02.01.2015 Views

here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo

here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo

here - Humanitarian Law Center/Fond za humanitarno pravo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

who were both underage at the time; I was raped by five people every single day and ‘Trcko’ 48<br />

was pimping me out to other men in exchange for a pack of cigarettes, letting them abuse me<br />

freely.” The injured parties confirmed the allegations in the indictment about the destruction of<br />

the mosque in Skočić, the murder of Arif Nuhanović, the physical torture and rape of captives as<br />

well as the taking of all the ethnic Roma to the village of Malešić, w<strong>here</strong> the three women were<br />

separated from the rest of the group who were taken to an unknown place. They also confirmed<br />

the allegations in the indictment of repeated rape, physical abuse and being forced to do the<br />

laundry, cook and undertake housework at the places w<strong>here</strong> they were held. Giving her testimony<br />

on the ethnic Roma who were taken by the defendants from Skočić and subsequently shot dead,<br />

protected witness ‘Alfa’ stated that a brother and sister of the injured party Zija Ribić were<br />

among them, thus contributing to determining the identity of all the victims.<br />

Injured party ‘Alfa’ recognized Đorđe Šević, Dragana Đekić, Zoran Stojanović, Zoran Alić and<br />

Simo Bogdanović in the courtroom. During her testimony, injured party ‘Beta’ asked to be shown<br />

into the courtroom and confronted with the indictees, so that she could “look them in the eye”;<br />

she recognized Simo Bogdanović, Zoran Alić and Zoran Stojanović. She became so distressed<br />

during this ‘confrontation’ that she had to leave the courtroom.<br />

The testimonies of the protected witnesses were marked by inappropriate conduct of the<br />

indictees, who used vulgar language and asked questions which were aimed at showing disdain<br />

and causing additional trauma to the victims. The presiding judge warned them he would not<br />

tolerate such behavior.<br />

Expert witness Dr Miodrag Blagojević, who conducted a psychiatric examination of Zoran Alić,<br />

was questioned during the main hearing. He stated that, at the time of the crime, the indictee was<br />

able to understand its meaning and consequences.<br />

Another expert witness, Dr Đorđe Alempijević, was also questioned. On the basis of medical<br />

documentation – the record of the exhumation, autopsy and examination of the exhumed remains,<br />

compiled by expert witnesses from BiH – he conducted a forensic examination of the mortal<br />

remains of the injured parties exhumed from a mass grave at the ‘Crni vrh’ (the Black Peak), near<br />

Zvornik, between 28 July and 3 October 2003. He confirmed that the mass grave at ‘Crni vrh’<br />

was a primary mass grave, but did not exclude the possibility that the injured parties might have<br />

been killed in other location and subsequently buried in the primary mass grave. The fact that<br />

only remains of skeletons were found, made him conclude that a long period of time was likely to<br />

have passed since the moment of death of injured parties, which could possibly have occurred<br />

July 1992. For the majority of injured parties, it could be safely said that their deaths were violent<br />

as evidenced by injuries found on the skeletal remains, and which were possibly inflicted by a<br />

firearm or fragments from an explosive device. In relation to the injured parties on whose skeletal<br />

remains no injuries were found, and for whom t<strong>here</strong>fore the cause of death could not be<br />

48 ‘Trcko’ is the nickname of indictee Zoran Stojanović.<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!