02.01.2015 Views

A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...

A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...

A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.4. Results 67<br />

emission l<strong>in</strong>e, us<strong>in</strong>g a low order polynomial function to describe the cont<strong>in</strong>uum emission.<br />

Instead <strong>of</strong> fitt<strong>in</strong>g the entire wavelength range <strong>in</strong> a row, we used shorter wavelength ranges<br />

for each spectrum th<strong>at</strong> sampled one or a few <strong>of</strong> the analyzed emission l<strong>in</strong>es. For example,<br />

an <strong>in</strong>terval <strong>of</strong> 4800 to 5100 Å was used for measur<strong>in</strong>g Hβ and [Oiii] λλ 4959,5007 Å. This<br />

ensures a characteriz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the cont<strong>in</strong>uum with the most simple polynomial function, and<br />

a way to simplify the fitt<strong>in</strong>g procedure. The s<strong>of</strong>tware also allows def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> emission l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

systems. This l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g method is useful to fit l<strong>in</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> share some properties (e.g., l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

th<strong>at</strong> are k<strong>in</strong>em<strong>at</strong>ically coupled with the same width) or <strong>in</strong>clude l<strong>in</strong>es whose l<strong>in</strong>e r<strong>at</strong>io is<br />

known (e.g., the l<strong>in</strong>e r<strong>at</strong>io between [Oiii] λ 4959 Å and [Oiii] λ 5007 Å). This was essential for<br />

accur<strong>at</strong>e deblend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>es, when necessary. Follow<strong>in</strong>g Gonzalez-Delgado et al. (1994),<br />

Castellanos et al. (2002) and Pérez-Montero and Díaz (2003), the st<strong>at</strong>istical errors associ<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

with the observed emission fluxes have been calcul<strong>at</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g the expression:<br />

σ l = σ c<br />

√N<br />

(<br />

1 + EW )<br />

N∆<br />

where σ l is the error <strong>in</strong> the observed l<strong>in</strong>e flux, σ c represents the standard devi<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> a box<br />

near the measured emission l<strong>in</strong>e and stands for the error <strong>in</strong> the cont<strong>in</strong>uum placement, N is<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> pixels used <strong>in</strong> the measurement <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>e flux, EW is the l<strong>in</strong>e equivalent<br />

width <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>e, and ∆ is the wavelength dispersion <strong>in</strong> Å per pixel. This expression takes<br />

<strong>in</strong>to account the error <strong>in</strong> the cont<strong>in</strong>uum and the photon count st<strong>at</strong>istics <strong>of</strong> the emission l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

The procedure <strong>of</strong> fitt<strong>in</strong>g all desired emission l<strong>in</strong>es has the advantage <strong>of</strong> cre<strong>at</strong><strong>in</strong>g flux<br />

maps <strong>of</strong> any l<strong>in</strong>e with the cont<strong>in</strong>uum subtracted. This is not the case <strong>of</strong> narrow-band imag<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

where a careful clean<strong>in</strong>g method has to be applied to obta<strong>in</strong> free-cont<strong>in</strong>uum images.<br />

Moreover, sometimes these narrow-band images <strong>in</strong>clude more than one l<strong>in</strong>e (e.g., Hα, the<br />

[Nii] λλ 6548,6584 Å doublet or the [Sii] λλ 6717,6731 Å doublet), reduc<strong>in</strong>g its usability to<br />

<strong>study</strong> the basic parameters <strong>of</strong> the <strong>ionized</strong> gas. This another advantage <strong>of</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g IFU d<strong>at</strong>a.<br />

In order to handle the d<strong>at</strong>a obta<strong>in</strong>ed from FIT3D and analyze them, we have built two<br />

python modules called pyfit3D and pyabund. The comb<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> both modules allows to<br />

cre<strong>at</strong>e maps from emission l<strong>in</strong>e measurements and clipp<strong>in</strong>g the d<strong>at</strong>a accord<strong>in</strong>g to a certa<strong>in</strong><br />

value. This is useful if there are d<strong>at</strong>a th<strong>at</strong> needs mask<strong>in</strong>g, as <strong>in</strong> the case when errors <strong>in</strong><br />

the flux measurement or <strong>in</strong> the r<strong>at</strong>ios from a comb<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> several l<strong>in</strong>es are too high. The<br />

first module also conta<strong>in</strong>s a general rout<strong>in</strong>e for autom<strong>at</strong>ic measurement <strong>of</strong> flux emission<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es for fits files <strong>of</strong> any dimension, <strong>in</strong> particular for RSS files. It is based on the ngaussfit<br />

task from IRAF. We have measured the Hα flux <strong>in</strong> the blue RSS with the pyfit3D task.<br />

The comparison <strong>of</strong> these results with the ones obta<strong>in</strong>ed with FIT3D gives the same flux<br />

measurement for each spaxel, with<strong>in</strong> the errors. This is not supris<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce both codes uses<br />

a similar algorithm for fitt<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es. The module pyabund also conta<strong>in</strong>s a rout<strong>in</strong>e which<br />

performs the abundance analysis and estim<strong>at</strong>es the physical properties from a table which<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>s the flux l<strong>in</strong>e measurements and their correspond<strong>in</strong>g errors.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!