02.01.2015 Views

here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo

here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo

here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Selimović, who were also on the route of the JNA convoy, after which a massive small arms<br />

barrage broke out, followed by the order to return fire.<br />

Witness Budimir Nikolić, who, at the time of the event, was in an office with Jurišić, stated that<br />

he, Ilija Jurišić and Meša Bajrić were watching the convoy leaving Tuzla on TV when he heard<br />

the first call by Ivica Divković over the radio, reporting that they were being shot at, and then<br />

repeating it twice more. After the third call Meša Bajrić told Ilija Jurišić to pass on his order to<br />

return fire. The first and the last calls for help were not more than five minutes apart.<br />

Witness Jasmin Imamović was, at the time of incident, in a car in the JNA convoy, together with<br />

Blagoje Stankić and Benjamin Fišeković. He heard calls for help over the radio and the phrase<br />

“Respond to fire with fire” when gunfire was already underway.<br />

Witness Nikola Slavuljica stated that, immediately before and during the event in question, he<br />

was at the premises of the Tuzla SJB and heard calls from reserve police stations over the radio –<br />

that soldiers were shooting at the police, buildings and civilians. He said that, to the best of his<br />

memory, 20 minutes passed between the first and the last call. He did not hear the phrase<br />

“Respond to fire with fire”.<br />

Witnesses Refik Plavšić, Hamdija Jahić and Mirzet Toromanović were direct participants in the<br />

events at Brčanska malta on 15 May 1992. According to their testimonies, the army convoy<br />

leaving the barracks was the first to open fire. They had no knowledge of other decisive facts<br />

crucial to these criminal proceedings.<br />

Military expert, Professor Mile Stojković gave an interesting testimony regarding the existence of<br />

an “insidious” plan to attack the convoy, at the main hearing, held on 27 September 2012. This<br />

witness testified in line with his findings and opinions given earlier, at the first trial. He stated<br />

that the attack was planned beforehand by one or more persons who had received excellent<br />

military training. In such attacks, said the witness, plans usually include cutting off parts of the<br />

convoy and the use of snipers. Preparations for such an attack usually take three to four hours.<br />

The forces that attacked the convoy might have done so just to clearly demonstrate their military<br />

superiority, in order to deter the JNA forces from engaging with them. Yet, after being asked a<br />

number of questions, he added that he could not rule out the possibility that it had all happened<br />

because the things had got out of control. In his opinion, “it made no sense to sacrifice such<br />

high-ranking officials such as those from the Tuzla Town Hall who were in the convoy in order<br />

to ensure the safe retreat of the army, unless it was the case that some informal group had<br />

launched the attack on its own.”<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!