02.01.2015 Views

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(j)<br />

The internal disciplinary process and the definition of police misconduct<br />

are set out in Part V of the Act.<br />

3. Criminal Code<br />

106. The Criminal Code 19 contains provisions dealing with the use of force by police<br />

officers. Section 25 provides protection where force is used in the administration or<br />

enforcement of the law. A police officer is, if he or she acts on reasonable grounds,<br />

justified in using as much force as is necessary for that purpose. <strong>In</strong> the case of force that<br />

causes death, the force will be considered justified if the officer believed on reasonable<br />

grounds that it was necessary for the self-preservation of the officer or the preservation<br />

of anyone under the officer’s protection from death or grievous bodily harm.<br />

107. <strong>In</strong> the case of a police officer who is lawfully arresting a person, if the person<br />

takes flight, the police officer is justified in using force that is intended or likely to cause<br />

death if the police officer believes on reasonable grounds that: the force is necessary to<br />

protect the police officer, anyone lawfully assisting the police officer, or any other<br />

person, from imminent or future death or grievous bodily harm; and that the flight<br />

cannot be prevented by reasonable means in a less violent manner. 20<br />

108. Section 26 of the Criminal Code clarifies that anyone who is authorized by law to<br />

use force is nonetheless criminally responsible for any excess thereof.<br />

109. I discuss the role of these Criminal Code provisions, and of the related case law<br />

interpreting them, in Chapter 10 (Use of Force).<br />

4. Common law<br />

110. <strong>Police</strong> officers who use lethal force, as well as the Toronto <strong>Police</strong> Services Board,<br />

may be subject to civil claims for recovery of damages in connection with a use of lethal<br />

force. A civil claim may be available, for example, for the tort of negligence or for an<br />

intentional tort such as assault or battery. The potential for civil liability (and criminal<br />

liability) in connection with the use of force is discussed in Chapter 10 (Use of Force),<br />

and is relevant to the issue of debriefing, which I discuss in Chapter 8 (Supervision).<br />

5. Human Rights Code<br />

111. Section 1 of the Ontario Human Rights Code forbids discrimination in the<br />

provision of a service to any person on the basis of disability. A disability includes,<br />

under section 10(1) of the Human Rights Code, a mental disorder, a condition of mental<br />

impairment, or a developmental disability.<br />

19<br />

R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46.<br />

20<br />

Id., s. 25(4).<br />

<strong>Police</strong> <strong>Encounters</strong> <strong>With</strong> <strong>People</strong> in <strong>Crisis</strong> |78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!