02.01.2015 Views

here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo

here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo

here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

elements of this criminal act and the fact that the armed conflict ceased to exist as of 20 June<br />

1999.<br />

As for the assessment of the testimony of cooperating witness ‘Božur 50’ and the objection by<br />

the Court of Appeal that the original trial court had applied double standards in assessing his<br />

testimony, the re-trial clearly removed this irregularity. The testimony of cooperating witness<br />

‘Božur 50’ was rejected in its entirety. This was the only possible decision, given the evidence<br />

presented and how flawed this witness’s testimony was. The court also properly noted that the<br />

indictment by the TRZ was entirely based on the testimony of this witness, failing to offer any<br />

other evidence to substantiate the charges.<br />

When analyzing the court’s assessment of the above witness’s statements, one fact deserves<br />

special attention: the same chamber, presided over by the same judge, in the initial trial gave a<br />

different assessment of this witness’s credibility.<br />

Despite the existence of ample evidence contrary to the factual allegations in the indictment, the<br />

TRZ did not substantially change the indictment before the end of proceedings. Instead, the TRZ<br />

ignored the fact that after 20 June 1990 t<strong>here</strong> was no armed conflict in Kosovo and that the<br />

evidence given by the chief witness of the prosecution, ‘Božur 50’, contradicted the description<br />

of events set forth in the indictment.<br />

2.7.Beli Manastir 148<br />

On 19 June 2012, the Higher Court in Belgrade 149 delivered a judgment convicting Zoran Vukšić,<br />

Slobodan Strigić, Branko Hrnjak and Velimir Bertić of a war crime against the civilian<br />

population. 150 Zoran Vukšić received the maximum prison sentence of 20 years, Slobodan Strigić<br />

was sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment, Branko Hrnjak to 5 years’ imprisonment and Velimir<br />

Bertić to 18 months’ imprisonment.<br />

Course of proceedings<br />

On 23 June 2010 the TRZ 151 filed an indictment 152 against Zoran Vukšić, Slobodan Strigić,<br />

Branko Hrnjak and Velimir Bertić for a war crime against the civilian population. According to<br />

148 The Higher Court in Belgrade - War Crimes Department -K-Po2 45/2010.<br />

149 Members of the trial chamber: judge Dragan Mirković (presiding), judge Tatjana Vuković and judge Olivera<br />

Anđelković.<br />

150 Article 142 of the CC of the FRY, as co-perpetrators, within the meaning of Article 22 of the CC of the FRY.<br />

151 Deputy War Crimes Prosecutor, Nebojša Marković.<br />

152 This case was transferred by the Office of the Attorney General of the Republic of Croatia in 2008, in keeping<br />

with the Agreement on Mutual Cooperation in the Prosecution of Perpetrators of War Crimes, Crimes against<br />

Humanity and Genocide (2006).<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!