02.01.2015 Views

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

41. <strong>With</strong> respect to the person subject to police attention, the Review heard that use<br />

of clear, short commands is viewed by police as being most effective in gaining<br />

compliance from a subject who may be agitated, in crisis, dealing with his or her own<br />

fear response, and processing significant stimuli, including the presence of police. The<br />

rationale for such standard commands is that people are told exactly what they have to<br />

do in order to avoid, or stop, the police use of force.<br />

42. <strong>In</strong>dividuals suffering from auditory hallucinations or other crisis symptoms may<br />

have difficulty comprehending any instructions from a police officer. This raises the<br />

question of whether the <strong>Police</strong> Challenge is effective when used in encounters with some<br />

people in crisis. One police trainer expressed the view that repetition of the <strong>Police</strong><br />

Challenge may get through the various other stimuli facing a person in crisis more<br />

effectively than lengthier or less direct methods of communication. Conversely, some<br />

stakeholders suggested that the repetitive shouting of “Don’t Move” is inconsistent with<br />

the need to attempt de-escalation and to use compassion when responding to people in<br />

crisis who may be struggling to regain a sense of control over their actions and<br />

surroundings.<br />

3. Use of Force Review Committee<br />

43. The Service has established a Use of Force Review Committee, which is composed<br />

of members from both Area and Central Field Command, the Emergency Task Force<br />

(ETF), the Toronto <strong>Police</strong> College, the Professional Standards <strong>In</strong>vestigative Unit, and<br />

the Public Safety and Emergency Management Unit. The Committee reviews policy and<br />

training related recommendations from the professional standards unit after a Firearm<br />

Discharge Report is filed, and reviews other use of force incidents to assess the<br />

effectiveness of the Service’s training, practices, and associated governance. The<br />

Committee reports its findings to the TPS Senior Management Team, but no formal<br />

reports or minutes of proceedings are published.<br />

4. Procedure regarding notification of the ETF<br />

44. As discussed in Chapter 4 (The Mental Health System and the Toronto <strong>Police</strong><br />

Service), the ETF must be notified of certain incidents involving people in crisis, such as<br />

suicide intervention calls. <strong>In</strong> those circumstances, the ETF decides whether to attend the<br />

scene, based on the nature of incident and the ETF’s availability. If the ETF is<br />

dispatched, the role of the primary response officers is to control and contain the scene<br />

until the ETF arrives. Unless there is an immediate danger to life, those first responders<br />

are not permitted to enter the scene. However, primary response units are instructed to<br />

obtain as much information as possible pending the arrival of the ETF, including the<br />

person’s identity, physical description, mental and physical condition, previous history<br />

of interactions with police, and access to weapons.<br />

45. Similarly, the ETF may be requested to attend in high risk incidents, which may<br />

include a situation involving an armed or violent person in crisis. The role of the<br />

<strong>Police</strong> <strong>Encounters</strong> <strong>With</strong> <strong>People</strong> in <strong>Crisis</strong> |204

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!