here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo
here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo
here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
At the first-instance trial, at the Military Court in Nis, Danilo Tešić and Mišel Seregi admitted<br />
having committed the offences they were charged with. The trial resulted in their conviction on<br />
11 October 2002. The defendants were sentenced to imprisonment as follows: Zlatan Mančić to<br />
seven years, Rade Radojević to five years, Danilo Tešić to four years and Mišel Seregi to three<br />
years.<br />
Upon hearing the appeals lodged by both parties, the Supreme Military Court in Belgrade, on 22<br />
May 2003 handed down a ruling modifying the trial court judgment by increasing the prison<br />
terms for the accused. 160<br />
However, the VSS reversed this final judgment and remanded the case for a new trial 161 .<br />
The retrial opened on 6 June 2007 at the District Court in Niš. Following the replacement of the<br />
judges in the trial chamber including the presiding judge, the retrial began anew in 2010.<br />
During six days of hearings held in 2012 the court heard seven witnesses. At the main hearing,<br />
held on 3 February 2012, seven witnesses, 162 who at the relevant time were members of the VJ,<br />
holding different ranks in the military hierarchy, gave their statements. None of them<br />
corroborated the allegations set forth in the indictment. The subsequent hearings were either<br />
postponed or dedicated to procedural issues, irrelevant for deciding on the merits of the case.<br />
Some of the defense lawyers stood out for their misbehaviour, something which was not<br />
adequately corrected by the presiding judge. On 3 August 2012, the court pronounced its<br />
judgment, convicting Zlatan Mančić, Rade Radojević, Danilo Tešić and Mišel Seregi. The<br />
presiding judge failed to provide a summary of the reasons for the court’s decision, saying, “it is<br />
unnecessary because the accused are not present, so t<strong>here</strong> is no need to bore the audience with it”.<br />
Analysis of proceedings<br />
Proceedings in this case took more than 10 years to complete, even though the indictees admitted<br />
having committed the crime. All participants in this trial are to blame for such excessively long<br />
proceedings: the court itself, in the first place, for showing no interest in speeding up the<br />
proceedings; defense lawyers, who, with their conduct and the evidence they put forward helped<br />
significantly to delay the proceedings; and the Deputy Senior Public Prosecutor of Niš, whose<br />
duty was to draw attention to the undue delay in the proceedings, but who was extremely passive<br />
in this matter, in addition to being late in amending the indictment.<br />
Excessively lengthy proceedings in cases that involve the gravest breaches of international<br />
humanitarian law, undermine both the victim’s and public’s confidence in the judiciary. Also,<br />
160 Mančić was sentenced to 14 years and Radojević to nine years imprisonment.<br />
161 As the HLC does not have the VSS’s ruling on reversal, it does not know the reasons behind it.<br />
162 Witnesses Ivan Midović, Branislav Kovačevič, Dražen Dobrić, Pavle Rudić, Božidar Delić, Janko Grandić and<br />
Vlatko Vuković.<br />
71