02.01.2015 Views

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

52. Under the substance abuse procedure, all officers at all levels must, upon<br />

becoming aware of another officer’s possible substance abuse problem, “encourage the<br />

officer to seek assistance voluntarily before work performance or safety is affected,”<br />

“give immediate assistance, if required, and intervene by notifying a supervisor<br />

whenever a member’s behaviour creates a safety hazard,” and “follow up, if required, to<br />

provide the member with proper support and encouragement to resolve the problem.” 32<br />

When supervisory officers become aware of an officer who exhibits work performance<br />

concerns that may be related to substance abuse, supervisory officers are given<br />

comprehensive monitoring duties, including to:<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

(d)<br />

(e)<br />

“determine if there are any immediate fitness for duty or safety concerns;”<br />

“discuss performance concerns and expectations” with the officer;<br />

encourage the officer “to seek assistance, where appropriate;”<br />

advise the officer of “options available for assistance” including the EFAP<br />

and MAS;<br />

“follow up, if required, to provide the member with the proper support and<br />

encouragement;” and<br />

(f) “provide heightened performance monitoring.” 33<br />

53. No similar procedure exists with respect to other mental health concerns.<br />

54. Because supervisory officers are not specifically tasked with monitoring officers’<br />

overall mental health except in the case of fitness for duty concerns, the degree to which<br />

early intervention is undertaken in practice is largely dependent on the attitude and<br />

approach of individual unit commanders and other supervisory officers, as well as coach<br />

officers. The Review was advised by several individuals that, as a general matter, the<br />

Service’s culture does not emphasize ongoing monitoring, correction, learning, and<br />

counselling with respect to mental health issues. As a result, problems are usually<br />

addressed only when they become significant or worse.<br />

55. Part of the issue is that officers are concerned that they will suffer adverse<br />

professional consequences if they identify a need for help, or if supervisors intervene to<br />

suggest help. It is important to an effective mental health culture of continuous<br />

treatment and learning to ensure that members of the Service are encouraged to view<br />

mental healthcare as helpful and non-threatening. 34<br />

32<br />

Id. at s. 5.<br />

33<br />

Id. at ss. 7, 10.<br />

34<br />

Kurke & Scrivner, <strong>Police</strong> Psychology, supra note 26 at 59.<br />

<strong>Police</strong> <strong>Encounters</strong> <strong>With</strong> <strong>People</strong> in <strong>Crisis</strong> |189

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!