02.01.2015 Views

A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...

A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...

A spatially resolved study of ionized regions in galaxies at different ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.5. Discussion 95<br />

20<br />

15<br />

EW(WR)(◦A)<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

100<br />

100 F(WR)/F(Hβ)<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

Age (Myr)<br />

Figure 3.26: Rel<strong>at</strong>ion between <strong>in</strong>tensities and equivalent widths <strong>of</strong> the Wolf-Rayet blue bump as a<br />

function <strong>of</strong> the age <strong>of</strong> the cluster for a Z = 0.02 metallicity, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Starburst 99 predictions.<br />

In both panels, (blue) solid l<strong>in</strong>es represent <strong>in</strong>stantaneous star form<strong>at</strong>ion and (green) dashed l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous star form<strong>at</strong>ion. The (light blue) horizontal band represents the error <strong>in</strong> the measurement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the appropri<strong>at</strong>e quantity for knot A.<br />

the blue bump as a function <strong>of</strong> the cluster age for a metallicity Z = 0.02 (Z ⊙ ), the closest<br />

value accord<strong>in</strong>g with the total oxygen abundances derived. The (blue) solid l<strong>in</strong>es represent<br />

<strong>in</strong> both plots the evolution <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>stantaneous burst, while the (green) dashed l<strong>in</strong>es do for<br />

a cont<strong>in</strong>uous star form<strong>at</strong>ion history with a constant star form<strong>at</strong>ion r<strong>at</strong>e. The (light blue)<br />

horizontal bands <strong>in</strong> both panels represents the error <strong>in</strong> the measurement <strong>of</strong> the appropri<strong>at</strong>e<br />

quantity for knot A. As noted <strong>in</strong> section 3.4.7, the quantities plotted depend strongly on<br />

metallicity. The models predict brightest and most prom<strong>in</strong>ent fe<strong>at</strong>ures for higher metallicity,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g with the stellar model <strong>at</strong>mospheres for WR stars (Crowther, 2007). At the same<br />

time, we notice th<strong>at</strong> <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stantaneous star form<strong>at</strong>ion the WR fe<strong>at</strong>ures appear dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

<strong>in</strong>terval between 2 and 5 Myr and they reach higher <strong>in</strong>tensities. On the other hand, for a<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous star form<strong>at</strong>ion history, the WR fe<strong>at</strong>ures appear <strong>at</strong> the same age and, despite <strong>of</strong><br />

reach<strong>in</strong>g lower <strong>in</strong>tensities, they converge to a non-zero value <strong>at</strong> older ages.<br />

By compar<strong>in</strong>g the rel<strong>at</strong>ive <strong>in</strong>tensities and equivalent widths <strong>of</strong> the three knots, shown <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 3.3, we see th<strong>at</strong> all <strong>of</strong> them are larger than the model-predicted values for a constant<br />

star form<strong>at</strong>ion law, but m<strong>at</strong>ch fairly well with the values predicted for an <strong>in</strong>stantaneous burst

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!