02.01.2015 Views

A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...

A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...

A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

96 3 • IFS <strong>of</strong> a GEHR <strong>in</strong> NGC 6946<br />

Object ID N(WR) WR/O<br />

Knot A 125 ± 10 0.047 ± 0.008<br />

Knot B 5 ± 2 0.002 ± 0.001<br />

Knot C 22 ± 3 0.008 ± 0.001<br />

Table 3.11: Derived number <strong>of</strong> WR stars and r<strong>at</strong>ios between WR and O stars.<br />

<strong>of</strong> star form<strong>at</strong>ion. The only exception is knot B, where the equivalent width is slightly higher<br />

than predicted by the models. However, the observed rel<strong>at</strong>ive <strong>in</strong>tensities are <strong>in</strong>side <strong>in</strong> the<br />

expected range <strong>of</strong> theoretical values. From both quantities, an age around 4 Myr fits well for<br />

the three knots, <strong>in</strong>dic<strong>at</strong><strong>in</strong>g th<strong>at</strong> these bursts are very young.<br />

As already told <strong>in</strong> section 3.4.7, a red bump has been marg<strong>in</strong>ally detected <strong>in</strong> knot A,<br />

<strong>in</strong>dic<strong>at</strong><strong>in</strong>g the existence <strong>of</strong> WC stars, but no accur<strong>at</strong>e measurements were made due the low<br />

signal-to-noise, so only the total number <strong>of</strong> WR (WN+WC) can be estim<strong>at</strong>ed.<br />

Table 3.11 shows the number <strong>of</strong> O and WR stars. We have derived these numbers by<br />

compar<strong>in</strong>g the dereddened lum<strong>in</strong>osities <strong>of</strong> Hα and <strong>of</strong> the WR blue bump with the predictions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stantaneous model <strong>of</strong> Starburst 99. As it can be seen, knot A conta<strong>in</strong>s more than<br />

one hundred WR stars, as expected from the strong blue bump fe<strong>at</strong>ure from its <strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

spectra. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, Knot B has a few WR stars, despite its weak contribution <strong>in</strong> the<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uum map <strong>of</strong> Figure 3.15.<br />

Other way to estim<strong>at</strong>e the number <strong>of</strong> WR stars is by means <strong>of</strong> calibr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> WR stars.<br />

Smith (1991) estim<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle WN7 star emits 3.2 × 10 36 ergs s −1 <strong>at</strong> 4650Å, which<br />

yields a total number <strong>of</strong> 120 ± 10 WR stars, very close to the value derived from the Starburst<br />

99 model. On the other hand, Vacca and Conti (1992) estim<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> one WN7 star emits 1.7<br />

× 10 36 ergs s −1 , ris<strong>in</strong>g the number <strong>of</strong> WR stars almost by a factor <strong>of</strong> 2.<br />

3.5.3 Metal content<br />

We derived oxygen, sulphur, nitrogen, neon, argon and iron chemical abundances <strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>at</strong>ed spectrum <strong>of</strong> the PPak-field and <strong>in</strong> three <strong>of</strong> the four knots, where auroral l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong><br />

[Oiii], [Oii] and [Siii] have been measured and thus their respective electron temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

derived. Due to the quality <strong>of</strong> the d<strong>at</strong>a, the electron temper<strong>at</strong>ures derived and thus, the<br />

metallicities, have associ<strong>at</strong>ed errors comparable to the dispersion found <strong>in</strong> empirical calibr<strong>at</strong>ions.<br />

The derived temper<strong>at</strong>ures (see Table 3.7) for the three knots and the <strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>at</strong>ed spectrum<br />

<strong>of</strong> the PPak-field show values very similar for all <strong>of</strong> them, centered <strong>in</strong> 8000K for t([Oiii]).<br />

Knot A shows a higher temper<strong>at</strong>ure, as expected from its Hα lum<strong>in</strong>osity, but similar to the<br />

other measurements with<strong>in</strong> the errors. Similarly, all the values for t([Oii]) are very close.<br />

The only exception is the one estim<strong>at</strong>ed for knot B from a rel<strong>at</strong>ion with t([Oiii]) based on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!