02.01.2015 Views

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

F. The legal context<br />

100. Before proceeding to Part 2 of the Report, which contains a detailed discussion<br />

and analysis of the issues forming part of the Review mandate, it is helpful to provide a<br />

summary of the legal context in which the issues arise.<br />

101. <strong>In</strong> one sense, the legal context is not directly relevant, because this Review is<br />

concerned with best practices, not with the minimum requirements for legal<br />

compliance. One of the main messages of this Report is that members of the TPS should<br />

strive for the optimal outcome, not just a lawful one. But the legal context is relevant for<br />

a different reason, because it helps to explain the powers of the police, the rights of the<br />

person in crisis, as well as the constraints within which both must operate.<br />

1. Mental Health Act and regulation<br />

102. The Ontario Mental Health Act is central in outlining both police powers and the<br />

rights of a person experiencing mental health issues. The statute is premised on the<br />

central principle that people, even if they are believed to be in need of observation, care,<br />

and treatment in a psychiatric facility, cannot be compelled to receive care and<br />

treatment except in a narrow range of circumstances. The liberty of the individual is<br />

given primacy in most cases.<br />

103. The major exception is where the person is reasonably believed to pose a danger<br />

of serious bodily harm or serious physical impairment to himself or herself, or a danger<br />

of serious bodily harm to another person. <strong>In</strong> such cases, under section 17 of the Mental<br />

Health Act, a police officer may apprehend the person, take the person into custody by<br />

force if necessary, and take the person to be examined by a physician. The police may<br />

also be involved in apprehending a person to be examined where a justice of the peace<br />

has issued an order for this purpose under section 16 of the Mental Health Act, and in<br />

certain other circumstances set out in the Act.<br />

104. Under section 33 of the Mental Health Act, a police officer who takes a person in<br />

custody to a psychiatric facility is required to remain at the facility and retain custody of<br />

the person until the facility takes custody of the person. Under section 7.2 of Regulation<br />

741 under the Act, 16 the officer in charge of the psychiatric facility or his or her delegate<br />

is required to ensure that a decision is made as soon as is reasonably possible as to<br />

whether or not the facility will take custody of the person. As explained below in Chapter<br />

4 (The <strong>Police</strong> and the Mental Health System in Toronto), the requirement for police to<br />

remain at the psychiatric facility is a controversial one, because hospital wait times for<br />

police can last for hours depending on the hospital, thus preventing police from<br />

returning to their police duties.<br />

2. <strong>Police</strong> Services Act and regulations<br />

105. I address the role of the <strong>Police</strong> Services Act and its regulations at various places<br />

throughout this Report. The key features of the legislation, for purposes of this Review,<br />

are the following:<br />

16<br />

R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 741.<br />

<strong>Police</strong> <strong>Encounters</strong> <strong>With</strong> <strong>People</strong> in <strong>Crisis</strong> |76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!