Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

davidpleonard
from davidpleonard More from this publisher
02.01.2015 Views

the TPS must participate in an annual performance review, which involves a written evaluation by their supervisors. Supervisors must rank officers as to whether they meet, exceed, or do not meet expectations in a variety of performance categories, including personal, technical and core competencies. Supervisors are expected to discuss with the officer his or her responsibilities and development plan, as well as ensure that he or she has received sufficient human rights training. 28 42. There are also opportunities for informal feedback and evaluation, such as debriefing incidents that occurred during a shift or reviewing Use of Force Reports to identify training needs. However, it is difficult to implement quality controls on these measures because each supervisor may use these opportunities with varying frequency and levels of focus. 43. The Review heard that the Service faces challenges in making the annual performance review process constructive and meaningful for members. Officers may not take evaluations seriously unless they are accompanied by positive or negative consequences, such as promotions, awards, training requirements, or disciplinary measures. As discussed below, the legislative framework for police discipline and dismissal makes it difficult for the TPS to correct performance through disciplinary action. In this respect, the Service differs from most other professions, where it is understood that poor performance can lead to dismissal, even when the individual has not been disciplined or found guilty of misconduct. 44. The performance review process can be used to ensure that officers receive positive reinforcement for appropriately de-escalating situations with people in crisis. Such skills should be evaluated and noted in the review process, and officers who have excellent de-escalation and communication skills should be recognized at the divisional and service-wide levels. Similarly, performance reviews that reflect the quality of officers’ skills in managing mental health crises could be very useful in the promotional process. De-escalation and communication skills, as well as experience, should be considered when assessing candidates for promotion to higher ranks and specialty units. E. Discipline 1. Applicable legislation 45. The Police Services Act (PSA) governs complaints against officers made to the Office of the Independent Police Review Director (OIPRD) and to the TPS directly. 29 Regardless of whether the OIPRD refers complaints against officers to the Chief of Police, a member of the public makes a local complaint to the TPS, or the Chief of Police makes a complaint about a TPS member, the issue is dealt with through internal discipline procedures. The focus of this section is on those internal procedures. 28 Toronto Police Service, 809 “Uniform Performance Appraisal and Development Plan: Constable” (Toronto, ON: Toronto Police Service, 2o12); see also Toronto Police Service, Uniform Performance Appraisal and Development Plan – User Guide (Toronto, ON: Toronto Police Service, 2002). 29 Police Services Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P-15 [PSA]; Public Complaints - Local Complaints, O. Reg. 263/09 [Complaints]. Police Encounters With People in Crisis |167

46. Upon receipt of a complaint from a member of the public against a police officer, the Chief of Police must ensure an investigation is conducted and must review a written report of the findings. 30 If the complaint is unsubstantiated, the Chief of Police must notify the complainant, the officer and the OIPRD that no action will be taken. 31 If the investigation reveals misconduct that is not “of a serious nature,” the Chief of Police may resolve the complaint informally with the consent of the complainant and the officer. 32 Similarly, local complaints can be addressed by way of alternative dispute resolution with the consent of the officer and the complainant. 33 Penalties imposed by way of informal resolution are expunged from the officer’s employment record after two years if there are no subsequent findings of misconduct. 34 If the report provides reasonable grounds to believe the officer’s conduct constitutes misconduct or unsatisfactory work performance, the Chief of Police “shall hold a hearing.” 35 47. The Chief of Police may make a complaint about any member of the TPS other than a deputy chief and, subject to approval by the TPSB, may ask another police service to conduct the investigation of such a complaint. 36 When a complaint is made against the Chief of Police or a Deputy Chief of Police, the TPSB is required to review the matter. 37 If the Board finds the impugned conduct may constitute misconduct, unsatisfactory work performance, or an offence under a provincial or federal law, the OIPRD must investigate and issue a written report. 38 Upon receipt of the OIPRD report, the TPSB has the same powers to dismiss the complaint, resolve it informally, or refer the issue to a hearing. 39 48. This Review is not focused on complaints filed by members of the TPS against their colleagues. However, the 2003 the Ferguson Report did note that it is critical to create a safe environment for whistle blowers in order to establish a proactive system for detecting misconduct within the Service. 40 The kind of culture shift required to prevent the stigmatization of officers who report misconduct perpetrated by their peers will take time and commitment from senior management. This process can be aided, however, by including information in internal training and reference material on how to make a complaint or report misconduct committed by another officer. TPS must also hold supervisors accountable for failing to identify and rectify behaviour that falls short of the expected standards, especially with respect to incidents involving people in crisis. 30 PSA, id., s. 66(1). 31 Id., s. 66(2). 32 Id., s. 66(4). 33 Complaints, supra note 29, s. 4. 34 PSA, supra note 29, s. 66(12). 35 Id., s. 66(3). 36 Id., s. 76(1)(4). 37 Id., s. 69(1). 38 Id., s. 69(2). 39 Id., s. 69(4)(8)(9). 40 Ferguson, Review, supra note 8 at 27. Police Encounters With People in Crisis |168

46. Upon receipt of a complaint from a member of the public against a police officer,<br />

the Chief of <strong>Police</strong> must ensure an investigation is conducted and must review a written<br />

report of the findings. 30 If the complaint is unsubstantiated, the Chief of <strong>Police</strong> must<br />

notify the complainant, the officer and the OIPRD that no action will be taken. 31 If the<br />

investigation reveals misconduct that is not “of a serious nature,” the Chief of <strong>Police</strong> may<br />

resolve the complaint informally with the consent of the complainant and the officer. 32<br />

Similarly, local complaints can be addressed by way of alternative dispute resolution<br />

with the consent of the officer and the complainant. 33 Penalties imposed by way of<br />

informal resolution are expunged from the officer’s employment record after two years<br />

if there are no subsequent findings of misconduct. 34 If the report provides reasonable<br />

grounds to believe the officer’s conduct constitutes misconduct or unsatisfactory work<br />

performance, the Chief of <strong>Police</strong> “shall hold a hearing.” 35<br />

47. The Chief of <strong>Police</strong> may make a complaint about any member of the TPS other<br />

than a deputy chief and, subject to approval by the TPSB, may ask another police service<br />

to conduct the investigation of such a complaint. 36 When a complaint is made against<br />

the Chief of <strong>Police</strong> or a Deputy Chief of <strong>Police</strong>, the TPSB is required to review the<br />

matter. 37 If the Board finds the impugned conduct may constitute misconduct,<br />

unsatisfactory work performance, or an offence under a provincial or federal law, the<br />

OIPRD must investigate and issue a written report. 38 Upon receipt of the OIPRD report,<br />

the TPSB has the same powers to dismiss the complaint, resolve it informally, or refer<br />

the issue to a hearing. 39<br />

48. This Review is not focused on complaints filed by members of the TPS against<br />

their colleagues. However, the 2003 the Ferguson Report did note that it is critical to<br />

create a safe environment for whistle blowers in order to establish a proactive system for<br />

detecting misconduct within the Service. 40 The kind of culture shift required to prevent<br />

the stigmatization of officers who report misconduct perpetrated by their peers will take<br />

time and commitment from senior management. This process can be aided, however, by<br />

including information in internal training and reference material on how to make a<br />

complaint or report misconduct committed by another officer. TPS must also hold<br />

supervisors accountable for failing to identify and rectify behaviour that falls short of the<br />

expected standards, especially with respect to incidents involving people in crisis.<br />

30<br />

PSA, id., s. 66(1).<br />

31<br />

Id., s. 66(2).<br />

32<br />

Id., s. 66(4).<br />

33<br />

Complaints, supra note 29, s. 4.<br />

34<br />

PSA, supra note 29, s. 66(12).<br />

35<br />

Id., s. 66(3).<br />

36<br />

Id., s. 76(1)(4).<br />

37<br />

Id., s. 69(1).<br />

38<br />

Id., s. 69(2).<br />

39<br />

Id., s. 69(4)(8)(9).<br />

40<br />

Ferguson, Review, supra note 8 at 27.<br />

<strong>Police</strong> <strong>Encounters</strong> <strong>With</strong> <strong>People</strong> in <strong>Crisis</strong> |168

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!