of the<br />
country’s regular Internet users have ever used any<br />
eGovernment service at all.<br />
Figure 6 (below) presents a matrix that shows the<br />
state of eGovernment usage in the 12 countries<br />
surveyed. The four categories of usage are:<br />
• Formative: Below average Internet penetration<br />
and eGovernment use.<br />
• Niche: Below average Internet penetration and<br />
high levels of eGovernment use.<br />
• Stalled: Above average Internet penetration and<br />
below average eGovernment use.<br />
• Mass: Above average Internet penetration and<br />
high levels of eGovernment use.<br />
With the exception of Spain, Internet users’ preferred<br />
channel of interaction with the <strong>government</strong><br />
in all countries is indeed the Internet (even though<br />
a sizable minority still prefers in-person service). This<br />
trend was especially true in France and Italy. Again,<br />
this finding may reflect the enthusiasm for “all<br />
things Internet” among the early Internet adopters<br />
in these countries. Countries with lower levels of<br />
Figure 6: The state of eGovernment usage (countries are positioned relative to average Internet<br />
penetration and average eGovernment use)<br />
eGovernment use percentage<br />
100<br />
Niche<br />
Mass<br />
Low<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
Spain<br />
•<br />
France<br />
•<br />
Italy<br />
•<br />
Belgium<br />
•<br />
Singapore<br />
•<br />
United<br />
Kingdom<br />
•<br />
• Ireland<br />
Australia<br />
•<br />
Canada<br />
•<br />
United States<br />
•<br />
Sweden<br />
•<br />
Internet penetration<br />
High<br />
50<br />
Germany<br />
•<br />
40<br />
Formative<br />
Stalled<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90<br />
100<br />
24