02.01.2015 Views

A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...

A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...

A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.4. Results 79<br />

to become a WR star. To estim<strong>at</strong>e the number <strong>of</strong> WR stars <strong>in</strong> a <strong>resolved</strong> cluster it is<br />

only necessary to count them. For an un<strong>resolved</strong> cluster, the equivalent width <strong>of</strong> the blue<br />

bump (WR λ 4650) or the r<strong>at</strong>io between this bump and the Hβ emission l<strong>in</strong>e are used as<br />

diagnostics. The values <strong>of</strong> these quantities <strong>in</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest (2-6 Myr) depends strongly<br />

on metallicity.<br />

We have detected the blue bump <strong>in</strong> several fibers on the IFU d<strong>at</strong>a, while the red bump was<br />

only marg<strong>in</strong>ally detected when summ<strong>in</strong>g the emission <strong>of</strong> the whole knot A. In Figure 3.21 we<br />

show the broad emission <strong>of</strong> both the blue and red bumps (the last one very weakly detected)<br />

for the <strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>at</strong>ed flux for knot A. The blue bump is remarkably strong <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

spectrum <strong>of</strong> this knot. In section 3.4.8 the <strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>at</strong>ed properties <strong>of</strong> the knots are described.<br />

Figure 3.22 shows the WR sp<strong>at</strong>ial distribution <strong>in</strong> the PPak field. The filled dark (violet)<br />

<strong>regions</strong> represent the fiber detections <strong>of</strong> the blue WR bump. On the upper panel the Hα<br />

contours are overplotted, while <strong>in</strong> the lower panel the cont<strong>in</strong>uum contours near the WR<br />

emission (∼ λ 4500 Å) are shown. The filled <strong>regions</strong> only represent positions <strong>of</strong> the WR stars<br />

<strong>in</strong> the field, not <strong>in</strong>tensity. Clear detections where found <strong>in</strong> 10 fibers <strong>of</strong> knot A, correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to the extended region <strong>in</strong> th<strong>at</strong> loc<strong>at</strong>ion. On the other hand, only <strong>in</strong> one fiber <strong>of</strong> knot B was<br />

found a weak blue bump, while <strong>in</strong> knot C two fibers showed a medium-<strong>in</strong>tensity fe<strong>at</strong>ure.<br />

As it is clearly seen, the loc<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the bumps follow very well the morphology <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uum emission adjacent to the WR blue bump. We also verified th<strong>at</strong> the maximum <strong>of</strong><br />

the cont<strong>in</strong>uum emission adjacent to Hβ corresponds <strong>sp<strong>at</strong>ially</strong> to the WR bumps <strong>in</strong>tensity<br />

maximum. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, knot B shows a weak WR blue bump. Although the cont<strong>in</strong>uum<br />

there has very low surface brightness, the local peak <strong>in</strong>tensity m<strong>at</strong>ches as well the position<br />

or the detected fe<strong>at</strong>ure. As we see from top panel <strong>of</strong> Figure 3.22, the loc<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the WR blue<br />

bump co<strong>in</strong>cides with the morphology <strong>of</strong> the Hα emission, although there are slight <strong>of</strong>fsets<br />

from their peak <strong>in</strong>tensity, particularly <strong>in</strong> knots B and C.<br />

The bumps have been measured <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g way. First a cont<strong>in</strong>uum shape has been<br />

adopted and we have measured the broad emission over this cont<strong>in</strong>uum <strong>in</strong> the wavelengths<br />

<strong>of</strong> the blue bump, <strong>at</strong> 4650 Å. F<strong>in</strong>ally, we have subtracted the emission <strong>of</strong> the narrower l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

not emitted by the WR w<strong>in</strong>ds, which are [Feiii] 4658 Å, Heii 4686 Å, Hei + [Ariv] 4711<br />

Å and [Ariv] 4740 Å <strong>in</strong> the blue bump (although these last two l<strong>in</strong>es present very small<br />

contribution). The dereddened rel<strong>at</strong>ive <strong>in</strong>tensities and the equivalent widths <strong>of</strong> the blue<br />

bump are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 3.3. Although some contribution <strong>of</strong> the red bump was found <strong>in</strong><br />

knots A and C, the flux could not be measured with an acceptable accuracy. No detection <strong>of</strong><br />

blue or red bump was found <strong>in</strong> knot D. All measurements were performed <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

spectra from the mosaic, so th<strong>at</strong> the reported values have been derived from absolute fluxes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!