here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo

here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo

02.01.2015 Views

that the activities that the KLA took were the activities they were habitually taking in other locations in Kosovo”. It is debatable whether the chamber should have agreed to admit Petrović’s identification of Kashnjeti at the main hearing into evidence. During Petrović’s testimony, the chamber showed him a photograph which, according to the TRZ, showed Mark Kashnjeti. Petrović recognized Kashnjeti in the photograph. This identification of the accused by witness Petrović cannot have any probative value because the picture in question had appeared in almost all the media long before Petrović’s testimony, with clear captions indicating that the person in the photograph was the person claimed by the TRZ to be Kashnjeti. 2.4. Bytyqi 113 On 9 May 2012, the Higher Court in Belgrade 114 delivered a judgment in the Bytyqi case retrial, acquitting Sreten Popović and Miloš Stojanović of charges of committing a war crime against prisoners of war. 115 Course of proceedings On 23 August 2006, the TRZ indicted Sreten Popović and Miloš Stojanović 116 for a war crime against prisoners of war. According to the indictment, Sreten Popović, who at the time was platoon commander of the Operational Pursuit Group (OPG), part of the 124th intervention brigade of the Serbian MUP’s PJP, and Miloš Stojanović, commander of a squad in the same platoon, deprived the injured parties - brothers Agron, Ylli and Mehmet Bytyqi, members of the ‘Atlantic Brigade’ volunteer group, part of the KLA – of their right to a fair trial and subjected them to inhuman treatment and mental torture. Specifically, Sreten Popović, acting on orders received from his superior officer, Vlastimir Đorđević, a General in the Serbian MUP, ordered Miloš Stojanović to detain the victims on their release from the District Jail in Prokuplje, where they had served their prison term for a misdemeanour and transport them to the PJP training grounds in Petrovo Selo near Kladovo (eastern Serbia). Miloš Stojanović did so on 8 July 1999 and drove the victims to the training centre in Petrovo Selo, where he handed them over to Sreten Popović. Stojanović and Popović locked the brothers up in a warehouse facility within the centre, lacking basic sanitation, and without informing them of the reasons for confinement, because of which the victims felt unbearable fear for their lives and bodily integrity. Popović then handed the injured parties over 113 K-Po2 51/2010. 114 Members of the trial chamber: judge Rastko Popović (presiding), judge Vinka Beraha Nikićević and judge Snežana Nikolić Garotić. 115 Aiding and abetting in the commission of a war crime against prisoners of war under Article 144 of the CC of FRY in conjunction with Article 24 of the CC of the FRY. 116 Deputy War Crimes Prosecutor Dragoljub Stanković. 50

to unidentified members of the MUP and Special Anti-Terrorist Units (SAJ), although he could have known that they would kill the injured parties summarily, without trial. The members of the MUP and SAJ tied up the victims with wire, took them to a waste pit some 500 meters away from the centre and killed them by shooting them in the back of the head. On 22 September 2009, the District Court in Belgrade 117 delivered a judgment acquitting the accused because it had not been proven that they had committed the offence for which they were indicted. Having considered the appeal lodged by the TRZ, the Court of Appeal in Belgrade handed down a ruling accepting the appeal, reversing the trial court judgment and remitting the case to the trial court for a new trial. Giving its reasons for its decision, the Court of Appeal stated that the trial court substantially violated the provisions of the criminal procedure in several respects: the disposition of the judgment was contradictory to the reasoning, the judgment failed to state the reasons regarding the decisive facts, and the reasons that were provided were unclear. At a new trial, which began on 23 September 2011, the accused were heard again and 10 witnesses were questioned. The TRZ further amended the indictment on 5 April 2012, redefining the acts of the accused as acts violating the norms of international law regarding the treatment of prisoners of war and intentional aiding and abetting of unidentified members of the police to deprive the victims of life thereby depriving them of the right to have a proper and unbiased trial. On 9 May 2012, judge Rastko Popović, who presided over the trial chamber, read out a judgment acquitting the defendants in the Bytyqi case retrial. In his oral statement of the reasons behind the judgment, judge Popović said that the TRZ had failed to prove that the accused had committed the crime for which they were indicted or that the murder of the brothers Bytyqi had been committed in connection with the armed conflict, since the armed conflict ended on 20 June 1999 with the withdrawal of VJ and Serb police forces from Kosovo, and the brothers Bytyqi had been arrested on 26 June 1999. The chamber found that the accused were not aware that the injured parties were prisoners of war. “Owing to contradictions and incoherence in the indictment, it was not possible to ascertain when and where the victims were murdered, nor who murdered them; the only thing that was established is that their mortal remains were found in 2001 in a mass grave located in Petrovo Selo”. The presiding judge emphasized that the Bytyqi brothers were arrested while performing a humane act – helping two Roma families get from Kosovo to Serbia, where they wanted to seek refuge. The presiding judge emphasized that it was up to the TRZ to find out who killed the Bytyqi brothers and on whose orders. 117 Members of the trial chamber: judge Vesko Krstajić (presiding), judge Vinka Beraha Nikićević and judge Snežana Nikolić Garotić. 51

to unidentified members of the MUP and Special Anti-Terrorist Units (SAJ), although he could<br />

have known that they would kill the injured parties summarily, without trial. The members of the<br />

MUP and SAJ tied up the victims with wire, took them to a waste pit some 500 meters away from<br />

the centre and killed them by shooting them in the back of the head.<br />

On 22 September 2009, the District Court in Belgrade 117 delivered a judgment acquitting the<br />

accused because it had not been proven that they had committed the offence for which they were<br />

indicted.<br />

Having considered the appeal lodged by the TRZ, the Court of Appeal in Belgrade handed down<br />

a ruling accepting the appeal, reversing the trial court judgment and remitting the case to the trial<br />

court for a new trial.<br />

Giving its reasons for its decision, the Court of Appeal stated that the trial court substantially<br />

violated the provisions of the criminal procedure in several respects: the disposition of the<br />

judgment was contradictory to the reasoning, the judgment failed to state the reasons regarding<br />

the decisive facts, and the reasons that were provided were unclear.<br />

At a new trial, which began on 23 September 2011, the accused were heard again and 10<br />

witnesses were questioned.<br />

The TRZ further amended the indictment on 5 April 2012, redefining the acts of the accused as<br />

acts violating the norms of international law regarding the treatment of prisoners of war and<br />

intentional aiding and abetting of unidentified members of the police to deprive the victims of life<br />

t<strong>here</strong>by depriving them of the right to have a proper and unbiased trial.<br />

On 9 May 2012, judge Rastko Popović, who presided over the trial chamber, read out a judgment<br />

acquitting the defendants in the Bytyqi case retrial. In his oral statement of the reasons behind the<br />

judgment, judge Popović said that the TRZ had failed to prove that the accused had committed<br />

the crime for which they were indicted or that the murder of the brothers Bytyqi had been<br />

committed in connection with the armed conflict, since the armed conflict ended on 20 June<br />

1999 with the withdrawal of VJ and Serb police forces from Kosovo, and the brothers Bytyqi<br />

had been arrested on 26 June 1999. The chamber found that the accused were not aware that the<br />

injured parties were prisoners of war. “Owing to contradictions and inco<strong>here</strong>nce in the<br />

indictment, it was not possible to ascertain when and w<strong>here</strong> the victims were murdered, nor who<br />

murdered them; the only thing that was established is that their mortal remains were found in<br />

2001 in a mass grave located in Petrovo Selo”. The presiding judge emphasized that the Bytyqi<br />

brothers were arrested while performing a humane act – helping two Roma families get from<br />

Kosovo to Serbia, w<strong>here</strong> they wanted to seek refuge. The presiding judge emphasized that it was<br />

up to the TRZ to find out who killed the Bytyqi brothers and on whose orders.<br />

117 Members of the trial chamber: judge Vesko Krstajić (presiding), judge Vinka Beraha Nikićević and judge<br />

Snežana Nikolić Garotić.<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!