02.01.2015 Views

here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo

here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo

here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

attempted to rape one of the victims but failed as he was drunk. Alen Ristić denied involvement<br />

in the rape, shifting blame to Đurđević and Jović.<br />

During the presentation of evidence, the court heard the injured parties, namely Kurem Avdić,<br />

son of the late Ramo, Fata Avdić, Ramo’s wife and Ni<strong>za</strong>ma Franc (née Avdić). They described<br />

very precisely what had happened to them, specifying the time of the crimes and the manner in<br />

which they were committed, as well as perpetrators. One of the injured parties, Hajreta Avdić,<br />

because of the trauma she endured (she had given birth to a baby only a couple of days before the<br />

incident) declined to take the stand before the Higher Court in Belgrade. Instead, she was<br />

interviewed by the presiding (lady) judge in the premises of the Serbian Embassy in Vienna,<br />

w<strong>here</strong> she currently lives. Also questioned were witnesses Dušan Spasojević, a police inspector,<br />

and Milorad Lovre, a crime scene technician, both working at the Bijeljina SUP at the time.<br />

Immediately after the injured parties reported the crime, the two men performed an investigation<br />

of the scene of Ramo Avdić’s murder, and obtained medical documentation for the injured parties<br />

Ni<strong>za</strong>ma and Hajreta. Also, a medical examination of Ramo, Ni<strong>za</strong>ma and Hajreta Avdić was<br />

performed to determine the injuries inflicted on them.<br />

Having convicted the defendants, judge Vinka Beraha Nikićević, who presided over the chamber,<br />

outlined the reasons behind the judgment. She said that in the course of evidence presentation it<br />

had been proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had committed the crimes they were<br />

charged with. On the basis of their own testimonies, and the testimonies of witnesses, Dušan<br />

Spasojević and Ramo Fejzić, the court established that the injured parties were civilians and that<br />

victim Ramo Avdić was no Muslim extremist, but a reservist of the Bijeljina SUP, a wealthy and<br />

respected man, “actively involved in efforts towards a peaceful settlement of conflicts between<br />

Serbs and Muslims in Bijeljina”. The court also determined that the accused, together with<br />

Milorad Živković (being tried separately), on 14 June 1992 in the ‘Tref’ café in Bijeljina, after<br />

being told by Danilo Spasojević, a local resident, that Ramo Avdić was a Muslim extremist who<br />

supplied weapons to the Muslims and stored weapons in his home, decided to go to Avdić’s<br />

house. They came to Ramo Avdić’s house, searched it and took away the weapons, for which he<br />

possessed all the required permits, as well as gold jewelry and money they found in the house.<br />

The court found that Dragan Jović killed Ramo Avdić by shooting him in the mouth. At the same<br />

time, the accused gang raped and sexually abused Avdić’s daughter-in-law Hajreta, who had<br />

given birth just a couple of days earlier, and his daughter Ni<strong>za</strong>ma. After that, the court<br />

established that they had taken the women from the house and put them in a car they had stolen<br />

from the injured party Dosa Todorović, and drove them toward Brčko. They stopped the car in<br />

Ljeljenča and raped and sexually abused Ni<strong>za</strong>ma and Hajreta again, after which the accused left<br />

the scene leaving the victims without clothes or shoes by the side of the road.<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!