02.01.2015 Views

here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo

here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo

here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

suspension were not met, a view held by the VSS, given its decision of 23 March 2000 to reverse<br />

the judgment.<br />

After the VSS reversed the first-instance judgment and ordered retrial, all that the District<br />

Prosecutor’s Office in Prokuplje did was to change some factual allegations in the charges on 10<br />

August 2000. Following the retrial at the District Court in Prokuplje, 92 Miloš Lukić was<br />

convicted on 7 July 2001 and sentenced to a prison term below the statutory minimum (18<br />

months). This decision, in terms of the factual background established and its ambiguity and<br />

inconsistency, is in essence identical to the initial first-instance decision. In deciding upon<br />

appeals lodged both by the parties and ex officio, the VSS made the only right decision that could<br />

have been made, and ruled on 2 April 2002 to set aside this judgment. The documentation<br />

currently available to the HLC does not allow for any further analysis of proceedings.<br />

It is not known whether the TRZ ever expressed interest in taking over the criminal prosecution<br />

in this case. It has become clear that the acts of the accused contain all the elements of the<br />

criminal offence defined as a war crime against the civilian population, the processing of which<br />

falls within the responsibility of the TRZ. 93 Regardless of the view of the TRZ, this situation<br />

could be changed if the Prosecutor’s Office prosecuting this case, changes the legal qualification<br />

of the offence and if the courts hearing this case declare themselves as not having jurisdiction to<br />

adjudicate in this matter, something which could be done before the end of the proceedings.<br />

2. Cases that resulted in first-instance judgments during 2012<br />

2.1. Bijeljina 94<br />

On 4 June 2012, the Higher Court in Belgrade delivered a judgment convicting the accused -<br />

Dragan Jović, Zoran Đurđević and Alen Ristić - of a war crime against civilians 95 and sentencing<br />

Dragan Jović to 15 years, Zoran Đurđević to 13 years and Alen Ristić to 12 years in prison. 96<br />

92 Chamber presided over by judge Aleksandar Stojanović.<br />

93 Articles 2 and 4 of the <strong>Law</strong> on Organisation and Jurisdiction of Government Bodies in the Proceedings against<br />

War Crime Perpetrators (Official Gazette of the RS No.s. 67/2003, 135/2004, 61/2005, 101/2007 and 104/2009).<br />

94 K.Po2 7/2011.<br />

95 Article 142 (1) of the CC of the FRY, in conjunction with Article 22 of the CC of the FRY.<br />

96 This case was transferred to Serbia from the judiciary of BiH.<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!