02.01.2015 Views

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

II. Overview of Issues Highlighted by Stakeholders<br />

62. Many of the individuals and organizations—both within and outside the TPS—<br />

who wrote to and met with the Review offered comments on the structure of supervision<br />

within the TPS. Some submissions recommended enhanced emphasis on the role of TPS<br />

procedures in guiding street-level decision making, suggesting that currently procedures<br />

are used mostly to justify conduct after an incident. Others suggested that the current<br />

police hierarchy is not conducive to upstream feedback on supervisors or training. The<br />

importance of debriefing encounters with people in crisis was repeatedly noted, and<br />

many stakeholders recognized the need to protect the debriefing process from disclosure<br />

in criminal and civil litigation in order to promote truthful, constructive dialogue.<br />

63. The Review received many submissions requesting that supervisors reinforce deescalation<br />

and broader crisis training at the divisional level through debriefing,<br />

recognitions for effective approaches to crisis situations, and regular discussions of the<br />

different techniques for dealing with people in crisis. Stakeholders further suggested<br />

that communication and de-escalation skills should be given more emphasis in<br />

performance reviews and consideration for promotions. An innovative proposal was<br />

made to implement one dedicated mental health supervisor in each division—a highly<br />

trained individual who could champion mental health issues within the division,<br />

facilitate debriefing, training and other discussions on responses to people in crisis, and<br />

act as a resource for officers. Such a role could be incorporated into the mental health<br />

liaison position that already exists at the divisional level, but is currently focused on<br />

coordinating with external community agencies.<br />

III.<br />

Recommendations<br />

64. I recommend that:<br />

Coach officers and supervisors<br />

RECOMMENDATION 24: The TPS further refine its selection and evaluation<br />

process for coach officers and supervisory officers to ensure that the individuals<br />

in these roles are best equipped to advise officers on appropriate responses to<br />

people in crisis; in particular, that the TPS:<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

Consider requiring additional mental health training and/or<br />

experience for candidates interested in coach officer and sergeant<br />

positions, such as CIT training or MCIT experience;<br />

Create an evaluation mechanism through which officers can provide<br />

anonymous feedback on their coach officers or supervisors,<br />

including feedback on their skills regarding people in crisis; and<br />

Ensure performance evaluation processes for supervisors include<br />

evaluation of both their skills regarding mental health and crisis<br />

response, as well as their monitoring of their subordinates’ mental<br />

health and wellness;<br />

<strong>Police</strong> <strong>Encounters</strong> <strong>With</strong> <strong>People</strong> in <strong>Crisis</strong> |173

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!