A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...
A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...
A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.3. Results 119<br />
Knot A B C D<br />
EW(Hα) (Å) 270±30 130±10 40±2 140±5<br />
f c 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00<br />
EW(Hα) c (Å) 270±30 130±10 42±2 140±5<br />
EW(Hβ) (Å) 34.9±4.5 30.0±1.7 10.7±1.1 32.2±4.7<br />
f c 1.01 1.03 1.13 1.00<br />
EW(Hβ) c (Å) 35.2±4.7 30.9±1.8 12.1±1.3 32.2±4.9<br />
EW(Hγ) (Å) 17.2±1.7 12.8±0.9 5.0±0.9 10.8±1.7<br />
f c 1.03 1.03 1.19 1.00<br />
EW(Hγ) c (Å) 17.7±1.3 13.2±1.0 6.0±1.0 10.8±0.9<br />
EW(Hδ) (Å) 8.1±0.6 6.2±0.7 1.8±1.0 8.0±0.8<br />
f c 1.09 1.13 1.24 1.03<br />
EW(Hδ) c (Å) 8.8±0.6 7.0±1.0 2.3±1.0 8.2±1.0<br />
Table 4.2: Equivalent widths <strong>of</strong> the hydrogen recomb<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>ion l<strong>in</strong>es Hβ, Hγ and Hδ as measured<br />
directly <strong>in</strong> the spectra <strong>of</strong> the observed knots <strong>of</strong> IIZw71 once the underly<strong>in</strong>g stellar popul<strong>at</strong>ions have<br />
been removed, with the correspond<strong>in</strong>g correction factors.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> J1657, the effect <strong>of</strong> the underly<strong>in</strong>g popul<strong>at</strong>ion is not so strong. Follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the procedures by Hägele et al. (2008), a pseudo-cont<strong>in</strong>uum has been def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> the base<br />
<strong>of</strong> the hydrogen emission l<strong>in</strong>es to measure the l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>tensities and m<strong>in</strong>imize the errors <strong>in</strong>troduced<br />
by the underly<strong>in</strong>g popul<strong>at</strong>ion. Hägele et al. (2008) compared the results obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
from this method with a multi-Gaussian fit to the absorption and emission components <strong>of</strong><br />
the galaxy, f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>at</strong> the difference between both methods for all Balmer l<strong>in</strong>es is, with<strong>in</strong><br />
the observ<strong>at</strong>ional errors, almost <strong>in</strong>appreciable for the stronger l<strong>in</strong>es. Nevertheless, for this<br />
galaxy, the absorption w<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the Balmer l<strong>in</strong>es were not prom<strong>in</strong>ent enough as to provide<br />
sensible results by the l<strong>at</strong>er method. Therefore, we have doubled the error derived us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the expression for the st<strong>at</strong>istical errors associ<strong>at</strong>ed with the observed emission fluxes, (σ l ),<br />
as a conserv<strong>at</strong>ive approach to <strong>in</strong>clude the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong>troduced by the presence <strong>of</strong> the<br />
underly<strong>in</strong>g stellar popul<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />
We also applied STARLIGHT code <strong>in</strong> J1657 to separ<strong>at</strong>e the emission spectra from the<br />
underly<strong>in</strong>g stellar absorptions, but for the strongest emission l<strong>in</strong>es the differences between<br />
the measurements made after the subtraction <strong>of</strong> the STARLIGHT fit and the the ones made<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the pseudo-cont<strong>in</strong>uum are well below the observ<strong>at</strong>ional errors.<br />
The absorption fe<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> the underly<strong>in</strong>g stellar popul<strong>at</strong>ion may also affect the helium<br />
emission l<strong>in</strong>es to some extent. However, these absorption l<strong>in</strong>es are narrower than those <strong>of</strong><br />
hydrogen (González Delgado et al., 2005). Therefore it is difficult to set adequ<strong>at</strong>e pseudocont<strong>in</strong>ua<br />
<strong>at</strong> both sides <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>es to measure their fluxes.<br />
The redden<strong>in</strong>g coefficients c(Hβ) were calcul<strong>at</strong>ed from the measured Balmer decrements,<br />
F (λ)/F (Hβ). For consistency with the work by Hägele et al. (2008), we adopted the galactic