02.01.2015 Views

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

Police-Encounters-With-People-In-Crisis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

involved in TPS efforts in this area. The Mental Health Sub-Committee was established<br />

in 2009 to examine the complex policing issues related to mental health. It is designed<br />

to be a mechanism to facilitate ongoing dialogue with the community and other mental<br />

health-related stakeholders in order to enable the TPSB to address mental health issues<br />

in an informed manner. 84<br />

98. As mentioned in Chapter 3 (Context), the Sub-Committee’s composition is an<br />

important mechanism through which the perspective of those who have experienced<br />

mental health issues is brought to bear. The Sub-Committee is co-chaired by a leading<br />

advocate on behalf of those with mental health issues and by the Chair of the TPSB.<br />

Members also include representatives from mental health treatment organizations, the<br />

TPSB, the Service, and the wider community.<br />

99. One of the Sub-Committee’s main initiatives has been its community<br />

consultation process, conducted through public meetings and written submissions,<br />

concerning the Service’s potential expansion of use of CEWs. The Sub-Committee<br />

produced a report that summarizes its consultations, and recommended that CEW use<br />

not be expanded at this time. The report raised key concerns, including the position that<br />

CEWs should not be considered a substitute for de-escalation and communication, and<br />

that there is a paucity of medical evidence regarding the health effects of CEWs, among<br />

other concerns. 85 The majority of deputants supported that view.<br />

100. The Sub-Committee has also played an active role in reviewing, and<br />

recommending improvements to, training and the Service’s initiatives for helping<br />

people in crisis, including the MCIT.<br />

101. <strong>In</strong> spite of the positive effort undertaken to create the Mental Health Sub-<br />

Committee, a wide variety of stakeholders and others who spoke to the Review<br />

expressed the view that there still is insufficient contact between people with mental<br />

illness and individual police officers outside of ordinary policing duties. Many people<br />

suggested that there is a mutual stigma between people with mental illness and police<br />

officers, which can be reduced if the two groups spend more time with each other and<br />

become more familiar on an individual level.<br />

7. <strong>In</strong>formation sharing, privacy, and physician-patient<br />

confidentiality<br />

102. <strong>In</strong>formation-sharing issues are an obstacle to effective coordination between the<br />

TPS and the mental health system with respect to people in crisis. <strong>In</strong>dividuals have a<br />

reasonable expectation of privacy in their healthcare information, as protected by the<br />

Personal Health <strong>In</strong>formation Protection Act, 2004 (PHIPA), 86 and healthcare<br />

institutions must protect physician-patient confidentiality.<br />

84<br />

Alok Mukherjee, “Submission from Community Members of the Board’s Mental Health Sub-Committee Regarding Expanded<br />

Deployment of Conducted Energy Weapons” (Report presented to the Toronto <strong>Police</strong> Services Board, 8 October 2013), online:<br />

Canadian Mental Health Association at 13-14.<br />

85<br />

Id. at 16-17.<br />

86<br />

Personal Health <strong>In</strong>formation Protection Act, 2004, S.O. 2004, c. 3, Sch. A.<br />

<strong>Police</strong> <strong>Encounters</strong> <strong>With</strong> <strong>People</strong> in <strong>Crisis</strong> |106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!