A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...
A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ... A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...
76 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 log [OIII]5007/Hβ −0.8−0.6−0.4−0.2 −1.2 −0.8 −0.4 0.0 log [NII]6584/Hα −1.2 −0.8 −0.4 0.0 log [SII]6717,31/Hα Figure 3.19: Diagnostic diagrams derived from different line ratios. Left panel: Relation between [Oiii] λ 5007/Hβ and [Nii] λ 6584/Hα. Right panel: Relation between [Oiii] λ 5007/Hβ and [Sii] λλ 6717,6731/Hα. The solid curve represents the theoretical maximum starburst line (Kewley et al., 2001). It should be noted the variation of the [Oiii] λ 5007/Hβ ratio across the region, of about 0.8 dex. This is comparable with the spread found in Hii galaxies, as in the case of IIZw70 (Kehrig et al., 2008). On the other hand, the variation in the [Nii] λ 6584/Hα and [Sii] λλ 6717,6731/Hα ratios are lower. Numerically, the field average ratio of log([Oiii] λ 5007/- Hβ) = -0.08 ± 0.16, log([Nii] λ 6584/Hα) = -0.58 ± 0.07 and log([Sii] λλ 6717,6731/Hα) = -0.54 ± 0.10 (1σ errors). A spatial representation of these three line ratios is shown in Figure 3.20. For the sake of clarity and comparison, Hα is also included in the upper left panel, corrected for reddening. Unlike the reddening map, the structures that appear in the excitation maps are much simpler. In terms of the main four knots, particularly knot A, there is a very good correlation between the value of the intensity of Hα and the value of the ratio, being negative the sign of the correlation for ratios log([Sii] λλ 6717,6731/Hα) and log([Nii] λ 6584/Hα) and positive for the ratio log([Oiii] λ 5007/Hβ). As it was mentioned before, this is the expected behaviour if in the central zones of the Hii region the sulphur, nitrogen and, oxygen were twice ionized, while only once in the surroundings due to the increasing distance from the young stellar cluster or ionizing source.
60¡DEC (arcsec) 60¡DEC (arcsec) 60¡DEC (arcsec) 60¡DEC (arcsec) 3.4. Results 77 log([OIII]/Hβ) 2441 0.44 50 922 50 0.32 Hα 349 0.19 40 133 40 0.07 30 51 30 -0.06 20 20 20 -0.18 9 -0.31 10 4 10 -0.43 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 RA (arcsec) 3 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 RA (arcsec) -0.56 log([SII]/Hα) log([NII]/Hα) -0.32 -0.44 50 -0.41 50 -0.49 -0.50 -0.54 40 -0.59 40 -0.58 30 -0.68 30 -0.63 20 -0.77 20 -0.68 -0.86 -0.73 10 -0.95 10 -0.78 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 RA (arcsec) -1.04 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 RA (arcsec) -0.83 Figure 3.20: Upper left panel: Hα flux map (corrected for reddening). The scale bar is given in units of 10 −16 erg s −1 cm −2 . This map is included as reference for the excitation maps. Upper right panel: Flux ratio map of log([Oiii] λ 5007/Hβ). Lower left panel: Flux ratio map of log([Sii] λλ 6717,6731/Hα). Lower right panel: Flux ratio map of log([Nii] λ 6584/Hα).
- Page 46 and 47: 26 2 • The star formation history
- Page 48 and 49: 28 2 • The star formation history
- Page 50 and 51: 30 2 • The star formation history
- Page 52 and 53: 32 2 • The star formation history
- Page 54 and 55: 34 2 • The star formation history
- Page 56 and 57: 36 2 • The star formation history
- Page 58 and 59: 38 2 • The star formation history
- Page 60 and 61: 40 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 62 and 63: 42 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 64 and 65: 44 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 66 and 67: 46 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 68 and 69: 48 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 70 and 71: 50 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 72 and 73: 52 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 74 and 75: 54 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 76 and 77: 56 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 78 and 79: 58 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 80 and 81: 60 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 82 and 83: 62 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 84 and 85: 64 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 86 and 87: 66 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 88 and 89: 68 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 90 and 91: 70 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 92 and 93: 72 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 94 and 95: 74 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 98 and 99: 78 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 100 and 101: 80 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 102 and 103: 82 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 104 and 105: β[H 84 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC
- Page 106 and 107: 86 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 108 and 109: 88 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 110 and 111: 90 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 112 and 113: 92 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 114 and 115: 94 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 116 and 117: 96 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 118 and 119: 98 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 120 and 121: 100 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 122 and 123: 102 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 124 and 125: 104 3 • IFS of a GEHR in NGC 6946
- Page 126 and 127: 106 4 • Long-slit spectrophotomet
- Page 128 and 129: 108 4 • Long-slit spectrophotomet
- Page 130 and 131: 110 4 • Long-slit spectrophotomet
- Page 132 and 133: 112 4 • Long-slit spectrophotomet
- Page 134 and 135: 114 4 • Long-slit spectrophotomet
- Page 136 and 137: Hδ 116 4 • Long-slit spectrophot
- Page 138 and 139: 118 4 • Long-slit spectrophotomet
- Page 140 and 141: 120 4 • Long-slit spectrophotomet
- Page 142 and 143: 122 4 • Long-slit spectrophotomet
- Page 144 and 145: Table 4.4 continued SDSS J1657 Knot
76 3 • IFS <strong>of</strong> a GEHR <strong>in</strong> NGC 6946<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
log [OIII]5007/Hβ<br />
−0.8−0.6−0.4−0.2<br />
−1.2 −0.8 −0.4 0.0<br />
log [NII]6584/Hα<br />
−1.2 −0.8 −0.4 0.0<br />
log [SII]6717,31/Hα<br />
Figure 3.19: Diagnostic diagrams derived from <strong>different</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e r<strong>at</strong>ios. Left panel: Rel<strong>at</strong>ion between<br />
[Oiii] λ 5007/Hβ and [Nii] λ 6584/Hα. Right panel: Rel<strong>at</strong>ion between [Oiii] λ 5007/Hβ and<br />
[Sii] λλ 6717,6731/Hα. The solid curve represents the theoretical maximum starburst l<strong>in</strong>e (Kewley<br />
et al., 2001).<br />
It should be noted the vari<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the [Oiii] λ 5007/Hβ r<strong>at</strong>io across the region, <strong>of</strong><br />
about 0.8 dex. This is comparable with the spread found <strong>in</strong> Hii <strong>galaxies</strong>, as <strong>in</strong> the case<br />
<strong>of</strong> IIZw70 (Kehrig et al., 2008). On the other hand, the vari<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> the [Nii] λ 6584/Hα and<br />
[Sii] λλ 6717,6731/Hα r<strong>at</strong>ios are lower. Numerically, the field average r<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> log([Oiii] λ 5007/-<br />
Hβ) = -0.08 ± 0.16, log([Nii] λ 6584/Hα) = -0.58 ± 0.07 and log([Sii] λλ 6717,6731/Hα) =<br />
-0.54 ± 0.10 (1σ errors).<br />
A sp<strong>at</strong>ial represent<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> these three l<strong>in</strong>e r<strong>at</strong>ios is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.20. For the sake <strong>of</strong><br />
clarity and comparison, Hα is also <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the upper left panel, corrected for redden<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Unlike the redden<strong>in</strong>g map, the structures th<strong>at</strong> appear <strong>in</strong> the excit<strong>at</strong>ion maps are much<br />
simpler. In terms <strong>of</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> four knots, particularly knot A, there is a very good correl<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
between the value <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong> Hα and the value <strong>of</strong> the r<strong>at</strong>io, be<strong>in</strong>g neg<strong>at</strong>ive the sign<br />
<strong>of</strong> the correl<strong>at</strong>ion for r<strong>at</strong>ios log([Sii] λλ 6717,6731/Hα) and log([Nii] λ 6584/Hα) and positive<br />
for the r<strong>at</strong>io log([Oiii] λ 5007/Hβ). As it was mentioned before, this is the expected behaviour<br />
if <strong>in</strong> the central zones <strong>of</strong> the Hii region the sulphur, nitrogen and, oxygen were twice <strong>ionized</strong>,<br />
while only once <strong>in</strong> the surround<strong>in</strong>gs due to the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g distance from the young stellar<br />
cluster or ioniz<strong>in</strong>g source.