02.01.2015 Views

RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

covariance analysis and to establish the energy requirement for N 2 fixation, and that the crop should be<br />

studied as a community of plants. Subba Rao said that in general, leaf area need not be considered for<br />

acetylene reduction assay.<br />

Relationship between soil temperature and nitrogenase activity is important, but this may not determine the<br />

time of inoculation. The possibility of 33° C as optimum for N 2 fixation, may be indirect because the same<br />

temperature is also optimum for leaf expansion. It was suggested these factors should be studied further. It was<br />

also clarified that nitrogenase activity is maximum around flowering, and is likely to be affected by drought at<br />

this stage.<br />

Quantification of nitrogen fixed by bacteria was discussed. Under field conditions, it could be 10 kg ha -1 N,<br />

but some pot-culture studies using 15 N have indicated that 17% of total plant N at low N levels is derived from<br />

the atmosphere by nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Subba Rao said that besides fixing nitrogen, these bacteria could<br />

have other positive effects on plant growth.<br />

Bagyaraj stressed the importance of mycorrhyza in agriculture. He said it is very important to develop<br />

methods of culturing mycorrhiza in the laboratory, and until such time, mycorrhiza research may be only of<br />

academic interest. Two areas that are not well understood are whether mycorrhiza needs recurring applications,<br />

and the residual effects of inoculation. Bagyaraj said that mycorrhiza-infected plants are resistant to<br />

parasitic fungi such as Sclerotium, possibly because mycorrhiza produce certain orthodihydroxy phenolic<br />

compounds.<br />

Krishna presented the mycorrhiza work in progress at ICRIS A T . During the discussions, it was pointed out<br />

that currently in Africa, acid treatment of rock phosphate is being tried, and it was suggested that the<br />

economics of acid treatment of rock phosphate, and the alternate method of rock phosphate and mycorrhizal<br />

fungi need to be established. To a question on the mode of action of mycorrhiza, Krishna said that mycorrhiza<br />

do not solubilize rock phosphate, but these fungi exploit more of the available P.<br />

Questions were raised on the interaction of mycorrhiza and other plant pathogenic fungi. Krishna clarified<br />

that mycorrhiza colonization offers resistance only to root pathogens. He also defined susceptibility, which<br />

indicates infection by mycorrhiza, and responsiveness, which indicates plant response.<br />

Doubts were raised about whether mycorrhiza produce phytoalexins, and thereby protect roots from root<br />

diseases. Subba Rao wondered if there is a genotype x strain interaction, but Krishna said that he is looking for<br />

horizontal susceptibility, as in the case of endemic diseases. He also explained that infected roots show greater<br />

affinity for P, and mycorrhiza increase the root surface area. Wani said that since one hybrid without<br />

mycorrhiza performed well, why not select such lines Krishna clarified that the plant is required to produce<br />

less energy per unit surface area explored when inoculated with mycorrhiza, compared to the energy required<br />

for root production and nutrient exploration.<br />

Tilak summarized the interaction of mycorrhiza and Azospirillum, and said that while inoculation with a<br />

mixture is advantageous, mycorrhizal inoculum production is a major constraint. The culture filtrate of<br />

Azospirillum enhances the spore germination of mycorrhiza, and it was suggested that this information may<br />

help to culture the V A M in the laboratory. Tilak clarified that he used 1500 kg ha -1 inoculum, and the<br />

Azospirillum inoculation could contribute about 10 kg ha -1 N, and that the remaining 10 kg ha -1 N could be<br />

applied. At higher N levels, Azospirillium has no effect.<br />

Subba Rao summarized the session: V A M could be seen inside the root, but cannot be cultured, while in<br />

contrast, Azospirillum can be cultured, but cannot be located inside the plant cell. Both microorganisms have<br />

immense potential to increase millet production, and in both Indian and African agriculture, inoculation with<br />

these microorganisms is very important, and research in this area should be strengthened. Methods to culture<br />

mycorrhiza need to be developed immediately.<br />

304

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!