02.01.2015 Views

A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...

A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...

A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.3. Results 129<br />

and the N/H r<strong>at</strong>io as:<br />

N<br />

O = N +<br />

O +<br />

log N H = log N O + log O H<br />

Neon is only visible <strong>in</strong> all the spectra via the [Neiii] emission l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>at</strong> λ3868 Å, then Ne 2+<br />

has been derived us<strong>in</strong>g this l<strong>in</strong>e. For this ion we have taken the electron temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong><br />

[Oiii], as represent<strong>at</strong>ive <strong>of</strong> the high excit<strong>at</strong>ion zone ((T e ([Neiii]) ≈ T e ([Oiii]); Peimbert and<br />

Costero, 1969). Classically, the total abundance <strong>of</strong> neon has been calcul<strong>at</strong>ed assum<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>at</strong><br />

Ne<br />

O<br />

= Ne2+<br />

O 2+<br />

Izotov et al. (2004) po<strong>in</strong>t out th<strong>at</strong> this assumption can lead to an overestim<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Ne/H<br />

<strong>in</strong> objects with low excit<strong>at</strong>ion, where the charge transfer between O 2+ and H 0 becomes<br />

important. Thus, we have used the follow<strong>in</strong>g expression for the ICF (Pérez-Montero et al.,<br />

2007):<br />

ICF (Ne 2+ ) ≈ 0.753 + 0.142 ·<br />

O 2+<br />

O + + O 2+ + 0.171 · O+ + O 2+<br />

O 2+<br />

Given the high excit<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the observed objects there are no significant differences<br />

between the total neon abundance derived us<strong>in</strong>g this ICF and those estim<strong>at</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

classical approxim<strong>at</strong>ion: Ne/O ≈ Ne 2+ /O 2+ .<br />

The only accessible emission l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> argon <strong>in</strong> the optical spectra <strong>of</strong> <strong>ionized</strong> <strong>regions</strong> correspond<br />

to Ar 2+ and Ar 3+ . The abundance <strong>of</strong> Ar 2+ has been calcul<strong>at</strong>ed from the measured<br />

[Ariii] λ 7136 Å l<strong>in</strong>e emission assum<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>at</strong> T e ([Ariii]) ≈ T e ([Siii]) (Garnett, 1992). No [Ariv]<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e has been found <strong>in</strong> the spectra.<br />

The total abundance <strong>of</strong> Ar was then calcul<strong>at</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g the ICF(Ar 2+ ) derived from photoioniz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

models by Pérez-Montero et al. (2007):<br />

(<br />

ICF (Ar 2+ ) = 0.749 + 0.507 · 1 −<br />

O 2+ )<br />

(<br />

O + + O 2+ + +0.0604 · 1 −<br />

O 2+<br />

O + + O 2+ ) −1<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, for iron (only measured <strong>in</strong> Knot A <strong>of</strong> J1657) we have used the emission l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

[Feiii] λ 4658 Å to calcul<strong>at</strong>e Fe 2+ assum<strong>in</strong>g T e ([Feiii]) ≈ T e ([Oiii]).<br />

The ICF for iron twice <strong>ionized</strong> has been taken from Rodríguez and Rub<strong>in</strong> (2004):<br />

ICF (F e 2+ ) =<br />

( O<br />

+ ) 0.09<br />

·<br />

[1<br />

O 2+ + O2+ ]<br />

O +

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!